Multicentre randomised trial of screening with sFlt1/PlGF and planned delivery to prevent pre-eclampsia at term: protocol of the PE37 study
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media electronic
Document type Clinical Trial Protocol, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
38458783
PubMed Central
PMC10928726
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076201
PII: bmjopen-2023-076201
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Hypertension, Maternal medicine, OBSTETRICS,
- MeSH
- Biomarkers MeSH
- Cesarean Section MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Multicenter Studies as Topic MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Placenta Growth Factor MeSH
- Predictive Value of Tests MeSH
- Pre-Eclampsia * diagnosis prevention & control epidemiology MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic MeSH
- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Clinical Trial Protocol MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Biomarkers MeSH
- FLT1 protein, human MeSH Browser
- Placenta Growth Factor MeSH
- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1 MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Pre-eclampsia affects ~5%-7% of pregnancies. Although improved obstetric care has significantly diminished its associated maternal mortality, it remains a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the world. Term pre-eclampsia accounts for 70% of all cases and a large proportion of maternal-fetal morbidity related to this condition. Unlike in preterm pre-eclampsia, the prediction and prevention of term pre-eclampsia remain unsolved. Previously proposed approaches are based on combined third-trimester screening and/or prophylactic drugs, but these policies are unlikely to be widely implementable in many world settings. Recent evidence shows that the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (s-Flt-1) to placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio measured at 35-37 weeks' gestation predicts term pre-eclampsia with an 80% detection rate. Likewise, recent studies demonstrate that induction of labour beyond 37 weeks is safe and well accepted by women. We hypothesise that a single-step universal screening for term pre-eclampsia based on sFlt1/PlGF ratio at 35-37 weeks followed by planned delivery beyond 37 weeks reduces the prevalence of term pre-eclampsia without increasing the caesarean section rates or worsening the neonatal outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We propose an open-label randomised clinical trial to evaluate the impact of a screening of term pre-eclampsia with the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio followed by planned delivery in asymptomatic nulliparous women at 35-37 weeks. Women will be assigned 1:1 to revealed (sFlt-1/PlGF known to clinicians) versus concealed (unknown) arms. A cut-off of >90th centile is used to define the high risk of subsequent pre-eclampsia and offer planned delivery from 37 weeks. The efficacy variables will be analysed and compared between groups primarily following an intention-to-treat approach, by ORs and their 95% CI. This value will be computed using a Generalised Linear Mixed Model for binary response (study group as fixed effect and the centre as intercept random effect). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is conducted under the principles of Good Clinical Practice. This study was accepted by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Hospital Clinic Barcelona on 20 November 2020. Subsequent approval by individual ethical committees and competent authorities was granted. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04766866.
Biochemistry Hospital Sant Pau Barcelona Spain
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège Liege Belgium
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
Hospital del Mar Barcelona Spain
Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol Badalona Spain
Hospital Politécnico y Universitario La Fe Valencia Spain
Obstetrician Son Llàtzer Hospital Palma de Mallorca Illes Balears Spain
Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Barcelona Spain
See more in PubMed
Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol 2009;33:130–7. 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.02.010 PubMed DOI
Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. . Global causes of maternal death: A WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2014;2:e323–33. 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X PubMed DOI
Gardosi J, Kady SM, McGeown P, et al. . Classification of Stillbirth by relevant condition at death (Recode): population based cohort study. BMJ 2005;331:1113–7. 10.1136/bmj.38629.587639.7C PubMed DOI PMC
Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Mercer BM, et al. . The preterm prediction study: recurrence risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstetri Gynecolo 1998;178:1035–40. 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70544-7 PubMed DOI
Williams D. Long-term complications of preeclampsia. Semin Nephrol 2011;31:111–22. 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2010.10.010 PubMed DOI
Davis EF, Lazdam M, Lewandowski AJ, et al. . Cardiovascular risk factors in children and young adults born to preeclamptic pregnancies: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2012;129:e1552–61. 10.1542/peds.2011-3093 PubMed DOI
Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Incidence of preeclampsia: risk factors and outcomes associated with early-versus late-onset disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:544. 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.019 PubMed DOI
Weitzner O, Yagur Y, Weissbach T, et al. . Preeclampsia: risk factors and neonatal outcomes associated with early- versus late-onset diseases. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020;33:780–4. 10.1080/14767058.2018.1500551 PubMed DOI
Steegers EA, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, et al. . Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2010;376:631–44. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60279-6 PubMed DOI
Kalafat E, Thilaganathan B. Cardiovascular origins of preeclampsia. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2017;29:383–9. 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000419 PubMed DOI
