Motor imagery (MI) is a mental simulation of a movement without its actual execution. Our study aimed to assess how MI of two modalities of gait (normal gait and much more posturally challenging slackline gait) affects muscle activity and lower body kinematics. Electromyography (biceps femoris, gastrocnemius medialis, rectus femoris and tibialis anterior muscles) as well as acceleration and angular velocity (shank, thigh and pelvis segments) data were collected in three tasks for both MI modalities of gait (rest, gait imagery before and after the real execution of gait) in quiet bipedal stance in 26 healthy young adults. No significant change was observed in electromyography activity and lower body kinematics when comparing MI tasks of normal gait. A significantly higher acceleration for the lower limb segments in the vertical direction and for the pelvis in the mediolateral and anteroposterior direction and angular velocity for pelvis in the frontal plane were found during MI of slackline gait after its real execution compared to rest. The results show that MI of normal gait does not lead to any significant changes, while MI of slackline gait affects lower body kinematics parameters.

Department of Clinical Rehabilitation Faculty of Health Sciences Palacký University Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Natural Sciences in Kinanthropology Faculty of Physical Culture Palacký University Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Rehabilitation University Hospital Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Decety, J. & Jeannerod, M. Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: Does Fitt’s law hold in motor imagery?. Behav. Brain Res.72, 127–134. 10.1016/0166-4328(96)00141-6 (1995). PubMed

Lotze, M. & Halsband, U. Motor imagery. J. Physiol. Paris99, 386–395. 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.012 (2006). PubMed

Ridderinkhof, K. R. & Brass, M. How Kinesthetic Motor Imagery works: A predictive-processing theory of visualization in sports and motor expertise. J. Physiol. Paris109, 53–63. 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2015.02.003 (2015). PubMed

Iseki, K., Hanakawa, T., Shinozaki, J., Nankaku, M. & Fukuyama, H. Neural mechanisms involved in mental imagery and observation of gait. Neuroimage41(3), 1021–1031. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.010 (2008). PubMed

Kaneko, N., Yokoyama, H., Masugi, Y., Watanabe, K. & Nakazawa, K. Phase dependent modulation of cortical activity during action observation and motor imagery of walking: An EEG study. Neuroimage225, 117486. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117486 (2021). PubMed

Miyai, I. et al. Cortical mapping of gait in humans: A near-infrared spectroscopic topography study. Neuroimage14(5), 1186–1192. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0905 (2001). PubMed

Hétu, S. et al. The neural network of motor imagery: An ALE meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.37, 930–949. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.017 (2013). PubMed

Solodkin, A., Hlustik, P., Chen, E. E. & Small, S. L. Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cereb. Cortex14, 1246–1255. 10.1093/cercor/bhh086 (2004). PubMed

Kami, A. et al. Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature377, 155–158. 10.1038/377155a0 (1995). PubMed

Wriessnegger, S. C., Steyrl, D., Koschutnig, K. & Müller-Putz, G. R. Short time sports exercise boosts motor imagery patterns: Implications of mental practice in rehabilitation programs. Front. Hum. Neurosci.8, 469. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00469 (2014). PubMed PMC

Kaneko, N., Masugi, Y., Usuda, N., Yokoyama, H. & Nakazawa, K. Modulation of Hoffmann reflex excitability during action observation of walking with and without motor imagery. Neurosci. Lett.684, 218–222. 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.041 (2018). PubMed

Malouin, F., Richards, C. L., Jackson, P. L., Dumas, F. & Doyon, J. Brain activations during motor imagery of locomotor-related tasks: A PET study. Hum. Brain Mapp.19(1), 47–62. 10.1002/hbm.10103 (2003). PubMed PMC

Guillot, A. & Collet, C. Construction of the motor imagery integrative model in sport: A review and theoretical investigation of motor imagery use. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol.1, 31–44. 10.1080/17509840701823139 (2008).

Guillot, A. et al. Muscular responses during motor imagery as a function of muscle contraction types. Int. J. Psychophysiol.665, 18–27. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.05.009 (2007). PubMed

Schuster, C. et al. Best practice for motor imagery: A systematic literature review on motor imagery training elements in five different disciplines. BMC Med.9, 75. 10.1186/1741-7015-9-75 (2011). PubMed PMC

Hall, C. R. & Martin, K. A. Measuring movement imagery abilities: A revision of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire. J. Ment. Imagery21, 143–154 (1997).

Bajaj, S., Butler, A. J., Drake, D. & Dhamala, M. Brain effective connectivity during motor-imagery and execution following stroke and rehabilitation. Neuroimage Clin.8, 572–582. 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.06.006 (2015). PubMed PMC

Guillot, A., Lebon, F. & Collet, C. Electromyographic activity during motor imagery. In The Neurophysiological Foundations of Mental and Motor Imagery (eds Guillot, A. & Collet, C.) 83–94 (Oxford University Press, 2010).

