Dense city centers support less evolutionary unique bird communities than sparser urban areas

. 2024 Feb 16 ; 27 (2) : 108945. [epub] 20240118

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid38322998
Odkazy

PubMed 38322998
PubMed Central PMC10844830
DOI 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108945
PII: S2589-0042(24)00166-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Urbanization alters avian communities, generally lowering the number of species and contemporaneously increasing their functional relatedness, leading to biotic homogenization. Urbanization can also negatively affect the phylogenetic diversity of species assemblages, potentially decreasing their evolutionary distinctiveness. We compare species assemblages in a gradient of building density in seventeen European cities to test whether the evolutionary distinctiveness of communities is shaped by the degree of urbanization. We found a significant decline in the evolutionary uniqueness of avian communities in highly dense urban areas, compared to low and medium-dense areas. Overall, communities from dense city centers supported one million years of evolutionary history less than communities from low-dense urban areas. Such evolutionary homogenization was due to a filtering process of the most evolutionarily unique birds. Metrics related to evolutionary uniqueness have to play a role when assessing the effects of urbanization and can be used to identify local conservation priorities.

Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Faculty of Environmental Sciences Kamýcká 129 CZ 165 00 Prague 6 Czech Republic

Department of Biogeography and Global Change Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales E 28006 Madrid Spain

Department of Biology University of Turku Turku Finland

Department of Plant Pathology Institute of Plant Protection Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Ménesi út 44 1118 Budapest Hungary

Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology Faculty of Science Palacky University in Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Zoology Faculty of Sciences University of Granada Granada Spain

Department of Zoology Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences University of Tartu Tartu Estonia

Department of Zoology Poznań University of Life Sciences Wojska Polskiego 71C PL 60 625 Poznań Poland

Department of Zoology School of Biology Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 54124 Thessaloniki Greece

Ecologie Systématique Evolution Université Paris Sud CNRS AgroParisTech Université Paris Saclay F 91405 Orsay Cedex France

Estonian Environmental Board Roheline 64 80010 Pärnu Estonia

Institute for Environmental Studies Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Staré Město Czech Republic

Institute of Biological Sciences University of Zielona Góra Prof Szafrana St 1 PL 65 16 Zielona Góra Poland

Nature Inventory and EIA services Arctic Centre University of Lapland P O Box 122 FI 96101 Rovaniemi Finland

Plegadis Riga Feraiou 6A 45444 Ioannina Greece

Rue des Roses 87200 Chaillac sur Vienne France

S C della Pantiera 23 61029 Pantiera Urbino Italy

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Güneralp B., Reba M., Hales B.U., Wentz E.A., Seto K.C. Trends in urban land expansion, density, and land transitions from 1970 to 2010: A global synthesis. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020;15

Jiang L., Deng X., Seto K.C. Multi-level modeling of urban expansion and cultivated land conversion for urban hotspot counties in China. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2012;108:131–139.

McDonald R.I. Global urbanization: can ecologists identify a sustainable way forward? Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008;6:99–104.

Seto K.C., Güneralp B., Hutyra L.R. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:16083–16088. PubMed PMC

Carrascal L.M., Cayuela L., Palomino D., Seoane J. What species-specific traits make a bird a better surrogate of native species richness? A test with insular avifauna. Biol. Conserv. 2012;152:204–211.

Clavero M., Brotons L., Herrando S. Bird community specialization, bird conservation and disturbance: the role of wildfires. J. Anim. Ecol. 2011;80:128–136. PubMed

Ibáñez-Álamo J.D., Morelli F., Benedetti Y., Rubio E., Jokimäki J., Pérez-Contreras T., Sprau P., Suhonen J., Tryjanowski P., Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M.L., et al. Biodiversity within the city: Effects of land sharing and land sparing urban development on avian diversity. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;707 PubMed

Suhonen J., Jokimäki J., Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M.L., Morelli F., Benedetti Y., Rubio E., Pérez-Contreras T., Sprau P., Tryjanowski P., Møller A.P., et al. Occupancy-frequency distribution of birds in land-sharing and -sparing urban landscapes in Europe. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2022;226

Morelli F., Benedetti Y., Ibáñez-Álamo J.D., Tryjanowski P., Jokimäki J., Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M.L., Suhonen J., Díaz M., Møller A.P., Moravec D., et al. Effects of urbanization on taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic avian diversity in Europe. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;795 PubMed

Crooks K.R., Suarez A.V., Bolger D.T. Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape. Biol. Conserv. 2004;115:451–462.

