Dietary species richness provides a comparable marker for better nutrition and health across contexts
Status Publisher Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
40128333
DOI
10.1038/s43016-025-01147-6
PII: 10.1038/s43016-025-01147-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Ecological diversity indices such as Hill numbers have been developed to estimate effective species numbers, yet the ability of Hill numbers to compare food biodiversity across contexts is unclear. Here we computed the between- and within-country variability of similarity-insensitive Hill numbers using dietary intake collected from prospective cohorts in nine European countries and cross-sectional studies in five low- and middle-income countries. We also assessed the relationships between more biodiverse diets, mortality rates and micronutrient adequacy. Only Hill0, better known as dietary species richness (DSR), showed strong heterogeneity between countries and individuals within countries. Higher DSR was most strongly associated with lower mortality rates in Europe as compared to Hill1, Hill2 and Hill∞, whereas relationships with micronutrient adequacy were comparable across Hill numbers in the global south. DSR can be used to assess progress towards more biodiverse diets, while also serving as a marker for the deleterious nutrition and health impacts associated with non-diverse diets.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública Madrid Spain
Department of Agricultural Biology Faculty of Agriculture University of Ruhuna Matara Sri Lanka
Department of Nutrition Sports and Exercise University of Copenhagen Frederiksberg Denmark
Department of Public Health Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
Faculty of Medicine Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo Samborondon Ecuador
Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Nutritional Science University of Potsdam Nuthetal Germany
Instituto de Salud Pública y Laboral de Navarra Pamplona Spain
Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK
MRC Epidemiology Unit University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine Cambridge UK
Navarra Institute for Health Research Pamplona Spain
Nutrition and Metabolism Branch International Agency for Research on Cancer Lyon France
Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Jones, S. K. et al. Agrobiodiversity Index scores show agrobiodiversity is underutilized in national food systems. Nat. Food 2, 712–723 (2021). PubMed DOI
Benton, T., Bieg, C., Harwatt, H., Pudassaini, R. & Wellesley, L. Food System Impacts on Biodiversity Loss: Three Levers for Food System Transformation in Support of Nature (Chatham House, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2021).
Khoury, C. K. et al. Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and the implications for food security. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 4001–4006 (2014). PubMed DOI PMC
Verger, E. O. et al. Dietary diversity indicators and their associations with dietary adequacy and health outcomes: a systematic scoping review. Adv. Nutr. 12, 1659–1672 (2021). PubMed DOI PMC
Stevens, G. A. et al. Micronutrient deficiencies among preschool-aged children and women of reproductive age worldwide: a pooled analysis of individual-level data from population-representative surveys. Lancet Glob. Health 10, e1590–e1599 (2022). PubMed DOI PMC
Estrada-Carmona, N., Sánchez, A. C., Remans, R. & Jones, S. K. Complex agricultural landscapes host more biodiversity than simple ones: a global meta-analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2203385119 (2022). PubMed DOI PMC
Herrero, M. et al. Farming and the geography of nutrient production for human use: a transdisciplinary analysis. Lancet Planet. Health 1, e33–e42 (2017). PubMed DOI PMC
Clark, M. A. et al. Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5° and 2 °C climate change targets. Science 370, 705–708 (2020). PubMed DOI
Remans, R., Wood, S. A., Saha, N., Anderman, T. L. & DeFries, R. S. Measuring nutritional diversity of national food supplies. Glob. Food Sec. 3, 174–182 (2014). DOI
Thompson, H. J. et al. Dietary botanical diversity affects the reduction of oxidative biomarkers in women due to high vegetable and fruit intake. J. Nutr. 136, 2207–2212 (2006). PubMed DOI
DeClerck, F., Fanzo, J., Palm, C. & Remans, R. Ecological approaches to human nutrition. Food Nutr. Bull. 32, S41–50 (2011). PubMed DOI
Springmann, M., Godfray, H. C. J., Rayner, M. & Scarborough, P. Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113, 4146–4151 (2016). PubMed DOI PMC
Jacobs, D. R. & Tapsell, L. C. Food, not nutrients, is the fundamental unit in nutrition. Nutr. Rev. 65, 439–450 (2007). PubMed DOI
Herforth, A. W., Wiesmann, D., Martínez-Steele, E., Andrade, G. & Monteiro, C. A. Introducing a suite of low-burden diet quality indicators that reflect healthy diet patterns at population level. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 4, nzaa168 (2020). PubMed DOI PMC
Barabási, A. L., Menichetti, G. & Loscalzo, J. The unmapped chemical complexity of our diet. Nat. Food 1, 33–37 (2020). DOI
Eisenhauer, N. et al. Plant diversity effects on soil food webs are stronger than those of elevated CO PubMed DOI PMC
de Oliveira Otto, M. C. et al. Dietary diversity: implications for obesity prevention in adult populations: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation 138, e160–e168 (2018). PubMed DOI PMC
Medeiros de, M. F. A. et al. Assessment of biodiversity in food consumption studies: a systematic review. Front. Nutr. 9, 832288 (2022). DOI
Berti, P. R. Relationship between production diversity and dietary diversity depends on how number of foods is counted. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 112, e5656 (2015). PubMed DOI PMC
Daly, A. J., Baetens, J. M. & De Baets, B. Ecological diversity: measuring the nmeasurable. Mathematics 6, 119 (2018). DOI
Hanley-Cook, G. T. et al. Food biodiversity: quantifying the unquantifiable in human diets. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2051163 (2022).
