European general practitioners' attitudes towards person-centred care and factors that influence its implementation in everyday practice: The protocol of the cross-sectional PACE GP/FP study in 24 European countries
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
40008619
PubMed Central
PMC11866646
DOI
10.1080/13814788.2025.2463630
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Primary health care, general practice, person-centred care,
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Patient-Centered Care * organization & administration MeSH
- Attitude of Health Personnel * MeSH
- General Practice * MeSH
- General Practitioners * psychology MeSH
- Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
BACKGROUND: Person-centred care (PCC) is a fundamental principle in general practice, emphasising practices tailored to individual patient preferences, needs, and values. Despite the importance of PCC, general practitioners (GPs) face obstacles in effectively implementing it, with associated factors remaining unclear. OBJECTIVES: The PACE GP/FP study aims to explore GPs' attitudes towards PCC and the factors facilitating or hindering its implementation in daily practice across European countries. This paper outlines the PACE GP/FP study protocol. METHODS: The cross-sectional design with data collection via an online survey distribution to GPs in 24 European countries. Study instruments include two validated questionnaires (Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and Patient Physician Orientation Scale (PPOS)) and additional items covering general information about the doctor and their practice, as well as facilitators and barriers to PCC. These additional items were specifically developed for the study, translated using the forward-backward method, evaluated through cognitive debriefing, and integrated into the REDCap platform to create language and country-specific survey links. The STROBE checklist guides the reporting of the manuscript. CONCLUSION: The PACE GP/FP study will provide a comprehensive exploration of GPs' attitudes towards PCC and the factors shaping its practice in Europe. The findings from the PACE GP/FP study will provide evidence for designing future implementation strategies and guide targeted interventions to promote PCC in primary care across Europe.
1st Faculty of Medicine Institute of General Practice Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Aragones Group of Research in Primary Health Care Zaragoza Spain
Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute Barakaldo Bizkaia Spain
Center for Public Health and Healthcare Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
Center of General Practice Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland
Centre for family medicine Family Medicine St Cyril and Methodius University Skopje North Macedonia
Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Cerrahpaşa Fatih İstanbul Turkey
Department of Family Medicine Ankara University School of Medicine Ankara Turkey
Department of Family Medicine Bursa Uludag University Bursa Turkey
Department of Family Medicine Jagiellonian University Medical College Kraków Poland
Department of Family Medicine Medical Faculty University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia
Department of Family Medicine Medical Faculty University of Maribor Maribor Slovenia
Department of Family Medicine School of Medicine University of Split Split Croatia
Department of Family Medicine School of Medicine University of Zagreb Zagreb Croatia
Department of Family Medicine Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Department of Family Medicine UJCM at Uniwersytet Jagielloński Collegium Medicum Kraków Poland
Department of General Practice Institute of Health and Society University of Oslo Oslo Norway
Department of General Practice University of Lille Lille France
Department of Physiatry and Nursing University of Zaragoza Zaragoza Spain
Department of Public Health and Primary Care Ghent University Ghent Belgium
Division of General Practice 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Prague Czechia
Dr Adolf Drolc Health Center Maribor Maribor Slovenia
Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care University of Exeter Exeter United Kingdom
Faculty of Medicine and Health technology Tampere University Tampere Finland
Faculty of Medicine Department of Family Medicine Dokuz Eylul University Izmir Turkey
Faculty of Medicine Institut of Family Medicine JKU Linz Linz Austria
Faculty of Medicine University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia
Health Center 'Dr Đorđe Kovačević' Belgrade Serbia
Health Centre Zagreb Centar Zagreb Croatia
Health Centre Zagreb West Zagreb Croatia
Ikerbasque Basque Foundation for Science Bilbao Spain
Institute of General Practice Faculty of Medicine University of Halle Wittenberg Halle Saale Germany
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón Madrid Spain
Irish College of General Practitioners Dublin Ireland
Kinetic Therapy and Special Motricity 'Spiru Haret' University Bucharest Romania
Ljubljana Community Health Centre Ljubljana Slovenia
Local Health Authority of Modena Modena Italy
Macedonaian Medical Association Skopje North Macedonia
Medical Faculty University of Tuzla Tuzla Bosnia and Herzegovina
National Institute of Environmental Health Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
NOVA Medical School Lisbon Portugal
Public Health Center 'Dr M Sehovic' Tuzla Tuzla Bosnia and Herzegovina
Quality and Safety Ghent Department of Public Health and Primary Care Ghent University Ghent Belgium
Split Dalmatia Health Center Split Croatia
See more in PubMed
Håkansson Eklund J, Holmström IK, Kumlin T, et al. . “Same same or different?” A review of reviews of person-centered and patient-centered care. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(1):3–11. Epub 2018 Aug 26. PMID: 30201221. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.029. PubMed DOI
[The European Definition of General Practice/Family Medicine . WONCA EUROPE 2023 Edition; 2023. Available from: https://www.woncaeurope.org/file/41f61fb9-47d5-4721-884e-603f4afa6588/WONCA_European_Definitions_2_v7.pdf.