MacGregor-Fors I., Escobar-Ibáñez J.F., Schondube J.E., Zuria I., Ortega-Álvarez R., Sosa-López J.R., Ruvalcaba-Ortega I., Almazán-Núñez R.C., Arellano-Delgado M., Arriaga-Weiss S.L., et al. The urban contrast: A nationwide assessment of avian diversity in Mexican cities. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;753 PubMed

Fernández-Juricic E., Jokimäki J. A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: Case studies from southern and northern Europe. Biodivers. Conserv. 2001;10:2023–2043.

Aronson M.F.J., La Sorte F.A., Nilon C.H., Katti M., Goddard M.A., Lepczyk C.A., Warren P.S., Williams N.S.G., Cilliers S., Clarkson B., et al. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2014;281 PubMed PMC

Møller A.P., Díaz M. Avian preference for close proximity to human habitation and its ecological consequences. Curr. Zool. 2018;64:623–630. PubMed PMC

Safi K., Armour-Marshall K., Baillie J.E.M., Isaac N.J.B. Global Patterns of Evolutionary Distinct and Globally Endangered Amphibians and Mammals. PLoS One. 2013;8 PubMed PMC

Callaghan C.T., Major R.E., Wilshire J.H., Martin J.M., Kingsford R.T., Cornwell W.K. Generalists are the most urban-tolerant of birds: a phylogenetically controlled analysis of ecological and life history traits using a novel continuous measure of bird responses to urbanization. Oikos. 2019;128:845–858.

Tryjanowski P., Morelli F., Møller A.P. In: The Routledge Handbook of Urban Ecology. Douglas I., Anderson P.M.L., Goode D., Houck M.C., Maddox D., Nagendra H., Tan P.Y., editors. Routledge; 2021. Urban birds: Urban avoiders, urban adapters and urban exploiters; pp. 399–411.

Šálek M., Grill S., Riegert J. Nest-site selection of an avian urban exploiter, the Eurasian magpie Pica pica, across the urban-rural gradient. J. Vertebr. Biol. 2020;70

McKinney M.L. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience. 2002;52:883–890.

Devictor V., Julliard R., Clavel J., Jiguet F., Lee A., Couvet D. Functional biotic homogenization of bird communities in disturbed landscapes. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2008;17:252–261.

Francis R.A., Chadwick M.A. What makes a species synurbic? Appl. Geogr. 2012;32:514–521.

Sol D., Bartomeus I., González-Lagos C., Pavoine S. Urbanisation and the loss of phylogenetic diversity in birds. Ecol. Lett. 2017;20:721–729. PubMed

Ibáñez-Álamo J.D., Rubio E., Benedetti Y., Morelli F. Global loss of avian evolutionary uniqueness in urban areas. Global Change Biol. 2017;23:2990–2998. PubMed

Morelli F., Benedetti Y., Ibáñez-Álamo J.D., Jokimäki J., Mänd R., Tryjanowski P., Møller A.P. Evidence of evolutionary homogenization of bird communities in urban environments across Europe. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2016;25:1284–1293.

Redding D.W., Hartmann K., Mimoto A., Bokal D., DeVos M., Mooers A.Ø. Evolutionarily distinctive species often capture more phylogenetic diversity than expected. J. Theor. Biol. 2008;251:606–615. PubMed

Redding D.W., Dewolff C.V., Mooers A.Ø. Evolutionary distinctiveness, threat status, and ecological oddity in primates. Conserv. Biol. 2010;24:1052–1058. PubMed

Jetz W., Thomas G.H., Joy J.B., Redding D.W., Hartmann K., Mooers A.O.Ø. Global distribution and conservation of evolutionary distinctness in birds. Curr. Biol. 2014;24:919–930. PubMed

Hidasi-Neto J., Loyola R., Cianciaruso M.V. Global and local evolutionary and ecological distinctiveness of terrestrial mammals: identifying priorities across scales. Divers. Distrib. 2015;21:548–559.

