Sampling methods that are both scientifically rigorous and ethical are cornerstones of any experimental biological research. Since its introduction 30 years ago, the method of using plasticine prey to quantify predation pressure has become increasingly popular in biology. However, recent studies have questioned the accuracy of the method, suggesting that misinterpretation of predator bite marks and the artificiality of the models may bias the results. Yet, bias per se might not be a methodological issue as soon as its statistical distribution in the samples is even, quantifiable, and thus correctable in quantitative analyses. In this study, we focus on avian predation of lepidopteran larvae models, which is one of the most extensively studied predator-prey interactions across diverse ecosystems worldwide. We compared bird predation on plasticine caterpillar models to that on dead caterpillars of similar size and color, using camera traps to assess actual predation events and to evaluate observer accuracy in identifying predation marks a posteriori. The question of whether plasticine models reliably measure insectivorous bird predation remained unanswered, for two reasons: (1) even the evaluation of experienced observers in the posterior assessment of predation marks on plasticine models was subjective to some extent, and (2) camera traps failed to reflect predation rates as assessed by observers, partly because they could only record evidence of bird presence rather than actual predation events. Camera traps detected more evidence of bird presence than predation clues on plasticine models, suggesting that fake prey may underestimate the foraging activity of avian insectivores. The evaluation of avian predation on real caterpillar corpses was probably also compromised by losses to other predators, likely ants. Given the uncertainties and limitations revealed by this study, and in the current absence of more effective monitoring methods, it remains simpler, more cost-effective, ethical, and reliable to keep using plasticine models to assess avian predation. However, it is important to continue developing improved monitoring technologies to better evaluate and refine these methods in order to advance research in this field.

BIOGECO INRAE University Bordeaux Cestas France

DYNAFOR University of Toulouse INRAE Toulouse France

Institute of Entomology Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Díaz-Siefer P, Olmos-Moya N, Fontúrbel FE, Lavandero B, Pozo RA, Celis-Diez JL. Bird-mediated effects of pest control services on crop productivity: a global synthesis. J Pest Sci. 2021;95(2):567–76. doi: 10.1007/s10340-021-01438-4 DOI

Remmel T, Davison J, Tammaru T. Quantifying predation on folivorous insect larvae: the perspective of life-history evolution. Biol J Linn Soc. 2011;104(1):1–18.

Ford AT, Goheen JR. Trophic cascades by large carnivores: a case for strong inference and mechanism. Trends Ecol Evol. 2015;30(12):725–35. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.012 PubMed DOI

Nyffeler M, Şekercioğlu ÇH, Whelan CJ. Insectivorous birds consume an estimated 400–500 million tons of prey annually. Sci Nat. 2018. Aug;105(7–8):47. PubMed PMC

Sherry T, Kent C, Sánchez N, Şekercioğlu Ç. Insectivorous birds in the Neotropics: Ecological radiations, specialization, and coexistence in species-rich communities. The Auk. 2020;137(4):ukaa049.

Thiollay J-M. Comparative Foraging Success of Insectivorous Birds in Tropical and Temperate Forests: Ecological Implications. Oikos. 1988. Jul;53(1):17. doi: 10.2307/3565658 DOI

Collins CT, Watson A. Field Observations of Bird Predation on Neotropical Moths. Biotropica. 1983. Mar;15(1):53.

Mäntylä E, Kleier S, Lindstedt C, Kipper S, Hilker M. Insectivorous Birds Are Attracted by Plant Traits Induced by Insect Egg Deposition. J Chem Ecol. 2018;44(12):1127–38. doi: 10.1007/s10886-018-1034-1 PubMed DOI

Poloni R, Dhennin M, Mappes J, Joron M, Nokelainen O. Exploring polymorphism in a palatable prey: predation risk and frequency dependence in relation to distinct levels of conspicuousness. Evol Lett. 2024. Jan 11. doi: qrad071 PubMed PMC

Van Bael SA, Philpott SM, Greenberg R, Bichier P, Barber NA, Mooney KA, et al.. Birds as predators in tropical agroforestry systems. Ecology. 2008;89(4):928–34. doi: 10.1890/06-1976.1 PubMed DOI

Michalski M, Nadolski J, Marciniak B, Loga B, Bańbura J. Faecal Analysis as a Method of Nestling Diet Determination in Insectivorous Birds: A Case Study in Blue TitsCyanistes caeruleusand Great TitsParus major. Acta Ornithologica. 2011. Dec;46(2):164–72. doi: 10.3161/000164511x625937 DOI

Sam K, Koane B, Jeppy S, Sykorova J, Novotny V. Diet of land birds along an elevational gradient in Papua New Guinea. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):44018. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04666-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Brodie III ED. Differential avoidance of coral snake banded patterns by free‐ranging avian predators in Costa Rica. Evolution. 1993;47(1):227–35. PubMed