Salik Sengul, Y., Kaya, N., Yalcinkaya, G., Kirmizi, M. & Kalemci, O. The effects of the addition of motor imagery to home exercises on pain, disability and psychosocial parameters in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Explore (NY)17, 334–339. 10.1016/j.explore.2020.02.001 (2021). PubMed

Zapparoli, L. et al. Motor imagery training speeds up gait recovery and decreases the risk of falls in patients submitted to total knee arthroplasty. Sci. Rep.10, 8917. 10.1038/s41598-020-65820-5 (2020). PubMed PMC

Mateo, S. et al. Improvement of grasping after motor imagery in C6–C7 tetraplegia: A kinematic and MEG pilot study. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci.33, 543–555. 10.3233/RNN-140466 (2015). PubMed

Page, S. J., Levine, P. & Hill, V. Mental practice-triggered electrical stimulation in chronic, moderate, upper-extremity hemiparesis after stroke. Am. J. Occup. Ther.69, 1–8. 10.5014/ajot.2015.014902 (2015). PubMed PMC

Ruffino, C., Papaxanthis, C. & Lebon, F. Neural plasticity during motor learning with motor imagery practice: Review and perspectives. Neuroscience341, 61–78. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.11.023 (2017). PubMed

Guerra, Z. F., Lucchetti, A. L. G. & Lucchetti, G. Motor imagery training after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther.41, 205–214. 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000200 (2017). PubMed

Blumen, H. M. & Verghese, J. Motor imagery of walking and walking while talking: A pilot randomized-controlled trial protocol for older adults. Neurodegener. Dis. Manag.7(6), 353–363. 10.2217/nmt-2017-0024 (2017). PubMed PMC

Yoo, P. E. et al. Distinct neural correlates underlie inhibitory mechanisms of motor inhibition and motor imagery restraint. Front. Behav. Neurosci.14, 77. 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00077 (2020). PubMed PMC

Lemos, T., Rodrigues, E. C. & Vargas, C. D. Motor imagery modulation of postural sway is accompanied by changes in the EMG-COP association. Neurosci. Lett.577, 101–105. 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.06.019 (2014). PubMed

Rodrigues, E. C. et al. Kinesthetic motor imagery modulates body sway. Neuroscience169(2), 743–750. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.04.081 (2010). PubMed

Kolářová, B., Krobot, A., Polehlová, K., Hluštík, P. & Richards, J. Effect of gait imagery tasks on lower limb muscle activity with respect to body posture. Percept. Mot. Skills122(2), 411–431. 10.1177/0031512516640377 (2016). PubMed

Kolářová, B. et al. How posture and previous sensorimotor experience influence muscle activity during gait imagery in young healthy individuals. Brain Sci.13(11), 1605. 10.3390/brainsci13111605 (2023). PubMed PMC

Haltmar, H., Janura, M., Haltmar, M. & Elfmark, M. The effect of gait imagery and its more demanding variant on muscle activity in stroke survivors. Rehabil. Fyz. Lék.31(3), 116–125. 10.48095/ccrhfl2024116 (2024).

Kaneko, N., Masugi, Y., Yokoyama, H. & Nakazawa, K. Difference in phase modulation of corticospinal excitability during the observation of the action of walking, with and without motor imagery. Neuroreport29(3), 169–173. 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000941 (2018). PubMed

Kotegawa, K., Yasumura, A. & Teramoto, W. Changes in prefrontal cortical activation during motor imagery of precision gait with age and task difficulty. Behav. Brain Res.399, 113046. 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.113046 (2021). PubMed

Putzolu, M. et al. Neural oscillations during motor imagery of complex gait: An HdEEG study. Sci. Rep.12, 4314. 10.1038/s41598-022-07511-x (2022). PubMed PMC

Goodworth, A. D. & Peterka, R. J. Influence of stance width on frontal plane postural dynamics and coordination in human balance control. J. Neurophysiol.104(2), 1103–1118. 10.1152/jn.00916.2009 (2010). PubMed PMC

Sheahan, H. R., Ingram, J. N., Žalalytė, G. M. & Wolpert, D. M. Imagery of movements immediately following performance allows learning of motor skills that interfere. Sci. Rep.8, 14330. 10.1038/s41598-018-32606-9 (2018). PubMed PMC

Yang, Y. J., Jeon, E. J., Kim, J. S. & Chung, C. K. Characterization of kinesthetic motor imagery compared with visual motor imageries. Sci. Rep.11, 3751. 10.1038/s41598-021-82241-0 (2021). PubMed PMC

Stegeman, D. F. & Hermens, H. J. Standards for surface electromyography: the European project (SENIAM). In: Surface electromyography application areas and parameters. Proceedings of the third general SENIAM workshop on surface electromyography. Aachen, Germany, 108–112 (1998).

van Melick, N., Meddeler, B. M., Hoogeboom, T. J., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. & van Cingel, R. How to determine leg dominance: The agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults. PloS One12, e0189876. 10.1371/journal.pone.0189876 (2017). PubMed PMC

Budini, K. et al. An exploration of the use of Inertial Measurement Units in the assessment of dynamic postural control of the knee and the effect of bracing and taping. Physiother. Pract. Res.39, 91–98. 10.3233/PPR-180111 (2018).

