Mammal responses to global changes in human activity vary by trophic group and landscape
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
38499871
PubMed Central
PMC11090811
DOI
10.1038/s41559-024-02363-2
PII: 10.1038/s41559-024-02363-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- COVID-19 * epidemiologie MeSH
- divoká zvířata MeSH
- ekosystém MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lidské činnosti * MeSH
- savci * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Wildlife must adapt to human presence to survive in the Anthropocene, so it is critical to understand species responses to humans in different contexts. We used camera trapping as a lens to view mammal responses to changes in human activity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Across 163 species sampled in 102 projects around the world, changes in the amount and timing of animal activity varied widely. Under higher human activity, mammals were less active in undeveloped areas but unexpectedly more active in developed areas while exhibiting greater nocturnality. Carnivores were most sensitive, showing the strongest decreases in activity and greatest increases in nocturnality. Wildlife managers must consider how habituation and uneven sensitivity across species may cause fundamental differences in human-wildlife interactions along gradients of human influence.
Abilene Christian University Abilene TX USA
Alaska Department of Fish and Game Juneau AK USA
Animal Ecology Unit Research and Innovation Centre Fondazione Edmund Mach Trento Italy
Arizona State University West Glendale AZ USA
Bavarian Forest National Park Grafenau Germany
Biodiversity Research Centre University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
Biotechnical Faculty University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia
Bridgewater State University Bridgewater MA USA
British Columbia Ministry of Forests Cranbrook British Columbia Canada
BUND Niedersachsen Hanover Germany
California Department of Fish and Wildlife Sacramento CA USA
Carnivoros Australes Talca Chile
CEFE Univ Montpellier CNRS EPHE PSL University IRD Montpellier France
Centre for Biological Diversity School of Biology University of St Andrews St Andrews UK
Centre for Environmental Sciences Hasselt University Hasselt Belgium
City of Issaquah Issaquah WA USA
Clemson University Clemson SC USA
Coastal Jaguar Conservation Heredia Costa Rica
College of Agricultural Sciences Oregon State University Corvallis OR USA
College of Forestry Wildlife and Environment Auburn University Auburn AL USA
Conservation Ecology Group Department of Biosciences Durham University Durham UK
Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
Department of Biology and Environment University of Haifa at Oranim Kiryat Tivon Israel
Department of Biology University of British Columbia Kelowna British Columbia Canada
Department of Biology University of Florence Florence Italy
Department of Biology University of Konstanz Konstanz Germany
Department of Botany and Zoology Faculty of Science Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Environmental Sciences Wageningen University and Research Wageningen the Netherlands
Department of Life Sciences University of Siena Siena Italy
Department of Migration Max Planck Institute of Animal Behaviour Konstanz Germany
Department of Veterinary Sciences University of Torino Turin Italy
Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation University of Florida Gainesville FL USA
Departments of Zoology and Botany University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
Division of Biological Sciences and Wildlife Biology Program University of Montana Missoula MT USA
Effigy Mounds National Monument Harper's Ferry WV USA
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur Campeche Mexico
Environmental Studies Department University of California Santa Cruz Santa Cruz CA USA
Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife Pietermartizburg South Africa
Faculty of Biology University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia
Faculty of Biology University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland
Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology Mendel University in Brno Brno Czech Republic
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Zagreb Zagreb Croatia
Felidae Conservation Fund Mill Valley CA USA
fRI Research Hinton Alberta Canada
Friends of the Earth Czech Republic Carnivore Conservation Programme Olomouc Czech Republic
Fundación Naturaleza El Salvador San Salvador El Salvador
Hamaarag Steinhardt Museum of Natural History Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
Hogle Zoo Salt Lake City UT USA
Hunting and Wildlife Program Kastamonu University Kastamonu Turkey
