Exploring consumers' perceptions of online purchase decision factors: electroencephalography and eye-tracking evidence
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
39624186
PubMed Central
PMC11608952
DOI
10.3389/fnhum.2024.1411685
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- EEG and consumer behavior, consumer affective reaction, consumer attention, event-related potentials (ERP), eye-tracing integration, online purchase behavior, utilitarian and hedonic consumption,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Consumer behavior on the Internet is influenced by factors that can affect consumers' perceptions and attention to products. Understanding these processes at the neurobiological level can help to understand consumers' implicit responses to marketing stimuli. The objective of this study is to use electroencephalography (EEG) to investigate the differential effects of selected online purchase decision factors that are becoming increasingly important in online shopping. METHODS: Using event-related potentials (ERPs) and simultaneous eye-tracking measurements, we identified differences in the perception of utilitarian and hedonic products when the products are exposed together with visual elements of the factors review, discount, and quantity discount. The ERP analysis focused on the P200 and late positive potential components (LPP). RESULTS: By allowing free-viewing of stimuli during measurement, early automatic and later more complex attentional affective responses could be observed. The results suggest that the review and discount factors are processed faster than the product itself. However, the eye-tracking data indicate that the brain processes the factor without looking at it directly, i.e., from a peripheral view. DISCUSSION: The study also demonstrates the possibilities of using new objective methods based on neurobiology and how they can be applied, especially in areas where the use of neuroscience is still rare, yet so much needed to objectify consumers' knowledge of their need satisfaction behavior.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Berčík J., Gálová J., Vietoris V., Paluchová J. (2021). The application of consumer neuroscience in evaluating the effect of aroma marketing on consumer preferences in the food market. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 35, 261–282. doi: 10.1080/08974438.2021.1989102 DOI
Berčík J., Horská E., Wang R. W. Y., Chen Y.-C. (2016). The impact of parameters of store illumination on food shopper response. Appetite 106, 101–109. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.010, PMID: PubMed DOI
Carretié L., Mercado F., Tapia M., Hinojosa J. A. (2001). Emotion, attention, and the “negativity bias”, studied through event-related potentials. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 41, 75–85. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00195-1, PMID: PubMed DOI
Chandon P., Wansink B., Laurent G. (2000). A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. J. Mark. 64, 65–81. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.64.4.65.18071 DOI
Chen W., Gu B., Ye Q., Zhu K. X. (2019). Measuring and managing the externality of managerial responses to online customer reviews. Inf. Syst. Res. 30, 81–96. doi: 10.1287/isre.2018.0781 DOI
Chen D., Qu W., Xiang Y., Zhao J., Shen G. (2019). People of lower social status are more sensitive to hedonic product information—electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13:147. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00147, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Crespo-Almendros E., Del Barrio-García S. (2016). Online airline ticket purchasing: influence of online sales promotion type and internet experience. J. Air Transp. Manag. 53, 23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.01.004 DOI
Davidaviciene V., Raudeliuniene J., Jonyte-Zemlickiene A., Tvaronaviciene M. (2021). Factors affecting customer buying behavior in online shopping. Mark. Manag. Innov. 5, 11–19. doi: 10.21272/mmi.2021.4-01 DOI
Delplanque S., Lavoie M. E., Hot P., Silvert L., Sequeira H. (2004). Modulation of cognitive processing by emotional valence studied through event-related potentials in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 356, 1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.10.014, PMID: PubMed DOI
Dhar R., Wertenbroch K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. J. Mark. Res. 37, 60–71. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718 DOI
Donoghue T., Voytek B. (2022). Automated meta-analysis of the event-related potential (ERP) literature. Sci. Rep. 12:1867. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05939-9, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Eger L., Komárková L., Egerová D., Mičík M. (2021). The effect of COVID-19 on consumer shopping behaviour: generational cohort perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 61:102542. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102542 DOI
Fu S., Cheng X., Bao Y., Bilgihan A., Okumus F. (2021). Staying in a hotel or peer-to-peer accommodation sharing? A discrete choice experiment with online reviews and discount strategies. Internet Res. 31, 654–676. doi: 10.1108/INTR-01-2020-0031 DOI