Morelli F., Møller A.P. Pattern of evolutionarily distinct species among four classes of animals and their conservation status: a comparison using evolutionary distinctiveness scores. Biodivers. Conserv. 2017;27:381–394.

McDonald R.I., Aronson M.F.J., Beatley T., Beller E., Bazo M., Grossinger R., Jessup K., Mansur A.V., Puppim de Oliveira J.A., Panlasigui S., et al. Denser and greener cities: Green interventions to achieve both urban density and nature. People Nat. 2023;5:84–102.

Folke C., Carpenter S., Elmqvist T., Gunderson L., Holling C.S., Walker B. Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a World of transformations. Ambio. 2002;31:437–440. PubMed

Oliver T.H., Heard M.S., Isaac N.J.B., Roy D.B., Procter D., Eigenbrod F., Freckleton R., Hector A., Orme C.D.L., Petchey O.L., et al. Biodiversity and Resilience of Ecosystem Functions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2015;30:673–684. PubMed

Naeem S., Chazdon R., Duffy J.E., Prager C., Worm B. Biodiversity and human well-being: An essential link for sustainable development. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2016;283 PubMed PMC

Zhang J.W., Piff P.K., Iyer R., Koleva S., Keltner D. An occasion for unselfing: Beautiful nature leads to prosociality. J. Environ. Psychol. 2014;37:61–72.

Miller J.R., Hobbs R.J. Conservation where people live and work. Conserv. Biol. 2002;16:330–337.

Díaz M., Ramos A., Concepción E.D. Changing urban bird diversity: how to manage adaptively our closest relation with wildlife. Ecosistemas. 2022;31:2354.

Frishkoff L.O., Karp D.S., M’Gonigle L.K., Mendenhall C.D., Zook J., Kremen C., Hadly E.A., Daily G.C. Loss of avian phylogenetic diversity in neotropical agricultural systems. Science. 2014;345:1343–1346. PubMed

Lai S.-M., Liu W.-C., Jordán F. On the centrality and uniqueness of species from the network perspective. Biol. Lett. 2012;8:570–573. PubMed PMC

Morelli F., Benedetti Y., Su T., Zhou B., Moravec D., Šímová P., Liang W. Taxonomic diversity, functional diversity and evolutionary uniqueness in bird communities of Beijing’s urban parks: effects of land use and vegetation structure. Urban For. Urban Green. 2017;23:84–92.

Benedetti Y., Kapsalis E., Morelli F., Kati V. Sacred oak woods increase bird diversity and specialization : Links with the European Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. J. Environ. Manag. 2021;294 PubMed

Marzluff J., Bowman R., Donnelly R. Springer Science; 2001. Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World.

Ng E. Routledge; 2015. Designing High- Density Cities: For Social and Environmental Sustainability.

Adams C.E. 3rd ed. CRC Press; 2016. Urban Wildlife Management.

Morelli F., Mikula P., Benedetti Y., Bussière R., Jerzak L., Tryjanowski P. Escape behaviour of birds in urban parks and cemeteries across Europe: Evidence of behavioural adaptation to human activity. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;631–632:803–810. PubMed

Bibby C.J., Burgess N.D., Hill D.A. Academic Press; 1992. Bird Census Techniques.

Voříšek P., Klvaňová A., Wotton S., Gregory R.D. Pan-European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme (PECMBS); 2010. A Best Practice Guide for Wild Bird Monitoring Schemes.

Kéry M., Royle J.A., Schmid H. Modeling avian abundance from replicated counts using binomial mixture models. Ecol. Appl. 2005;15:1450–1461.

Morelli F., Brlík V., Benedetti Y., Bussière R., Moudrá L., Reif J., Svitok M. Detection rate of bird species and what it depends on: Tips for field surveys. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2022;9

Magurran A. Blackwell Science; 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity.

Tucker C.M., Cadotte M.W., Carvalho S.B., Davies T.J., Ferrier S., Fritz S.A., Grenyer R., Helmus M.R., Jin L.S., Mooers A.Ø., et al. A guide to phylogenetic metrics for conservation, community ecology and macroecology. Biol. Rev. 2017;92:698–715. PubMed PMC

Isaac N.J.B., Turvey S.T., Collen B., Waterman C., Baillie J.E.M. Mammals on the EDGE: conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny. PLoS One. 2007;2:e296. PubMed PMC

Brooks M., Bolker B., Kristensen K., Maechler M., Magnusson A., McGillycuddy M., Skaug H., Nielsen A., Berg C., Van Bentham K., et al. 2022. glmmTMB: Generalized Linear Mixed Models Using Template Model Builder.