iCWild Department of Biological Sciences University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa
Illinois Natural History Survey Prairie Research Institute University of Illinois Champaign IL USA
Inland Norway University Hamar Norway
Institute of Ecology Technische Universität Berlin Berlin Germany
Institute of Environmental Sciences Faculty of Biology Jagiellonian University Kraków Poland
Institute of Forestry Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry Kėdainių Lithuania
Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá Tefé Brazil
Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos Ciudad Real Spain
Iowa State University Ames IA USA
Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research Rome Italy
Koç University Istanbul Turkey
Krkonoše Mountains National Park Vrchlabí Czech Republic
Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research Berlin Germany
Lincoln Memorial University Harrogate TN USA
Mammal Research Institute Polish Academy of Sciences Białowieża Poland
McDowell Sonoran Conservancy Scottsdale AZ USA
Mianus River Gorge Bedford MA USA
Missouri State University Springfield MO USA
Museo delle Scienze Trento Italy
National Biodiversity Future Center Palermo Italy
National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis Santa Barbara CA USA
National Institute of the Atlantic Forest Santa Teresa Brazil
National Park Tara Mokra Gora Serbia
New Mexico State University Las Cruces NM USA
Noble Research Institute LLC Ardmore OK USA
North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences Raleigh NC USA
North Carolina State University Raleigh NC USA
Northern and Yorke Landscape Board Clare South Australia Australia
Northern Arizona University Flagstaff AZ USA
Northern Michigan University Marquette MI USA
Oeko Log Freilandforschung Friedrichswalde Germany
Parks Canada Alberni Clayoquot British Columbia Canada
Parks Canada Banff Alberta Canada
Parks Canada Ucluelet British Columbia Canada
Parks Canada Waterton Lakes National Park Waterton Park Alberta Canada
Parks Victoria Melbourne Victoria Australia
Paul Smith's College Paul Smiths NY USA
Planning and Environmental Services City of Edmonton Edmonton Alberta Canada
Purdue University West Lafayette IN USA
Quest University Canada Squamish British Columbia Canada
Research Ecology and Environment Dimension Pistoia Italy
Research Institute for Nature and Forest Brussels Belgium
Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria Melbourne Victoria Australia
Rutgers University New Brunswick NJ USA
Sageland Collaborative Salt Lake City UT USA
School of Biological Sciences University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
School of Forest Fisheries and Geomatics Sciences University of Florida Gainesville FL USA
School of Natural Resources and the Environment University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA
School of Zoology Faculty of Life Sciences Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
Scientific Laboratory of Gorce National Park Niedźwiedź Poland
Seattle University Seattle WA USA
Service Public of Wallonia Gembloux Belgium
Siena College Loudonville NY USA
Slovenia Forest Service Ljubljana Slovenia
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Balboa Republic of Panama
Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute Washington DC USA
South Dakota State University Brookings SD USA
Southeastern Louisiana University Hammond LA USA
Springfield College Springfield MA USA
St Lawrence University Canton NY USA
Stelvio National Park Bormio Italy
Stephen F Austin State University Nacogdoches TX USA
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin TX USA
Texas State University San Marcos TX USA
The King's University Edmonton Alberta Canada
Tufts University Grafton MA USA
United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge UK
United States Army Fort Hood TX USA
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Nacogdoches TX USA
Universidad de Santiago de Chile Santiago Chile
Université de Toulouse INRAE CEFS Castanet Tolosan France
University of Connecticut Storrs CT USA
University of Freiburg Breisgau Germany
University of Hawai'i at Manoa Honolulu HI USA
University of Illinois Urbana IL USA
University of Kansas Lawrence KS USA
University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA
University of Missouri Columbia MO USA
University of Montana Missoula MT USA
University of Mount Union Alliance OH USA
University of North Dakota Grand Forks ND USA
University of Rhode Island Kingstown RI USA
University of Richmond Richmond VA USA
University of Utah Salt Lake City UT USA
University of Victoria Victoria British Columbia Canada
University of Wisconsin Whitewater Whitewater WI USA