Goto N., Lim X. L., Shee D., Hatano A., Khong K. W., Buratto L. G., et al. . (2019). Can brain waves really tell if a product will be purchased? Inferring consumer preferences from single-item brain potentials. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 13:19. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2019.00019, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Goto N., Mushtaq F., Shee D., Lim X. L., Mortazavi M., Watabe M., et al. . (2017). Neural signals of selective attention are modulated by subjective preferences and buying decisions in a virtual shopping task. Biol. Psychol. 128, 11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.06.004, PMID: PubMed DOI
Gu S., Ślusarczyk B., Hajizada S., Kovalyova I., Sakhbieva A. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on online consumer purchasing behavior. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 16, 2263–2281. doi: 10.3390/jtaer16060125 DOI
Hajcak G., MacNamara A., Olvet D. M. (2010). Event-related potentials, emotion, and emotion regulation: an integrative review. Dev. Neuropsychol. 35, 129–155. doi: 10.1080/87565640903526504, PMID: PubMed DOI
Hajcak G., Moser J. S., Simons R. F. (2006). Attending to affect: appraisal strategies modulate the electrocortical response to arousing pictures. Emotion 6, 517–522. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.517 PubMed DOI
Hakim A., Levy D. J. (2019). A gateway to consumers’ minds: achievements, caveats, and prospects of electroencephalography-based prediction in neuromarketing. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 10:e1485. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1485, PMID: PubMed DOI
Herbas Torrico B., Frank B., Enkawa T. (2011). The role of hedonic and utilitarian attitudes in the formation of affective and cognitive customer satisfaction. 95th Conference of the Japanese Society for Quality Control. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271385527_The_Role_of_Hedonic_and_Utilitarian_Attitudes_in_the_Formation_of_Affective_and_Cognitive_Customer_Satisfaction?channel=doi&linkId=54c690840cf22d626a34ebe7&showFulltext=true
Herring D. R., Taylor J. H., White K. R., Crites S. L., Jr. (2011). Electrophysiological responses to evaluative priming: the LPP is sensitive to incongruity. Emotion 11, 794–806. doi: 10.1037/a0022804, PMID: PubMed DOI
Hu F., Wu Q., Li Y., Xu W., Zhao L., Sun Q. (2020). Love at first glance but not after deep consideration: the impact of sexually appealing advertising on product preferences. Front. Neurosci. 14:465. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00465, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Hyvärinen A., Oja E. (2000). Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications. Neural Netw. 13, 411–430. doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00026-5, PMID: PubMed DOI
Jin J., Dou X., Meng L., Yu H. (2018). Environmental-friendly eco-labeling matters: Evidences from an ERPS study. Front. hum. neurosci. [Internet]. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00417, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Jin J., Zhang W., Chen M. (2017). How consumers are affected by product descriptions in online shopping: event-related potentials evidence of the attribute framing effect. Neurosci. Res. 125, 21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2017.07.006, PMID: PubMed DOI
Jones W. J., Childers T. L., Jiang Y. (2012). The shopping brain: math anxiety modulates brain responses to buying decisions. Biol. Psychol. 89, 201–213. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.011, PMID: PubMed DOI
Jung T.-P., Makeig S., Bell A. J., Sejnowski T. J. (1998). “Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic and event-related potential data” in Central auditory processing and neural modeling. eds. Poon P. W. F., Brugge J. F. (Boston, MA: Springer; ).
Junghöfer M., Bradley M. M., Elbert T. R., Lang P. J. (2001). Fleeting images: a new look at early emotion discrimination. Psychophysiology 38, 175–178. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3820175, PMID: PubMed DOI
Keshvari S., Rosenholtz R. (2016). Pooling of continuous features provides a unifying account of crowding. J. Vis. 16:39. doi: 10.1167/16.3.39, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Kotchoubey B. (2006). Event-related potentials, cognition, and behavior: a biological approach. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 30, 42–65. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.04.002 PubMed DOI
Kral S., Fedorko R. (2021). Development of online shopping within B2C e-commerce in the Visegrad four countries. Market. Sci. Inspirat. 16, 42–50. doi: 10.46286/msi.2021.16.3.5 DOI
Kulke L., Brümmer L., Pooresmaeili A., Schacht A. (2021). Overt and covert attention shifts to emotional faces: combining EEG, eye tracking, and a go/no-go paradigm. Psychophysiology 58:e13838. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13838, PMID: PubMed DOI
Li X., Li X., Luo Y.-J. (2005). Anxiety and attentional bias for threat: an event-related potential study. Neuroreport 16, 1501–1505. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000176522.26971.83 PubMed DOI
Lijffijt M., Lane S. D., Meier S. L., Boutros N. N., Burroughs S., Steinberg J. L., et al. . (2009). P50, N100, and P200 sensory gating: relationships with behavioral inhibition, attention, and working memory. Psychophysiology 46, 1059–1068. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00845.x, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Lin M.-H., Cross S. N. N., Childers T. L. (2018a). Understanding olfaction and emotions and the moderating role of individual differences. Eur. J. Mark. 52, 811–836. doi: 10.1108/EJM-05-2015-0284 DOI
