European Nephrologists' Attitudes toward the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice: A Comprehensive Survey
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
38008072
PubMed Central
PMC10836740
DOI
10.1159/000534604
PII: 000534604
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Artificial intelligence, Dialysis, Nephrologists, Survey,
- MeSH
- dialýza ledvin MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nefrologie * MeSH
- nefrologové MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- umělá inteligence * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence and big data analytics, including descriptive, diagnostic, predictive, and prescriptive analytics, has the potential to revolutionize many areas of medicine, including nephrology and dialysis. Artificial intelligence and big data analytics can be used to analyze large amounts of patient medical records, including laboratory results and imaging studies, to improve the accuracy of diagnosis, enhance early detection, identify patterns and trends, and personalize treatment plans for patients with kidney disease. Additionally, artificial intelligence and big data analytics can be used to identify patients' treatment who are not receiving adequate care, highlighting care inefficiencies in the dialysis provider, optimizing patient outcomes, reducing healthcare costs, and consequently creating values for all the involved stakeholders. OBJECTIVES: We present the results of a comprehensive survey aimed at exploring the attitudes of European physicians from eight countries working within a major hemodialysis network (Fresenius Medical Care NephroCare) toward the application of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. METHODS: An electronic survey on the implementation of artificial intelligence in hemodialysis clinics was distributed to 1,067 physicians. Of the 1,067 individuals invited to participate in the study, 404 (37.9%) professionals agreed to participate in the survey. RESULTS: The survey showed that a substantial proportion of respondents believe that artificial intelligence has the potential to support physicians in reducing medical malpractice or mistakes. CONCLUSION: While artificial intelligence's potential benefits are recognized in reducing medical errors and improving decision-making, concerns about treatment plan consistency, personalization, privacy, and the human aspects of patient care persist. Addressing these concerns will be crucial for successfully integrating artificial intelligence solutions in nephrology practice.
Associazione Ipertensione Nefrologia e Trapianto Renale Reggio Calabria Italy
Fresenius Medical Care Global Medical Office Bad Homburg Germany
Fresenius Medical Care Global Medical Office Bucharest Romania
Fresenius Medical Care Global Medical Office Istanbul Turkey
Fresenius Medical Care Global Medical Office Lisbon Portugal
Fresenius Medical Care Global Medical Office Madrid Spain
Fresenius Medical Care Global Medical Office Naples Italy
Fresenius Medical Care Global Medical Office Praha Czechia
Fresenius Medical Care Global Medical Office Waltham Massachusetts USA
Fresenius Medical Care Global Medical Office Warsaw Poland
Institute of Biology and Molecular Genetics Ariano Irpino Italy
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, Dong Y, Li H, Ma S, et al. . Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2(4):230–43. PubMed PMC
Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44–56. PubMed
Webster AC, Nagler EV, Morton RL, Masson P. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2017;389(10075):1238–52. PubMed
Saran R, Robinson B, Abbott KC, Bragg-Gresham J, Chen X, Gipson D, et al. . US renal data system 2019 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75(1 Suppl 1):A6–7. PubMed
The Lancet . Artificial intelligence in health care: within touching distance. Lancet. 2017;390(10114):2739. PubMed
Sarwar S, Dent A, Faust K, Richer M, Djuric U, Van Ommeren R, et al. . Physician perspectives on integration of artificial intelligence into diagnostic pathology. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:28. PubMed PMC
Cabitza F, Rasoini R, Gensini GF. Unintended consequences of machine learning in medicine. JAMA. 2017;318(6):517–8. PubMed
Whicher D, Wu AW. Ethics review of survey research: a mandatory requirement for publication? Patient. 2015;8(6):477–82. PubMed
Zoccali C, Blankestijn PJ, Bruchfeld A, Capasso G, Fliser D, Fouque D, et al. . The nephrology crystal ball: the medium-term future. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020;35(2):222–6. PubMed
Nemati S, Holder A, Razmi F, Stanley MD, Clifford GD, Buchman TG. An interpretable machine learning model for accurate prediction of sepsis in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(4):547–53. PubMed PMC
Niel O, Bastard P. Artificial intelligence in nephrology: core concepts, clinical applications, and perspectives. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;74(6):803–10. PubMed
Miotto R, Wang F, Wang S, Jiang X, Dudley JT. Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges. Brief Bioinform. 2018;19(6):1236–46. PubMed PMC
Barbieri C, Neri L, Stuard S, Mari F, Martín-Guerrero JD. From electronic health records to clinical management systems: how the digital transformation can support healthcare services. Clin Kidney J. 2023;16(11):1878–84. PubMed PMC