Dense city centers support less evolutionary unique bird communities than sparser urban areas
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
38322998
PubMed Central
PMC10844830
DOI
10.1016/j.isci.2024.108945
PII: S2589-0042(24)00166-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Ecology, Evolutionary biology, Ornithology,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Urbanization alters avian communities, generally lowering the number of species and contemporaneously increasing their functional relatedness, leading to biotic homogenization. Urbanization can also negatively affect the phylogenetic diversity of species assemblages, potentially decreasing their evolutionary distinctiveness. We compare species assemblages in a gradient of building density in seventeen European cities to test whether the evolutionary distinctiveness of communities is shaped by the degree of urbanization. We found a significant decline in the evolutionary uniqueness of avian communities in highly dense urban areas, compared to low and medium-dense areas. Overall, communities from dense city centers supported one million years of evolutionary history less than communities from low-dense urban areas. Such evolutionary homogenization was due to a filtering process of the most evolutionarily unique birds. Metrics related to evolutionary uniqueness have to play a role when assessing the effects of urbanization and can be used to identify local conservation priorities.
Department of Biology University of Turku Turku Finland
Department of Zoology Faculty of Sciences University of Granada Granada Spain
Department of Zoology Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences University of Tartu Tartu Estonia
Estonian Environmental Board Roheline 64 80010 Pärnu Estonia
Plegadis Riga Feraiou 6A 45444 Ioannina Greece
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Güneralp B., Reba M., Hales B.U., Wentz E.A., Seto K.C. Trends in urban land expansion, density, and land transitions from 1970 to 2010: A global synthesis. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020;15
Jiang L., Deng X., Seto K.C. Multi-level modeling of urban expansion and cultivated land conversion for urban hotspot counties in China. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2012;108:131–139.
McDonald R.I. Global urbanization: can ecologists identify a sustainable way forward? Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008;6:99–104.
Seto K.C., Güneralp B., Hutyra L.R. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:16083–16088. PubMed PMC
Carrascal L.M., Cayuela L., Palomino D., Seoane J. What species-specific traits make a bird a better surrogate of native species richness? A test with insular avifauna. Biol. Conserv. 2012;152:204–211.
Clavero M., Brotons L., Herrando S. Bird community specialization, bird conservation and disturbance: the role of wildfires. J. Anim. Ecol. 2011;80:128–136. PubMed
Ibáñez-Álamo J.D., Morelli F., Benedetti Y., Rubio E., Jokimäki J., Pérez-Contreras T., Sprau P., Suhonen J., Tryjanowski P., Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M.L., et al. Biodiversity within the city: Effects of land sharing and land sparing urban development on avian diversity. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;707 PubMed
Suhonen J., Jokimäki J., Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M.L., Morelli F., Benedetti Y., Rubio E., Pérez-Contreras T., Sprau P., Tryjanowski P., Møller A.P., et al. Occupancy-frequency distribution of birds in land-sharing and -sparing urban landscapes in Europe. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2022;226
Morelli F., Benedetti Y., Ibáñez-Álamo J.D., Tryjanowski P., Jokimäki J., Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M.L., Suhonen J., Díaz M., Møller A.P., Moravec D., et al. Effects of urbanization on taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic avian diversity in Europe. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;795 PubMed
Crooks K.R., Suarez A.V., Bolger D.T. Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape. Biol. Conserv. 2004;115:451–462.
MacGregor-Fors I., Escobar-Ibáñez J.F., Schondube J.E., Zuria I., Ortega-Álvarez R., Sosa-López J.R., Ruvalcaba-Ortega I., Almazán-Núñez R.C., Arellano-Delgado M., Arriaga-Weiss S.L., et al. The urban contrast: A nationwide assessment of avian diversity in Mexican cities. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;753 PubMed
Fernández-Juricic E., Jokimäki J. A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: Case studies from southern and northern Europe. Biodivers. Conserv. 2001;10:2023–2043.
