Predicting worsening heart failure hospitalizations in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: is it all about alerts? A pooled analysis of nine trials
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
Biotronik
PubMed
38291778
PubMed Central
PMC10858640
DOI
10.1093/europace/euae032
PII: 7593796
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Heart failure score, Heart rate, Implantable defibrillators, Predictive algorithm, Remote monitoring, Worsening heart failure hospitalization,
- MeSH
- defibrilátory implantabilní * MeSH
- extrasystoly MeSH
- hospitalizace MeSH
- komorová tachykardie * diagnóza terapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- srdeční selhání * diagnóza terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
AIMS: To predict worsening heart failure hospitalizations (WHFHs) in patients with implantable defibrillators and remote monitoring, the HeartInsight algorithm (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) calculates a heart failure (HF) score combining seven physiologic parameters: 24 h heart rate (HR), nocturnal HR, HR variability, atrial tachyarrhythmia, ventricular extrasystoles, patient activity, and thoracic impedance. We compared temporal trends of the HF score and its components 12 weeks before a WHFH with 12-week trends in patients without WHFH, to assess whether trends indicate deteriorating HF regardless of alert status. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from nine clinical trials were pooled, including 2050 patients with a defibrillator capable of atrial sensing, ejection fraction ≤ 35%, NYHA class II/III, no long-standing atrial fibrillation, and 369 WHFH from 259 patients. The mean HF score was higher in the WHFH group than in the no WHFH group (42.3 ± 26.1 vs. 30.7 ± 20.6, P < 0.001) already at the beginning of 12 weeks. The mean HF score further increased to 51.6 ± 26.8 until WHFH (+22% vs. no WHFH group, P = 0.003). As compared to the no WHFH group, the algorithm components either were already higher 12 weeks before WHFH (24 h HR, HR variability, thoracic impedance) or significantly increased until WHFH (nocturnal HR, atrial tachyarrhythmia, ventricular extrasystoles, patient activity). CONCLUSION: The HF score was significantly higher at, and further increased during 12 weeks before WHFH, as compared to the no WHFH group, with seven components showing different behaviour and contribution. Temporal trends of HF score may serve as a quantitative estimate of HF condition and evolution prior to WHFH.
Cardiothoracovascular Department Cattinara Hospital ASUGI and University of Trieste Trieste Italy
Center for Clinical Research Biotronik SE and Co KG Berlin Germany
CHU Lille University of Lille Lille University Hospital Center Lille Hauts de France France
Clinical Unit Biotronik Italia S P A Cologno Monzese Italy
U O Electrophysiology ASST Rhodense 95 Viale Carlo Forlanini 20024 Garbagnate Milanese Italy
Unità Operativa di Elettrofisiologia Studio e Terapia delle Aritmie Monaldi Hospital Naples Italy
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JG, Coats AJ et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;18:891–975. PubMed
Braunschweig F, Cowie MR, Auricchio A. What are the costs of heart failure? Europace 2011;13:ii13–7. PubMed
Abraham WT, Adamson PB, Bourge RC, Aaron MF, Costanzo MR, Stevenson LW et al. Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;377:658–66. PubMed
Morgan JM, Dimitrov BD, Gill J, Kitt S, Ng GA, McComb JM et al. Rationale and study design of the REM-HF study: remote management of heart failure using implanted devices and formalized follow-up procedures. Eur J Heart Fail 2014;16:1039–45. PubMed
D’Onofrio A, Solimene F, Calo L, Calvi V, Viscusi M, Melissano D et al. Combining home monitoring temporal trends from implanted defibrillators and baseline patient risk profile to predict heart failure hospitalizations: results from the SELENE HF study. Europace 2022;24:234–44. PubMed PMC
Levy WC, Mozaffarian D, Linker DT, Sutradhar SC, Anker SD, Cropp AB et al. The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure. Circulation 2006;113:1424–33. PubMed
Metra M, Teerlink JR. Heart failure. Lancet 2017;390:1981–95. PubMed
Murphy SP, Ibrahim NE, Januzzi JL Jr. Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a review. JAMA 2020;324:488–504. PubMed
Worden NE, Alqasrawi M, Krothapalli SM, Mazur A. “Two for the price of one”: a single-lead implantable cardioverter-defibrillator system with a floating atrial dipole. J Atr Fibrillation 2016;8:1396. PubMed PMC