Kornacki J, Wirstlein P, Wender-Ozegowska E. n.d. Markers of endothelial injury and dysfunction in early- and late-onset preeclampsia. Life;10:239. 10.3390/life10100239 PubMed DOI PMC
Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Incidence of preeclampsia: risk factors and outcomes associated with early- versus late-onset disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:544. 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.019 PubMed DOI
Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC, et al. . Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2017;377:613–22. 10.1056/NEJMoa1704559 PubMed DOI
Döbert M, Varouxaki AN, Mu AC, et al. . Pravastatin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk of term preeclampsia. Circulation 2021;144:670–9. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053963 PubMed DOI
Cluver C, Novikova N, Koopmans CM, et al. . Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;1:CD009273. 10.1002/14651858.CD009273.pub2 PubMed DOI PMC
Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, et al. . Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med 2018;379:513–23. 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566 PubMed DOI PMC
Middleton P, Shepherd E, Morris J, et al. . Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;7:CD004945. 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub5 Available: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub5 PubMed DOI PMC
Crovetto F, Triunfo S, Crispi F, et al. . First-trimester screening with specific algorithms for early- and late-onset fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:340–8. 10.1002/uog.15879 PubMed DOI
Gallo DM, Wright D, Casanova C, et al. . Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 19-24 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:619. 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.016 PubMed DOI
Wang A, Rana S, Karumanchi SA. Preeclampsia: the role of angiogenic factors in its pathogenesis. Physiology (Bethesda) 2009;24:147–58. 10.1152/physiol.00043.2008 PubMed DOI
Karumanchi SA. Angiogenic factors in Preeclampsia: from diagnosis to therapy. Hypertension 2016;67:1072–9. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.06421 PubMed DOI
Zeisler H, Llurba E, Chantraine F, et al. . Predictive value of the sFlt-1:Plgf ratio in women with suspected preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2016;374:13–22. 10.1056/NEJMoa1414838 PubMed DOI
Chappell LC, Duckworth S, Seed PT, et al. . Diagnostic accuracy of placental growth factor in women with suspected preeclampsia: a prospective multicenter study. Circulation 2013;128:2121–31. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003215 PubMed DOI
Rana S, Powe CE, Salahuddin S, et al. . Angiogenic factors and the risk of adverse outcomes in women with suspected preeclampsia. Circulation 2012;125:911–9. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.054361 PubMed DOI PMC
Valiño N, Giunta G, Gallo DM, et al. . Biophysical and biochemical markers at 35-37 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:203–9. 10.1002/uog.15663 PubMed DOI
Döbert M, Wright A, Varouxaki AN, et al. . STATIN trial: predictive performance of competing-risks model in screening for pre-eclampsia at 35-37 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022;59:69–75. 10.1002/uog.24789 PubMed DOI
Samplesize4Clinicaltrials: sample size calculation for the comparison of means or proportions in phase III clinical trials; Clinical trial design
Figueras F, Meler E, Iraola A, et al. . Customized birthweight standards for a Spanish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;136:20–4. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.12.015 PubMed DOI
Gómez O, Figueras F, Fernández S, et al. . Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11-41 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:128–32. 10.1002/uog.5315 PubMed DOI
Arduini D, Rizzo G. Normal values of pulsatility index from fetal vessels: a cross-sectional study on 1556 healthy fetuses. J Perinat Med 1990;18:165–72. 10.1515/jpme.1990.18.3.165 PubMed DOI
Kamath PS, Kim WR, Advanced Liver Disease Study Group . The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Hepatology 2007;45:797–805. 10.1002/hep.21563 PubMed DOI
Kellum JA. Acute kidney injury. Crit Care Med 2008;36(4 Suppl):S141–5. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318168c4a4 PubMed DOI
Pfister RH, Bingham P, Edwards EM, et al. . The Vermont Oxford neonatal encephalopathy registry: rationale, methods, and initial results. BMC Pediatr 2012;12:84. 10.1186/1471-2431-12-84 PubMed DOI PMC
Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A. International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 2005;6:2–8. 10.1097/01.PCC.0000149131.72248.E6 PubMed DOI
Spielberger CD. State-trait anxiety inventory. In: The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2010: 1. 10.1002/9780470479216 DOI
Bech P, Olsen LR, Kjoller M, et al. . Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: a comparison of the SF-36 mental health subscale and the WHO-five well-being scale. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2003;12:85–91. 10.1002/mpr.145 PubMed DOI PMC
Hodnett ED, Simmons-Tropea DA. The labour agentry scale: psychometric properties of an instrument measuring control during childbirth. Res Nurs Health 1987;10:301–10. 10.1002/nur.4770100503 PubMed DOI
Stergiotou I, Bijnens B, Cruz-Lemini M, et al. . Maternal Subclinical vascular changes in fetal growth restriction with and without pre-Eclampsia - PubMed. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:706–12. 10.1002/uog.14815 Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25678131/ PubMed DOI
EMA . ICH E9 statistical principles for clinical trials - scientific guideline. European Medicines Agency; 2018. Available: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/ich-e9-statistical-principles-clinical-trials-scientific-guideline [Accessed 3 Jan 2023].
EMA . Missing data in confirmatory clinical trials - scientific guideline. European Medicines Agency; 2018. Available: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/missing-data-confirmatory-clinical-trials-scientific-guideline
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT04766866