Evaluating the feasibility of "Friends in Nature," a complex nature-based social intervention to address loneliness and quality of life in six cities worldwide
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country Great Britain, England Media electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
39616375
PubMed Central
PMC11607793
DOI
10.1186/s40814-024-01575-4
PII: 10.1186/s40814-024-01575-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Feasibility, Green spaces, Group-based activities, Loneliness, Mental health, Nature-based interventions, Social prescribing, Study design,
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: Loneliness, a major public health concern, could be alleviated through social interventions with nature contact as a primary component. "Friends in Nature" is a complex nature-based social intervention designed to be implemented as part of "Reimagining Environments for Connection and Engagement: Testing Actions for Social Prescribing in Natural Spaces" (RECETAS). This project aims to alleviate loneliness and promote health-related quality of life in six different geographic areas worldwide. Feasibility studies are crucial to assess the viability of complex interventions and study procedures before conducting definitive studies. This paper aims to describe the design, implementation, and evaluation of the six-related feasibility studies on the "Friends in Nature" intervention. These studies specifically evaluate feasibility of recruitment and study procedures, intervention implementation, and data collection and distribution. METHODS: We defined a comprehensive set of indicators to assess the feasibility of "Friends in Nature." For the first domain, recruitment procedures were assessed to determine their adequacy, while attrition rates were examined to assess participant retention. For the second domain, the implementation of interventions was evaluated, along with the study design's ability to adapt to unexpected situations and participant adherence to the intervention. Finally, for the third domain, completion rates and the acceptability of the study activities were also analyzed. The feasibility of using specific scales to assess loneliness and well-being was also explored. RESULTS: The feasibility indicators defined for this study were useful to assess the feasibility of "Friends in Nature." Recruitment procedures were generally found to be adequate, and the number of dropouts was low. Interventions were implemented with minor adjustments, and facilitators played a vital role in the well-functioning of the interventions. Although some unexpected situations occurred during the study, adaptations were made, and participants were generally satisfied with the activities proposed. Scales used to assess loneliness and quality of life showed potential for measuring the effects of nature-based social prescribing in the full trial. CONCLUSION: This paper offers valuable insights into the design and execution of feasibility studies for complex interventions like "Friends in Nature." Findings from these assessments explore the feasibility of "Friends in Nature" and will inform the main RECETAS studies, which are designed to strengthen the evidence base to support the use of nature-based social prescribing to reduce loneliness and promote quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Barcelona trial: NCT05488496, Prague trial: NCT05522140, and Helsinki trial: NCT05507684.
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille Marseille France
Barcelona Institute for Global Health 08003 Barcelona Spain
Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau Barcelona Spain
CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública Madrid Spain
Institute for Research and Innovation Life Sciences and Health in Central Catalonia Vic Spain
Research Group On Innovation in Mental Health and Social Wellbeing Vic Spain
Research Group On Methodology Methods Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences Vic Spain
See more in PubMed
Perlman D, Peplau L. Toward a social psychology of loneliness. Pers Relatsh. 1981;3(May):31–56.
Astell-Burt T, Hartig T, Putra IGNE, Walsan R, Dendup T, Feng X. Green space and loneliness: a systematic review with theoretical and methodological guidance for future research. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 2022 Nov;847:157521. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969722046198. PubMed
Wang X, Wong YD, Yuen KF. Rise of ‘lonely’ consumers in the post-COVID-19 era: a synthesised review on psychological, commercial and social implications. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2021 Jan 6;18(2):404. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/2/404. PubMed PMC
Luhmann M, Buecker S, Rüsberg M. Loneliness across time and space. Nat Rev Psychol [Internet]. 2022 Nov 7;2(1):9–23. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-022-00124-1. PubMed PMC
Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2010;96(3–4):221–30. PubMed PMC
Luanaigh C, Lawlor B. Loneliness and the health of older people. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry [Internet]. 2008;23(12):1213–21. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18537197/. PubMed
Holt-Lunstad J, Robles T, Sbarra DA. Advancing social connection as a public health priority in the United States. Physiol Behav. 2017;176(3):139–48. PubMed PMC
Sachs A, Tharrey M, Darmon N, Alaimo K, Boshara A, Beavers A, et al. “To me, it’s just natural to be in the garden”: a multi-site investigation of new community gardener motivation using self-determination theory. Wellbeing, Sp Soc [Internet]. 2022;3(February):100088. Available from: 10.1016/j.wss.2022.100088
Bickerdike L, Booth A, Wilson PM, Farley K, Wright K. Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2017 Apr 7;7(4):e013384. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013384. PubMed PMC
World Health Organization. A toolkit on how to implement social prescribing. 2022.