Box G.E.P., Cox D.R. An analysis of transformations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. 1964;26:211–243.

Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B., Walker S. 2014. lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Eigen and S4 - R Package.

Long J.A. 2020. Jtools: Analysis and Presentation of Social Scientific Data.

Fox J., Monette G. Generalized collinearity diagnostics. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1992;87:178–183.

Fox J., Weisberg S. SAGE Publications Inc); 2019. An {R} Companion to Applied Regression Third.

Graham M.H. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology. 2003;84:2809–2815.

Bartoń K. 2013. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference, R Package.

R Development Core Team . 2023. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.

Ferraz G., Nichols J.D., Hines J.E., Stouffer P.C., Bierregaard R.O., Jr., Lovejoy T.E. A large-scale deforestation experiment: effects of patch area and isolation on Amazon birds. Science. 2007;315:238–241. PubMed

Martin A.E., Desrochers A., Fahrig L. Homogenization of dispersal ability across bird species in response to landscape change. Oikos. 2016;126:996–1003.

Shimazaki A., Yamaura Y., Senzaki M., Yabuhara Y., Akasaka T., Nakamura F. Urban permeability for birds: An approach combining mobbing-call experiments and circuit theory. Urban For. Urban Green. 2016;19:167–175.

Morelli F., Reif J., Díaz M., Tryjanowski P., Ibáñez-Álamo J.D., Suhonen J., Jokimäki J., Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M.L., Pape Møller A., Bussière R., et al. Top ten birds indicators of high environmental quality in European cities. Ecol. Indicat. 2021;133

McKinney M.L., Lockwood J.L. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the nextmass extinction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999;14:450–453. PubMed

Monnet A.C., Jiguet F., Meynard C.N., Mouillot D., Mouquet N., Thuiller W., Devictor V. Asynchrony of taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity in birds. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2014;23:780–788. PubMed PMC

Gumbs R., Gray C.L., Hoffmann M., Molina-Venegas R., Owen N.R., Pollock L.J. Conserving avian evolutionary history can effectively safeguard future benefits for people. Sci. Adv. 2023;9 PubMed PMC

Tucker C.M., Aze T., Cadotte M.W., Cantalapiedra J.L., Chisholm C., Díaz S., Grenyer R., Huang D., Mazel F., Pearse W.D., et al. Assessing the utility of conserving evolutionary history. Biol. Rev. 2019;94:1740–1760. PubMed PMC

Gaston K.J., Blackburn T.M. Evolutionary age and risk of extinction in the global avifauna. Evol. Ecol. 1997;11:557–565.

Roeland S., Moretti M., Amorim J.H., Branquinho C., Fares S., Morelli F., Niinemets Ü., Paoletti E., Pinho P., Sgrigna G., et al. Towards an integrative approach to evaluate the environmental ecosystem services provided by urban forest. J. For. Res. 2019;30:1981–1996.

Ferenc M., Sedláček O., Fuchs R., Dinetti M., Fraissinet M., Storch D. Are cities different? Patterns of species richness and beta diversity of urban bird communities and regional species assemblages in Europe. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2014;23:479–489.

Marzluff J.M. A decadal review of urban ornithology and a prospectus for the future. Ibis. 2017;159:1–13.

Jokimäki J., Suhonen J., Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M.L. Urban core areas are important for species conservation: A European-level analysis of breeding bird species. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2018;178:73–81.

Escobar-Ibáñez J.F., Rueda-Hernández R., MacGregor-Fors I. The Greener the Better! Avian communities across a Neotropical gradient of urbanization density. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2020;8

Redding D.W., Mooers A.O., Şekercioğlu Ç.H., Collen B. Global evolutionary isolation measures can capture key local conservation species in Nearctic and Neotropical bird communities. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2015;370 PubMed PMC

United Nations . 2016. Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures. World Cities Report 2016 (United Nations)

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...