Aronson M.F.J., La Sorte F.A., Nilon C.H., Katti M., Goddard M.A., Lepczyk C.A., Warren P.S., Williams N.S.G., Cilliers S., Clarkson B., et al. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2014;281 PubMed PMC
Møller A.P., Díaz M. Avian preference for close proximity to human habitation and its ecological consequences. Curr. Zool. 2018;64:623–630. PubMed PMC
Safi K., Armour-Marshall K., Baillie J.E.M., Isaac N.J.B. Global Patterns of Evolutionary Distinct and Globally Endangered Amphibians and Mammals. PLoS One. 2013;8 PubMed PMC
Callaghan C.T., Major R.E., Wilshire J.H., Martin J.M., Kingsford R.T., Cornwell W.K. Generalists are the most urban-tolerant of birds: a phylogenetically controlled analysis of ecological and life history traits using a novel continuous measure of bird responses to urbanization. Oikos. 2019;128:845–858.
Tryjanowski P., Morelli F., Møller A.P. In: The Routledge Handbook of Urban Ecology. Douglas I., Anderson P.M.L., Goode D., Houck M.C., Maddox D., Nagendra H., Tan P.Y., editors. Routledge; 2021. Urban birds: Urban avoiders, urban adapters and urban exploiters; pp. 399–411.
Šálek M., Grill S., Riegert J. Nest-site selection of an avian urban exploiter, the Eurasian magpie Pica pica, across the urban-rural gradient. J. Vertebr. Biol. 2020;70
McKinney M.L. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience. 2002;52:883–890.
Devictor V., Julliard R., Clavel J., Jiguet F., Lee A., Couvet D. Functional biotic homogenization of bird communities in disturbed landscapes. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2008;17:252–261.
Francis R.A., Chadwick M.A. What makes a species synurbic? Appl. Geogr. 2012;32:514–521.
Sol D., Bartomeus I., González-Lagos C., Pavoine S. Urbanisation and the loss of phylogenetic diversity in birds. Ecol. Lett. 2017;20:721–729. PubMed
Ibáñez-Álamo J.D., Rubio E., Benedetti Y., Morelli F. Global loss of avian evolutionary uniqueness in urban areas. Global Change Biol. 2017;23:2990–2998. PubMed
Morelli F., Benedetti Y., Ibáñez-Álamo J.D., Jokimäki J., Mänd R., Tryjanowski P., Møller A.P. Evidence of evolutionary homogenization of bird communities in urban environments across Europe. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2016;25:1284–1293.
Redding D.W., Hartmann K., Mimoto A., Bokal D., DeVos M., Mooers A.Ø. Evolutionarily distinctive species often capture more phylogenetic diversity than expected. J. Theor. Biol. 2008;251:606–615. PubMed
Redding D.W., Dewolff C.V., Mooers A.Ø. Evolutionary distinctiveness, threat status, and ecological oddity in primates. Conserv. Biol. 2010;24:1052–1058. PubMed
Jetz W., Thomas G.H., Joy J.B., Redding D.W., Hartmann K., Mooers A.O.Ø. Global distribution and conservation of evolutionary distinctness in birds. Curr. Biol. 2014;24:919–930. PubMed
Hidasi-Neto J., Loyola R., Cianciaruso M.V. Global and local evolutionary and ecological distinctiveness of terrestrial mammals: identifying priorities across scales. Divers. Distrib. 2015;21:548–559.
Morelli F., Møller A.P. Pattern of evolutionarily distinct species among four classes of animals and their conservation status: a comparison using evolutionary distinctiveness scores. Biodivers. Conserv. 2017;27:381–394.
McDonald R.I., Aronson M.F.J., Beatley T., Beller E., Bazo M., Grossinger R., Jessup K., Mansur A.V., Puppim de Oliveira J.A., Panlasigui S., et al. Denser and greener cities: Green interventions to achieve both urban density and nature. People Nat. 2023;5:84–102.
