Changes in Segmental Impedances and Selected Body Composition Parameters Assessed by Multi-Frequency Bioimpedance Analysis after Fluid Consumption in Healthy Young Population
Language English Country Australia Media electronic-ecollection
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
38058961
PubMed Central
PMC10696504
DOI
10.7150/ijms.77396
PII: ijmsv20p1783
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- acute fluid consumption, adults, body composition changes, percentage of body fat, segmental multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis, visceral fat,
- MeSH
- Absorptiometry, Photon MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Electric Impedance MeSH
- Electrolytes MeSH
- Body Mass Index MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Food MeSH
- Body Composition * MeSH
- Adipose Tissue * metabolism MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Electrolytes MeSH
Objectives: Body composition (BC) analysis is a routine part of comprehensive public health care. Assessment of BC is more important source of information than BMI. Adherence to the standard measurement conditions is essential for the correct results. Our study aimed to examine the effect of acute fluid consumption on measures of body mass (BM), percentage of body fat (%BF), visceral fat (VF), percentage of body water (%BW), and impedance at 100 kHz (I100) and 20 kHz (I20) using segmental multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (SMF-BIA) in a general healthy population. Methods: 95 consecutive healthy normal-weight adults (42 men; 53 women) were involved in the study (mean ± s.d.; age 23.9±1.6 years; body mass 68.3±14.1 kg). All subjects underwent two separate series of body composition (BC) measurements at 0 (BASELINE), 30, 60, 90 min (POST): the first series after drinking 600 ml of isotonic carbohydrate/electrolyte drink (IST) and the second after no fluid administration (CON). Individual measurements were performed in the morning on two consecutive days. Results: In the IST group, BM, VF (both P<0.001), and %BF (P<0.05) increased significantly at 30 min POST compared to BASELINE. BM and VF remained elevated at 90 min POST (both P<0.001). %BW decreased significantly at 30 min POST (P<0.01) then increased at 60 min (P<0.001) and 90 min (P<0.01) POST. There were no significant changes in I100. I20 increased significantly at 30 min POST (P<0.001) then decreased at 60 min (P<0.001) and 90 min POST (P<0.01) compared to BASELINE. In the CON group, BM and VF decreased below BASELINE at 90 min POST (P<0.001), %BF, %BW and I100 did not change significantly. The difference between IST and CON was statistically significant for all POST measurement times only in BM and VF (both P<0.001). The VF results are also underlined by the detected impedance changes in the trunk area at 20 kHz (B20) and 100 kHz (B100) at 60 min and 90 min (both P<0.001). Conclusions: Our study suggests that segmental impedances and BC measurement in healthy young normal-weight adults requires strict adherence to fluid restriction at least 90 min before the measurement to avoid false impedance values and overestimation of BM and VF.
See more in PubMed
Bolanowski M, Nilsson BE. Assessment of human BC using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2001;7:1029–1033. PubMed
Romero-Corral A, Somers VK, Sierra-Johnson J. et al. Accuracy of Body Mass Index to Diagnose Obesity: In the US Adult Population. Int J Obes. 2008;32:959–966. PubMed PMC
Kennedy AP, Shea JL, Sun G. Comparison of the Classification of Obesity by BMI vs. Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry in the Newfoundland Population. Obesity. 2009;17:2094–2099. PubMed
Houtkooper LB, Lohman TG, Going SB. et al. Why bioelectrical impedance analysis should be used for estimating adiposity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64(Suppl 3):S436–S448. PubMed
Gomez-Arbelaez D, Bellido D, Castro AI. et al. BC Changes After Very-Low-Calorie Ketogenic Diet in Obesity Evaluated by 3 Standardized Methods. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102:488–498. PubMed
Kushner RF, Gudivaka R, Schoeller DA. Clinical characteristics influencing bioelectrical impedance analysis measurements. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;64(Suppl 3):S423–S427. PubMed
Shirreffs SM. Markers of hydration status. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(Suppl 2):S6–S9. PubMed
Heyward VH, Wagner DR, editorsApplied BC Assessment. 2nd ed. Champaign IL.: Human Kinetics. 2004.
Dixon CB, LoVallo SJ, Andreacci JL. et al. The effect of acute fluid consumption on measures of impedance and percent body fat using leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006;60:142–146. PubMed
Dixon CB, Ramos L, Fitzgerald E. et al. The effect of acute fluid consumption on measures of impedance and percent body fat estimated using segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63:1115–1122. PubMed
Demura S, Yamaji S, Goshi F. et al. The influence of transient change of total body water on relative body fats based on three bioelectrical impedance analyses methods. Comparison between before and after exercise with sweat loss, and after drinking. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2002;42:38–44. PubMed
Ugras S. Evaluating of altered hydratation status on effectiveness of BC analysis using bioelectric impedance analysis. Libyan Journal of Medicine.2020; 15[1]: 1741904.doi:10.1080/19932820. 2020. 1741904. PubMed PMC
Matthews EL, Hosick PA. Bioelectrical impedance analysis does not detect an increase in total body water following isotonic fluid consumption. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019;44:1116–1120. PubMed
Gomez T, Mole PA, Collins A. Dilution of body fluid electrolytes affects bioelectrical impedance measurements. Sports Med Training Rehab. 1993;4:291–298.
Androutsos O, Gerasimidis K, Karanikolou A. et al. Impact of eating and drinking on BC measurements by bioelectrical impedance. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015;28:165–171. PubMed
Kutac P. The effect of intake of water on the final values of BC parameters in active athletes using two different bioimpedance analyzers. Acta Gymnica. 2014;44:107–116.
Heiss CJ, Naylor J, Bronco KM. et al. A small food or fluid load has no effect on BC measured by 3 different methods. Top Clin Nutr. 2008;23:229–233.
Coppini LZ, Waitzberg DL, Campos AC. Limitations and validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis in morbidly obese patients. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005;8:329–332. PubMed
Deurenberg P, Weststrate J.A, Paymans I. et al. Factors affecting bioelectrical impedance measurements in humans. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1988;42:1017–1722. PubMed
Elsen R, Siu M, Pineda O, Sources of variability in bioelectrical impedance determinations in adults. In: Ellis K, Yasumura S, Morgan W, editors. In vivo BC Studies. London: Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine. 1987. p. 84-88.
Slinde F, Bark A, Jansson J, Rossander-Hulthen L. Bioelectrical impedance variation in healthy subjects during 12 h in the supine position. Clin Nutr. 2003;22:153–157. PubMed
Oshima Y, Shiga T. Within-day variability of whole-body and segmental bioelectrical impedance in a standing position. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006;60:938–941. PubMed
Wagner DR. Bioelectrical impedance changes of the trunk are opposite the limbs following acute hydration change. J Electr Bioimp. 2022;13:25–30. PubMed PMC
O´Brien C, Young AJ, Sawka MN. Bioelectrical impedance to estimate changes in hydration status. Int J Sports Med. 2002;23:361–366. PubMed
The Influence of Intermittent Fasting on Selected Human Anthropometric Parameters