An expert group mandated by the European Society of Pathology (ESP) outlines its recommendations on the digital transformation of pathology departments, aiming to facilitate the acquisition of resources for better patient care. This statement is directed at pathology professionals, offering guidance for the safe implementation of digital pathology while emphasizing the necessity of standardization, quality control, and sustainability. Digital pathology involves automating and standardizing laboratory workflows to produce high-quality whole slide images (WSIs), which are crucial for diagnosis, research, and education. A successful digital transformation requires a multidisciplinary approach, significant investment in human, structural, and informatic resources, and progressive adaptation of laboratory workflows. Key components include robust infrastructure; continuous training; and clear policies for hardware renewal, data storage, and interoperability. The transition demands attention to quality and production control, ensuring efficient WSI generation and timely diagnostic reporting. ESP strongly recommends that pathology departments, supported by funding organizations, start to prioritize digital transformation as a step toward improved patient care and in alignment with global healthcare initiatives. Collaboration, investment, and adherence to quality standards are critical to benefiting the most the full potential of digital pathology.

Department of Pathological Cytological and Thanatological Anatomy School of Health of Polytechnic Institute of Porto Porto Portugal

Department of Pathology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht Netherlands

Department of Pathology Vall Hebron University Hospital Barcelona Spain

Escola de Medicina E Ciências Biomédicas Universidade Fernando Pessoa Porto Portugal

Hospital U Arnau de Vilanova and University of Lleida IRBLLEIDA Lleida Spain

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge IDIBELL Barcelona Spain

Institute for Tissue Medicine and Pathology University of Bern Bern Switzerland

Institute of Pathology Heidelberg Heidelberg University Heidelberg Germany

Pathology Department Gravina Hospital Caltagirone ASP Catania Italy

Pathology Department Medical Faculty University of Porto Porto Portugal

Pathology Laboratory Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology University of Porto Rua Júlio Amaral de Carvalho 45 4200 135 Ipatimup Portugal

The Fingerland Department of Pathology University Hospital Hradec Králové and Charles University Medical Faculty Hradec Králové Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Matias-Guiu X, Stanta G, Carneiro F, Ryska A, Hoefler G, Moch H (2020) The leading role of pathology in assessing the somatic molecular alterations of cancer: position paper of the European society of pathology. Virchows Arch 476:491–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-020-02757-0 PubMed DOI PMC

Fraggetta F, L’Imperio V, Ameisen D, Carvalho R, Leh S, Kiehl TR, Serbanescu M, Racoceanu D, Della Mea V, Polonia A, Zerbe N, Eloy C (2021) Best practice recommendations for the implementation of a digital pathology workflow in the anatomic pathology laboratory by the European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP) Diagnostics (Basel) 11 https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112167

Williams BJ, Treanor D (2020) Practical guide to training and validation for primary diagnosis with digital pathology. J Clin Pathol 73:418–422. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2019-206319 PubMed DOI

Jahn SW, Plass M, Moinfar F (2020) Digital pathology: advantages, limitations and emerging perspectives J Clin Med 9 https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113697

Williams B, Fraggetta F, Hanna M, Huang R, Lennerz J, Salgado R, Sirintrapun S, Pantanowitz L, Parwani A, Zarella M, Treanor D (2020) The future of pathology: what can we learn from the COVID-19 pandemic? Journal of Pathology Informatics 11:15–15. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_29_20 PubMed DOI PMC

Temprana-Salvador J, Lopez-Garcia P, Castellvi Vives J, de Haro L, Ballesta E, Rojas Abusleme M, Arrufat M, Marques F, Casas JR, Gallego C, Pons L, Mate JL, Fernandez PL, Lopez-Bonet E, Bosch R, Martinez S, Ramon YCS, Matias-Guiu X (2022) DigiPatICS: digital pathology transformation of the Catalan Health Institute Network of 8 hospitals-planification, implementation, and preliminary results Diagnostics (Basel) 12 https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12040852

Fraggetta F, Caputo A, Guglielmino R, Pellegrino MG, Runza G, L’Imperio V (2021) A survival guide for the rapid transition to a fully digital workflow: the “Caltagirone example” Diagnostics (Basel) 11 https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101916