US Air Force Academy Colorado Springs CO USA
Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand
Virginia Tech Blacksburg VA USA
Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources University of Georgia Athens GA USA
Watershed Studies Institute Murray State University Murray KY USA
West Virginia University Morgantown WV USA
Wildlife Habitat Council Silver Spring MD USA
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Madison WI USA
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Venter O, et al. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12558. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12558. PubMed DOI PMC
Suraci JP, Clinchy M, Zanette LY, Wilmers CC. Fear of humans as apex predators has landscape‐scale impacts from mountain lions to mice. Ecol. Lett. 2019;22:1578–1586. doi: 10.1111/ele.13344. PubMed DOI
Berger J. Fear, human shields and the redistribution of prey and predators in protected areas. Biol. Lett. 2007;3:620–623. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0415. PubMed DOI PMC
McShea WJ. Ecology and management of white-tailed deer in a changing world. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2012;1249:45–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06376.x. PubMed DOI
Suraci JP, et al. Disturbance type and species life history predict mammal responses to humans. Glob. Change Biol. 2021;27:3718–3731. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15650. PubMed DOI
Pacifici M, et al. Global correlates of range contractions and expansions in terrestrial mammals. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:2840. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16684-w. PubMed DOI PMC
Ripple WJ, et al. Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science. 2014;343:1241484. doi: 10.1126/science.1241484. PubMed DOI
Kays R, et al. Does hunting or hiking affect wildlife communities in protected areas? J. Appl. Ecol. 2017;54:242–252. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12700. DOI
Reilly CM, Suraci JP, Smith JA, Wang Y, Wilmers CC. Mesopredators retain their fear of humans across a development gradient. Behav. Ecol. 2022;33:428–435. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arab150. DOI
Bates AE, Primack RB, Moraga P, Duarte CM. COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown as a ‘Global Human Confinement Experiment’ to investigate biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2020;248:108665. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108665. PubMed DOI PMC
Rutz C, et al. COVID-19 lockdown allows researchers to quantify the effects of human activity on wildlife. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2020;4:1156–1159. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1237-z. PubMed DOI
Basile M, Russo LF, Russo VG, Senese A, Bernardo N. Birds seen and not seen during the COVID-19 pandemic: the impact of lockdown measures on citizen science bird observations. Biol. Conserv. 2021;256:109079. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109079. PubMed DOI PMC
Bates AE, et al. Global COVID-19 lockdown highlights humans as both threats and custodians of the environment. Biol. Conserv. 2021;263:109175. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109175. PubMed DOI PMC
Hale T, et al. A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker) Nat. Hum. Behav. 2021;5:529–538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. PubMed DOI
Procko M, Naidoo R, LeMay V, Burton AC. Human impacts on mammals in and around a protected area before, during and after COVID-19 lockdowns. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2022;4:e12743. doi: 10.1111/csp2.12743. PubMed DOI PMC
Burton AC, et al. Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes. J. Appl. Ecol. 2015;52:675–685. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12432. DOI
Chen C, et al. Global camera trap synthesis highlights the importance of protected areas in maintaining mammal diversity. Conserv. Lett. 2022;15:e12865. doi: 10.1111/conl.12865. DOI
Naidoo R, Burton AC. Relative effects of recreational activities on a temperate terrestrial wildlife assemblage. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2020;2:e271. doi: 10.1111/csp2.271. DOI
Betts MG, et al. Extinction filters mediate the global effects of habitat fragmentation on animals. Science. 2019;366:1236–1239. doi: 10.1126/science.aax9387. PubMed DOI
Lowry H, Lill A, Wong BBM. Behavioural responses of wildlife to urban environments. Biol. Rev. 2013;88:537–549. doi: 10.1111/brv.12012. PubMed DOI
Klees van Bommel J, Badry M, Ford AT, Golumbia T, Burton AC. Predicting human–carnivore conflict at the urban–wildland interface. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020;24:e01322.
