Background: Chronic wounds present a significant clinical, social, and economic challenge. This study aimed to objectify the risk factors of healing outcomes and the duration of chronic wounds from various etiologies. Methods: Patients treated for non-healing wounds at the surgical outpatient clinic of the Olomouc Military Hospital were involved. Data from patients treated between 8/2021 and 9/2023 were selected. Patients were mostly treated as outpatients, with microbiological follow-up indicated in cases of advanced signs of inflammation. Results: There were 149 patients who met our selection criteria (the mean age was 64.4 years). Predominant causes of wounds involved diabetes (30.9%), post-trauma (25.5%), pressure ulcers (14.8%), surgical site infections (14.8%), and vascular ulcers (14.1%). Patient outcomes included wound resolution in 77.2% of patients (with a mean healing time of 110.9 days), amputation in 14.1%, and wound-related death in 8.7% of patients. Non-healing cases (amputation/death) were predicted by several local factors including an initial depth greater than 1 cm, wound secretion, inflammatory base, and a maximum wound size. Systemic factors included most strongly clinically manifested atherosclerosis and its risk factors. Of the 110 swabs performed, 103 identified at least 1 bacterial genus. The dominant risk factor for a prolonged healing duration was bacterial infection. Wounds contaminated by Proteus or Pseudomonas had prolonged healing times of 87 days (p = 0.02) and 72 days (p = 0.045), respectively. Conclusions: The early identification of local and systemic risk factors contributes to the successful resolution of chronic wounds and a reduced duration of healing.

Department of Biophysics Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Palacký University Olomouc Hněvotínská 976 3 775 15 Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Public Health Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Palacký University Olomouc Hněvotínská 976 3 775 15 Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Surgery Military Hospital Olomouc Sušilovo Náměstí 5 771 11 Olomouc Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

International Diabetes Federation IDF Diabetes Atlas 2021. [(accessed on 9 December 2023)]. Available online: https://diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition/

Williams M. Wound Infections: An overview. Br. J. Community Nurs. 2021;1:22–25. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2021.26.Sup6.S22. PubMed DOI

Sen C.K. Human Wound and Its Burden: Updated 2020 Compendium of Estimates. Adv. Wound Care. 2021;10:281–292. doi: 10.1089/wound.2021.0026. PubMed DOI PMC

William W., Li W.W., Carter M.J., Mashiach E., Guthrie S.D. Vascular assessment of wound healing: A clinical review. Int. Wound J. 2017;14:460–469. PubMed PMC

Bowers S., Franco E. Chronic Wounds: Evaluation and Management. Am. Fam. Physician. 2020;101:159–166. PubMed

Mensikova A., Klugarova J., Klugar M., Mensik I., Soukupova Z., Pokorna A. Perioperative management of pressure injury: A best practice implementation project. JBI Evid. Implement. 2022;8:59–66. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000327. PubMed DOI

Raeder K., Jachan D.E., Müller-Werdan U., Lahmann N.A. Prevalence and risk factors of chronic wounds in nursing homes in Germany: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. Wound J. 2020;17:1128–1134. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13486. PubMed DOI PMC

Edward R., Harding K.G. Bacteria and wound healing. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2004;17:91–96. doi: 10.1097/00001432-200404000-00004. PubMed DOI

Yao Z., Niu J., Cheng B. Prevalence of Chronic Skin Wounds and Their Risk Factors in an Inpatient Hospital Setting in Northern China. Adv. Skin Wound Care. 2020;3:1–10. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000694164.34068.82. PubMed DOI

Lindholm C., Searle R. Wound management for the 21st century: Combining effectiveness and efficiency. Int. Wound J. 2016;13:5–15. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12623. PubMed DOI PMC

Nuutila K., Eriksson E. Moist Wound Healing with Commonly Available Dressing. Adv. Wound Care. 2021;10:685–698. doi: 10.1089/wound.2020.1232. PubMed DOI PMC

Levine N.S., Lindberg R.B., Mason A.D., Pruitt B.A., Jr. The quantitative swab culture and smear: A quick, simple method for determining the number of viable aerobic bacteria on open wounds. J. Trauma. 1976;16:89–94. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197602000-00002. PubMed DOI

