Socioeconomic disparities in changes to preterm birth and stillbirth rates during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: a study of 21 European countries

. 2024 Jul 01 ; 34 (Supplement_1) : i58-i66.

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid38946450

Grantová podpora
101018317 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme

BACKGROUND: Despite concerns about worsening pregnancy outcomes resulting from healthcare restrictions, economic difficulties and increased stress during the COVID-19 pandemic, preterm birth (PTB) rates declined in some countries in 2020, while stillbirth rates appeared stable. Like other shocks, the pandemic may have exacerbated existing socioeconomic disparities in pregnancy, but this remains to be established. Our objective was to investigate changes in PTB and stillbirth by socioeconomic status (SES) in European countries. METHODS: The Euro-Peristat network implemented this study within the Population Health Information Research Infrastructure (PHIRI) project. A common data model was developed to collect aggregated tables from routine birth data for 2015-2020. SES was based on mother's educational level or area-level deprivation/maternal occupation if education was unavailable and harmonized into low, medium and high SES. Country-specific relative risks (RRs) of PTB and stillbirth for March to December 2020, adjusted for linear trends from 2015 to 2019, by SES group were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one countries provided data on perinatal outcomes by SES. PTB declined by an average 4% in 2020 {pooled RR: 0.96 [95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.94-0.97]} with similar estimates across all SES groups. Stillbirths rose by 5% [RR: 1.05 (95% CI: 0.99-1.10)], with increases of between 3 and 6% across the three SES groups, with overlapping confidence limits. CONCLUSIONS: PTB decreases were similar regardless of SES group, while stillbirth rates rose without marked differences between groups.

3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia

Centre for Network Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health Madrid Spain

Denmark Statistics Copenhagen Denmark

Department for Research Studies Assessment and Statistics French Ministry of Health Paris France

Department of Child Life and Health University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics National Research Institute of Mother and Child Warsaw Poland

Department of Epidemiology and Statistics Directorate of Health Luxembourg Luxembourg

Department of Evaluation and Analysis Epidemiology and Methodological Support Unit Karolinska Institute Stockholm Sweden

Department of Health Sciences College of Life Sciences University of Leicester Leicester UK

Department of Knowledge Brokers THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare Helsinki Finland

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research Unit University Medical Centre Ljubljana Slovenia

Department of Public Health University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

Directorate for Social Statistics and Welfare Italian Statistical Institute Rome Italy

Division of Mental and Physical Health Norwegian Institute of Public Health Bergen Norway

Division of Obstetrics and Feto Maternal Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Division of Public Health Croatian Institute of Public Health Zagreb Croatia

EPIUnit University of Porto Porto Portugal

Estonian Institute for Population Studies Tallinn University Tallinn Estonia

Federal Statistical Office Neuchâtel Switzerland

Health Monitoring Unit Ministry of Health Nicosia Cyprus

Health Statistics Department Health Information Centre Institute of Hygiene Vilnius Lithuania

Information Services Division Public Health Scotland Edinburgh UK

Institute for the Care of Mother and Child Prague Czechia

Institute of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Karolinska Institute Stockholm Sweden

National Health Information Center Bratislava Slovakia

National Obstetric Information System Directorate for Health Information and Research Pieta Malta

Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team INSERM INRAE Paris Cité University Paris France

Public Health and Preventive Medicine Department University of Valencia Valencia Spain

Public Health General Directorate Valencia Regional Public Health Authority Valencia Spain

Social Data Department Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare Berlin Germany

The Centre for Disease Prevention and Control of Latvia Riga Latvia

The National Perinatal Reporting System Health Pricing Office Dublin Ireland

The Netherlands Perinatal Registry Utrecht Netherlands

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Kramer MS, Seguin L, Lydon J, Goulet L.. Socio-economic disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so poorly? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2000;14:194–210. PubMed

Singh GK, Kogan MD.. Persistent socioeconomic disparities in infant, neonatal, and postneonatal mortality rates in the United States, 1969-2001. Pediatrics 2007;119:e928-39–e939. PubMed

Smith LK, Draper ES, Manktelow BN, et al.Socioeconomic inequalities in very preterm birth rates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007;92:F11–4. PubMed PMC

Zeitlin J, Mortensen L, Prunet C, et al.; Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee. Socioeconomic inequalities in stillbirth rates in Europe: measuring the gap using routine data from the Euro-Peristat Project. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:15. PubMed PMC

Lindquist A, Noor N, Sullivan E, Knight M.. The impact of socioeconomic position on severe maternal morbidity outcomes among women in Australia: a national case-control study. BJOG 2015;122:1601–9. PubMed

Jardine J, Walker K, Gurol-Urganci I, et al.; National Maternity and Perinatal Audit Project Team. Adverse pregnancy outcomes attributable to socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in England: a national cohort study. Lancet 2021;398:1905–12. PubMed

Zilidis C, Hadjichristodoulou C.. Economic crisis impact and social determinants of perinatal outcomes and infant mortality in Greece. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:6606. PubMed PMC

Burris HH, Riis VM, Schmidt I, et al.Maternal stress, low cervicovaginal beta-defensin, and spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020;2:100092. PubMed PMC

Biaggi A, Conroy S, Pawlby S, Pariante CM.. Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 2016;191:62–77. PubMed PMC

Gonthier C, Estellat C, Deneux-Tharaux C, et al.Association between maternal social deprivation and prenatal care utilization: the PreCARE cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017;17:126. PubMed PMC

Allotey J, Stallings E, Bonet M, et al.; for PregCOV-19 Living Systematic Review Consortium. Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2020;370:m3320. PubMed PMC