Hanley-Cook, G. T. et al. Food biodiversity and total and cause-specific mortality in 9 European countries: an analysis of a prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 18, e1003834 (2021). PubMed DOI PMC
Lachat, C. et al. Dietary species richness as a measure of food biodiversity and nutritional quality of diets. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 115, 127–132 (2018). PubMed DOI
Nelson, G. et al. Income growth and climate change effects on global nutrition security to mid-century. Nat. Sustain. 1, 773–781 (2018). DOI
Salomé, M. et al. Contrary to ultra-processed foods, the consumption of unprocessed or minimally processed foods is associated with favorable patterns of protein intake, diet quality and lower cardiometabolic risk in French adults (INCA3). Eur. J. Nutr. 60, 4055–4067 (2021). PubMed DOI
Hill, M. O. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54, 427–432 (1973). DOI
Jost, L. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113, 363–375 (2006). DOI
James-Martin, G. et al. Environmental sustainability in national food-based dietary guidelines: a global review. Lancet Planet. Health 6, e977–e986 (2022). PubMed DOI
Roswell, M., Dushoff, J. & Winfree, R. A conceptual guide to measuring species diversity. Oikos 130, 321–338 (2021). DOI
Fang, C., Fernie, A. R. & Luo, J. Exploring the diversity of plant metabolism. Trends Plant Sci. 24, 83–98 (2019). PubMed DOI
Ahmed, S. et al. Foodomics: a data-driven approach to revolutionize nutrition and sustainable diets. Front. Nutr. 9, 874312 (2022). PubMed DOI PMC
Bernhardt, J. R. & O'Connor, M. I. Aquatic biodiversity enhances multiple nutritional benefits to humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 118, e1917487118 (2021). PubMed DOI PMC
Heilpern, S. A. et al. Declining diversity of wild-caught species puts dietary nutrient supplies at risk. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf9967 (2021). PubMed DOI PMC
Heiman, M. L. & Greenway, F. L. A healthy gastrointestinal microbiome is dependent on dietary diversity. Mol. Metab. 5, 317–320 (2016). PubMed DOI PMC
Valdes, A. M., Walter, J., Segal, E. & Spector, T. D. Role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. BMJ 361, k2179 (2018). PubMed DOI PMC
Xiao, C. et al. Associations of dietary diversity with the gut microbiome, fecal metabolites, and host metabolism: results from 2 prospective Chinese cohorts. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 116, 1049–1058 (2022). PubMed DOI PMC
Fardet, A. & Rock, E. Chronic diseases are first associated with the degradation and artificialization of food matrices rather than with food composition: calorie quality matters more than calorie quantity. Eur. J. Nutr. 61, 2239–2253 (2022). PubMed DOI
Willett, W. C. et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 6736, 3–49 (2019).
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & Bioversity International Guidelines on Assessing Biodiverse Foods in Dietary Intake Surveys (FAO, 2017).
Leite, F. H. M. et al. Ultra-processed foods should be central to global food systems dialogue and action on biodiversity. BMJ Glob. Health 7, e008269 (2022). PubMed DOI PMC
Hanley-Cook, G. T. et al. Seasonality and day-to-day variability of dietary diversity: longitudinal study of pregnant women enrolled in a randomized controlled efficacy trial in rural Burkina Faso. J. Nutr. 152, 2145–2154 (2022). PubMed DOI PMC
Charrondière, U. R. et al. FAO/INFOODS food composition database for biodiversity. Food Chem. 140, 408–412 (2013). DOI
World Health Organization Guidance on Mainstreaming Biodiversity for Nutrition and Health (WHO, 2020).
Hanley-Cook, G. T., Kennedy, G. & Lachat, C. Reducing Risk of Poor Diet Quality through Food Biodiversity. Agrobiodiversity Index Report (Bioversity International, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-01199-0.50226-7
Jones, S. K. et al. Achieving win-win outcomes for biodiversity and yield through diversified farming. Basic Appl. Ecol. 67, 14–31 (2023). DOI
Green, E. J. et al. Relating characteristics of global biodiversity targets to reported progress. Conserv. Biol. 33, 1360–1369 (2019). PubMed DOI PMC
Lachat, C. et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology—nutritional epidemiology (STROBE-nut): an extension of the STROBE statement. PLoS Med. 13, e1002036 (2016). PubMed DOI PMC
Buckland, G. et al. Adherence to the mediterranean diet and risk of coronary heart disease in the Spanish EPIC cohort study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 170, 1518–1529 (2009). PubMed DOI
Zheng, Y. et al. Association of changes in red meat consumption with total and cause specific mortality among US women and men: two prospective cohort studies. BMJ 365, l2110 (2019). PubMed DOI PMC
Reynolds, A. et al. Carbohydrate quality and human health: a series of systematic reviews and meta analyses. Lancet 393, 434–445 (2019). PubMed DOI
Deygers, J., Berden, J. & Hanley-Cook, G. T. Syntax: unifying food biodiversity indices through effective species numbers: analysis of cohorts in Europe and surveys from Africa, Asia, and South America. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14730448 (2025).