Kumar R, Chattu VK.. What is in the name? Understanding terminologies of patient-centered, person-centered, and patient-directed care!. J Family Med Prim Care. 2018;7(3):487–488. PMID: 30112293; PMCID: PMC6069658. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_61_18. PubMed DOI PMC
Khatri RB, Wolka E, Nigatu F, et al. . People-centred primary health care: a scoping review. BMC Prim Care. 2023;24(1):236. PMID: 37946115; PMCID: PMC10633931. doi:10.1186/s12875-023-02194-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Švab I, Cerovečki V.. Person-centred care, a core concept of family medicine. Eur J Gen Pract. 2024;30(1):2393860. Epub 2024 Aug 27. PMID: 39190294; PMCID: PMC11351358. doi:10.1080/13814788.2024.2393860. PubMed DOI PMC
Ahmed A, van den Muijsenbergh METC, Vrijhoef HJM.. Person-centred care in primary care: what works for whom, how and in what circumstances? Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30(6):e3328–e3341. Epub 2022 Jul 21. PMID: 35862510; PMCID: PMC10083933. doi:10.1111/hsc.13913. PubMed DOI PMC
Ahmed A, van den Muijsenbergh METC, Vrijhoef HJM.. Person-centred care in the Dutch primary care setting: refinement of middle-range theory by patients and professionals. PLoS One. 2023;18(3):e0282802. PMID: 36893112; PMCID: PMC9997984. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0282802. PubMed DOI PMC
Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, et al. . The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(9):796–804. PubMed
Sacristán JA. Patient-centered medicine and patient-oriented research: improving health outcomes for individual patients. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13(1):6. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-13-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, et al. . Patient-centred medicine. Transforming the clinical method. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2003.
Michie S, Miles J, Weinman J.. Patient-centredness in chronic illness: what is it and does it matter? Patient Educ Couns. 2003; Nov51(3):197–206. doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00194-5. PubMed DOI
Poitras ME, Maltais ME, Bestard-Denommé L, et al. . What are the effective elements in patient-centered and multimorbidity care? A scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):446. PMID: 29898713; PMCID: PMC6001147. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3213-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Robinson JH, Callister LC, Berry JA, et al. . Patient-centered care and adherence: definitions and applications to improve outcomes. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008;20(12):600–607. PMID: 19120591. doi:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00360.x. PubMed DOI
Epstein RM, Street RL. Jr.. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(2):100–103. PMID: 21403134; PMCID: PMC3056855. doi:10.1370/afm.1239. PubMed DOI PMC
Rosengren K, Brannefors P, Carlstrom E.. Adoption of the concept of person-centred care into discourse in Europe: a systematic literature review. J Health Organ Manag. 2021;35(9):265–280. PMID: 34523306; PMCID: PMC9136870. doi:10.1108/JHOM-01-2021-0008. PubMed DOI PMC
J Alharbi TS, Olsson LE, Ekman I, et al. . The impact of organizational culture on the outcome of hospital care: after the implementation of person-centred care. Scand J Public Health. 2014;42(1):104–110. Epub 2013 Aug 19. PMID: 23960157. doi:10.1177/1403494813500593. PubMed DOI
Lydahl D. Visible persons, invisible work? Exploring articulation work in the implementation of person-centred care on a hospital ward. SoFo. 2017;54(3):163–179. Available from http://du.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1143769/FULLTEXT01.pdf doi:10.37062/sf.54.18213. DOI
Britten N, Ekman I, Naldemirci Ö, et al. . Learning from Gothenburg model of person centred healthcare. BMJ. 2020;370:m2738. PMID: 32873594. doi:10.1136/bmj.m2738. PubMed DOI
Drivenes K, Haaland VØ, Mesel T, et al. . Practitioners’ positive attitudes promote shared decision-making in mental health care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019;25(6):1041–1049. Epub 2019 Sep 11. PMID: 31508872. doi:10.1111/jep.13275. PubMed DOI