Eloy C, Vale J, Curado M, Polonia A, Campelos S, Caramelo A, Sousa R, Sobrinho-Simoes M (2021) Digital pathology workflow implementation at IPATIMUP Diagnostics (Basel) 11 https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112111

Baidoshvili A, Bucur A, van Leeuwen J, van der Laak J, Kluin P, van Diest PJ (2018) Evaluating the benefits of digital pathology implementation: time savings in laboratory logistics. Histopathology 73:784–794. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13691 PubMed DOI

Eloy C (2023) Postponing evolution: why are we choosing to ignore the need for a digital transformation in pathology? Virchows Arch. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-023-03714-3 PubMed DOI PMC

Bychkov A, Schubert M (2023) Constant demand. Patchy Supply 88:18–27

Hassell LA, Absar SF, Chauhan C, Dintzis S, Farver CF, Fathima S, Glassy EF, Goldstein JA, Gullapalli R, Ho J, Koch LK, Madory JE, Mirza KM, Nguyen PN, Pantanowitz L, Parwani A, Rojansky R, Seifert RP, Singh R, ElGabry EA, Bui M (2023) Pathology education powered by virtual and digital transformation: now and the future. Arch Pathol Lab Med 147:474–491. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2021-0473-RA PubMed DOI

Yao R, Zhang W, Evans R, Cao G, Rui T, Shen L (2022) Inequities in health care services caused by the adoption of digital health technologies: scoping review. J Med Internet Res 24:e34144. https://doi.org/10.2196/34144 PubMed DOI PMC

Lujan G, Quigley JC, Hartman D, Parwani A, Roehmholdt B, Meter BV, Ardon O, Hanna MG, Kelly D, Sowards C, Montalto M, Bui M, Zarella MD, LaRosa V, Slootweg G, Retamero JA, Lloyd MC, Madory J, Bowman D (2021) Dissecting the business case for adoption and implementation of digital pathology: a white paper from the digital pathology association J Pathol. Inform 12:17. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_67_20 DOI

Ho J, Ahlers SM, Stratman C, Aridor O, Pantanowitz L, Fine JL, Kuzmishin JA, Montalto MC, Parwani AV (2014) Can digital pathology result in cost savings? A financial projection for digital pathology implementation at a large integrated health care organization. J Pathol Infor 5:33. https://doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.139714 DOI

Pinto DG, Bychkov A, Tsuyama N, Fukuoka J, Eloy C (2023) Exploring the adoption of digital pathology in clinical settings - insights from a cross-continent study medRxiv:2023.2004.2003.23288066 https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.03.23288066

Huisman A, Looijen A, van den Brink SM, van Diest PJ (2010) Creation of a fully digital pathology slide archive by high-volume tissue slide scanning. Hum Pathol 41:751–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2009.08.026 PubMed DOI

Griffin J, Treanor D (2017) Digital pathology in clinical use: where are we now and what is holding us back? Histopathology 70:134–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12993 PubMed DOI

Schömig-Markiefka B, Pryalukhin A, Hulla W, Bychkov A, Fukuoka J, Madabhushi A, Achter V, Nieroda L, Büttner R, Quaas A, Tolkach Y (2021) Quality control stress test for deep learning-based diagnostic model in digital pathology. Modern Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-021-00859-x PubMed DOI PMC

Ferreira D, Vale J, Curado M, Polonia A, Eloy C (2022) The impact of different coverslipping methods in the quality of the whole slide images used for diagnosis in pathology. J Pathol Inform 13:100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100098 PubMed DOI PMC

Eloy C, Neves B, Vale J, Campelos S, Curado M, Polonia A (2023) Inking cell blocks improves scanner detection for diagnosis in pathology. Diagn Cytopathol. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.25224 PubMed DOI

Eloy C, Vale J, Barros M, Oliveira D, Mesquita M, Curado M, Pinto J, Polonia A (2024) Optimizing the management of thyroid specimens to efficiently generate whole slide images for diagnosis. Virchows Arch 485:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03762-3 PubMed DOI PMC

