Current use of donor lymphocyte infusions after allogenic stem cell transplantation in Europe: a survey on behalf of the cellular therapy and immunobiology working party of the EBMT
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
PubMed
40123004
DOI
10.1038/s41409-025-02555-9
PII: 10.1038/s41409-025-02555-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- alografty MeSH
- dárci tkání MeSH
- homologní transplantace metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nemoc štěpu proti hostiteli MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- transfuze lymfocytů * metody MeSH
- transplantace hematopoetických kmenových buněk * metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
Unmanipulated donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) are crucial for enhancing the graft versus tumor (GVT) effect in post-transplant settings. Practices regarding DLI use vary widely among centers, encompassing differences in indications, prerequisites, and application methods. To explore current DLI policies, we developed a comprehensive survey that garnered responses from 165 EBMT centers across 43 countries. Notably, 97% of respondents reported using DLI in their practices. Indications for DLI included preemptive use for minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity in 86.9% of centers and mixed chimerism in 73.1%; therapeutic use for hematological relapse in 73.1%; and prophylactic use for high-risk disease in 43.8%. Active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and active infections were deemed absolute contraindications by 85.6% and 57.5% of centers, respectively. 35% of centers did not consider a prior history of acute (a)GVHD as an exclusion criterion. The majority (71.9%) requested immunosuppression withdrawal before DLI. Most centers (71.3%) collected DLI post-transplant, with 78.1% utilizing unstimulated apheresis. The cell doses applied at the first DLI varied significantly, depending on indication, timing, and donor type. This survey provides the largest overview of current DLI practices, highlighting the need for high-quality data to assess the risks and benefits of different approaches.
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud Lyon France
Department of Hematology Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
Department of Hematology and Center for Translational Immunology UMC Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
Department of Medicine and Clinical Surgery Federico 2 University of Naples Naples Italy
Department of Pediatrics Jena University Hospital Jena Germany
Division of Hematology Department of Oncology Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland
Division of Hematology Nantes University Hospital; INSERM U1232 CNRS CRCINA Nantes France
EBMT Leiden Study Unit Leiden The Netherlands
EBMT Statistical Unit Leiden The Netherlands
Hematology Unit Department of Oncology and Hematology Santo Spirito Hospital Pescara Italy
Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Prague Czechia
Kings College Hospital London London UK
Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen Netherlands
San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit Milan Italy
Southampton General Hospital Southampton UK
University College London Hospital London UK
University Hospital | Basel Basel Switzerland
University Hospital | Essen Duesseldorf Germany
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Horowitz MM, Gale RP, Sondel PM, Goldman JM, Kersey J, Kolb HJ, et al. Graft-versus-leukemia reactions after bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 1990;75:555–62. PubMed DOI
Kolb HJ, Mittermuller J, Clemm C, Holler E, Ledderose G, Brehm G, et al. Donor leukocyte transfusions for treatment of recurrent chronic myelogenous leukemia in marrow transplant patients. Blood. 1990;76:2462–5. PubMed DOI
Schmid C, Kuball J, Bug G. Defining the role of donor lymphocyte infusion in high-risk hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:397–418. PubMed DOI
Falkenburg JHF, Schmid C, Kolb HJ, Locatelli F, Kuball J, Carreras E et al. Delayed transfer of immune cells or the art of Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) 2.0. In: Sureda A, Corbacioglu, S, Greco R, Kröger N, Carreras E. (eds) The EBMT handbook 2024; pp 531–9.
Pagliuca S, Schmid C, Santoro N, Simonetta F, Battipaglia G, Guillaume T, et al. Donor lymphocyte infusion after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for haematological malignancies: basic considerations and best practice recommendations from the EBMT. Lancet Haematol. 2024;11:e448–58. PubMed DOI
Bader P, Kreyenberg H, Bacigalupo A. Documentation of engraftment and chimerism after HCT. In: Sureda, A., Corbacioglu, S, Greco, R., Kröger N, Carreras E. The EBMT handbook 2024; pp 183–7.
Zhang J, Yin Z, Liang Z, Bai Y, Zhang T, Yang J, et al. Impacts of cryopreservation on phenotype and functionality of mononuclear cells in peripheral blood and ascites. J Transl Intern Med. 2024;12:51–63. DOI
Gürman G, Dilek I, Arslan Ö, Arat M, Beksaç M, Ilhan O, et al. The effect of G-CSF on lymphocyte subsets and CD34+ cells in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Transfus Apher Sci. 2001;24:23–8. PubMed DOI
Bader P, Kreyenberg H, Hoelle W, Dueckers G, Kremens B, Dilloo D, et al. Increasing mixed chimerism defines a high-risk group of childhood acute myelogenous leukemia patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation where pre-emptive immunotherapy may be effective. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2004;33:815–21. DOI
Santoro N, Mooyaart JE, Devillier R, Koc Y, Vydra J, Castagna L, et al. Donor lymphocyte infusions after haploidentical stem cell transplantation with PTCY: a study on behalf of the EBMT Cellular therapy & Immunobiology Working Party. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2023;58:54–60. DOI
Yan CH, Xu LP, Liu DH, Chen H, Wang Y, Liu KY, et al. Immunosuppression for 6–8 weeks after modified donor lymphocyte infusion reduced acute graft–versus–host disease without influencing graft–versus–leukemia effect in haploidentical transplant. Chin Med J. 2014;127:3602–9. PubMed DOI
Yan CH, Xu LP, Liu DH, Chen H, Wang Y, Wang JZ, et al. Low-dose methotrexate may preserve a stronger antileukemic effect than that of cyclosporine after modified donor lymphocyte infusion in unmanipulated haploidentical HSCT. Clin Transpl. 2015;29:594–605. DOI
Abbi KKS, Zhu J, Ehmann WC, Epner E, Carraher M, Mierski J, et al. G-CSF mobilized vs conventional donor lymphocytes for therapy of relapse or incomplete engraftment after allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2013;48:357–62. DOI
Lamure S, Paul F, Gagez AL, Delage J, Vincent L, Fegueux N, et al. A retrospective comparison of DLI and gDLI for post-transplant treatment. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2204. PubMed DOI PMC
Yan CH, Liu DH, Liu KY, Xu LP, Liu YR, Chen H, et al. Risk stratification-directed donor lymphocyte infusion could reduce relapse of standard-risk acute leukemia patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2012;119:3256–62. PubMed DOI
Alyea EP, DeAngelo DJ, Moldrem J, Pagel JM, Przepiorka D, Sadelin M, et al. NCI first international workshop on the biology, prevention and treatment of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: report from the committee on prevention of relapse following allogeneic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2010;16:1037–69. DOI
Odak I, Sikora R, Riemann L, Bayir LM, Beck M, Drenker M, et al. Spectral flow cytometry cluster analysis of therapeutic donor lymphocyte infusions identifies T cell subsets associated with outcome in patients with AML relapse. Front Immunol. 2022;13:999163. PubMed DOI PMC