Lin M.-H., Cross S. N. N., Jones W. J., Childers T. L. (2018b). Applying EEG in consumer neuroscience. Eur. J. Mark. 52, 66–91. doi: 10.1108/EJM-12-2016-0805 DOI
Ma Y., Jin J., Yu W., Zhang W., Xu Z., Ma Q. (2018). How is the neural response to the Design of Experience Goods Related to personalized preference? An implicit view. Front. Neurosci. 12:760. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00760, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Mastria S., Ferrari V., Codispoti M. (2017). Emotional picture perception: repetition effects in free-viewing and during an explicit categorization task. Front. Psychol. 8:1001. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01001, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
McEvoy L. K., Pellouchoud E., Smith M. E., Gevins A. (2001). Neurophysiological signals of working memory in normal aging. Cogn. Brain Res. 11, 363–376. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00009-X, PMID: PubMed DOI
McInnes A. N., Sung B., Hooshmand R. (2023). A practical review of electroencephalography’s value to consumer research. Int. J. Mark. Res. 65, 52–82. doi: 10.1177/14707853221112622 DOI
Michie P. T., Solowij N., Crawford J. M., Glue L. C. (1993). The effects of between-source discriminability on attended and unattended auditory ERPs. Psychophysiology 30, 205–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb01733.x, PMID: PubMed DOI
Minnix J. A., Versace F., Robinson J. D., Lam C. Y., Engelmann J. M., Cui Y., et al. . (2013). The late positive potential (LPP) in response to varying types of emotional and cigarette stimuli in smokers: a content comparison. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 89, 18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.04.019, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Niu W., Huang L., Li X., Zhang J., Chen M. (2022). Beyond the review information: an investigation of individual- and group-based presentation forms of review information. Inf. Technol. Manag. 24, 159–176. doi: 10.1007/s10799-022-00361-z DOI
Plassmann H., Venkatraman V., Huettel S., Yoon C. (2015). Consumer neuroscience: applications, challenges, and possible solutions. J. Mark. Res. 52, 427–435. doi: 10.1509/jmr.14.0048 DOI
Pollak F., Dorčák P. (2015). Analysis of online reputation of elected e-commerce entities operating in the central European market. IDIMT-2015: information technology and society – interaction and interdependence. 23rd interdisciplinary information management talks, 44. Available at: https://idimt.org/
Pozharliev R., Verbeke W. J. M. I., Van Strien J. W., Bagozzi R. P. (2015). Merely being with you increases my attention to luxury products: using EEG to understand consumers’ emotional experience with luxury branded products. J. Mark. Res. 52, 546–558. doi: 10.1509/jmr.13.0560 DOI
Prasetyo Y. T., Tanto H., Mariyanto M., Hanjaya C., Young M. N., Persada S. F., et al. . (2021). Factors affecting customer satisfaction and loyalty in online food delivery service during the COVID-19 pandemic: its relation with open innovation. J. Open Innov.: Technol. Mark. Complex. 7:76. doi: 10.3390/joitmc7010076 DOI
Sabatinelli D., Lang P. J., Keil A., Bradley M. M. (2006). Emotional perception: correlation of functional MRI and event-related potentials. Cereb. Cortex 17, 1085–1091. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl017, PMID: PubMed DOI
Schupp H., Cuthbert B., Bradley M., Hillman C., Hamm A., Lang P. (2004). Brain processes in emotional perception: motivated attention. Cognit. Emot. 18, 593–611. doi: 10.1080/02699930341000239 DOI
Stahl J., Wiese H., Schweinberger S. R. (2010). Learning task affects ERP-correlates of the own-race bias, but not recognition memory performance. Neuropsychologia 48, 2027–2040. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.024, PMID: PubMed DOI
Telpaz A., Webb R., Levy D. J. (2015). Using EEG to predict consumers’ future choices. J. Mark. Res. 52, 511–529. doi: 10.1509/jmr.13.0564 DOI
Voss K. E., Spangenberg E. R., Grohmann B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. J. Mark. Res. 40, 310–320. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.40.3.310.19238 DOI
Wang X., Huang Y., Ma Q., Li N. (2012). Event-related potential P2 correlates of implicit aesthetic experience. Neuroreport 23, 862–866. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283587161, PMID: PubMed DOI
Yen N.-S., Chen K.-H., Liu E. H. (2010). Emotional modulation of the late positive potential (LPP) generalizes to Chinese individuals. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 75, 319–325. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.12.014, PMID: PubMed DOI
Yuan J., Zhang Q., Chen A., Li H., Wang Q., Zhuang Z., et al. . (2007). Are we sensitive to valence differences in emotionally negative stimuli? Electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study. Neuropsychologia 45, 2764–2771. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.04.018, PMID: PubMed DOI
Zhang J. Q., Craciun G., Shin D. (2010). When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews. J. Bus. Res. 63, 1336–1341. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.12.011 DOI
Zhang W., Jin J., Wang A., Ma Q., Yu H. (2019). Consumers’ implicit motivation of purchasing luxury brands: an EEG study. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 12, 913–929. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S215751, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC