The article examines financial hardship (FH) that appears as one of the essential socio-economic-financial categories reflecting a financial burden on society and therefore having a significant impact on the social and economic development of the country. The purpose of this article is to propose and approve a methodology for the complex quantitative assessment of financial difficulty, which allows comparing countries one another. The novelty of the conducted research is manifested by the formed financial hardship adequately exposing a system of indicators and suggesting the transformation of incomparable indicators into the comparable ones. The paper proposes a methodology for the integrated assessment of financial hardship based on multi-criteria methods, which contributes to solving the problems of the social sustainability and economic development of the countries employing different research methods. The proposed methodology provides a possibility of moving to a higher level of research comparing the countries as a whole, in line to the current status of FH. The actual benefits of the carried out research arise from the opportunity to envisage targeted measures for increasing social sustainability subject to the specific situation of the financial hardship of the countries thus removing the burdens of further economic development.

Business Innovation School Kazimieras Simonavicius University Vilnius Lithuania

Faculty of Economics and Management Czech University of Life Science Prague Czech Republic

Faculty of Engineering Management Bialystok University of Technology Bialystok Poland

WSB University Dąbrowa Górnicza Poland

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ólafsson S, Kristjansson A. The Distribution of Incomes and Wealth in a Comparative Perspective. Reykjavik: University of Iceland Press. 2017. ISBN 9789935231291, ISBN 9789935231291—Google Search.

Taylor J. The Financial Crisis and the Policy Responses: an Empirical Analysis of What Went Wrong. Working Pape. 2008:1–19. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w14631/w14631.pdf

White W. Procyclicality in the financial system: do we need a new macrofinancial stabilisation framework? Basel: Bank of International Settlement. 2006. https://www.bis.org/publ/work193.pdf

Kangas O, Palme J. Social Rights, Structural Needs and Social Expenditure: A comparative study of 18 OECD countries 1960–2000. In Clasen J., & Siegel N. A., Investigating Welfare State Change. Monograph Book. 2007, pp. 106–129. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Castles F. The Comparative History of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1989. ISBN: 978-0-745-60518-0. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+Comparative+History+of+Public+Policy-p-9780745605180

Castles F, Leibfried S, Lewis J, Obinger H, Pierson C. The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2010.

Taylor-Gooby P, Leruth B, Chung H. After Austerity: Welfare State Transformation in Europe after the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2017.

Krugman P. End this Depression Now!. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. 2012. https://wwnorton.com/books/9780393088779/about-the-book/product-details

Georgieva K. Financial Services and Inequality: New IMF Research. The Financial Sector in the 2020s: Building a More Inclusive System in the New Decade. IMF Staff Discussion Note, SDN/20/01. 2020. https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2020/01/17/sp01172019-the-financial-sector-in-the-2020s

Hiilamo H. In this Way SOTE became Inferior. Reykjavik: University of Iceland Press. 2017. https://www.hs.fi/sunnuntai/art-20000054483366.html

Jean-Pierre Robin. Kristalina Georgieva: Global warming can add 100 million poor people by 2030. The World bank. 2017 September 14. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/opinion/2017/09/14/global-warming-can-add-100-million-poor-people-by-2030#:~:text=The%20World%20Bank%20has%20calculated,result%20in%20considerable%20population%20movements

Cihak M, Sahay R. Finance and Inequality. IMF Staff Discussion Notes, SDN/20/01. International Monetary Fund. 2020.

Frey C, Osborne M. The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017;114:254–280. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 DOI

Varjonen S, Kangas O, Niemelä M. Partisanship, continuity, and change: Politics in Finnish unemployment benefit reforms 1985–2016. Social Policy & Administration. 2019;54(1): 119–133. doi: 10.1111/spol.12526 DOI

Moisio P. A Latent Class Application to the Multidimensional Measurement of Poverty. Quality and Quantity. 2004;38(6): 703–717. doi: 10.1007/s11135-004-5940-7 DOI

Townsend P. Poverty in the United Kingdom. Middlesex: Penguin Books. 1979. file:///C:/Users/Home/Downloads/piuk-whole.pdf

Lyte R, Maître B, Nolan B, Whelan Ch.T. Persistent and Consistent Poverty in the 1994 and 1995 Waves of the European Community Household Panel Survey. Review of Income and Wealth. 2001;47(4):427–449. doi: 10.1111/1475-4991.00028 DOI

Income and living conditions. Retrieved from Eurostat: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/income-and-living-conditions

Ólafsson S, Daly M, Kangas O, Palme J. Welfare and the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2019. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/welfare-and-the-great-recession-9780198830962?cc=lt&lang=en&

Nolan B, Whelan Ch.T. Poverty and Deprivation in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2011.

Hwang C.-L, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey. New-York: Springer-Verlag. 1981.

Eurostat Statistics Explained. Glossary: Material deprivation. 2019. Retrieved from European Comssion Eurostat: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:Material_deprivation (accessed 10 September 2020)

EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) methodology—monetary poverty. 2021. Retrieved from European Comssion Eurostat: EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) methodology—distribution of income—Statistics Explained (europa.eu)

Eurostat. 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ILC_LI04/default/table?lang=en

Income Distribution Database (IDD): Gini, poverty, income, Methods and Concepts—OECD. Retrieved from OECD Income (IDD) and Wealth (WDD) Distribution Databases—OECD.

