Factors Influencing the Outcome of Patients with Primary Ewing Sarcoma of the Sacrum
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Egypt Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
38524902
PubMed Central
PMC10960648
DOI
10.1155/2024/4751914
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is a rare and highly malignant bone tumor primarily affecting children, adolescents, and young adults. The pelvis, trunk, and lower extremities are the most common sites, while EwS of the sacrum as a primary site is very rare, and only few studies focusing on this location are published. Due to the anatomical condition, local treatment is challenging in sacral malignancies. We analyzed factors that might influence the outcome of patients suffering from sacral EwS. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of the GPOH EURO-E.W.I.N.G 99 trial and the EWING 2008 trial, with a cohort of 124 patients with localized or metastatic sacral EwS. The study endpoints were overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). OS and EFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate comparisons were estimated using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) with respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated in a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: The presence of metastases (3y-EFS: 0.33 vs. 0.68; P < 0.001; HR = 3.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 6.6; 3y-OS: 0.48 vs. 0.85; P < 0.001; HR = 4.23, 95% CI 1.8 to 9.7), large tumor volume (≥200 ml) (3y-EFS: 0.36 vs. 0.69; P=0.02; HR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.0; 3y-OS: 0.42 vs. 0.73; P=0.04; HR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.5), and age ≥18 years (3y-EFS: 0.41 vs. 0.60; P=0.02; HR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.2; 3y-OS: 0.294 vs. 0.59; P=0.01; HR = 2.92, 95% CI 1.29 to 6.6) were revealed as adverse prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Young age seems to positively influence patients` survival, especially in patients with primary metastatic disease. In this context, our results support other studies, stating that older age has a negative impact on survival. Tumor volume, metastases, and the type of local therapy modality have an impact on the outcome of sacral EwS. Level of evidence: Level 2. This trial is registered with NCT00020566 and NCT00987636.
Charles University Motol Child Ren's Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Childhood Cancer Center Queen Silvia Children's Hospital Gothenburg Sweden
Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Camperdown Australia
Clinic of Tumororthopedics University Hospital Essen West German Cancer Centre Essen Germany
Clinics of Children's Diseases Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania
Department of Oncology Hematology University Children's Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Sydney Camperdown Australia
German Cancer Consortium Partnersite Essen Germany
Leiden University Medical Center Department of Medical Oncology Leiden NL USA
Patient Representative St Josef's Hospital Bochum University Hospital Bochum Germany
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology Department of Solid Tumors Utrecht Netherlands
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Hesla A. C., Papakonstantinou A., Tsagkozis P. Current status of management and outcome for patients with ewing sarcoma. Cancers . 2021;13(6):p. 1202. doi: 10.3390/cancers13061202. PubMed DOI PMC
Hense H. W., Ahrens S., Paulussen M., Lehnert M., Jürgens H. Factors associated with tumor volume and primary metastases in Ewing tumors: results from the (EI)CESS studies. Annals of Oncology . 1999;10(9):1073–1078. doi: 10.1023/a:1008357018737. PubMed DOI
Haveman L. M., Ranft A., Vd Berg H., et al. The relation of radiological tumor volume response to histological response and outcome in patients with localized Ewing Sarcoma. Cancer Medicine . 2019;8(3):1086–1094. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2002. PubMed DOI PMC
Grünewald T. G. P., Cidre-Aranaz F., Surdez D., et al. Ewing sarcoma. Nature Reviews Disease Primers . 2018;4(1):p. 5. doi: 10.1038/s41572-018-0003-x. PubMed DOI