Lövei GL, Ferrante M. A review of the sentinel prey method as a way of quantifying invertebrate predation under field conditions. Insect Sci. 2017;24(4):528–42. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12405 PubMed DOI

Roslin T, Hardwick B, Novotny V, Petry W, Andrew N, Asmus A, et al.. Higher predation risk for insect prey at low latitudes and elevations. Science. 2017;356(6339):742–4. PubMed

Schillé L, Valdés‐Correcher E, Archaux F, Bălăcenoiu F, Bjørn M, Bogdziewicz M, et al.. Decomposing drivers in avian insectivory: Large-scale effects of climate, habitat and bird diversity. J Biogeography. 2024. doi: jbi.14808

Valdés‐Correcher E, Moreira X, Augusto L, Barbaro L, Bouget C, Bouriaud O, et al.. Search for top‐down and bottom‐up drivers of latitudinal trends in insect herbivory in oak trees in Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2021;30(3):651–65.

Bateman P, Fleming P, Wolfe A. A different kind of ecological modelling: the use of clay model organisms to explore predator–prey interactions in vertebrates. Journal of Zoology. 2017;301(4):251–62.

Rodriguez‐Campbell A, Rahn O, Chiuffo MC, Hargreaves AL. Clay larvae do not accurately measure biogeographic patterns in predation. J Biogeogr. 2023.

Zvereva EL, Kozlov MV. Predation risk estimated on live and artificial insect prey follows different patterns. Ecology. 2023;104(3):e3943. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3943 PubMed DOI

Valdés-Correcher E, Mäntylä E, Barbaro L, Damestoy T, Sam K, Castagneyrol B. Following the track: accuracy and reproducibility of predation assessment on artificial caterpillars. Entomol Exp Appl. 2022;170(10):914–21.

Rößler DC, Pröhl H, Lötters S. The future of clay model studies. BMC Zool. 2018;3(1). doi: 10.1186/s40850-018-0033-6 DOI

Low P, Sam K, McArthur C, Posa M, Hochuli D. Determining predator identity from attack marks left in model caterpillars: guidelines for best practice. Entomology Experimental and Applied. 2014;152(2):120–6.

Nimalrathna T, Solina I, Mon A, Pomoim N, Bhadra S, Zvereva E, et al.. Estimating predation pressure in ecological studies: controlling bias imposed by using sentinel plasticine prey. Entomol Exp Appl. 2023;171(1):56–67.

Valdés-Correcher E, van Halder I, Barbaro L, Castagneyrol B, Hampe A. Insect herbivory and avian insectivory in novel native oak forests: Divergent effects of stand size and connectivity. Forest Ecology and Management. 2019;445:146–53.

Muchula K, Xie G, Gurr GM. Ambient temperature affects the utility of plasticine caterpillar models as a tool to measure activity of predators across latitudinal and elevational gradients. Biological Control. 2019;129:12–7. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.11.006 DOI

Mrazova A, Houska Tahadlová M, Řehová V, Sam K. The specificity of induced chemical defence of two oak species affects differently arthropod herbivores and arthropod and bird predation. Arthropod-Plant Interactions. 2023;17(2):141–55. doi: 10.1007/s11829-023-09951-2 DOI

Campos RC, Steiner J, Zillikens A. Bird and mammal frugivores ofEuterpe edulisat Santa Catarina island monitored by camera traps. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment. 2012;47(2):105–10. doi: 10.1080/01650521.2012.678102 DOI

Zhu C, Li W, Gregory T, Wang D, Ren P, Zeng D, et al.. Arboreal camera trapping: a reliable tool to monitor plant‐frugivore interactions in the trees on large scales. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv. 2021;8(1):92–104. doi: 10.1002/rse2.232 DOI

Schillé L, Plat N, Barbaro L, Jactel H, Raspail F, Rivoal JB, et al.. Accuracy in bird predation assessment: Camera trap testing the efficacy of plasticine caterpillars as prey models. PCI RR Manag Board [Internet]. 2024. Jun 12 [cited 2024 Nov 14]; Available from: https://osf.io/be2hn

Schille L, Valdés-Correcher E, Archaux F, Bălăcenoiu F, Bjørn MC, Bogdziewicz M, et al.. Data and codes for the article “Decomposing drivers in avian insectivory: large-scale effects of climate, habitat and bird diversity” [Internet]. Recherche Data Gouv; 2024. [cited 2024 Feb 2]. Available from: https://entrepot.recherche.data.gouv.fr/citation?persistentId=doi:10.57745/0E0JEA DOI

Naef-Daenzer B. Radiotracking of great and blue tits: new tools to assess territoriality, home-range use and resource distribution; 1994.