Zanotto G, Capucci A. HeartInsight: from SELENE HF to implementation in clinical practice. Eur Heart J Suppl 2023;25:C337–43. PubMed PMC
Inglis SC, Clark RA, Dierckx R, Prieto-Merino D, Cleland JG. Structured telephone support or non-invasive telemonitoring for patients with heart failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD007228. PubMed PMC
Stevenson LW, Ross HJ, Rathman LD, Boehmer JP. Remote monitoring for heart failure management at home. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;81:2272–91. PubMed
Bohm M, Swedberg K, Komajda M, Borer JS, Ford I, Dubost-Brama A et al. Heart rate as a risk factor in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): the association between heart rate and outcomes in a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2010;376:886–94. PubMed
Oliva F, Sormani P, Contri R, Campana C, Carubelli V, Ciro A et al. Heart rate as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target in acute and chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol 2018;253:97–104. PubMed
D’Onofrio A, Marini M, Rovaris G, Zanotto G, Calvi V, Iacopino S et al. Prognostic significance of remotely monitored nocturnal heart rate in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. Heart Rhythm 2023;20:233–40. PubMed
Boriani G, Bertini M, Manzo M, Calo L, Santini L, Savarese G et al. Performance of a multi-sensor implantable defibrillator algorithm for heart failure monitoring in the presence of atrial fibrillation. Europace 2023;25:euad261. PubMed PMC
Marrouche NF, Brachmann J, Andresen D, Siebels J, Boersma L, Jordaens L et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure. N Engl J Med 2018;378:417–27. PubMed
Abraham WT. Disease management: remote monitoring in heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators, resynchronization devices, and haemodynamic monitors. Europace 2013;15:i40–6. PubMed
Boehmer JP, Hariharan R, Devecchi FG, Smith AL, Molon G, Capucci A et al. A multisensor algorithm predicts heart failure events in patients with implanted devices: results from the MultiSENSE study. JACC Heart Fail 2017;5:216–25. PubMed
Capucci A, Santini L, Favale S, Pecora D, Petracci B, Calo L et al. Preliminary experience with the multisensor HeartLogic algorithm for heart failure monitoring: a retrospective case series report. ESC Heart Fail 2019;6:308–18. PubMed PMC
Gardner RS, Thakur P, Hammill EF, Nair DG, Eldadah Z, Stancak B et al. Multiparameter diagnostic sensor measurements during clinically stable periods and worsening heart failure in ambulatory patients. ESC Heart Fail 2021;8:1571–81. PubMed PMC
Heggermont WA, Van Bockstal K. Heartlogic™: ready for prime time? Expert Rev Med Devices 2022;19:107–11. PubMed
Brasca FM, Perego GB. Remote monitoring of implantable electronic devices to predict heart failure decompensation. Expert Rev Med Devices 2021;18:9–12. PubMed
Cowie MR, Sarkar S, Koehler J, Whellan DJ, Crossley GH, Tang WH et al. Development and validation of an integrated diagnostic algorithm derived from parameters monitored in implantable devices for identifying patients at risk for heart failure hospitalization in an ambulatory setting. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2472–80. PubMed PMC
Burri H, Da Costa A, Quesada A, Ricci RP, Favale S, Clementy N et al. Risk stratification of cardiovascular and heart failure hospitalizations using integrated device diagnostics in patients with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator. Europace 2018;20:e69–77. PubMed
Virani SA, Sharma V, McCann M, Koehler J, Tsang B, Zieroth S. Prospective evaluation of integrated device diagnostics for heart failure management: results of the TRIAGE-HF study. ESC Heart Fail 2018;5:809–17. PubMed PMC
Ahmed FZ, Sammut-Powell C, Kwok CS, Tay T, Motwani M, Martin GP et al. Remote monitoring data from cardiac implantable electronic devices predicts all-cause mortality. Europace 2022;24:245–55. PubMed PMC
Tajstra M, Sokal A, Gadula-Gacek E, Kurek A, Wozniak A, Niedziela J et al. Remote supervision to decrease hospitalization rate (RESULT) study in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillator. Europace 2020;22:769–76. PubMed
Kolk MZH, Narayan SM, Clopton P, Wilde AAM, Knops RE, Tjong FVY. Reduction in long-term mortality using remote device monitoring in a large real-world population of patients with implantable defibrillators. Europace 2023;25:969–77. PubMed PMC
Abraham WT, Stevenson LW, Bourge RC, Lindenfeld JA, Bauman JG, Adamson PB. Sustained efficacy of pulmonary artery pressure to guide adjustment of chronic heart failure therapy: complete follow-up results from the CHAMPION randomised trial. Lancet 2016;387:453–61. PubMed