Werier J., Yao X., Caudrelier J.-M., et al. A systematic review of optimal treatment strategies for localized Ewing’s sarcoma of bone after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Surgical Oncology . 2016;25(1):16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2015.11.002. PubMed DOI
Baker N. D., Dorfman D. M. Ewing’s sarcoma of the sacrum. Skeletal Radiology . 1996;25(3):302–304. doi: 10.1007/s002560050085. PubMed DOI
Gargallo P., Yáñez Y., Juan A., et al. Review: ewing sarcoma predisposition. Pathology and Oncology Research . 2020;26(4):2057–2066. doi: 10.1007/s12253-019-00765-3. PubMed DOI
Chan R. C., Sutow W. W., Lindberg R. D., Samuels M. L., Murray J. A., Johnston D. A. Management and results of localized Ewing’s sarcoma. Cancer . 1979;43(3):1001–1006. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197903)43:3<1001::aid-cncr2820430332>3.0.co;2-p. PubMed DOI
Hense H., Ahrens S., Paulussen M., Lehnert M., Jürgens H. Deskriptive Epidemiologie der Ewing-Tumoren- Analysen der deutschen Patienten von (EI) CESS 1980-1997. Klinische Pädiatrie . 1999;211(4):271–275. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1043799. PubMed DOI
Jürgens H., Dirksen U. Ewing sarcoma treatment. European Journal of Cancer . 2011;47:S366–S367. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(11)70206-4. PubMed DOI
Huang M., Lucas K. Current therapeutic approaches in metastatic and recurrent ewing sarcoma. Sarcoma . 2011;2011:5. doi: 10.1155/2011/863210.863210 PubMed DOI PMC
Eaton B. R., Claude L., Indelicato D. J., et al. Ewing sarcoma. Pediatric Blood and Cancer . 2021;68(2) doi: 10.1002/pbc.28355.28355 PubMed DOI
Potratz J., Dirksen U., Jürgens H., Craft A. Ewing sarcoma: clinical state-of-the-art. Pediatric Hematology and Oncology . 2012;29(1):1–11. doi: 10.3109/08880018.2011.622034. PubMed DOI
Zöllner S. K., Amatruda J. F., Bauer S., et al. Ewing sarcoma-diagnosis, treatment, clinical challenges and future perspectives. Journal of Clinical Medicine . 2021;10(8):p. 1685. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081685. PubMed DOI PMC
Ladenstein R., Pötschger U., Le Deley M. C., et al. Primary disseminated multifocal Ewing sarcoma: results of the Euro-EWING 99 trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2010;28(20):3284–3291. doi: 10.1200/jco.2009.22.9864. PubMed DOI
Haeusler J., Ranft A., Boelling T., et al. The value of local treatment in patients with primary, disseminated, multifocal Ewing sarcoma (PDMES) Cancer . 2010;116(2):443–450. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24740. PubMed DOI
Mohammadhoseini P., Razzaghi S., Barazesh M., Jalili S. Ewing’s sarcoma of the hip: a case report with no evidence of tumor recurrence and literature review. BoneKEy Reports . 2021;15 doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101131.101131 PubMed DOI PMC
Jagodzińska-Mucha P., Raciborska A., Koseła-Paterczyk H., et al. Age as a prognostic factor in patients with ewing sarcoma-the polish sarcoma group experience. Journal of Clinical Medicine . 2021;10(16):p. 3627. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163627. PubMed DOI PMC
Bacci G., Ferrari S., Mercuri M., et al. Multimodal therapy for the treatment of nonmetastatic Ewing sarcoma of pelvis. Journal of Pediatric Hematology . 2003;25(2):118–124. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200302000-00007. PubMed DOI
Rodriguez-Galindo C., Billups C. A., Kun L. E., et al. Survival after recurrence of ewing tumors: the st jude children’s research hospital experience, 1979-1999. Cancer . 2002;94(2):561–569. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10192.abs. PubMed DOI
Stahl M., Ranft A., Paulussen M., et al. Risk of recurrence and survival after relapse in patients with Ewing sarcoma. Pediatric Blood and Cancer . 2011;57(4):549–553. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23040. PubMed DOI