Gaynor KM, Brown JS, Middleton AD, Power ME, Brashares JS. Landscapes of fear: spatial patterns of risk perception and response. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2019;34:355–368. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.004. PubMed DOI
González-Lagos C, Sol D, Reader SM. Large-brained mammals live longer. J. Evol. Biol. 2010;23:1064–1074. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01976.x. PubMed DOI
Gaynor KM, Hojnowski CE, Carter NH, Brashares JS. The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. Science. 2018;360:1232. doi: 10.1126/science.aar7121. PubMed DOI
Carter NH, Shrestha BK, Karki JB, Pradhan NMB, Liu J. Coexistence between wildlife and humans at fine spatial scales. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:15360–15365. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210490109. PubMed DOI PMC
Packer C, et al. Conserving large carnivores: dollars and fence. Ecol. Lett. 2013;16:635–641. doi: 10.1111/ele.12091. PubMed DOI
Tucker MA, et al. Behavioral responses of terrestrial mammals to COVID-19 lockdowns. Science. 2023;380:1059–1064. doi: 10.1126/science.abo6499. PubMed DOI
Lamb CT, et al. The ecology of human–carnivore coexistence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:17876. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1922097117. PubMed DOI PMC
Ripple, W. J. et al., Bushmeat hunting and extinction risk to the world’s mammals. R. Soc. Open Sci.3, 160498 (2016). PubMed PMC
Soulé ME, Estes JA, Berger J, Del Rio CM. Ecological effectiveness: conservation goals for interactive species. Conserv. Biol. 2003;17:1238–1250. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01599.x. DOI
Estes JA, et al. Trophic downgrading of planet earth. Science. 2011;333:301–306. doi: 10.1126/science.1205106. PubMed DOI
Raynor JL, Grainger CA, Parker DP. Wolves make roadways safer, generating large economic returns to predator conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118:e2023251118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023251118. PubMed DOI PMC
Rutz C. Studying pauses and pulses in human mobility and their environmental impacts. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2022;3:157–159. doi: 10.1038/s43017-022-00276-x. DOI
Ward M, et al. Impact of 2019–2020 mega-fires on Australian fauna habitat. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2020;4:1321–1326. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1251-1. PubMed DOI
Schrimpf MB, et al. Reduced human activity during COVID-19 alters avian land use across North America. Sci. Adv. 2021;7:eabf5073. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf5073. PubMed DOI PMC
Lindsey P, et al. Conserving Africa’s wildlife and wildlands through the COVID-19 crisis and beyond. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2020;4:1300–1310. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1275-6. PubMed DOI
Kays R, et al. SNAPSHOT USA 2020: a second coordinated national camera trap survey of the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ecology. 2022;103:e3775. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3775. PubMed DOI PMC
Ahumada JA, et al. Wildlife Insights: a platform to maximize the potential of camera trap and other passive sensor wildlife data for the planet. Environ. Conserv. 2019;47:1–6. doi: 10.1017/S0376892919000298. DOI
Díaz S, et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science. 2019;366:eaax3100. doi: 10.1126/science.aax3100. PubMed DOI
Soria CD, Pacifici M, Di Marco M, Stephen SM, Rondinini C. COMBINE: a coalesced mammal database of intrinsic and extrinsic traits. Ecology. 2021;102:e03344. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3344. PubMed DOI
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2022).
Brooks ME, et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 2017;9:378–400. doi: 10.32614/RJ-2017-066. DOI
Teucher A., lutz: Look up time zones of point coordinates. R package version 0.3.1 (2019).
Kelley D., Richards C., oce: Analysis of oceanographic data. R package version 1.7-10 (2022).
Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Softw. 2010;36:1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v036.i03. DOI
Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Cowlishaw G, Mace GM. Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2000;267:1947–1952. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1234. PubMed DOI PMC
Chichorro F, Juslén A, Cardoso P. A review of the relation between species traits and extinction risk. Biol. Conserv. 2019;237:220–229. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.001. DOI
Benson-Amram S, Dantzer B, Stricker G, Swanson EM, Holekamp KE. Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:2532–2537. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505913113. PubMed DOI PMC
Wilman H, et al. EltonTraits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology. 2014;95:2027. doi: 10.1890/13-1917.1. DOI
Jones KE, et al. PanTHERIA: a species-level database of life history, ecology and geography of extant and recently extinct mammals. Ecology. 2009;90:2648. doi: 10.1890/08-1494.1. DOI
Stankowich T. Ungulate flight responses to human disturbance: a review and meta-analysis. Biol. Conserv. 2008;141:2159–2173. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.06.026. DOI
Buchhorn, M. et al. Copernicus global land cover layers—Collection 2. Remote Sens.12, 1044 (2020).
Kennedy CM, Oakleaf JR, Theobald DM, Baruch-Mordo S, Kiesecker J. Managing the middle: a shift in conservation priorities based on the global human modification gradient. Glob. Change Biol. 2019;25:811–826. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14549. PubMed DOI
Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density (CIESIN, 2016).
Meijer JR, Huijbregts MA, Schotten KC, Schipper AM. Global patterns of current and future road infrastructure. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018;13:064006. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aabd42. DOI
Bartoń, K. MUMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.47.1 (2022).
Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Stat. Med. 2002;21:1539–1558. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186. PubMed DOI