Given the enormous scale of the COVID-19 pandemic affecting the healthcare sector, limited human resource capacity, and efforts to prevent the spread of COVID-19, occupational health protection could not escape changes. The aim was to identify and compare the regulations regarding the provision of medical occupational check-ups (MOCs) during the pandemic in all European Union member states (EU MS). The study employed the Delphi method, involving experts from EU MS to assess MOC regulations between January 2020 and May 2021. Experts were queried regarding the existence and specifics of MOC regulations, particularly for entrance and periodic MOCs at hazardous and non-hazardous workplaces. Out of the 27 EU MS surveyed, 13 EU MS did not regulate MOCs, while 14 EU MS (51.6%) regulated the provision of MOCs. The regulations were changes in the way MOCs were provided, modifications (postponement in time, alternative provision, e.g. using telemedicine or online connection, or replacing the medical certificate of fitness to work based on the MOC with a declaration by the worker), or interruption without compensation, even for hazardous works. The regulations were in effect for different lengths of time and varied in some countries during the study period. The cumulative duration of MOC interruptions in all EU MS during the study period was 137 months (7.5% of the cumulative study period of 1836 months). Given the different approaches to the provision of MOCs in EU MS, it has proved appropriate to develop an optimal unified framework plan for future similar situations.

Department of Occupational Medicine University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Palacký University Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Public Health Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Palacký University Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Public Health Protection Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Gralinski LE, Menachery VD.  Return of the coronavirus: 2019-nCoV. Viruses  2020;12:135. PubMed PMC

Jacob Machado D, Scott R, Guirales S  et al.  Fundamental evolution of all Orthocoronavirinae including three deadly lineages descendent from Chiroptera-hosted coronaviruses: SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. Cladistics  2021;37:461–88. PubMed PMC

King AMQ, Lefkowitz EJ, Mushegian AR  et al.  Changes to taxonomy and the International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2018). Arch Virol  2018;163:2601–31. PubMed

Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The species severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol  2020;5:536–44. PubMed PMC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID-19. Published 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/index.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fcoronavirus%2F2019-ncov%2Ffaq.html (7 November 2023, date last accessed).

World Health Organization. Annex 2 of the International Health Regulations (2005). Published 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20140320195048/http://www.who.int/ihr/annex_2/en/ (23 December 2023, date last accessed).

Ziemann M, Chen C, Forman R  et al. Global Health Workforce responses to address the COVID-19 pandemic: What policies and practices to recruit, retain, reskill, and support health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic should inform future workforce development? Published 31 March 2023. https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/publications/i/global-health-workforce-responses-to-address-the-covid-19-pandemic-what-policies-and-practices-to-recruit-retain-reskill-and-support-health-workers-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-should-inform-future-workforce-development (20 December 2023, date last accessed). PubMed

Ranka S, Quigley J, Hussain T.  Behaviour of occupational health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Occup Med (Lond)  2020;70:359–63. PubMed PMC

Omeogu C, Green-McKenzie J.  How did occupational and employee health services innovate to maintain core business while meeting the increased work demands of the COVID-19 pandemic?  J Occup Environ Med  2021;63:e39–e41. PubMed PMC

European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Work-related diseases. Published 2023. https://osha.europa.eu/en/themes/work-related-diseases (23 December 2023, date last accessed).

Zimmermann R.  The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civil Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

International Labour Office. Technical and Ethical Guidelines for Workers' Health Surveillance. Geneva: International Labour Office, 1998.

European Commission. EU strategic framework on health and safety at work 2021-2027 occupational safety and health in a changing world of work. Published 28 June 2021. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52021DC0323 (20 December 2023, date last accessed).

World Health Organization. COVID-19 strategic preparedness and response plan. Published 12 February 2020. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/covid-19-sprp-unct-guidelines.pdf (20 December 2023, date last accessed).

International Labour Organization. C161 - Occupational Health Services Convention, 1985 (No. 161). Published 25 June 1985. https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C161 (23 December 2023, date last accessed).

