Impact of Multiple Sclerosis Subtypes on Pain Management in Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia After Stereotactic Radiosurgery: An International Multicenter Analysis
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Multicenter Study, Journal Article
PubMed
38051068
DOI
10.1227/neu.0000000000002790
PII: 00006123-990000000-00985
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Pain etiology surgery MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local surgery MeSH
- Pain Management methods MeSH
- Trigeminal Neuralgia * radiotherapy surgery MeSH
- Radiosurgery * methods MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Multiple Sclerosis * surgery MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Trigeminal neuralgia affects approximately 2% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and often shows higher rates of pain recurrence after treatment. Previous studies on the effectiveness of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for trigeminal neuralgia did not consider the different MS subtypes, including remitting relapsing (RRMS), primary progressive (PPMS), and secondary progressive (SPMS). Our objective was to investigate how MS subtypes are related to pain control (PC) rates after SRS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of prospectively collected databases. Pain status was assessed using the Barrow National Institute Pain Intensity Scales. Time to recurrence was estimated through the Kaplan-Meier method and compared groups using log-rank tests. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-eight patients, 135 (52.4%) RRMS, 30 (11.6%) PPMS, and 93 (36%) SPMS, were included from 14 institutions. In total, 84.6% of patients achieved initial pain relief, with a median time of 1 month; 78.7% had some degree of pain recurrence with a median time of 10.2 months for RRMS, 8 months for PPMS, 8.1 months for SPMS ( P = .424). Achieving Barrow National Institute-I after SRS was a predictor for longer periods without recurrence ( P = .028). Analyzing PC at the last available follow-up and comparing with RRMS, PPMS was less likely to have PC (OR = 0.389; 95% CI 0.153-0.986; P = .047) and SPMS was more likely (OR = 2.0; 95% CI 0.967-4.136; P = .062). A subgroup of 149 patients did not have other procedures apart from SRS. The median times to recurrence in this group were 11.1, 9.8, and 19.6 months for RRMS, PPMS, and SPMS, respectively (log-rank, P = .045). CONCLUSION: This study is the first to investigate the relationship between MS subtypes and PC after SRS, and our results provide preliminary evidence that subtypes may influence pain outcomes, with PPMS posing the greatest challenge to pain management.
Department of Neurological Surgery NYU Langone Health New York University New York New York USA
Department of Neurological Surgery UPMC Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
Department of Neurosurgery Allegheny Health Network Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
Department of Neurosurgery Centre de recherche du CHUS Université de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke Canada
Department of Neurosurgery Gamma Knife Center Jewish Hospital Mayfield Clinic Cincinnati Ohio USA
Department of Neurosurgery IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano Italy
Department of Neurosurgery Koc University School of Medicine Istanbul Turkey
Department of Neurosurgery North Shore University Hospital Hempstead New York USA
Department of Neurosurgery North Shore University Hospital Manhasset New York USA
Department of Neurosurgery University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA
Department of Neurosurgery UVA Charlottesville Virginia USA
Department of Radiation Oncology NYU Langone Health New York University New York New York USA
Division of Radiation Oncology Department of Oncology University of Alberta Edmonton Canada
Radiosurgery Unit Hospital Ruber Internacional Madrid Spain
Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czechia
See more in PubMed
Lublin FD, Reingold SC, Cohen JA, et al. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: the 2013 revisions. Neurology. 2014;83(3):278-286.
Tremlett H, Paty D, Devonshire V. The natural history of primary progressive MS in British Columbia, Canada. Neurology. 2005;65(12):1919-1923.
Hauser SL, Cree BAC. Treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review. Am J Med. 2020;133(12):1380-1390.e2.
Cree BAC. Chapter 9—multiple sclerosis genetics. In: Goodin DS, editor. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Elsevier; 2014;193-209.
Dobson R, Giovannoni G. Multiple sclerosis—a review. Eur J Neurol . 2019;26(1):27-40.
Ghasemi N, Razavi S, Nikzad E. Multiple sclerosis: pathogenesis, symptoms, diagnoses and cell-based therapy. Cell J. 2017;19(1):1-10.
Thompson A. Overview of primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS): similarities and differences from other forms of MS, diagnostic criteria, pros and cons of progressive diagnosis. Mult Scler. 2004;10(Suppl 1):s2-s7.
Love S, Gradidge T, Coakham HB. Trigeminal neuralgia due to multiple sclerosis: ultrastructural findings in trigeminal rhizotomy specimens. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2001;27(3):238-244.
