Glyoxal acid-free (GAF) histological fixative is a suitable alternative to formalin: results from an open-label comparative non-inferiority study
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, srovnávací studie, hodnocení ekvivalence
Grantová podpora
POR FESR 2014-2020
Regione Piemonte
PubMed
37996705
PubMed Central
PMC11329524
DOI
10.1007/s00428-023-03692-6
PII: 10.1007/s00428-023-03692-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Fixation, Formalin, Glyoxal acid-free (GAF), Trial,
- MeSH
- fixace tkání * metody MeSH
- fixativa * chemie MeSH
- formaldehyd * chemie MeSH
- glyoxal * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- hodnocení ekvivalence MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- fixativa * MeSH
- formaldehyd * MeSH
- glyoxal * MeSH
Formalin, an aqueous solution of formaldehyde, has been the gold standard for fixation of histological samples for over a century. Despite its considerable advantages, growing evidence points to objective toxicity, particularly highlighting its carcinogenicity and mutagenic effects. In 2016, the European Union proposed a ban, but a temporary permission was granted in consideration of its fundamental role in the medical-diagnostic field. In the present study, we tested an innovative fixative, glyoxal acid-free (GAF) (a glyoxal solution deprived of acids), which allows optimal tissue fixation at structural and molecular level combined with the absence of toxicity and carcinogenic activity. An open-label, non-inferiority, multicentric trial was performed comparing fixation of histological specimens with GAF fixative vs standard phosphate-buffered formalin (PBF), evaluating the morphological preservation and the diagnostic value with four binary score questions answered by both the central pathology reviewer and local center reviewers. The mean of total score in the GAF vs PBF fixative groups was 3.7 ± 0.5 vs 3.9 ± 0.3 for the central reviewer and 3.8 ± 0.5 vs 4.0 ± 0.1 for the local pathologist reviewers, respectively. In terms of median value, similar results were observed between the two fixative groups, with a median value of 4.0. Data collected indicate the non-inferiority of GAF as compared to PBF for all organs tested. The present clinical performance study, performed following the international standard for performance evaluation of in vitro diagnostic medical devices, highlights the capability of GAF to ensure both structural preservation and diagnostic value of the preparations.
ADDAX Biosciences Srl Turin Italy
Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO IRCCS Candiolo Turin Italy
Department of Medical Sciences University of Turin Turin Italy
Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences University of Turin Turin Italy
Department of Pathology The Christie NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK
Pathology Department Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Blum F (1893) Der Formaldehyd als Hartungsmittel. Z Wiss Mikrosc 10:314–315
Blum F (1894) Notiz uber die Anwendung des Formaldehyds (Formol) als Hartungs- und Konservierungsmittel. Anat Anz 9:229
Melan MA (1994) Overview of cell fixation and permeabilization. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ 34:55–66. 10.1385/0-89603285-x:5510.1385/0-89603285-x:55 PubMed DOI
Tanaka KAK, Suzuki KGN, Shirai YM et al (2010) Membrane molecules mobile even after chemical fixation. Nat Methods 7:865–866. 10.1038/nmeth.f.314 10.1038/nmeth.f.314 PubMed DOI
Schnell U, Dijk F, Sjollema KA, Giepmans BNG (2012) Immunolabeling artifacts and the need for live-cell imaging. Nat Methods 9:152–158. 10.1038/nmeth.1855 10.1038/nmeth.1855 PubMed DOI
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (2012) Chemical agents and related occupations. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Humans 100:9–562 PubMed PMC
Rana I, Rieswijk L, Steinmaus C, Zhang L (2021) Formaldehyde and brain disorders: a meta-analysis and bioinformatics approach. Neurotox Res 39:924–948. 10.1007/s12640-020-00320-y 10.1007/s12640-020-00320-y PubMed DOI PMC
Letellier N, Gutierrez LA, Pilorget C, Artaud F, Descatha A, Ozguler A, Goldberg M, Zins M, Elbaz A, Berr C (2022) Association between occupational exposure to formaldehyde and cognitive impairment. Neurology 98:e633–e640. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013146 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013146 PubMed DOI
Buesa RJ (2008) Histology without formalin? Ann Diagn Pathol 12:387–396. 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2008.07.004 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2008.07.004 PubMed DOI
Fairley JA, Gilmour K, Walsh K (2012) Making the most of pathological specimens: molecular diagnosis in formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue. Curr Drug Targets 13:1475–1487. 10.2174/138945012803530125 10.2174/138945012803530125 PubMed DOI
Dietel M, Jöhrens K, Laffert M, Hummel M, Bläker H, Müller BM, Lehmann A, Denkert C, Heppner FL, Koch A, Sers C, Anagnostopoulos I (2013) Predictive molecular pathology and its role in targeted cancer therapy: a review focussing on clinical relevance. Cancer Gene Ther 20:211–221. 10.1038/cgt.2013.13 10.1038/cgt.2013.13 PubMed DOI
Wicks LF, Suntzeff V (1943) Glyoxal, a non-irritating aldehyde suggested as substitute for formalin in histological fixations. Science 98:204. 10.1126/science.98.2539.204 10.1126/science.98.2539.204 PubMed DOI
Harke H, Höffler J (1984) U¨ bergang antimikrobieller Wirkstoffe von der Fla¨che in die Luft. Hyg Med 259–60
