INSURE: a pooled analysis of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory myeloma in routine practice
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Lexington, MA, USA
PubMed
38197267
DOI
10.2217/fon-2023-0604
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- IRd, effectiveness, ixazomib, ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone, multiple myeloma, pooled analysis, progression-free survival, proteasome inhibitor, relapsed/refractory, routine clinical practice, time-to-next treatment,
- MeSH
- dexamethason terapeutické užití MeSH
- glycin * analogy a deriváty MeSH
- lenalidomid terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom * farmakoterapie MeSH
- multicentrické studie jako téma MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- sloučeniny boru terapeutické užití MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- dexamethason MeSH
- glycin * MeSH
- ixazomib MeSH Prohlížeč
- lenalidomid MeSH
- sloučeniny boru MeSH
Aim: We pooled data from three observational studies (INSIGHT MM, UVEA-IXA and REMIX) to investigate the real-world effectiveness of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Materials & methods: INSIGHT MM was a prospective study conducted in countries across Europe, Asia and North/Latin America while UVEA-IXA and REMIX were multicenter, retrospective/prospective studies conducted in Europe. Patients who had received IRd as ≥2nd line of therapy were analyzed. Primary outcomes were time-to-next treatment (TTNT) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Overall, 564 patients were included (median follow-up: 18.5 months). Median TTNT and PFS were 18.4 and 19.9 months; both outcomes were numerically longer for earlier versus later lines. Median treatment duration was 14.0 months. Overall response rate was 64.6%. No new safety concerns were noted. Conclusion: The effectiveness of IRd in routine practice appears similar to the efficacy observed in TOURMALINE-MM1. IRd benefit in earlier versus later lines was consistent with previous reports.
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit MI 48201 USA
CHU de Bordeaux Bordeaux 33000 France
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Ltd Brno 602 00 Czech Republic
M D Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX 77030 USA
Takeda Development Center Americas Inc Lexington MA 02421 USA
Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG Opfikon 8152 Switzerland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org