Litt JS, Coll-Planas L, Sachs AL, Masó Aguado M, Howarth M. Current trends and future directions in urban social prescribing. Curr Environ Heal Reports. 2023;(October). Available from: 10.1007/s40572-023-00419-2. PubMed
Jansson A, Pitkälä K. Circle of Friends, an encouraging intervention for alleviating loneliness. J Nutr Heal Aging [Internet]. 2021;25(6):714–5. Available from: 10.1007/s12603-021-1615-5%0AEditorial. PubMed PMC
Litt JS, Coll-Planas L, Sachs AL, Ursula R, Jansson A, Vladimira D, et al. Nature-based social interventions for people experiencing loneliness: the rationale and overview of the RECETAS project. Cities Heal. 2023.
Coll-Planas L, Carbó-Cardeña A, Jansson A, Dostálová V, Bartova A, Rautiainen L, et al. Nature-based social interventions to address loneliness among vulnerable populations: a common study protocol for three related randomized controlled trials in Barcelona, Helsinki, and Prague within the RECETAS European project. BMJ Public Heal. 2024. PubMed PMC
Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Sandercock P, Tyrer P. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000;321(694). PubMed PMC
Cocks K, Torgerson DJ. Sample size calculations for pilot randomized trials: a confidence interval approach. J Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 2013;66(2):197–201. Available from: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.002. PubMed
Lancaster G, Dodds S, Williamson P. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2002;10(2):307–12. PubMed
Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger W, Coben LA, Martin RL. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry [Internet]. 1982 Jun 29;140(6):566–72. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007125000112085/type/journal_article. PubMed
Routasalo PE, Tilvis RS, Kautiainen H, Pitkala KH. Effects of psychosocial group rehabilitation on social functioning, loneliness and well-being of lonely, older people: randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(2):297–305. PubMed
Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res [Internet]. 1975;12(3):189–98. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0022395675900266?via%3Dihub. PubMed
Jansson AH, Savikko NM, Pitkälä KH. Training professionals to implement a group model for alleviating loneliness among older people – 10-year follow-up study. Educ Gerontol [Internet]. 2018 Mar 4;44(2–3):119–27. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03601277.2017.1420005.
Paño P, Garcia G, Granizo P. Hacia la prescripción social basada en la naturaleza para aliviar la soledad: una experiencia de co-creación desde América Latina. Submitted. 2023.
Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, CONSORT, et al. statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2010;2016:355. PubMed PMC
Thabane L, Hopewell S, Lancaster GA, Bond CM, Coleman CL, Campbell MJ, et al. Methods and processes for development of a CONSORT extension for reporting pilot randomized controlled trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud [Internet]. 2016;2(1):1–13. Available from: 10.1186/s40814-016-0065-z. PubMed PMC
Gierveld JDJ, Van Tilburg TG. A 6-item scale for overall, emotional, and social loneliness: confirmatory tests on survey data. Res Aging. 2006;28(5):582–98.
Sintonen H. The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):328–36. PubMed
Gierveld JDJ, Van Tilburg TG. Manual of the Loneliness Scale. Methoden en Tech. 1999.
Teague S, Youssef GJ, Macdonald JA, Sciberras E, Shatte A, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, et al. Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol [Internet]. 2018 Dec 26;18(1):151. Available from: https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7. PubMed PMC
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05488496, NCT05507684, NCT05522140