Janowczyk A, Zuo R, Gilmore H, Feldman M, Madabhushi A (2019) HistoQC: An open-source quality control tool for digital pathology slides. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 3:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.18.00157 PubMed DOI

Rienda I, Vale J, Pinto J, Polonia A, Eloy C (2024) Using artificial intelligence to prioritize pathology samples: report of a test drive. Virchows Arch. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03988-1 PubMed DOI PMC

Albuquerque T, Moreira A, Barros B, Montezuma D, Oliveira SP, Neto PC, Monteiro J, Ribeiro L, Goncalves S, Monteiro A, Pinto IM, Cardoso JS (2022) Quality control in digital pathology: automatic fragment detection and counting Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med. Biol Soc 2022:588–593. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC48229.2022.9871208 DOI

Williams BJ, Jayewardene D, Treanor D (2019) Digital immunohistochemistry implementation training and validation: experience and technical notes from a large clinical laboratory. J Clin Pathol 72:373–378. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205628 PubMed DOI

Clarke E, Doherty D, Randell R, Grek J, Thomas R, Ruddle RA, Treanor D (2023) Faster than light (microscopy): superiority of digital pathology over microscopy for assessment of immunohistochemistry J Clin Pathol 76:333–338 https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207961

Eloy C, Bychkov A, Fraggetta F, Temprana-Salvador J, Pantanowitz L, Vielh P (2024) How many more slides to go until we fully adopt digital cytology? Cytopathology 35:442–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/cyt.13388 PubMed DOI

Kim D, Thrall MJ, Michelow P, Schmitt FC, Vielh PR, Siddiqui MT, Sundling KE, Virk R, Alperstein S, Bui MM, Chen-Yost H, Donnelly AD, Lin O, Liu X, Madrigal E, Zakowski MF, Parwani AV, Jenkins E, Pantanowitz L, Li Z (2024) The current state of digital cytology and artificial intelligence (AI): global survey results from the american society of cytopathology digital cytology task force. J Am Soc Cytopathol 13:319–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2024.04.003 PubMed DOI

Tresserra F, Fabra G, Luque O, Castella M, Gomez C, Fernandez-Cid C, Rodriguez I (2024) Validation of digital image slides for diagnosis in cervico-vaginal cytology. Rev Esp Patol 57:182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patol.2024.03.005 PubMed DOI

de Velozo G, Cordeiro J, Sousa J, Holanda AC, Pessoa G, Porfirio M, Tavora F (2023) Comparison of glass and digital slides for cervical cytopathology screening and interpretation. Diagn Cytopathol 51:735–743. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.25209 PubMed DOI

Ikenberg H, Lieder S, Ahr A, Wilhelm M, Schon C, Xhaja A (2023) Comparison of the Hologic genius digital diagnostics system with the ThinPrep imaging system-a retrospective assessment. Cancer Cytopathol 131:424–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22695 PubMed DOI

Kim D, Sundling KE, Virk R, Thrall MJ, Alperstein S, Bui MM, Chen-Yost H, Donnelly AD, Lin O, Liu X, Madrigal E, Michelow P, Schmitt FC, Vielh PR, Zakowski MF, Parwani AV, Jenkins E, Siddiqui MT, Pantanowitz L, Li Z (2024) Digital cytology part 1: digital cytology implementation for practice: a concept paper with review and recommendations from the American society of cytopathology digital cytology task force. J Am Soc Cytopathol 13:86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2023.11.006 PubMed DOI

Kim D, Sundling KE, Virk R, Thrall MJ, Alperstein S, Bui MM, Chen-Yost H, Donnelly AD, Lin O, Liu X, Madrigal E, Michelow P, Schmitt FC, Vielh PR, Zakowski MF, Parwani AV, Jenkins E, Siddiqui MT, Pantanowitz L, Li Z (2024) Digital cytology part 2: artificial intelligence in cytology: a concept paper with review and recommendations from the American society of cytopathology digital cytology task force. J Am Soc Cytopathol 13:97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2023.11.005 PubMed DOI

