The recent developments in multiaxis three-dimensional (3D) printing have got a large potential for expanding the capability of material extrusion based methods. Especially curved and nonplanar methods can improve buildability, surface quality, and mechanical performance. However, the challenges that arise from using them complicate their deployment. In this article, we propose a hybrid planar method, based on varying the layer height and deposition speed in combination with tool reorientation, that allows us to get a lot of the same benefits that come from using nonplanar layers. The goal of the method is to keep the deposition constant regardless of the overhang angle. This is achieved by simultaneous control of layer height, deposition speed, and tool orientation. The method is the most beneficial for large-scale, single-wall 3D printing, such as clay, concrete, and other composites. The main restriction of the method depends on the minimum/maximum ratio between the nozzle diameter and layer height. A description of the method is provided, and sample objects are evaluated either as trajectories or as test prints. The claims are confirmed by microscopy measurement of the contact patch width. The method as presented allows printing of overhangs up to 82.34°, can be applied to complex geometry without difficulties, and further possibilities of limit expansion are discussed. The contact patch width decreases only by 20% at the 80° of overhang.

Creative Robotics University of Art and Design Linz Linz Austria

Institute of Machine and Industrial Design Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Brno University of Technology Brno Czech Republic

One3D s r o Mohelnice Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Dizon JRC, Espera AH, Chen Q, et al. Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Addit Manuf 2018;20:44–67; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.002. DOI

Nayyeri P, Zareinia K, Bougherara H. Planar and nonplanar slicing algorithms for fused deposition modeling technology: A critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2022;119:2785–2810; doi: 10.1007/s00170-021-08347-x. DOI

Nisja GA, Cao A, Gao C. Short review of nonplanar fused deposition modeling printing. Mater Des Process Commun 2021;3(4):e221; doi: 10.1002/mdp2.221. DOI

Zhao HM, He Y, Fu JZ, et al. Inclined layer printing for fused deposition modeling without assisted supporting structure. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 2018;51(2016):1–13; doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2017.11.011. DOI

Gosselin C, Duballet R, Roux P, et al. Large-scale 3D printing of ultra-high performance concrete—A new processing route for architects and builders. Mater Des 2016;100:102–109; doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.097. DOI

Xu K, Li Y, Chen L, et al. Curved layer based process planning for multi-axis volume printing of freeform parts. CAD Comput Aided Des 2019;114:51–63; doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2019.05.007. DOI

Shan Y, Gan D, Mao H. Curved layer slicing based on isothermal surface. Procedia Manuf 2021;53:484–491; doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2021.06.081. DOI

Dai C, Wang CCL, Wu C, et al. Support-free volume printing by multi-axis motion. ACM Trans Graph 2018;37(4):1–14; doi: 10.1145/3197517.3201342. DOI

Fry NR, Richardson RC, Boyle JH. Robotic additive manufacturing system for dynamic build orientations. Rapid Prototyp J 2020;26(4):659–667; doi: 10.1108/RPJ-09-2019-0243. DOI

Murtezaoglu Y, Plakhotnik D, Stautner M, et al. Geometry-based process planning for multi-axis support-free. Proc CIRP 2018;78:73–78; doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.04.009. DOI

Zhao G, Ma G, Feng J, et al. Nonplanar slicing and path generation methods for robotic additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2018;96(9–12):3149–3159; doi: 10.1007/s00170-018-1772-9. DOI

Pelzer L, Hopmann C. Additive manufacturing of non-planar layers with variable layer height. Addit Manuf 2021;37(2020):101697; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101697. DOI

Etienne J, Ray N, Panozzo D, et al. Curvislicer: Slightly curved slicing for 3-axis printers. ACM Trans Graph 2019;38(4):1–11; doi: 10.1145/3306346.3323022. DOI

Chen L, Chung MF, Tian Y, et al. Variable-depth curved layer fused deposition modeling of thin-shells. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 2019;57(2018):422–434; doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2018.12.016. DOI

Moetazedian A, Budisuharto AS, Silberschmidt VV, et al. CONVEX (CONtinuously Varied EXtrusion): A new scale of design for additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 2021;37(2020):1–19; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101576. DOI

Gleadall A. FullControl GCode Designer: Open-source software for unconstrained design in additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 2021;46:102109; doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102109. DOI

Mani K, Kulkarni P, Dutta D. Region-based adaptive slicing. CAD Comput Aided Des 1999;31(5):317–333; doi: 10.1016/S0010-4485(99)00033-0. DOI

Mao H, Kwok TH, Chen Y, et al. Adaptive slicing based on efficient profile analysis. CAD Comput Aided Des 2019;107:89–101; doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2018.09.006. DOI

Pandey PM, Reddy NV, Dhande SG. Real time adaptive slicing for fused deposition modelling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2003;43(1):61–71; doi: 10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00164-5. DOI

Wasserfall F, Hendrich N, Zhang J. Adaptive slicing for the FDM process revisited. IEEE Int Conf Autom Sci Eng 2017;2017:49–54; doi: 10.1109/COASE.2017.8256074. DOI

Huang B, Singamneni SB. Curved layer adaptive slicing (CLAS) for fused deposition modelling. Rapid Prototyp J 2015;21(4):354–367; doi: 10.1108/RPJ-06-2013-0059. DOI

Kuznetsov VE, Solonin AN, Urzhumtsev OD, et al. Strength of PLA components fabricated with fused deposition technology using a desktop 3D printer as a function of geometrical parameters of the process. Polymers (Basel) 2018;10(3):1–11; doi: 10.3390/polym10030313. PubMed DOI PMC

Anonymous. Layers and perimeters. Available from: https://help.prusa3d.com/cs/article/vrstvy-a-perimetry_1748 [Last accessed: June 10, 2022].

Braumann J, Brell-Çokcan S. Parametric robot control. Proc 31st Annu Conf Assoc Comput Aided Des Archit 2011;242–251; doi: 10.52842/conf.acadia.2011.242. DOI

Wüthrich M, Gubser M, Elspass WJ, et al. A novel slicing strategy to print overhangs without support material. Appl Sci 2021;11(18):1–21; doi: 10.3390/app11188760. DOI

Krčma M, Paloušek D. Comparison of the effects of multiaxis printing strategies on large-scale 3D printed surface quality, accuracy, and strength. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2022;119:7109–7120; doi: 10.1007/s00170-022-08685-4. DOI

Krejcirik P, Skaroupka D, Palousek D. Free directional robotic deposition—Influence on overhang printability. MM Sci J 2018;12(2018):2715–2721; doi: 10.17973/mmsj.2018_12_2018119. DOI