Background/Objectives: The DIEP flap is among the preferred techniques in autologous breast reconstruction due to better long-term outcomes, including higher satisfaction and more natural breast shape compared to implant-based breast reconstruction. With the rise in genetic testing, bilateral DIEP reconstructions are becoming more common, though they carry a higher risk of complications. This study aims to compare the risks between unilateral and bilateral procedures to improve surgical decision-making. Methods: A retrospective, single-center review was conducted on female patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction between January 2018 and May 2024. The study included patients with complete medical records and follow-up data, excluding those with incomplete records. Patient characteristics, operative details, and complications were thoroughly analyzed, with donor site complications assessed per patient and recipient site complications per breast. Results: During the study, 141 DIEP flaps were performed on 114 women, with 87 unilateral and 27 bilateral reconstructions. Age and BMI were similar between groups. However, chemotherapy was more common in the bilateral group (85% vs. 47%, p = 0.0011). Operative time was significantly longer in bilateral procedures (650 vs. 460 min, p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in recipient and donor site complications across groups. The hospital stay was significantly longer in the bilateral group (11 vs. 8.8 days, p = 0.024). Conclusions: Bilateral and unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions have similar complication and early take-back rates.

1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Kateřinská 1660 32 121 08 Prague Czech Republic

Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Geneva University Hospitals Geneva University 1205 Geneva Switzerland

See more in PubMed

Eltahir Y., Werners L.L.C.H., Dreise M.M., Zeijlmans van Emmichoven I.A., Werker P.M.N., de Bock G.H. Which Breast Is the Best? Successful Autologous or Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Quality-of-Life Outcomes. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2015;135:43. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000804. PubMed DOI

Pusic A.L., Matros E., Fine N., Buchel E., Gordillo G.M., Hamill J.B., Kim H.M., Qi J., Albornoz C., Klassen A.F., et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study. J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2017;35:2499–2506. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9561. PubMed DOI PMC

Wilkins E.G., Hamill J.B., Kim H.M., Kim J.Y., Greco R.J., Qi J., Pusic A.L. Complications in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: One-Year Outcomes of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC) Study. Ann. Surg. 2018;267:164. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002033. PubMed DOI PMC

Hu E.S., Pusic A.L., Waljee J.F., Kuhn L., Hawley S.T., Wilkins E., Alderman A.K. Patient-Reported Aesthetic Satisfaction with Breast Reconstruction during the Long-Term Survivorship Period. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2009;124:1–8. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ab10b2. PubMed DOI

Yueh J.H., Slavin S.A., Adesiyun T., Nyame T.T., Gautam S., Morris D.J., Tobias A.M., Lee B.T. Patient Satisfaction in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, Latissimus Flap, and Implant Techniques. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2010;125:1585. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181cb6351. PubMed DOI

Alderman A.K., Wilkins E.G., Lowery J.C., Kim M., Davis J.A. Determinants of Patient Satisfaction in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2000;106:769. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200009020-00003. PubMed DOI

Martineau J., Kalbermatten D.F., Oranges C.M. Safety and Efficacy of the Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator (SGAP) Flap in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers. 2022;14:4420. doi: 10.3390/cancers14184420. PubMed DOI PMC

Martineau J., Scampa M., Viscardi J.A., Giordano S., Kalbermatten D.F., Oranges C.M. Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator (IGAP) Flap in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Proportional Meta-Analysis of Surgical Outcomes. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2023;84:147–156. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.05.018. PubMed DOI

Toyserkani N.M., Jørgensen M.G., Tabatabaeifar S., Damsgaard T., Sørensen J.A. Autologous versus Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Breast-Q Patient-Reported Outcomes. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2020;73:278–285. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.09.040. PubMed DOI

Mégevand V., Scampa M., McEvoy H., Kalbermatten D.F., Oranges C.M. Comparison of Outcomes Following Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implants for Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers. 2022;14:4223. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174223. PubMed DOI PMC

von Glinski M., Holler N., Kümmel S., Reinisch M., Wallner C., Wagner J.M., Dadras M., Sogorski A., Lehnhardt M., Behr B. Autologous vs. Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Skin- and Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy-A Deeper Insight Considering Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes. Front. Surg. 2022;9:903734. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.903734. PubMed DOI PMC

Stefura T., Rusinek J., Wątor J., Zagórski A., Zając M., Libondi G., Wysocki W.M., Koziej M. Implant vs. Autologous Tissue-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Studies Comparing Surgical Approaches in 55,455 Patients. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2023;77:346–358. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.11.044. PubMed DOI

Sgarzani R., Negosanti L., Morselli P.G., Vietti Michelina V., Lapalorcia L.M., Cipriani R. Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life in DIEAP Flap versus Implant Breast Reconstruction. Surg. Res. Pract. 2015;2015:405163. doi: 10.1155/2015/405163. PubMed DOI PMC

Tønseth K.A., Hokland B.M., Tindholdt T.T., Åbyholm F.E., Stavem K. Quality of Life, Patient Satisfaction and Cosmetic Outcome after Breast Reconstruction Using DIEP Flap or Expandable Breast Implant. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2008;61:1188–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.05.006. PubMed DOI