Costello, K. E. et al. Quantifying varus thrust in knee osteoarthritis using wearable inertial sensors: A proof of concept. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon)80, 105232. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105232 (2020). PubMed PMC

Cotter, K. N. Mental control in musical imagery: A dual component model. Front. Psychol.10, 1–13. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01904 (2019). PubMed PMC

Ghislieri, M., Gastaldi, L., Pastorelli, S., Tadano, S. & Agostini, V. Wearable inertial sensors to assess standing balance: A systematic review. Sensors19(19), 4075. 10.3390/s19194075 (2019). PubMed PMC

Contessa, P., De Luca, C. J., Roy, S. H. & Richards, J. In The Comprehensive Textbook of Clinical Biomechanics (ed. Richards, J.) 225–225 (Elsevier, 2018).

Kolářová, B. et al. The effect of motor imagery on quality of movement when performing reaching tasks in healthy subjects: A proof of concept. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther.29, 161–166. 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.10.004 (2022). PubMed

Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 2nd edn. (Routledge Academic, 1988).

Brach, J. S., Van Swearingen, J. M., Perera, S., Wert, D. M. & Studenski, S. Motor learning versus standard walking exercise in older adults with subclinical gait dysfunction: A randomized clinical trial. J. Am. Ger. Soc.61, 1879–1886. 10.1111/jgs.12506 (2013). PubMed PMC

Shadmehr, R. & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J. Neurosci.14, 3208–3224. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-05-03208.1994 (1994). PubMed PMC

Solomon, J. P., Kraeutner, S. N., Bardouille, T. & Boe, S. G. Probing the temporal dynamics of movement inhibition in motor imagery. Brain Res.1720, 146310. 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146310 (2019). PubMed

Gabel, C. P., Osborne, J. & Burkett, B. The influence of “Slacklining” on quadriceps rehabilitation, activation and intensity. J. Sci. Med. Sport18, 62–66. 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.11.007 (2015). PubMed

Pfusterschmied, J. et al. Effect of instability training equipment on lower limb kinematics and muscle activity. Sportverletzung Sportschaden27, 28–33. 10.1055/s-0032-1330725 (2013). PubMed

Kaneko, N., Masugi, Y., Usuda, N., Yokoyama, H. & Nakazawa, K. Muscle-specific modulation of spinal reflexes in lower-limb muscles during action observation with and without motor imagery of walking. Brain Sci.9(12), 333. 10.3390/brainsci9120333 (2019). PubMed PMC

Wong, A. L., Haith, A. M. & Krakauer, J. W. Motor planning. Neuroscientist21, 385–398. 10.1177/1073858414541484 (2015). PubMed

Montull, L., Vázquez, P., Rocas, L., Hristovski, R. & Balagué, N. Flow as an embodied state. Informed awareness of slackline walking. Front. Psychol.10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02993 (2020). PubMed PMC

Desmurget, M. & Grafton, S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn. Sci.4, 423–431. 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01537-0 (2000). PubMed

Gentili, R., Cahouet, V., Ballay, Y. & Papaxanthis, C. Inertial properties of the arm are accurately predicted during motor imagery. Behav. Brain Res.155, 231–239. 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.04.027 (2004). PubMed

Harris, D. J., Vine, S. J. & Wilson, M. R. Neurocognitive mechanisms of the flow state. Prog. Brain Res.234, 221–243. 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.06.012 (2017). PubMed

Holmes, P. S. & Collins, D. J. The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: A functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. J. Appl. Sport Psychol.13, 60–83. 10.1080/10413200109339004 (2001).

Verhagen, E. et al. The effect of a proprioceptive balance board training program for the prevention of ankle sprains: A prospective controlled trial. Am. J. Sports Med.32, 1385–1393. 10.1177/0363546503262177 (2004). PubMed

Allami, N., Paulignan, Y., Brovelli, A. & Boussaoud, D. Visuo-motor learning with combination of different rates of motor imagery and physical practice. Exp. Brain Res.184, 105–113. 10.1007/s00221-007-1086-x (2008). PubMed