Three-dimensional printed model reconstruction in intraoperative use for glass penetrating facial tissue removal
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu kazuistiky, časopisecké články
PubMed
39210933
PubMed Central
PMC11358196
DOI
10.1002/ccr3.9271
PII: CCR39271
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- 3D print, facial surgery, foreign body, glass particles, inspections,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- kazuistiky MeSH
KEY CLINICAL MESSAGE: In the anatomically complex terrain of the head and neck, the use of 3D intraoperative models serves as an effective verification tool, determining the size, shape, and number of foreign bodies. This allows the main operator to maximize their capacities for careful wound revision and receive real-time information about the remaining content of the sought-after bodies. ABSTRACT: Penetrating foreign bodies of various origins in the head and neck are uncommon, but potentially hazardous injuries. Complete removal of foreign bodies from soft tissues is essential for optimal healing, minimizing complications, and significantly reducing the risk of the need for reoperation. Despite various technological systems and safeguards available, unintentionally retained surgically placed foreign bodies remain difficult to eliminate completely. A 34-year-old female patient with a cut on the right side of her face who was initially treated with sutures at a general surgical clinic presented for a follow-up examination. A foreign body was verified subcutaneously on the anterior-posterior x-ray image on the right side. Computed tomography confirmed a total of 7 foreign bodies with a density corresponding to dental enamel, distributed subcutaneously, subfascially, and intramuscularly in the right temporal region. As part of the preoperative preparation and analysis, the bone segment of the right temporal fossa with the zygomatic bone and the glass fragments were segmented from the CT data and printed on an SLA printer. The physical 3D models were autoclave sterilized and present during surgery. The position, shape, and number of each individual glass fragment was compared with 3D-printed one. The benefits of producing 3D models of foreign bodies are undeniable, particularly in their perioperative comparison with the removed foreign bodies from wounds.
Department of Clinical Biomechanics Regional Hospital Liberec Liberec Czechia
Department of Maxillo Facial surgery Regional Hospital Liberec Liberec Czechia
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Voss JO, Thieme N, Doll C, et al. Penetrating foreign bodies in head and neck trauma: a surgical challenge. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2018;11(3):172‐182. PubMed PMC
Sanli AM, Kertmen H, Yilmaz ER, Sekerci Z. A retained wood penetrating the superior orbital fissure in a neurologically intact child. Turk Neurosurg. 2012;22(3):393‐397. PubMed
Schreckinger M, Orringer D, Thompson BG, La Marca F, Sagher O. Transorbital penetrating injury: case series, review of the literature, and proposed management algorithm. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(1):53‐61. PubMed
Whang G, Mogel GT, Tsai J, Palmer SL. Left behind: unintentionally retained surgically placed foreign bodies and how to reduce their incidence—pictorial review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(6):79‐89. PubMed
Del Cura JL, Aza I, Zabala RM, Sarabia M, Korta I. US‐guided localization and removal of soft‐tissue foreign bodies. Radiographics. 2020;40(4):1188‐1195. PubMed
Horton LK, Jacobson JA, Powell A, Fessell DP, Hayes CW. Sonography and radiography of soft‐tissue foreign bodies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(5):1155‐1159. doi:10.2214/ajr.176.5.1761155 PubMed DOI
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy‐Cramer J, et al. 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(9):1323‐1341. PubMed PMC
Louvrier A, Marty P, Barrabé A, et al. How useful is 3D printing in maxillofacial surgery? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;118(4):206‐212. doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2017.07.002 PubMed DOI
Meglioli M, Naveau A, Macaluso GM, Catros S. 3D printed bone models in oral and cranio‐maxillofacial surgery: a systematic review. 3D Print Med. 2020;6(1):1‐18. doi:10.1186/s41205-020-00082-5 PubMed DOI PMC
Khonsari RH, Adam J, Benassarou M, et al. In‐house 3D printing: why, when, and how? overview of the national French good practice guidelines for in‐house 3D‐printing in maxillo‐facial surgery, stomatology, and oral surgery. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;122(4):458‐461. PubMed
Zoabi A, Redenski I, Oren D, et al. 3D printing and virtual surgical planning in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Clin Med. 2022;11:2385. doi:10.3390/jcm11092385 PubMed DOI PMC
Apriawan T, Bajamal AH, Hermawan Y, et al. Three‐dimensional (3D)‐printed model reconstruction in pre‐operative planning for wooden penetrating brain injury. Bioprint. 2021;24:e00168.
Nakayama M, Yamamoto S, Kaneko N, Mato N, Suzuki T, Hagiwara K. Use of low‐cost three‐dimensional printer to simulate grasping of bronchial foreign body. Respirol Case Rep. 2018;6(7):e00351. PubMed PMC