Guder W. K., Hardes J., Nottrott M., Steffen A. J., Dirksen U., Streitbürger A. Pelvic Ewing sarcoma: a retrospective outcome analysis of 104 patients who underwent pelvic tumor resection at a single supra-regional center. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research . 2020;15(1):p. 534. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02028-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Hesla A. C., Tsagozis P., Jebsen N., Zaikova O., Bauer H., Brosjö O. Improved prognosis for patients with ewing sarcoma in the sacrum compared with the innominate bones: the scandinavian sarcoma group experience. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery . 2016;98(3):199–210. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.o.00362. PubMed DOI
Raque G. H., Vitaz T. W., Shields C. B. Treatment of neoplastic diseases of the sacrum. Journal of Surgical Oncology . 2001;76(4):301–307. doi: 10.1002/jso.1050. PubMed DOI
Andreou D., Ranft A., Gosheger G., et al. Which factors are associated with local control and survival of patients with localized pelvic ewing’s sarcoma? A retrospective analysis of data from the euro-EWING99 trial. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research . 2020;478(2):290–302. doi: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000962. PubMed DOI PMC
Rödl R. W., Hoffmann C., Gosheger G., Leidinger B., Jürgens H., Winkelmann W. Ewing’s sarcoma of the pelvis: combined surgery and radiotherapy treatment. Journal of Surgical Oncology . 2003;83(3):154–160. doi: 10.1002/jso.10256. PubMed DOI
Paulussen M., Ahrens S., Dunst J., et al. Localized Ewing tumor of bone: final results of the cooperative Ewing’s Sarcoma Study CESS 86. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2001;19(6):1818–1829. doi: 10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1818. PubMed DOI
Cotterill S. J., Ahrens S., Paulussen M., et al. Prognostic factors in ewing’s tumor of bone: analysis of 975 patients from the European intergroup cooperative ewing’s sarcoma study group. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2000;18(17):3108–3114. doi: 10.1200/jco.2000.18.17.3108. PubMed DOI
Gaspar N., Hawkins D. S., Dirksen U., et al. Ewing sarcoma: current management and future approaches through collaboration. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2015;33(27):3036–3046. doi: 10.1200/jco.2014.59.5256. PubMed DOI
Whelan J., Hackshaw A., McTiernan A., et al. Survival is influenced by approaches to local treatment of Ewing sarcoma within an international randomised controlled trial: analysis of EICESS-92. Clinical Sarcoma Research . 2018;8(1):p. 6. doi: 10.1186/s13569-018-0093-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Bacci G., Longhi A., Ferrari S., Mercuri M., Versari M., Bertoni F. Prognostic factors in non-metastatic Ewing’s sarcoma tumor of bone: an analysis of 579 patients treated at a single institution with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 1972 and 1998. Acta Oncologica . 2006;45(4):469–475. doi: 10.1080/02841860500519760. PubMed DOI
Kaçmaz İE., Keçeci B., Basa C. D., Sabah D. Treatment of pelvic Ewing’s sarcoma: pros and cons of chemotherapy plus definitive radiotherapy versus surgery. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica . 2020;54(1):42–48. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.01.601. PubMed DOI PMC
Bosma S. E., Ayu O., Fiocco M., Gelderblom H., Dijkstra P. D. S. Prognostic factors for survival in Ewing sarcoma: a systematic review. Surgical Oncology . 2018;27(4):603–610. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.07.016. PubMed DOI
Morales E., Olson M., Iglesias F., Luetkens T., Atanackovic D. Targeting the tumor microenvironment of Ewing sarcoma. Immunotherapy . 2021;13(17):1439–1451. doi: 10.2217/imt-2020-0341. PubMed DOI
Pan B., Bu X., Cao M., et al. Inactivation of ICAM1 inhibits metastasis and improves the prognosis of Ewing’s sarcoma. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology . 2021;147(2):393–401. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03431-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Dirksen U. Ewing 2008. 2018. https://www.skion.nl/workspace/uploads/C2--EWING2008_Protocol_Versie-2-1_01-03-2018_1.pdf .
Lewis D. I., Jürgens D. H., Oberlin O., ProfDrH G., Judson I., ProfDrM P. EURO-E.W.I.N.G. https://www.skion.nl/workspace/uploads/ee99_amended_treo__2006_02_14.pdf .
