Research on the impact of rotor wear on the effectiveness of the aluminium refining process

. 2023 Oct 18 ; 13 (1) : 17758. [epub] 20231018

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid37853029

Grantová podpora
TH04010449 Technology Agency of the Czech Republic
07SVV2325 Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of Czech Republic
11/020/RGJ22/0089 Silesian University of Technology
11/020/RGJ23/0107 Silesian University of Technology
11/020/BK_22/0088 (BK-208/RM2/2022) Silesian University of Technology

Odkazy

PubMed 37853029
PubMed Central PMC10584949
DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-44562-0
PII: 10.1038/s41598-023-44562-0
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Physical modelling is successfully used to understand mechanisms involved in the aluminium refining process by injecting inert gas into the liquid metal through rotors. Two types of industrial impellers, which are extremely different in construction, were tested in the research. The aim of the research was to determine the effectiveness of their operation depending on their degree of wear. This type of research has not been tested on water models so far. During the process, the parameters were changed, such as the gas flow rate from 13 to 19 L/min, the rotor speed from 325 to 400 rpm and the height of the rotor from the bottom of the refining reactor. Tests were carried out for new and worn rotors. Oxygen removal rate curves were prepared on the basis of tests determining changes in oxygen content in the model liquid as a function of time for changing rotor speed values. It was found that the efficiency of hydrogen removal from the model liquid was higher when worn impellers were used in the model. In order to verify results of model tests, a metallographic analysis of samples obtained in industrial conditions and using the analysed process parameters was carried out.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Zhang L, Lv X, Torgeson AT, Long M. Removal of impurity elements from molten aluminum: A review. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2011;32:150–228.

Sigworth GK. A scientific basis for degassing aluminum. AFS Trans. 1987;95:73–78.

Liu Y, Zhang T, Sano M, Wang Q, Ren X, He J. Mechanical stirring for highly efficient gas injection refining. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China. 2011;21:1896–1904.

Engh TA. Principles of Metal Refining. Oxford University Press; 1992.

Schmitz Ch. Handbook of Aluminium Recycling. Vulkan-Verlag GmbH; 2006.

Johansen S, Graadahl S, Tetlie P, Rasch B, Myrbostad E. Can Rotor-Based Refining Units be Developed and Optimized Based on Water Model Experiments? In Light Metals. TMS; 1998. pp. 805–810.

Taylor MB. Molten metal fluxing/treatment: How best achieve the desired quality requirements. Aluminum. 2003;79:44–50.

Li JH, Hao QT. Develop the degassing and purification equipment of molten aluminium alloys by rotary impeller. Zhuzao/Foundry. 2007;56:731–734.

Liu Y, Sano M, Zhang T, Wang Q, He J. Intensification of bubble disintegration and dispersion by mechanical stirring in gas injection refining. ISIJ Int. 2009;49:17–23.

Yamamoto T, Suzuki A, Komarova SV, Ishiwata Y. Investigation of impeller design and flow structures in mechanical stirring of molten aluminum. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2018;261:164–172.

Tovio DO, Mugica GW, González AC, Cuyás JC. Formation and size of bubbles in degassing system of aluminum. AFS Trans. 2000;108:457–462.

Mancilla E, Cruz-Mendez W, Garduno IE, Gonzalez-Rivera C, Ramirez-Argaez MA, Ascanio G. Comparison of the hydrodynamic performance of rotor-injector devices in a water physical model of an aluminum degassing ladle. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2017;118:158–169.

Warke VS, Tryggvason G, Makhlouf MM. Mathematical modelling and computer simulation of molten metal cleansing by the rotating impeller degasser Part I. Fluid flow. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2005;168:112–118.

Abreu-López D, Amaro-Villeda A, Acosta-González FA, González-Rivera C, Ramírez-Argáez MA. Effect of the impeller design on degasification kinetics using the impeller injector technique assisted by mathematical modelling. Metals. 2017;7(132):1–14. doi: 10.3390/met7040132. DOI

Gomez ER, Zenit R, Rivera CG, Trapaga G, Ramirez-Argazez MA. Physical modelling of fluid flow in ladles of aluminium equipped with impeller and gas purging for degassing. Metall. Mater. Trans. B. 2013;44:974–983.

Yamamoto T, Kato K, Komarov SV, Ueno Y, Hayashi M. Investigation of melt stirring in aluminium melting furnace through water model. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2018;259:409–415.

Waz, E., Carre, J., Le Brun, P., Jardy, A., Xuereb, C., & Ablitzer, D. Physical modelling of the aluminium degassing process: Experimental and mathematical approaches. In Light Metals 901–907 (TMS, Warrendale, 2003).

Saternus M, Merder T. Numerical and physical modelling of aluminium refining process conducted in uro-200 reactor. Solid State Phenom. 2012;191:3–12.

Wan B, Chen W, Mao M, Fu Z, Zhu D. Numerical simulation of a stirring purifying technology for aluminum melt. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2018;251:330–342.

Camacho-Martinez JL, Ramirez-Argaez MA, Zenit-Camacho R, Juarez-Hernandez A, Barceinas-Sanchez JO, Trapaga-Martinez G. Physical modelling of an aluminium degassing operation with rotating impellers a comparative hydrodynamic analysis. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2010;25:581–591.

Müller L. Application of Dimensional Analysis in Model Research. Publishing of the PWN; 1983.

Michalek K. The Use of Physical Modeling and Numerical Optimization for Metallurgical Processes. VSB; 2001.

