Sympatry in a nightingale contact zone has no effect on host-specific blood parasite prevalence and lineage diversity
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
38460721
DOI
10.1016/j.ijpara.2024.03.002
PII: S0020-7519(24)00052-3
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Birds, Community ecology, Disease biology, Host-parasite interactions, Hybridisation, Parasitology,
- MeSH
- Haemosporida * classification isolation & purification genetics MeSH
- Host Specificity MeSH
- Host-Parasite Interactions MeSH
- Bird Diseases parasitology epidemiology MeSH
- Passeriformes parasitology MeSH
- Prevalence MeSH
- Protozoan Infections, Animal epidemiology parasitology MeSH
- Sympatry * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe epidemiology MeSH
Parasites are a key driving force behind many ecological and evolutionary processes. Prevalence and diversity of parasites, as well as their effects on hosts, are not uniform across host species. As such, the potential parasite spillover between species can significantly influence outcomes of interspecific interactions. We screened two species of Luscinia nightingales for haemosporidian blood parasites (Plasmodium, Leucocytozoon and Haemoproteus) along an approximately 3000 km transect in Europe, incorporating areas of host distant allopatry, close allopatry and sympatry. We found significant differences in infection rates between the two host species, with common nightingales having much lower parasite prevalence than thrush nightingales (36.7% versus 83.8%). This disparity was mostly driven by Haemoproteus prevalence, which was significantly higher in thrush nightingales while common nightingales had a small, but significantly higher, Plasmodium prevalence. Furthermore, we found no effect of proximity to the contact zone on infection rate in either host species. Despite having lower infection prevalence, common nightingales were infected with a significantly higher diversity of parasite lineages than thrush nightingales, and lineage assemblages differed considerably between the two species, even in sympatry. This pattern was mostly driven by the large diversity of comparatively rare lineages, while the most abundant lineages were shared between the two host species. This suggests that, despite the close evolutionary relationships between the two nightingales, there are significant differences in parasite prevalence and diversity, regardless of the distance from the contact zone. This suggests that spillover of haemosporidian blood parasites is unlikely to contribute towards interspecific interactions in this system.
Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary
Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czechia
References provided by Crossref.org