Krupat E, Yeager CM, Putnam S.. Patient role orientations, doctor‐patient fit, and visit satisfaction. Psychol Health. 2000;15(5):707–719. doi:10.1080/08870440008405481. DOI
Krupat E, Rosenkranz SL, Yeager CM, et al. . The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39(1):49–59. doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00090-7. PMID: 11013547. PubMed DOI
Shaw WS, Woiszwillo MJ, Krupat E.. Further validation of the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS) from recorded visits for back pain. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89(2):288–291. Epub 2012 Sep 3. PMID: 22954491. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2012.07.017. PubMed DOI
Ishikawa H, Hashimoto H, Kiuchi T.. The evolving concept of "patient-centeredness" in patient-physician communication research. Soc Sci Med. 2013;96:147–153. Epub 2013 Aug 3. PMID: 24034962. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.026. PubMed DOI
Greenhalgh T, Shaw S, Wherton J, et al. . Real-world implementation of video outpatient consultations at macro, meso, and micro levels: mixed-method study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(4):e150. PMID: 29625956; PMCID: PMC5930173. doi:10.2196/jmir.9897. PubMed DOI PMC
Montague T, Gogovor A, Aylen J, et al. . Patient-centred care in Canada: key components and the path forward. Healthc Q. 2017;20(1):50–56. PMID: 28550701. doi:10.12927/hcq.2017.25136. PubMed DOI
MapChart. Europe . [Internet]. Create your own custom map. [cited 2024 May 1]. Available from: https://www.mapchart.net/europe-detailed.html.
Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, STROBE Initiative ., et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1500–1524. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.014. PubMed DOI
Collins C, Clays E, Van Poel E, et al. . Distress and wellbeing among general practitioners in 33 countries during COVID-19: results from the cross-sectional PRICOV-19 study to inform health system interventions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(9):5675. doi:10.3390/ijerph19095675. PubMed DOI PMC
Mitchell AM, Crane PA, Kim Y.. Perceived stress in survivors of suicide: psychometric properties of the Perceived Stress Scale. Res Nurs Health. 2008;31(6):576–585. doi:10.1002/nur.20284. PubMed DOI
Ardenghi S, Rampoldi G, Pepe A, et al. . Assessing patient-centeredness among medical students: the Italian translation and validation of the patient-practitioner orientation scale. BPA. 2019;67(285):51–61. doi.org/. doi:10.26387/bpa.285.5. DOI
Mudiyanse RM, Pallegama RW, Jayalath T, et al. . Translation and validation of patient-practitioner orientation scale in Sri Lanka. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2015;28(1):35–40. doi:10.4103/1357-6283.161847. PubMed DOI
Paul-Savoie E, Bourgault P, Gosselin E, et al. . Assessing patient-centered care: validation of the French version of the patient-practitioner orientation scale (PPOS). EJPCH. 2015;3(3):295–302. doi:10.5750/ejpch.v3i3.956. DOI
Perestelo-Pérez L, Rivero-Santana A, González-González AI, et al. . Cross-cultural validation of the patient-practitioner orientation scale among primary care professionals in Spain. Health Expect. 2021;24(1):33–41. doi:10.1111/hex.13135. PubMed DOI PMC
García AA. Cognitive interviews to test and refine questionnaires. Public Health Nurs. 2011;28(5):444–450. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00938.x. PubMed DOI
Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation ., et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x. PubMed DOI
Van de Vijver FJR, Leung K.. Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1997.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. . The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. PubMed DOI PMC
Suresh K, Chandrashekara S.. Sample size estimation and power analysis for clinical research studies. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2012;5(1):7–13. Retraction in: J Hum Reprod Sci. 2015 Jul-Sep;8(3):186. doi:10.4103/0974-1208.97779. PubMed DOI PMC