Saternus M, Merder T. Physical modelling of aluminum refining process conducted in batch reactor with rotary impeller. Metals. 2018;8:726. doi: 10.3390/met8090726. DOI

Laakkonen M, Moilanen P, Alopaeus V, Aittamaa J. Modeling local bubble size distribution in agitated vessels. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007;62:721–740. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2006.10.006. DOI

Oldshue JY. Fluid Mixing Technology. McGraw Hill Higher Education; 1983.

Sigworth GK, Engh TA. Refining of liquid aluminium: A review of important chemical factors. Scand. J. Met. 1982;11:143–149.

Mazdumar D, Guthrie RIL. The physical and mathematical modelling of gas stirred ladle systems. ISIJ Int. 1995;35:1–20.

Mishra SK, Jha PK, Sharma SC, Ajamani SK. Effect of blockage of outlet nozzle on fluid flow and heat transfer in continuously cast multistrand billet caster tundish. Can. Metall. Q. 2012;51:170–183.

Panic B. 3D Model studies on the effect of bed and powder type upon radial static pressure and powder distribution in metallurgical shaft furnaces. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2017;62:1449–1452.

Saternus M. Physical Modelling of Phenomena Occurring During Refining Process of Fe and Al Solutions by Means of Inert Gases. Silesian University of Technology; 2020.

Wang Z, Yang Z, Wang X, Yue Q, Xia Z, Xiao H. Residence time distribution (RTD) applications in continuous casting Tundish: A review and new perspectives. Metals. 2022;12:1366. doi: 10.3390/met12081366. DOI

Rückert A, Warzecha M, Koitzsch R, Pawlik M, Pfeifer H. Particle distribution and separation in continuous casting tundish. Steel Res. Int. 2009;80:568–574.

Chen Y, Wang X, Qiu S, Peng S. Study on the residence time distribution characteristics of T type eight-strand continuous casting tundish. Iron Steel Vanadium Titan. 2009;30:46–50.

Bensouici M, Bellaouar A, Talbi K. Numerical investigation of the fluid flow in continuous casting tundish using analysis of RTD curves. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2009;16:22–29.

Sengupta A, Mishra P, Singh V, Mishra S, Jha P, Ajmani S, Sharma S. Physical modelling investigation of influence of strand blockage on RTD characteristics in a multistrand tundish. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2013;40:159–166.

Saternus M, Merder T. Physical modeling of the impeller construction impact on the aluminum refining process. Materials. 2022;15:575. doi: 10.3390/ma15020575. PubMed DOI PMC

Hernández-Hernández M, Camacho-Martínez JL, González-Rivera C, Ramírez-Argáez MA. Impeller design assisted by physical modeling and pilot plant trials. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2016;236:1–8.

Hernández-Hernández M, Cruz-Mendez WF, Gonzalez-Rivera C, et al. Mathematical modeling of aluminum degassing by the impeller injector technique validated by a physical modeling. MRS Online Proc. Libr. 2014;1611:49–54. doi: 10.1557/opl.2014.757. DOI

Ramos Gomez E, Zenit R, González Rivera C, Trápaga G, Ramírez-Argáez MA. Mathematical modeling of fluid flow in a water physical model of an aluminum degassing ladle equipped with an impeller-injector. Metall. Mater. Trans. B. 2013;44B:423–435.

Guofa M, Shouping Q, Xiangyu L, Jitai N. Research on water simulation experiment of the rotating impeller degassing process. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2009;499:195–199.

Camacho-Martinez JL, Ramirez-Argaez MA, Juarez-Hernandez A, Gonzalez-Rivera C, Trapaga-Martinez G. Novel degasification design for aluminium using an impeller degasification water physical model. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2012;27:556–560.

Mi G, Liu X, Wang K, Qi S, Wang NH. Analyses of the influencing factors of rotating impeller degassing process and water simulation experiment. J. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2008;575–578:1258–1265.

Saternus M, Merder T, Pieprzyca J. The influence of impeller geometry on the gas bubbles dispersion in uro-200 reactor—RTD curves. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2015;60:2887–2893.

Diaz MC, Komarov SV, Sano M. Bubble behaviour and absorption rate in gas injection through rotary lances. ISIJ Int. 1997;37:1–8.

Chen, J. & Zhao, J. Bubble distribution in a melt treatment water model. In: Light Metals 1227–1231 (TMS, Warrendale, 1995).

Ruizhi W, Jun Wang DS, Baode S, Milin Z. Flow field and gas-bubble size analysis in water model for the process of aluminum melt degassing by particle image velocimetry. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2007;546–49(2):1087–1092.

Chen Y, Ding J, Weng P, Lu Z, Li X. A theoretical model describing bubble deformability and its effect on binary breakup in turbulent dispersions. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids. 2019;75:352–360.

Andersson R, Helmi A. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of fluid particle fragmentation in turbulent flows. Appl. Math. Modell. 2014;38(17–18):4186–4196.

Oweis GF, van der Hout IE, Iyer C, Tryggvason G, Ceccio SL. Capture and inception of bubbles near line vortices. Phys. Fluids. 2005;17(2):022105–022114.

Jha N, Govardhan R. Interaction of a vortex ring with a single bubble: Bubble and vorticity dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 2015;773:460–497. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2015.256. DOI

Kumaresan T, Joshi JB. Effect of impeller design on the flow pattern and mixing in stirred tanks. Chem. Eng. J. 2006;115(3):173–193. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2005.10.002. DOI

Posadas-Navarro DI, González-Rivera C, Ramírez-Argáez MA, Ascanio G. Power characteristics and mass transfer of rotor injectors in a water physical model of an aluminum degassing ladle. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2023;191:261–270. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2023.01.040. DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...