Auto-contouring of cardiac substructures for Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR): A STOPSTORM.eu consortium study
Language English Country Ireland Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study
PubMed
39489426
DOI
10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110610
PII: S0167-8140(24)04272-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Tachycardia, Ventricular * MeSH
- Organs at Risk radiation effects MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods MeSH
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed * MeSH
- Radiosurgery * methods MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Heart radiation effects MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: High doses to healthy cardiac substructures (CS) in stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) raise concerns regarding potential treatment-induced cardio-toxicity. However, CS contours are not routinely created, hindering the understanding of the CS dose-effect relationships. To address this issue, the alignment of CS contouring was initiated within the STOPSTORM consortium. In this study, we developed and evaluated auto-contouring models trained to delineate CS and major vessels in ventricular tachycardia (VT) patients. METHODS: Eight centres provided standard treatment planning computed tomography (CT) and/or contrast-enhanced CT datasets of 55 VT patients, each including 16 CS. Auto-contouring models were trained to contour either large structures or small structures. Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), 95 % Hausdorff distance (HD95) and volume ratio (VR) were used to evaluate model performance versus inter-observer variation (IOV) on seven VT patient test cases. Significant differences were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: The performance on the four chambers and the major vessels (median DSC: 0.88; HD95: 5.8-19.4 mm; VR: 1.09) was similar to the IOV (median DSC: 0.89; HD95: 4.8-14.0 mm; VR: 1.20). For the valves, model performance (median DSC: 0.37; HD95: 11.6 mm; VR: 1.63) was similar to the IOV (median DSC: 0.41; HD95: 12.4 mm; VR: 3.42), but slightly worse for the coronary arteries (median DSC: 0.33 vs 0.42; HD95: 24.4 mm vs 16.9 mm; VR: 1.93 vs 3.30). The IOV for these small structures remains large despite using contouring guidelines. CONCLUSION: CS auto-contouring models trained on VT patient data perform similarly to IOV. This allows for time-efficient evaluation of CS as possible organs-at-risk.
Department for Radiation Oncology Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
Department of Oncology University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Ostrava Czech Republic
Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
Department of Radiation Oncology University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein Kiel Germany
Department of Radiotherapy University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht the Netherlands
References provided by Crossref.org