• This record comes from PubMed

Real-world effectiveness of cladribine as an escalation strategy for MS: Insights from the Czech nationwide ReMuS registry

. 2024 ; 16 () : 11795735241262743. [epub] 20240724

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country United States Media electronic-ecollection

Document type Journal Article

Links

PubMed 39055049
PubMed Central PMC11271105
DOI 10.1177/11795735241262743
PII: 10.1177_11795735241262743
Knihovny.cz E-resources

BACKGROUND: Cladribine, a selective immune reconstitution therapy, is approved for the treatment of adult patients with highly active multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVES: Provide experience with cladribine therapy in a real-world setting. METHODS: This is a registry-based retrospective observational cohort study. First, using data from the Czech nationwide registry ReMuS, we analysed patients who initiated cladribine from September 1, 2018 to December 31, 2021. Second, we analysed a subgroup of patients who initiated cladribine between September 1, 2018 to June 30, 2020, thus possessing a follow-up period of at least 2 years. We evaluated demographic and MS characteristics including disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) before and after cladribine administration, relapses, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and adherence. RESULTS: In total, 617 patients (335 with follow-up of at least 2 years) started cladribine therapy in the study period (mean age 37.0, mean disease duration 8.4 years, 74.1% females). In most cases, cladribine was administered as a second-line drug, a total of 80.7% had been escalated from a platform DMT. During 2 years before cladribine initiation, the average annualised relapse rate (ARR) was .67. Following cladribine initiation, the ARR decreased to .28 in the first year and .22 in the second year. Overall, across the entire two-year treatment period, 69.0% of patients were relapse-free and the average ARR was .25. As for EDSS development, the median baseline EDSS was 2.5 and remained stable even after 24 months. The adherence to treatment ranged of around 90%. CONCLUSION: This nationwide study confirms the efficacy of cladribine in real-world settings, especially in patients who are not treatment-naïve. In addition, the study shows an exceptionally high adherence rate, a finding that underscores the invaluable role of cladribine, but also the value of registry-based studies in capturing real-world clinical practice.

1st Department of Neurology University Hospital U Svate Anny and Masaryk University Brno Brno Czech Republic

Department of Economic Statistics Prague University of Economics and Business Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology 2nd Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague and Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague and General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Kralove Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen Charles University Plzen Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Faculty of Medicine Palacky University and University Hospital Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Hospital Ceske Budejovice Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Hospital of Jihlava Jihlava Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Hospital Pardubice Pardubice Czech Republic

Department of Neurology KZ a s Hospital Teplice Teplice Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Thomayer Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Tomas Bata Hospital Zlin Czech Republic

Department of Neurology University Hospital and Masaryk University Brno Brno Czech Republic

Department of Neurology University Hospital Ostrava and Medical Faculty Ostrava University Ostrava Czech Republic

Endowment Fund IMPULS Prague Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Mavenclad EMA. INN-Cladribine. Amsterdam, Netherlands: European Medicines Agency; 2017. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/mavenclad-epar-product-information_en.pdf. accessed 30 June 2023.

FDA. FDA Approves New Oral Treatment for Multiple Sclerosis. Maryland, USA: Food and Drug Administration. Silver Spring; 2019. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-new-oral-treatment-multiple-sclerosis. accessed 30 June 2023.

Giovannoni G, Comi G, Cook S, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of oral cladribine for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:416-426. PubMed

Giovannoni G, Soelberg Sorensen P, Cook S, et al. Safety and efficacy of cladribine tablets in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results from the randomised extension trial of the CLARITY study. Mult Scler. 2018;24:1594-1604. PubMed

Leist TP, Comi G, Cree BA, et al. Effect of oral cladribine on time to conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with a first demyelinating event (ORACLE MS): a phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:257-267. PubMed

Leist T, Cook S, Comi G, et al. Long-term safety data from the cladribine tablets clinical development program in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020;46:102572. PubMed

SUKL. Reimbursement. Indication Restrictions for Mavenclad. Prague, Czech Republic: Statni ustav pro kontrolu leciv; 2018. https://www.sukl.cz/modules/medication/detail.php?code=0222414&tab=prices. accessed 31 December 2022.

