A plain language summary of the PERSEUS study of daratumumab plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for treating newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Patient Education Handout
- Keywords
- VRd, blood, cancer, daratumumab, multiple myeloma, plain language summary,
- MeSH
- Bortezomib * administration & dosage therapeutic use MeSH
- Dexamethasone * administration & dosage therapeutic use MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic MeSH
- Lenalidomide * administration & dosage therapeutic use MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Multiple Myeloma * drug therapy diagnosis MeSH
- Antibodies, Monoclonal * administration & dosage therapeutic use MeSH
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols * therapeutic use adverse effects MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Patient Education Handout MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Bortezomib * MeSH
- daratumumab MeSH Browser
- Dexamethasone * MeSH
- Lenalidomide * MeSH
- Antibodies, Monoclonal * MeSH
WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This summary describes the first analysis of the PERSEUS study, which looked at adults with multiple myeloma that had never been treated before, also called newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Multiple myeloma is a type of cancer in the blood, specifically in plasma cells within the soft, spongy tissue in the center of most bones, called the bone marrow. Researchers wanted to see if adding daratumumab (D) to a standard treatment of three other medicines called VRd, which stands for bortezomib (V), lenalidomide (R), and dexamethasone (d), could stop the multiple myeloma from getting worse and help participants live longer without multiple myeloma.Half of the participants were assigned to the treatment plan with daratumumab; they received D-VRd during initial treatment phases (induction and consolidation), followed by daratumumab as well as lenalidomide (D-R) in the maintenance phase. The other half of participants received treatment without daratumumab; they received VRd induction and consolidation followed by lenalidomide alone (R) maintenance. In addition, all participants were able to receive an autologous stem cell transplant, a procedure used to further help reduce multiple myeloma. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: At the time of this analysis of PERSEUS, about 4 years after participants started the study, participants who received D-VRd treatment followed by D-R maintenance had a better response to treatment (as measured by specific markers of multiple myeloma) and were more likely to be alive and free from their multiple myeloma getting worse in comparison to participants who received VRd followed by R maintenance. Side effects (unwanted or undesirable effects of treatment) in both treatment groups were in line with the known side effects of daratumumab and VRd. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: The results of the PERSEUS study showed that including daratumumab in D-VRd induction/consolidation and D-R maintenance was better for treating multiple myeloma than the current standard VRd treatment followed by R maintenance alone in adults with a new diagnosis of multiple myeloma who were also able to receive an autologous stem cell transplant. Of importance, there were no unexpected side effects in either group.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02874742 (GRIFFIN) (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Ankara University Ankara Turkey
CHU de Toulouse IUCT O Université de Toulouse UPS Service d'Hématologie Toulouse France
Department of Hematology ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia Brescia Italy
Department of Hematology Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Navarra Spain
Department of Hematology Careggi Hospital and University of Florence Firenze Italy
Department of Hematology EMN Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam The Netherlands
Department of Hematology Hôpital Haut Lévêque University Hospital Pessac France
Department of Hematology Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark
Department of Hematology Theagenion Cancer Hospital Thessaloniki Greece
Department of Internal Medicine 2 University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology Cantonal Hospital St Gallen St Gallen Switzerland
Division of Hematology IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo Pavia Italy
Genmab US Inc Plainsboro NJ USA
Hematology Department University Hospital Hôtel Dieu Nantes France
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona IDIBAPS Barcelona Spain
Janssen Research and Development Beerse Belgium
Janssen Research and Development LLC Beijing China
Janssen Research and Development LLC Leiden The Netherlands
Janssen Research and Development LLC Spring House PA USA
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
University of Leuven Leuven Belgium
University of Melbourne and St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Australia
References provided by Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02874742