Knight M, Bunch K, Vousden N, et al.; UK Obstetric Surveillance System SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Pregnancy Collaborative Group. Characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women admitted to hospital with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in UK: national population based cohort study. BMJ 2020;369:m2107. PubMed PMC

Chmielewska B, Barratt I, Townsend R, et al.Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2021;9:e759–e772. PubMed PMC

Yang J, D'Souza R, Kharrat A, et al.COVID-19 pandemic and population-level pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a living systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2021;100:1756–70. PubMed PMC

Yao XD, Zhu LJ, Yin J, Wen J.. Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health 2022;213:127–34. PubMed PMC

Calvert C, Brockway MM, Zoega H, et al.Changes in preterm birth and stillbirth during COVID-19 lockdowns in 26 countries. Nat Hum Behav 2023;7:529–44. PubMed PMC

Gemmill A, Casey JA, Margerison CE, et al.Patterned outcomes, unpatterned counterfactuals, and spurious results: perinatal health outcomes following COVID-19. Am J Epidemiol 2022;191:1837–41. PubMed PMC

Rusconi F, Puglia M, Pacifici M, et al.; AIE Perinatal Health Working Group. Pregnancy outcomes in Italy during COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based cohort study. BJOG 2022;130:276–84. PubMed PMC

Fresson J, Bruckner TA, Ray CL, et al.Decreases in preterm birth during the first COVID-19 lockdown in France by gestational age sub-groups and regional COVID-19 incidence. Ann Epidemiol 2022;72:74–81. PubMed

Hwang J, Moon S, Cho KD, et al.Changes in preterm birth and birthweight during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a nationwide study in South Korea. Sci Rep 2022;12:16288. PubMed PMC

Oakley LL, Ortqvist AK, Kinge J, et al.Preterm birth after the introduction of COVID-19 mitigation measures in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark: a registry-based difference-in-differences study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;226:550.e1–550.e22. PubMed PMC

Shah PS, Ye XY, Yang J, Campitelli MA.. Preterm birth and stillbirth rates during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based cohort study. CMAJ 2021;193:E1164–E1172. PubMed PMC

Homer CSE, Leisher SH, Aggarwal N, et al.Counting stillbirths and COVID 19-there has never been a more urgent time. Lancet Glob Health 2021;9:e10–e11. PubMed PMC

Gallo LA, Gallo TF, Borg DJ, et al.A decline in planned, but not spontaneous, preterm birth rates in a large Australian tertiary maternity centre during COVID-19 mitigation measures. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2022;62:62–70. PubMed PMC

Dench D, Joyce T, Minkoff H.. United States preterm birth rate and COVID-19. Pediatrics 2022;149:e2021055495. PubMed

Einarsdottir K, Swift EM, Zoega H.. Changes in obstetric interventions and preterm birth during COVID-19: a nationwide study from Iceland. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2021;100:1924–30. PubMed PMC

Zeitlin J, Alexander S, Barros H, et al.; Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee. Perinatal health monitoring through a European lens: eight lessons from the Euro-Peristat report on 2015 births. BJOG 2019;126:1518–22. PubMed

Zeitlin J, Wildman K, Breart G, et al.; The Peristat Scientific Advisory Committee. PERISTAT: indicators for monitoring and evaluating perinatal health in Europe. Eur J Public Health 2003;13:29–37. PubMed

Zeitlin J, Mohangoo A, Cuttini M, et al.; EUROPERISTAT Report Writing Committee. The European Perinatal Health Report: comparing the health and care of pregnant women and newborn babies in Europe. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009;63:681–2. PubMed

Gissler M, Mohangoo AD, Blondel B, et al.; Euro-Peristat Group. Perinatal health monitoring in Europe: results from the EURO-PERISTAT project. Inform Health Soc Care 2010;35:64–79. PubMed

Zeitlin J, Philibert M, Estupiñán-Romero F, Euro-Peristat Research Group, et al.Developing and testing a protocol using a common data model for federated collection and analysis of national perinatal health indicators in Europe. Open Res Eur 2023;3:54. PubMed PMC

European Parliament, Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Off J Eur Union 2016.

Blondel B, Cuttini M, Hindori-Mohangoo AD, et al.; Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee. How do late terminations of pregnancy affect comparisons of stillbirth rates in Europe? Analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat Project. BJOG 2018;125:226–34. PubMed

Poulsen G, Strandberg-Larsen K, Mortensen L, et al.Exploring educational disparities in risk of preterm delivery: a comparative study of 12 European birth cohorts. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2015;29:172–83. PubMed

Gurol-Urganci I, Waite L, Webster K, et al.Obstetric interventions and pregnancy outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a nationwide cohort study. PLoS Med 2022;19:e1003884. PubMed PMC

Morgan AS, Bradford C, Farrow H, et al.Effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on perinatal activity in Yorkshire and the Humber region during 2020: an interrupted time series analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2022;107:624–9. PubMed

Fan S, Guan J, Cao L, et al.Psychological effects caused by COVID-19 pandemic on pregnant women: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Asian J Psychiatr 2021;56:102533. PubMed PMC

Silverman ME, Burgos L, Rodriguez ZI, et al.Postpartum mood among universally screened high and low socioeconomic status patients during COVID-19 social restrictions in New York City. Sci Rep 2020;10:22380. PubMed PMC

Euro-Peristat Research Network. Population birth data and pandemic readiness in Europe. BJOG 2021;129:179–84. PubMed PMC

Kaufman JS, Dole N, Savitz DA, Herring AH.. Modeling community-level effects on preterm birth. Ann Epidemiol 2003;13:377–84. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...