Folke C., Carpenter S., Elmqvist T., Gunderson L., Holling C.S., Walker B. Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a World of transformations. Ambio. 2002;31:437–440. PubMed
Oliver T.H., Heard M.S., Isaac N.J.B., Roy D.B., Procter D., Eigenbrod F., Freckleton R., Hector A., Orme C.D.L., Petchey O.L., et al. Biodiversity and Resilience of Ecosystem Functions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2015;30:673–684. PubMed
Naeem S., Chazdon R., Duffy J.E., Prager C., Worm B. Biodiversity and human well-being: An essential link for sustainable development. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2016;283 PubMed PMC
Zhang J.W., Piff P.K., Iyer R., Koleva S., Keltner D. An occasion for unselfing: Beautiful nature leads to prosociality. J. Environ. Psychol. 2014;37:61–72.
Miller J.R., Hobbs R.J. Conservation where people live and work. Conserv. Biol. 2002;16:330–337.
Díaz M., Ramos A., Concepción E.D. Changing urban bird diversity: how to manage adaptively our closest relation with wildlife. Ecosistemas. 2022;31:2354.
Frishkoff L.O., Karp D.S., M’Gonigle L.K., Mendenhall C.D., Zook J., Kremen C., Hadly E.A., Daily G.C. Loss of avian phylogenetic diversity in neotropical agricultural systems. Science. 2014;345:1343–1346. PubMed
Lai S.-M., Liu W.-C., Jordán F. On the centrality and uniqueness of species from the network perspective. Biol. Lett. 2012;8:570–573. PubMed PMC
Morelli F., Benedetti Y., Su T., Zhou B., Moravec D., Šímová P., Liang W. Taxonomic diversity, functional diversity and evolutionary uniqueness in bird communities of Beijing’s urban parks: effects of land use and vegetation structure. Urban For. Urban Green. 2017;23:84–92.
Benedetti Y., Kapsalis E., Morelli F., Kati V. Sacred oak woods increase bird diversity and specialization : Links with the European Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. J. Environ. Manag. 2021;294 PubMed
Marzluff J., Bowman R., Donnelly R. Springer Science; 2001. Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World.
Ng E. Routledge; 2015. Designing High- Density Cities: For Social and Environmental Sustainability.
Adams C.E. 3rd ed. CRC Press; 2016. Urban Wildlife Management.
Morelli F., Mikula P., Benedetti Y., Bussière R., Jerzak L., Tryjanowski P. Escape behaviour of birds in urban parks and cemeteries across Europe: Evidence of behavioural adaptation to human activity. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;631–632:803–810. PubMed
Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D., Hill D.A. Academic Press; 1992. Bird Census Techniques.
Voříšek P., Klvaňová A., Wotton S., Gregory R.D. Pan-European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme (PECMBS); 2010. A Best Practice Guide for Wild Bird Monitoring Schemes.
Kéry M., Royle J.A., Schmid H. Modeling avian abundance from replicated counts using binomial mixture models. Ecol. Appl. 2005;15:1450–1461.
Morelli F., Brlík V., Benedetti Y., Bussière R., Moudrá L., Reif J., Svitok M. Detection rate of bird species and what it depends on: Tips for field surveys. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2022;9
Magurran A. Blackwell Science; 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity.
Tucker C.M., Cadotte M.W., Carvalho S.B., Davies T.J., Ferrier S., Fritz S.A., Grenyer R., Helmus M.R., Jin L.S., Mooers A.Ø., et al. A guide to phylogenetic metrics for conservation, community ecology and macroecology. Biol. Rev. 2017;92:698–715. PubMed PMC
Isaac N.J.B., Turvey S.T., Collen B., Waterman C., Baillie J.E.M. Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny. PLoS One. 2007;2:e296. PubMed PMC
Brooks M., Bolker B., Kristensen K., Maechler M., Magnusson A., McGillycuddy M., Skaug H., Nielsen A., Berg C., Van Bentham K., et al. 2022. glmmTMB: Generalized Linear Mixed Models Using Template Model Builder.