Hwang C.L, Lin M.J. Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria: Methods and Applications. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer. 1987.

Opricovic S, Tzeng G.-H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research. 2004;156(2):445–455. Retrieved from doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1 DOI

Podvezko V. Agreement of expert estimates. Technological and economical development of economy. 2005;11(2): 101–107. doi: 10.3846/13928619.2005.9637688 DOI

Saaty T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1980. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/0470011815.b2a4a002 DOI

Figueira J, Roy B. Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure. European Journal of Operational Research. 2002;2(1):317–326. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00370-8 DOI

Girdzijauskaitė E. Modelling the branch campus establishment abroad in the development of university internationalisation. Doctoral dissertation. Vilnius: Technika. 2020. https://vb.vgtu.lt/object/elaba:70066857/

Stankevičienė J, Kraujalienė L, Vaiciukevičiūtė A. Assessment of technology transfer office performance for value creation in higher education institutions. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2017;18(6):1063–1081. doi: 10.3846/16111699.2017.1405841 DOI

Kraujalienė L. Efficiency evaluation of technology transfer process in higher education institutions: doctoral dissertation. Vilnius: Technika. 2019. http://dspace.vgtu.lt/handle/1/3810

Vaiciukevičiūtė A. Assessing economic impact and efficiency of higher education institutions: doctoral dissertation. Vilnius: Technika. 2019. http://dspace.vgtu.lt/handle/1/3796

Zavadskas E K, Turskis Z. Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 2011;17(2):397–427. doi: 10.3846/20294913.2011.593291 DOI

Gedvilaitė D. The assessment of sustainable development of a country’s regions. Doctoral dissertation. Vilnius: Technika. 2019. https://etalpykla.vilniustech.lt/bitstream/handle/123456789/59423/Gedvilaite%20disertacija.pdf?sequence=6&isAllowed=y

Volkov A. Assessment of the impact of the common agricultural policy direct payments system on agricultural sustainability. Doctoral dissertation. Vilnius: Technika. 2018. https://vb.lcss.lt/object/elaba:30829704/index.html

Kozyreva О, Sagaidak-Nikituk R, Demchenko N. Analysis of the Socio-Economic Development of Ukrainian Regions. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies. 2017;3(2):51–58. Retrieved from 10.30525/2256-0742/2017-3-2-51-58 DOI

Pracevic N, Pracevic Z. Application of fuzzy AHP for ranking and selection of alternatives in construction project management. Journal of civil Engineering and Management. 2017;23(8):1123–1135. doi: 10.3846/13923730.2017.1388278 DOI

Song Y, Yao S, Yu D, Schen Y. Risky multi-criteria group decision on green capacity investment projects based on supply chain. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2017;18(3):355–372. doi: 10.3846/16111699.2017.1331461 DOI

Gao H, Ju Y, Gonzalez E D R S, Zhang W. Green supplier selection in electronics manufacturing: An approach based on consensus decision making. Journal of Cleaner Product. 2020;245:118781. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118781 DOI

Mahmoud M R, Garcia L A. Comparison of different multicriteria evaluation methods for the Red Bluff diversion dam. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2000;15(5):471–478. doi: 10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00025-6 DOI

Manupati V K, Ramkumar M, Samanta D. A multi-criteria decision making approach for the urban renewal in Southern India. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2018;42:471–481. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.011 DOI

Stanujkić D, Đorđević B, Đorđević M. Comparative Analysis of Some Prominent MCDM Methods: a Case of Ranking Serbian Banks. Serbian Journal of Management. 2013;8(2):213–241. doi: 10.5937/sjm8-3774 DOI

Tamošaitiene J, Bartkiene L, Vilutiene T. The new development trend of operational research in civil engineering and sustainable development as a result of collaboration between german‐Lithuanian‐Polish scientific triangle. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2010;11(2):316–340. doi: 10.3846/jbem.2010.16 DOI

Sahay R, Čihák M, N’Diaye P, Barajas A, Mitra S, Kyobe A J, et al. Financial Inclusion; Can it Meet Multiple Macroeconomic Goals? IMF Staff Discussion Notes, SDN/15/17. 2015/017. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2015/sdn1517.pdf

Sivilevičius H, Maskeliūnaitė L. The criteria for identifying the quality of passengers’ transportation by railway and their ranking using AHP method. Transport. 2010;25(4):368–381. doi: 10.3846/transport.2010.46 DOI

Poverty and inequality statistics. (2016–2019). Retrieved from EUROMOD: https://www.euromod.ac.uk/sites/default/files/reports/EM_baseline_report_2016-2019_web1.pdf

Balestra C, Tonkin R. Inequalities in household wealth across OECD countries: Evidence from the OECD Wealth Distribution Database. OECD Statistics Working Papers. 2018, January. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/7e1bf673-en.pdf?expires=1691559558&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=2EDF9FBC9DA243F1D5F2409E150D3A59

Eurostat. 2019. Retrieved from Ec.europa: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ilc_sip8/default/table?lang=en

Kendall M E. Rank Correlation Methods. 4th ed. London: Griffin and Co. 1970. https://www.worldcat.org/title/Rank-correlation-methods/oclc/3827024