Lerche-Jørgensen M, Mallord JW, Willemoes M, Orsman CJ, Roberts JT, Skeen RQ, et al.. Spatial behavior and habitat use in widely separated breeding and wintering distributions across three species of long-distance migrant Phylloscopus warblers. Ecol Evol. 2019;9(11):6492–500. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5226 PubMed DOI PMC

Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology. Birds of the World. In: Billerman SM, Keeney BK, Rodewald PG, Schulenberg TS, editors. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology. Ithaca, NY, USA [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/home

Naguib M, Titulaer M, Waas J, Van Oers K, Sprau P, Snijders L. Prior territorial responses and home range size predict territory defense in radio-tagged great tits. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2022;76(3):35.

Howe A, Lövei G, Nachman G. Dummy caterpillars as a simple method to assess predation rates on invertebrates in a tropical agroecosystem. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 2009;131(3):325–9.

Sam K, Koane B, Novotny V. Herbivore damage increases avian and ant predation of caterpillars on trees along a complete elevational forest gradient in Papua New Guinea. Ecography. 2014;38(3):293–300. doi: 10.1111/ecog.00979 DOI

van Lunteren P. EcoAssist: A no-code platform to train and deploy custom YOLOv5 object detection models. JOSS. 2023;8(88):5581. doi: 10.21105/joss.05581 DOI

Beery S, Morris D, Yang S. Efficient Pipeline for Camera Trap Image Review [Internet]. arXiv; 2019. [cited 2024 Mar 16]. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.06772

R Core Team. R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. [Internet]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2021. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/

Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 PubMed DOI PMC

Gamer M, Lemon J, Singh IFP. irr: Various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement [Internet]. 2019. [cited 2024 Mar 17]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/irr/index.html

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Statistical Software. 2015;67(1):5–8.

Castagneyrol B, Valdés-Correcher E, Bourdin A, Barbaro L, Bouriaud O, Branco M, et al.. Can school children support ecological research? Lessons from the oak bodyguard citizen science project. Citizen Sci: Theory and Practice. 2020;5(1):10.

Czarnecki C, Manderino R, Parry D. Reduced avian predation on an ultraviolet-fluorescing caterpillar model. Canadian Entomologist. 2022;154(1):e10.

Franco JC, Branco M, Conde S, Garcia A, Fernandes MR, Lima Santos J, et al.. Ecological infrastructures may enhance lepidopterans predation in irrigated mediterranean farmland, depending on their typology and the predator guild. Sustainability. 2022;14(7):3874. doi: 10.3390/su14073874 DOI

Xirocostas ZA, Debono SA, Slavich E, Moles AT. The ZAX herbivory trainer—free software for training researchers to visually estimate leaf damage. Methods Ecol Evol. 2021;13(3):596–602. doi: 10.1111/2041-210x.13785 DOI

Darras KFA, Balle M, Xu W, Yan Y, Zakka VG, Toledo‐Hernández M, et al.. Eyes on nature: Embedded vision cameras for terrestrial biodiversity monitoring. Methods Ecol Evol. 2024;15(12):2262–75. doi: 10.1111/2041-210x.14436 DOI

Akcali CK, Adán Pérez-Mendoza H, Salazar-Valenzuela D, Kikuchi DW, Guayasamin JM, Pfennig DW. Evaluating the utility of camera traps in field studies of predation. PeerJ. 2019;7e6487. PubMed PMC

O’Brien TG, Kinnaird MF. A picture is worth a thousand words: the application of camera trapping to the study of birds. Bird Conservation Int. 2008;18(S1):S144–62. doi: 10.1017/s0959270908000348 DOI

Zvereva EL, Castagneyrol B, Cornelissen T, Forsman A, Hernández-Agüero JA, Klemola T, et al.. Opposite latitudinal patterns for bird and arthropod predation revealed in experiments with differently colored artificial prey. Ecol Evol. 2019;9(24):14273–85. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5862 PubMed DOI PMC

Richards LA, Coley PD. Seasonal and habitat differences affect the impact of food and predation on herbivores: a comparison between gaps and understory of a tropical forest. Oikos. 2006;116(1):31–40. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.15043.x DOI

Sam K, Jorge LR, Koane B, Amick PK, Sivault E. Vertebrates, but not ants, protect rainforest from herbivorous insects across elevations in Papua New Guinea. J Biogeogr. 2023. Jul 19:jbi.14686.

Glover‐Kapfer P, Soto‐Navarro CA, Wearn OR. Camera‐trapping version 3.0: current constraints and future priorities for development. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv. 2019;5(3):209–23. doi: 10.1002/rse2.106 DOI