Giovannoni G, Mathews J. Cladribine tablets for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a clinician's review. Neurol Ther. 2022;11(2):571-595. PubMed PMC

SUKL. Characteristics. Mavenclad Summary of Product. Prague, Czech Republic: Statni ustav pro kontrolu leciv; 2018. https://www.sukl.cz/modules/medication/detail.php?code=0222414&tab=texts. accessed 31 December 2022.

Horakova D, Rockova P, Jircikova J, et al. Initiation of first disease-modifying treatment for multiple sclerosis patients in the Czech republic from 2013 to 2016: data from the national registry ReMuS. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;35:196-202. PubMed

Stastna D, Drahota J, Lauer M, et al.. The Czech National MS Registry (ReMuS): data trends in multiple sclerosis patients whose first disease-modifying therapies were initiated from 2013 to 2021. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2023. DOI: 10.5507/bp.2023.015 PubMed DOI

Giovannoni G, Comi G, Rammohan K, et al. Long-term disease stability assessed by the expanded disability status scale in patients treated with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg for relapsing multiple sclerosis: an exploratory post hoc analysis of the CLARITY and CLARITY extension studies. Adv Ther. 2021;38:4975-4985. PubMed PMC

Sorensen PS, Pontieri L, Joensen H, et al. Real-world experience of cladribine treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a Danish nationwide study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023;70:104491. PubMed

Meuth SG, Bayas A, Kallmann B, et al. Long-term management of multiple sclerosis patients treated with cladribine tablets: an expert opinion. Expet Opin Pharmacother. 2020;21:1965-1969. PubMed

Sørensen PS, Centonze D, Giovannoni G, et al. Expert opinion on the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020;13:1756286420935019. PubMed PMC

Rauma I, Viitala M, Kuusisto H, et al. Finnish multiple sclerosis patients treated with cladribine tablets: a nationwide registry study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;61:103755. PubMed

Zanetta C, Rocca MA, Meani A, et al. Effectiveness and safety profile of cladribine in an Italian real-life cohort of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: a monocentric longitudinal observational study. J Neurol. 2023;270:3553-3564. PubMed PMC

Hrnciarova T, Drahota J, Spelman T, et al. Does initial high efficacy therapy in multiple sclerosis surpass escalation treatment strategy? A comparison of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the Czech and Swedish national multiple sclerosis registries. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023;76:104803. PubMed

Lizak N, Hodgkinson S, Butler E, et al. Real-world effectiveness of cladribine for Australian patients with multiple sclerosis: an MSBase registry substudy. Mult Scler. 2021;27(3):465-474. PubMed PMC

Kołtuniuk A, Chojdak-Łukasiewicz J. Adherence to therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis-review. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2022;19(4):2203. PubMed PMC

Menzin J, Caon C, Nichols C, et al. Narrative review of the literature on adherence to disease-modifying therapies among patients with multiple sclerosis. J Manag Care Pharm. 2013;19(1 Suppl A):S24-S40. PubMed PMC

Di BG, Bertolotto A, Gasperini C, et al. Multiple sclerosis state of the art (SMART): a qualitative and quantitative analysis of Therapy's adherence, hospital reliability's perception, and services provided quality. Mult Scler Int. 2014;2014:752318. PubMed PMC

Devonshire V, Lapierre Y, Macdonell R, et al. The Global Adherence Project (GAP): a multicenter observational study on adherence to disease-modifying therapies in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: global Adherence Project: adherence to DMTs in MS. Eur J Neurol. 2011;18:69-77. PubMed

Steinberg SC, Faris RJ, Chang CF, et al. Impact of adherence to interferons in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a non-experimental, retrospective, cohort study. Clin. Drug Invest. 2010;30:89-100. PubMed

Clerico M, Barbero P, Contessa G, et al. Adherence to interferon-beta treatment and results of therapy switching. J Neurol Sci. 2007;259:104-108. PubMed

Cox D, Stone J. Managing self-injection difficulties in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Nurs. 2006;38:167-171. PubMed

Arroyo E, Grau C, Ramo-Tello C, et al. Adherence to disease-modifying therapies in Spanish patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: two-year interim results of the global adherence project. Eur Neurol. 2011;65:59-67. PubMed

Nicholas JA, Edwards NC, Edwards R, et al. Real-world adherence to, and persistence with, once- and twice-daily oral disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol. 2020;20:281. PubMed PMC

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...