Homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian cancer: Global expert consensus on testing and a comparison of companion diagnostics
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Comparative Study
PubMed
39693891
DOI
10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115169
PII: S0959-8049(24)01776-3
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- BRCA, Companion diagnostic assays, Genomic instability, Homologous recombination deficiency, Ovarian cancer, PARP inhibitor,
- MeSH
- Delphi Technique MeSH
- Homologous Recombination MeSH
- Consensus * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor genetics MeSH
- Ovarian Neoplasms * genetics diagnosis drug therapy MeSH
- Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors * therapeutic use MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Biomarkers, Tumor MeSH
- Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors * MeSH
BACKGROUND: Poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) are a treatment option for patients with advanced high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (OC). Recent guidelines have clarified how homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) may influence treatment decision-making in this setting. As a result, numerous companion diagnostic assays (CDx) have been developed to identify HRD. However, the optimal HRD testing strategy is an area of debate. Moreover, recently published clinical and translational data may impact how HRD status may be used to identify patients likely to benefit from PARPi use. We aimed to extensively compare available HRD CDx and establish a worldwide expert consensus on HRD testing in primary and recurrent OC. METHODS: A group of 99 global experts from 31 different countries was formed. Using a modified Delphi process, the experts aimed to establish consensus statements based on a systematic literature search and CDx information sought from investigators, companies and/or publications. RESULTS: Technical information, including analytical and clinical validation, were obtained from 14 of 15 available HRD CDx (7 academic; 7 commercial). Consensus was reached on 36 statements encompassing the following topics: 1) the predictive impact of HRD status on PARPi use in primary and recurrent OC; 2) analytical and clinical validation requirements of HRD CDx; 3) resource-stratified HRD testing; and 4) how future CDx may include additional approaches to help address unmet testing needs. CONCLUSION: This manuscript provides detailed information on currently available HRD CDx and up-to-date guidance from global experts on HRD testing in patients with primary and recurrent OC.
Department of Gynecological Oncology Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Shanghai China
Department of Medical Oncology Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier Montpellier France
Division of Experimental Oncology European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy
Federal University MG Brazilian Group of Gynecologic Oncology Oncoclínicas DOM Oncologia Brazil
Institute of Pathology School of Medicine and Health Technical University Munich Munich Germany
Texas Oncology US Oncology Network The Woodlands TX USA
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research London UK
References provided by Crossref.org