Koch R., Gelderblom H., Haveman L., et al. High-dose treosulfan and melphalan as consolidation therapy versus standard therapy for high-risk (metastatic) ewing sarcoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2022;40(21):2307–2320. doi: 10.1200/jco.21.01942. PubMed DOI
Dirksen U., Brennan B., Le Deley M.-C., et al. High-dose chemotherapy compared with standard chemotherapy and lung radiation in ewing sarcoma with pulmonary metastases: results of the European ewing tumour working initiative of national groups, 99 trial and EWING 2008. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2019;37(34):3192–3202. doi: 10.1200/jco.19.00915. PubMed DOI PMC
Whelan J., Le Deley M.-C., Dirksen U., et al. High-dose chemotherapy and blood autologous stem-cell rescue compared with standard chemotherapy in localized high-risk ewing sarcoma: results of euro-E.W.I.N.G.99 and ewing-2008. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2018;36(31) doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.2516.2018782516 PubMed DOI PMC
Le Deley M.-C., Paulussen M., Lewis I., et al. Cyclophosphamide compared with ifosfamide in consolidation treatment of standard-risk Ewing sarcoma: results of the randomized noninferiority Euro-EWING99-R1 trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2014;32(23):2440–2448. doi: 10.1200/jco.2013.54.4833. PubMed DOI
Juergens C., Weston C., Lewis I., et al. Safety assessment of intensive induction with vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (VIDE) in the treatment of Ewing tumors in the EURO-E.W.I.N.G. 99 clinical trial. Pediatric Blood and Cancer . 2006;47(1):22–29. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20820. PubMed DOI
Heesen P., Ranft A., Bhadri V., et al. Association between local treatment modalities and event-free survival, overall survival, and local recurrence in patients with localised Ewing Sarcoma. Report from the Ewing 2008 trial. European Journal of Cancer . 2023;192 doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113260.113260 PubMed DOI
Sucato D. J., Rougraff B., McGrath B. E., et al. Ewing’s sarcoma of the pelvis. Long-term survival and functional outcome. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research . 2000;373(373):193–201. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200004000-00023. PubMed DOI
Ruggieri P., Angelini A., Pala E., Mercuri M. Infections in surgery of primary tumors of the sacrum: spine. Spine . 2012;37(5):420–428. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3182213a44. PubMed DOI
Jawad M. U., Pollock B. H., Zeitlinger L. N., et al. Impact of local treatment modality on overall- and disease-specific survival for nonmetastatic pelvic and sacral Ewing sarcoma. Journal of Surgical Oncology . 2022;126(3):577–587. doi: 10.1002/jso.26922. PubMed DOI
CRI. HIBISCus project. 2023. https://commons.cri.uchicago.edu/hibiscus/
Worch J., Ranft A., DuBois S. G., Paulussen M., Juergens H., Dirksen U. Age dependency of primary tumor sites and metastases in patients with Ewing sarcoma. Pediatric Blood and Cancer . 2018;65(9) doi: 10.1002/pbc.27251.27251 PubMed DOI
Esiashvili N., Goodman M., Marcus R. B. Changes in incidence and survival of Ewing sarcoma patients over the past 3 decades: Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results data. Journal of Pediatric Hematology . 2008;30(6):425–430. doi: 10.1097/mph.0b013e31816e22f3. PubMed DOI
Jawad M. U., Cheung M. C., Min E. S., Schneiderbauer M. M., Koniaris L. G., Scully S. P. Ewing sarcoma demonstrates racial disparities in incidence-related and sex-related differences in outcome: an analysis of 1631 cases from the SEER database, 1973-2005. Cancer . 2009;115(15):3526–3536. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24388. PubMed DOI
Bellan D. G., Filho R. J.-G., Garcia J. G., et al. EWING’S sarcoma: epidemiology and prognosis for patients treated at the pediatric oncology institute, IOP-GRAACC-UNIFESP. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition) . 2012;47(4):446–450. doi: 10.1016/s2255-4971(15)30126-9. PubMed DOI PMC
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT00987636, NCT00020566