Box G.E.P., Cox D.R. An analysis of transformations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. 1964;26:211–243.
Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B., Walker S. 2014. lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Eigen and S4 - R Package.
Long J.A. 2020. Jtools: Analysis and Presentation of Social Scientific Data.
Fox J., Monette G. Generalized collinearity diagnostics. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1992;87:178–183.
Fox J., Weisberg S. SAGE Publications Inc); 2019. An {R} Companion to Applied Regression Third.
Graham M.H. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology. 2003;84:2809–2815.
Bartoń K. 2013. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference, R Package.
R Development Core Team . 2023. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
Ferraz G., Nichols J.D., Hines J.E., Stouffer P.C., Bierregaard R.O., Jr., Lovejoy T.E. A large-scale deforestation experiment: effects of patch area and isolation on Amazon birds. Science. 2007;315:238–241. PubMed
Martin A.E., Desrochers A., Fahrig L. Homogenization of dispersal ability across bird species in response to landscape change. Oikos. 2016;126:996–1003.
Shimazaki A., Yamaura Y., Senzaki M., Yabuhara Y., Akasaka T., Nakamura F. Urban permeability for birds: An approach combining mobbing-call experiments and circuit theory. Urban For. Urban Green. 2016;19:167–175.
Morelli F., Reif J., Díaz M., Tryjanowski P., Ibáñez-Álamo J.D., Suhonen J., Jokimäki J., Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M.L., Pape Møller A., Bussière R., et al. Top ten birds indicators of high environmental quality in European cities. Ecol. Indicat. 2021;133
McKinney M.L., Lockwood J.L. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the nextmass extinction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999;14:450–453. PubMed
Monnet A.C., Jiguet F., Meynard C.N., Mouillot D., Mouquet N., Thuiller W., Devictor V. Asynchrony of taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity in birds. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2014;23:780–788. PubMed PMC
Gumbs R., Gray C.L., Hoffmann M., Molina-Venegas R., Owen N.R., Pollock L.J. Conserving avian evolutionary history can effectively safeguard future benefits for people. Sci. Adv. 2023;9 PubMed PMC
Tucker C.M., Aze T., Cadotte M.W., Cantalapiedra J.L., Chisholm C., Díaz S., Grenyer R., Huang D., Mazel F., Pearse W.D., et al. Assessing the utility of conserving evolutionary history. Biol. Rev. 2019;94:1740–1760. PubMed PMC
Gaston K.J., Blackburn T.M. Evolutionary age and risk of extinction in the global avifauna. Evol. Ecol. 1997;11:557–565.
Roeland S., Moretti M., Amorim J.H., Branquinho C., Fares S., Morelli F., Niinemets Ü., Paoletti E., Pinho P., Sgrigna G., et al. Towards an integrative approach to evaluate the environmental ecosystem services provided by urban forest. J. For. Res. 2019;30:1981–1996.
Ferenc M., Sedláček O., Fuchs R., Dinetti M., Fraissinet M., Storch D. Are cities different? Patterns of species richness and beta diversity of urban bird communities and regional species assemblages in Europe. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2014;23:479–489.
Marzluff J.M. A decadal review of urban ornithology and a prospectus for the future. Ibis. 2017;159:1–13.
Jokimäki J., Suhonen J., Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M.L. Urban core areas are important for species conservation: A European-level analysis of breeding bird species. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2018;178:73–81.
Escobar-Ibáñez J.F., Rueda-Hernández R., MacGregor-Fors I. The Greener the Better! Avian communities across a Neotropical gradient of urbanization density. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2020;8
Redding D.W., Mooers A.O., Şekercioğlu Ç.H., Collen B. Global evolutionary isolation measures can capture key local conservation species in Nearctic and Neotropical bird communities. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2015;370 PubMed PMC
United Nations . 2016. Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures. World Cities Report 2016 (United Nations)