Betterton EA, Hoffmann MR (1988) Henry’s law constants of some environmentally important aldehydes. Environ Sci Technol 22:1415–1418. 10.1021/es00177a004 10.1021/es00177a004 PubMed DOI
PubChem Glyoxal. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/7860. Accessed 18 Oct 2022
World Health Organization/International Programme on Chemical Safety (2004) Concise international chemical assessment document no. 57 glyoxal. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/7860
Sabatini DD, Bensch K, Barrnett RJ (1963) Cytochemistry and electron microscopy. The preservation of cellular ultrastructure and enzymatic activity by aldehyde fixation. J Cell Biol 17:19–58. 10.1083/jcb.17.1.19 10.1083/jcb.17.1.19 PubMed DOI PMC
Hopwood D (1969) The elution patterns of formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, glyoxal and alpha-hydroxy adipaldehyde from sephadex G-10 and their significance for tissue fixation. Histochemie 20:127–132 10.1007/BF00268706 PubMed DOI
Dapson RW (2007) Glyoxal fixation: how it works and why it only occasionally needs antigen retrieval. Biotech Histochem Off Publ Biol Stain Comm 82:161–166. 10.1080/1052029070148811310.1080/10520290701488113 PubMed DOI
Marcon N, Bressenot A, Montagne K, Bastien C, Champigneulle J, Monhoven N, Albuisson E, Plénat F (2009) Glyoxal: a possible polyvalent substitute for formaldehyde in pathology? Ann Pathol 29:460–467. 10.1016/j.annpat.2009.09.011 10.1016/j.annpat.2009.09.011 PubMed DOI
Umlas J, Tulecke M (2004) The effects of glyoxal fixation on the histological evaluation of breast specimens. Hum Pathol 35:1058–1062. 10.1016/j.humpath.2004.04.013 10.1016/j.humpath.2004.04.013 PubMed DOI
Tubbs R, Hsi E, Hicks D, Goldblum J (2004) Molecular pathology testing of tissues fixed in prefer solution. Am J Surg Pathol 28:417–419 10.1097/00000478-200403000-00022 PubMed DOI
Willmore-Payne C, Metzger K, Layfield LJ (2007) Effects of fixative and fixation protocols on assessment of Her-2/neu oncogene amplification status by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol AIMM 15:84–87. 10.1097/01.pai.0000209866.20581.8e 10.1097/01.pai.0000209866.20581.8e PubMed DOI
Foss RD, Guha-Thakurta N, Conran RM, Gutman P (1994) Effects of fixative and fixation time on the extraction and polymerase chain reaction amplification of RNA from paraffin-embedded tissue. Comparison of two housekeeping gene mRNA controls. Diagn Mol Pathol Am J Surg Pathol Part B 3:148–155. 10.1097/00019606-199409000-0000310.1097/00019606-199409000-00003 PubMed DOI
Gillespie JW, Best CJM, Bichsel VE et al (2002) Evaluation of non-formalin tissue fixation for molecular profiling studies. Am J Pathol 160:449–457. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64864-X 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64864-X PubMed DOI PMC
Zhang Z, Zhao D, Xu B (2013) Analysis of glyoxal and related substances by means of high-performance liquid chromatography with refractive index detection. J Chromatogr Sci 51:893–898. 10.1093/chromsci/bms186 10.1093/chromsci/bms186 PubMed DOI
Bussolati G, Annaratone L, Berrino E, Miglio U, Panero M, Cupo M, Gugliotta P, Venesio T, Sapino A, Marchiò C (2017) Acid-free glyoxal as a substitute of formalin for structural and molecular preservation in tissue samples. PLoS One 12:e0182965. 10.1371/journal.pone.0182965 10.1371/journal.pone.0182965 PubMed DOI PMC
Allan C, Burel J-M, Moore J et al (2012) OMERO: flexible, model-driven data management for experimental biology. Nat Methods 9:245–253. 10.1038/nmeth.1896 10.1038/nmeth.1896 PubMed DOI PMC
Shi SR, Key ME, Kalra KL (1991) Antigen retrieval in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues: an enhancement method for immunohistochemical staining based on microwave oven heating of tissue sections. J Histochem Cytochem Off J Histochem Soc 39:741–748. 10.1177/39.6.170965610.1177/39.6.1709656 PubMed DOI
Lam J, Koustas E, Sutton P, Padula AM, Cabana MD, Vesterinen H, Griffiths C, Dickie M, Daniels N, Whitaker E, Woodruff TJ (2021) Exposure to formaldehyde and asthma outcomes: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and economic assessment. PLoS One 16:e0248258. 10.1371/journal.pone.0248258 10.1371/journal.pone.0248258 PubMed DOI PMC
Nassiri M, Ramos S, Zohourian H, Vincek V, Morales AR, Nadji M (2008) Preservation of biomolecules in breast cancer tissue by a formalin-free histology system. BMC Clin Pathol 8:1. 10.1186/1472-6890-8-1 10.1186/1472-6890-8-1 PubMed DOI PMC
Parker JDK, Yap SQ, Starks E, Slind J, Swanson L, Docking TR, Fuller M, Zhou C, Walker B, Filipenko D, Xiong W, Karimuddin AA, Phang PT, Raval M, Brown CJ, Karsan A (2019) Fixation effects on variant calling in a clinical resequencing panel. J Mol Diagn 21:705–717. 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.03.005 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.03.005 PubMed DOI
Berrino E, Bellomo SE, Chesta A, Detillo P, Bragoni P, Gagliardi A, Naccarati A, Cereda M, Witel G, Sapino A, Bussolati B, Bussolati G, Marchiò C (2023) Alternative tissue fixation protocols dramatically reduce the impact of DNA artifacts, unraveling the interpretation of clinical comprehensive genomic profiling. Laboratory Investigation 100280. In press. 10.1016/j.labinv.2023.100280 PubMed
Vendrell JA, Grand D, Rouquette I, Costes V, Icher S, Selves J, Larrieux M, Barbe A, Brousset P, Solassol J (2017) High-throughput detection of clinically targetable alterations using next-generation sequencing. Oncotarget 8:40345–40358. 10.18632/oncotarget.15875 10.18632/oncotarget.15875 PubMed DOI PMC