-
Something wrong with this record ?
Progress in forensic bone DNA analysis: Lessons learned from ancient DNA
M. Hofreiter, J. Sneberger, M. Pospisek, D. Vanek
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review
- MeSH
- DNA Fingerprinting MeSH
- DNA * genetics MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- DNA Degradation, Necrotic MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Forensic Genetics MeSH
- DNA, Ancient * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH
Research on ancient and forensic DNA is related in many ways, and the two fields must deal with similar obstacles. Therefore, communication between these two communities has the potential to improve results in both research fields. Here, we present the insights gained in the ancient DNA community with regard to analyzing DNA from aged skeletal material and the potential use of the developed protocols in forensic work. We discuss the various steps, from choosing samples for DNA extraction to deciding between classical PCR amplification and massively parallel sequencing approaches. Based on the progress made in ancient DNA analyses combined with the requirements of forensic work, we suggest that there is substantial potential for incorporating ancient DNA approaches into forensic protocols, a process that has already begun to a considerable extent. However, taking full advantage of the experiences gained from ancient DNA work will require comparative studies by the forensic DNA community to tailor the methods developed for ancient samples to the specific needs of forensic studies and case work. If successful, in our view, the benefits for both communities would be considerable.
Biologicals s r o Sramkova 315 Ricany 25101 Czech Republic
Charles University Prague 2nd Faculty of Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Forensic DNA Service Janovskeho 18 Prague 7 17000 Czech Republic
Institute of Legal Medicine Bulovka Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Nuclear Physics Institute of the CAS Na Truhlarce 39 64 Prague 18086 Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22003810
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220127145832.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2021 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102538 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34265517
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Hofreiter, Michael $u Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany. Electronic address: michi@palaeo.eu
- 245 10
- $a Progress in forensic bone DNA analysis: Lessons learned from ancient DNA / $c M. Hofreiter, J. Sneberger, M. Pospisek, D. Vanek
- 520 9_
- $a Research on ancient and forensic DNA is related in many ways, and the two fields must deal with similar obstacles. Therefore, communication between these two communities has the potential to improve results in both research fields. Here, we present the insights gained in the ancient DNA community with regard to analyzing DNA from aged skeletal material and the potential use of the developed protocols in forensic work. We discuss the various steps, from choosing samples for DNA extraction to deciding between classical PCR amplification and massively parallel sequencing approaches. Based on the progress made in ancient DNA analyses combined with the requirements of forensic work, we suggest that there is substantial potential for incorporating ancient DNA approaches into forensic protocols, a process that has already begun to a considerable extent. However, taking full advantage of the experiences gained from ancient DNA work will require comparative studies by the forensic DNA community to tailor the methods developed for ancient samples to the specific needs of forensic studies and case work. If successful, in our view, the benefits for both communities would be considerable.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 12
- $a DNA $x genetika $7 D004247
- 650 _2
- $a nekrotická degradace DNA $7 D053836
- 650 _2
- $a DNA fingerprinting $7 D016172
- 650 12
- $a starobylá DNA $7 D000072441
- 650 _2
- $a soudní genetika $7 D053803
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Sneberger, Jiri $u Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Vinicna 5, Prague 2 12843, Czech Republic; Department of the History of the Middle Ages of Museum of West Bohemia, Kopeckeho sady 2, Pilsen 30100, Czech Republic; Nuclear Physics Institute of the CAS, Na Truhlarce 39/64, Prague 18086, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pospisek, Martin $u Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Vinicna 5, Prague 2 12843, Czech Republic; Biologicals s.r.o., Sramkova 315, Ricany 25101, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vanek, Daniel $u Forensic DNA Service, Janovskeho 18, Prague 7 17000, Czech Republic; Institute of Legal Medicine, Bulovka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Charles University in Prague, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: daniel.vanek@fdnas.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00166775 $t Forensic science international. Genetics $x 1878-0326 $g Roč. 54, č. - (2021), s. 102538
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34265517 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220127145829 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1751315 $s 1154959
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 54 $c - $d 102538 $e 20210529 $i 1878-0326 $m Forensic science international. Genetics $n Forensic Sci Int Genet $x MED00166775
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113