Jeyaraman K., Berhane T., Hamilton M., Chandra A.P., Falhammar H. Mortality in patients with diabetic foot ulcer: A retrospective study of 513 cases from a single Centre in the Northern Territory of Australia. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2019;3:19. doi: 10.1186/s12902-018-0327-2. PubMed DOI PMC

Everett E., Mathioudakis N. Update on management of diabetic foot ulcers. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2018;1411:153–165. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13569. PubMed DOI PMC

Schneider C., Stratman S., Kirsner R.S. Lower Extremity Ulcers. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2021;105:663–679. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2021.04.006. PubMed DOI

Burgess J.L., Wyant W.A., Abujamra A.B., Kirsner R.S., Jozic I. Diabetic Wound-Healing Science. Medicina. 2021;57:1072. doi: 10.3390/medicina57101072. PubMed DOI PMC

Ovington L.G. Dealing with drainage: The what, why, and how of wound exudate. Home Healthc. Nurse J. Home Care Hosp. Prof. 2002;20:368–374. doi: 10.1097/00004045-200206000-00013. PubMed DOI

Broussard K.C., Powers J.G. Wound dressings: Selecting the most appropriate type. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2013;14:449–459. doi: 10.1007/s40257-013-0046-4. PubMed DOI

Drago F., Gariazzo L., Cioni M., Trave I., Parodi A. The microbiome and its relevance in complex wounds. Eur. J. Dermatol. 2019;29:6–13. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2018.3486. PubMed DOI

Strobel R.M., Leonhardt M., Förster F., Neumann K., Lobbes L.A., Seifarth C., Lee L.D., Schineis C.H.W., Kamphues C., Weixler B., et al. The impact of surgical site infection-a cost analysis. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2022;407:819–828. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02346-y. PubMed DOI PMC

Jung K., Covington S., Sen K.C., Januszyk M., Kirsner R.S., Gurtner G.C., Shah N.H. Rapid identification of slow healing wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2016;24:181–188. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12384. PubMed DOI PMC

Daeschlein G. Antimicrobial and antiseptic strategies in wound management. Int. Wound J. 2013;10:9–14. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12175. PubMed DOI PMC

Thornton F.J. Wound healing in sepsis and trauma. Shock. 1997;8:391–401. doi: 10.1097/00024382-199712000-00001. PubMed DOI

Rand B.C.C., Penn-Barwell J.G., Wenke J.C. Combined local and systemic antibiotic delivery improves eradication of wound contamination: An animal experimental model of contaminated fracture. Bone Jt. J. 2015;97:1423–1427. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.35651. PubMed DOI

Dunyach-Remy C., Salipante F., Lavigne J.P., Brunaud M., Demattei C., Yahiaoui-Martinez A., Bastide S., Palayer C., Sotto A., Gélis A. Pressure ulcers microbiota dynamics and wound evolution. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:18506. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98073-x. PubMed DOI PMC

Zhu T., Liu S., Ying Y., Xu L., Liu Y., Jin J., Ying J., Lu J., Lin X., Li K., et al. Genomic and functional characterization of fecal sample strains of Proteus cibarius carrying two floR antibiotic resistance genes and a multiresistance plasmid-encoded cfr gene. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2020;69:101427. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101427. PubMed DOI

De Sousa T., Hébraud M., Dapkevicius M.L.N.E., Maltez L., Pereira J.E., Capita R., Alonso-Calleja C., Igrejas G., Poeta P. Genomic and Metabolic Characteristics of the Pathogenicity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:12892. doi: 10.3390/ijms222312892. PubMed DOI PMC

Li S., Renick P., Senkowsky J., Nair A., Tang L. Diagnostics for Wound Infections. Adv. Wound Care. 2021;10:317–327. doi: 10.1089/wound.2019.1103. PubMed DOI PMC

Garbuio D.C., Zamarioli C.M., Da Silva N.C.M., De Souza Oliveira-Kumakura A.R., Carvalho E.C. Assessment tools for the healing of wounds: An integrative review. Rev. Eletrônica Enferm. 2018;20:20–40.