International Labour Organization. COVID-19 and the world of work. Published 7 July 2020. https://global-summit.ilo.org/en/event/constituents-day/ (23 December 2023, date last accessed).

International Labour Organization. COVID-19 country policy responses. Published 1 March 2023. https://www.ilo.org/static/english/covid-19/country-policy-responses/covid-EU-response-2023-03-01.pdf (23 December 2023, date last accessed).

World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Published 8 November 2023. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (23 December 2023, date last accessed).

Blauer B, Brownstein JS, Gardner L  et al.  Innovative platforms for data aggregation, linkage and analysis in the context of pandemic and epidemic intelligence. Euro Surveill  2023;28:2200860. PubMed PMC

Okoli C, Pawlowski SD.  The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf Manag  2004;42:15–29.

Marcinkiewicz A.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the resources and activities of basic occupational health services in Poland. Med Pr  2022;73:19–24. PubMed

European Commission. The EU in Global Health. Published 30 September 2014. https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2016-11/20140930_global_health_infograph_en_0.pdf (23 December 2023, date last accessed).

Iddins BO, Waugh MH, Buck B.  How did occupational and employee health services provide strategic input to organizational emergency contingency planning during the COVID-19 pandemic? A case study. J Occup Environ Med  2021;63:E153–e155. PubMed PMC

Journeay WS, Burnstein MD.  Pandemic influenza: implications for occupational medicine. J Occup Med Toxicol  2009;4:15. PubMed PMC

Kellerbauer M, Klamert M, Tomkin J.  The EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

European Parliament. COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned and recommendations for the future. Published 12 July 2023. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0282_EN.html (18 December 2023, date last accessed).

Smith PW, Hansen K, Spanbauer L  et al.  Pandemic influenza preparedness: a survey of businesses. Am J Infect Control  2007;35:484–5. PubMed

European Commission. Health emergency preparedness and response authority. Published 1 January 2022. https://commission.europa.eu/about-european-commission/departments-and-executive-agencies/health-emergency-preparedness-and-response-authority_en (23 December 2023, date last accessed).

European Commission. Commission Decision of 16.9.2021 establishing the Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Authority. Published 16 September 2021. https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-09/hera_2021_decision_en_0.pdf (19 December 2023, date last accessed).

International Labour Organization. ILO Standards and COVID-19 (coronavirus). Published 13 13 2021. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—-ed_norm/—-normes/documents/publication/wcms_780445.pdf (23 December 2023, date last accessed).

International Labour Organization. Application of International Labour Standards in times of crisis: the importance of international labour standards and effective and authoritative supervision in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Published November 2020. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—-ed_norm/—-normes/documents/publication/wcms_767351.pdf (23 December 2023, date last accessed).

World Health Organization. COVID-19 strategic preparedness and response plan. Published 12 February 2020. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/covid-19-sprp-unct-guidelines.pdf (23 December 2023, date last accessed).

European Council. Video conference of the members of the European Council. Published 10 March 2020. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/european-council/2020/03/10/ (20 December 2023, date last accessed).

International Labour Organization. Application of International Labour Standards 2021. Published June 2021. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—-ed_norm/—-relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_771042.pdf (21 December 2023, date last accessed).

Japanese Trade Union Confederation. RENGO’s Urgent Proposal on Comprehensive Measures against the spread of COVID-19 infection to Mr Nishimura, Minister of Economic Revitalization. Published 7 April 2020. http://www.jtuc-rengo.org/updates/index.cgi?mode=view&no=396&dir=2020/04 (23 December 2023, date last accessed).

Japanese Trade Union Confederation. RENGO President Kozu delivered a message at ILO Global Summit on COVID-19 and the World of Work. Published 9 July 2020. http://www.jtuc-rengo.org/updates/index.cgi?mode=view&no=401&dir=2020/07 (20 December 2023, date last accessed).