Moulin DE. Pain in central and peripheral demyelinating disorders. Neurol Clin. 1998;16(4):889-898.
Love S, Coakham HB. Trigeminal neuralgia: pathology and pathogenesis. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 12):2347-2360.
Hooge JP, Redekop WK. Trigeminal neuralgia in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1995;45(7):1294-1296.
Zorro O, Lobato-Polo J, Kano H, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D. Gamma knife radiosurgery for multiple sclerosis-related trigeminal neuralgia. Neurology. 2009;73(14):1149-1154.
Lazar ML, Kirkpatrick JB. Trigeminal neuralgia and multiple sclerosis: demonstration of the plaque in an operative case. Neurosurgery. 1979;5(6):711-717.
Kondziolka D, Zorro O, Lobato-Polo J, et al. Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(4):758-765.
Huang E, Teh BS, Zeck O, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia in multiple sclerosis patients. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2002;79(1):44-50.
Kondziolka D, Perez B, Flickinger JC, Habeck M, Lunsford LD. Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: results and expectations. Arch Neurol. 1998;55(12):1524-1529.
Urgosik D, Vymazal J, Vladyka V, Liscák R. Gamma knife treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: clinical and electrophysiological study. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1998;70(Suppl 1):200-209.
Mohammad-Mohammadi A, Recinos PF, Lee JH, Elson P, Barnett GH. Surgical outcomes of trigeminal neuralgia in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurosurgery. 2013;73(6):941-950; discussion 950.
Weller M, Marshall K, Lovato JF, et al. Single-institution retrospective series of gamma knife radiosurgery in the treatment of multiple sclerosis-related trigeminal neuralgia: factors that predict efficacy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2014;92(1):53-58.
Rogers CL, Shetter AG, Ponce FA, Fiedler JA, Smith KA, Speiser BL. Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia associated with multiple sclerosis. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(5 Suppl):529-532.
Xu Z, Mathieu D, Heroux F, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia in patients with multiple sclerosis: a multicenter study. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(2):499-505.
Mousavi SH, Lindsey JW, Gupta RK, Wolinsky JS, Lincoln JA. Trigeminal neuralgia in multiple sclerosis: association with demyelination and progression. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023;74:104727.
Mousavi SH, Niranjan A, Akpinar B, et al. A proposed plan for personalized radiosurgery in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg. 2018;128(2):452-459.
Rogers CL, Shetter AG, Fiedler JA, Smith KA, Han PP, Speiser BL. Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: the initial experience of the Barrow Neurological Institute. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47(4):1013-1019.
Helis CA, McTyre E, Munley MT, et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for multiple sclerosis-associated trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery. 2019;85(5):e933-e939.
Leduc W, Mathieu D, Adam E, Ferreira R, Iorio-Morin C. Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia secondary to multiple sclerosis: a case-control study. Neurosurgery. 2023;93(2):453-461.
Fraioli B, Esposito V, Guidetti B, Cruccu G, Manfredi M. Treatment of trigeminal neuralgia by thermocoagulation, glycerolization, and percutaneous compression of the gasserian ganglion and/or retrogasserian rootlets: long-term results and therapeutic protocol. Neurosurgery. 1989;24(2):239-245.
Texakalidis P, Xenos D, Karras CL, Rosenow JM. Percutaneous surgical approaches in multiple sclerosis-related trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2021;146:342-350.e1.
Montano N, Papacci F, Cioni B, Di Bonaventura R, Meglio M. What is the best treatment of drug-resistant trigeminal neuralgia in patients affected by multiple sclerosis? A literature analysis of surgical procedures. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115(5):567-572.
Asplund P, Linderoth B, Lind G, Winter J, Bergenheim AT. One hundred eleven percutaneous balloon compressions for trigeminal neuralgia in a cohort of 66 patients with multiple sclerosis. Oper Neurosurg. 2019;17(5):452-459.
Gass A, Kitchen N, MacManus DG, Moseley IF, Hennerici MG, Miller DH. Trigeminal neuralgia in patients with multiple sclerosis: lesion localization with magnetic resonance imaging. Neurology. 1997;49(4):1142-1144.
Burchiel KJ. Abnormal impulse generation in focally demyelinated trigeminal roots. J Neurosurg. 1980;53(5):674-683.
Nurmikko TJ. Pathophysiology of MS-related trigeminal neuralgia. Pain. 2009;143(3):165-166.