Tuttle T.M., Habermann E.B., Grund E.H., Morris T.J., Virnig B.A. Increasing Use of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Patients: A Trend Toward More Aggressive Surgical Treatment. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007;25:5203–5209. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.3141. PubMed DOI

Han E., Johnson N., Glissmeyer M., Wagie T., Carey B., DelaMelena T., Nelson J. Increasing Incidence of Bilateral Mastectomies: The Patient Perspective. Am. J. Surg. 2011;201:615–618. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.01.018. PubMed DOI

Stucky C.-C.H., Gray R.J., Wasif N., Dueck A.C., Pockaj B.A. Increase in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Echoes of a Bygone Era? Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2010;17:330–337. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1259-x. PubMed DOI

Albornoz C.R., Matros E., Lee C.N., Hudis C.A., Pusic A.L., Elkin E., Bach P.B., Cordeiro P.G., Morrow M. Bilateral Mastectomy versus Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: The Role of Breast Reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2015;135:1518. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001276. PubMed DOI PMC

Arrington A.K., Jarosek S.L., Virnig B.A., Habermann E.B., Tuttle T.M. Patient and Surgeon Characteristics Associated with Increased Use of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients with Breast Cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2009;16:2697–2704. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0641-z. PubMed DOI

King T.A., Sakr R., Patil S., Gurevich I., Stempel M., Sampson M., Morrow M. Clinical Management Factors Contribute to the Decision for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29:2158–2164. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.4041. PubMed DOI

Ain Q., Richardson C., Mutebi M., George A., Kemp Z., Rusby J.E. Does Mainstream BRCA Testing Affect Surgical Decision-Making in Newly-Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients? Breast. 2023;67:30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.12.001. PubMed DOI PMC

Winters S., Martin C., Murphy D., Shokar N.K. Breast Cancer Epidemiology, Prevention, and Screening. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2017;151:1–32. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.07.002. PubMed DOI

Wormald J.C.R., Wade R.G., Figus A. The Increased Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Bilateral Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction Compared to Unilateral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2014;67:143–156. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.10.024. PubMed DOI

Nelson J.A., Allen R.J.J., Polanco T., Shamsunder M., Patel A.R., McCarthy C.M., Matros E., Dayan J.H., Disa J.J., Cordeiro P.G., et al. Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: An 8-Year Examination of 3268 Patients. Ann. Surg. 2019;270:473. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003467. PubMed DOI

Miseré R.M., van Kuijk S.M., Claassens E.L., Heuts E.M., Piatkowski A.A., van der Hulst R.R. Breast-Related and Body-Related Quality of Life Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction Is Superior to Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction—A Long-Term Follow-up Study. Breast. 2021;59:176–182. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.07.003. PubMed DOI PMC

Alves A.S., Tan V., Scampa M., Kalbermatten D.F., Oranges C.M. Complications of Immediate versus Delayed DIEP Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. Cancers. 2022;14:4272. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174272. PubMed DOI PMC

Panchal H., Pilewskie M.L., Sheckter C.C., Albornoz C.R., Razdan S.N., Disa J.J., Cordeiro P.G., Mehrara B.J., Matros E. National Trends in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2019;119:79–87. doi: 10.1002/jso.25315. PubMed DOI PMC

O’Neill A.C., Haykal S., Bagher S., Zhong T., Hofer S.O.P. Predictors and Consequences of Intraoperative Microvascular Problems in Autologous Breast Reconstruction. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2016;69:1349–1355. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.07.006. PubMed DOI

Freedman R.A., Kouri E.M., West D.W., Rosenberg S., Partridge A.H., Lii J., Keating N.L. Higher Stage of Disease Is Associated with Bilateral Mastectomy Among Patients with Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Survey. Clin. Breast Cancer. 2016;16:105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.08.004. PubMed DOI PMC

Neuburger J., Macneill F., Jeevan R., van der Meulen J.H.P., Cromwell D.A. Trends in the Use of Bilateral Mastectomy in England from 2002 to 2011: Retrospective Analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003179. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003179. PubMed DOI PMC

Fosnot J., Fischer J.P., Smartt J.M., Low D.W., Kovach S.J., Wu L.C., Serletti J.M. Does Previous Chest Wall Irradiation Increase Vascular Complications in Free Autologous Breast Reconstruction? Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2011;127:496–504. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fed560. PubMed DOI

Chang E.I., Chang E.I., Soto-Miranda M.A., Zhang H., Nosrati N., Ghali S., Chang D.W. Evolution of Bilateral Free Flap Breast Reconstruction over 10 Years: Optimizing Outcomes and Comparison to Unilateral Reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2015;135:946e–953e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001233. PubMed DOI

Tekdogan B., Martineau J., Kalbermatten D.F., Oranges C.M. Unilateral Versus Bilateral Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open. 2024;12:e6359. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006359. PubMed DOI PMC

Moellhoff N., Prantl L., Fritschen U., Germann G., Giunta R.E., Kehrer A., Aung T., Zeman F., Broer P.N., Heidekrueger P.I. Uni-vs. Bilateral DIEP Flap Reconstruction—A Multicenter Outcome Analysis. Surg. Oncol. 2021;38:101605. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101605. PubMed DOI