Williams BJ, Brettle D, Aslam M, Barrett P, Bryson G, Cross S, Snead D, Verrill C, Clarke E, Wright A, Treanor D (2020) Guidance for remote reporting of digital pathology slides during periods of exceptional service pressure: an emergency response from the UK Royal College of Pathologists J Pathol. Inform 11:12. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_23_20 DOI

Krupinski EA, Silverstein LD, Hashmi SF, Graham AR, Weinstein RS, Roehrig H (2012) Observer performance using virtual pathology slides: impact of LCD color reproduction accuracy. J Digit Imaging 25:738–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9479-1 PubMed DOI PMC

Badano A, Revie C, Casertano A, Cheng WC, Green P, Kimpe T, Krupinski E, Sisson C, Skrovseth S, Treanor D, Boynton P, Clunie D, Flynn MJ, Heki T, Hewitt S, Homma H, Masia A, Matsui T, Nagy B, Nishibori M, Penczek J, Schopf T, Yagi Y, Yokoi H, Summit on Color in Medical I (2015) Consistency and standardization of color in medical imaging: a consensus report. J Digit Imaging 28:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9721-0 PubMed DOI

Clarke EL, Treanor D (2017) Colour in digital pathology: a review. Histopathology 70(2):153–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13079 PubMed DOI

Williams BJ, Knowles C, Treanor D (2019) Maintaining quality diagnosis with digital pathology: a practical guide to ISO 15189 accreditation. J Clin Pathol 72:663–668. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2019-205944 PubMed DOI

Clarke EL, Brettle D, Sykes A, Wright A, Boden A, Treanor D (2019) Development and evaluation of a novel point-of-use quality assurance tool for digital pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 143:1246–1255. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2018-0210-OA PubMed DOI

Abels E, Pantanowitz L (2017) Current state of the regulatory trajectory for whole slide imaging devices in the USA J Pathol. Inform 8:23. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_11_17 DOI

Alcaraz-Mateos E, Hernandez-Gomez R, Rojas Calvente E, Sanchez-Campoy N, Martinez Gonzalez-Moro I, Caballero-Aleman F, Poblet E (2022) Comparison of muscle activity while using different input devices in digital pathology. Rev Esp Patol 55:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patol.2021.02.005 PubMed DOI

Eloy C, Seegers P, Bazyleva E, Fraggetta F (2024) The 1 million words pathology report or the challenge of a reproducible and meaningful message. ESMO Real World Data Digit Oncol 4:100044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100044 DOI

Farahani N, Pantanowitz L (2015) Overview of telepathology. Surg Pathol Clin 8(2):223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.path.2015.02.018 PubMed DOI

Weinstein RS, Descour MR, Liang C, Bhattacharyya AK, Graham AR, Davis JR, Scott KM, Richter L, Krupinski EA, Szymus J, Kayser K, Dunn BE (2001) Telepathology overview: from concept to implementation. Hum Pathol 32:1283–1299. https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2001.29643 PubMed DOI

Weinstein RS, Graham AR, Richter LC, Barker GP, Krupinski EA, Lopez AM, Erps KA, Bhattacharyya AK, Yagi Y, Gilbertson JR (2009) Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future. Hum Pathol 40:1057–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.006 PubMed DOI

Schaad N, Berezowska S, Perren A, Hewer E (2024) Impact of template-based synoptic reporting on completeness of surgical pathology reports. Virchows Arch 484:31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-023-03533-6 PubMed DOI

Pantanowitz L, Sinard JH, Henricks WH, Fatheree LA, Carter AB, Contis L, Beckwith BA, Evans AJ, Lal A, Parwani AV, College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center (2013) Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the college of American pathologists pathology and laboratory quality center. Arch Pathol Lab Med 137:1710–1722. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2013-0093-CP PubMed DOI PMC

Evans AJ, Brown RW, Bui MM, Chlipala EA, Lacchetti C, Milner DA, Pantanowitz L, Parwani AV, Reid K, Riben MW, Reuter VE, Stephens L, Stewart RL, Thomas NE (2022) Validating whole slide imaging systems for diagnostic purposes in pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 146:440–450. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2020-0723-CP PubMed DOI

Antonini P, Santonicco N, Pantanowitz L, Girolami I, Rizzo PC, Brunelli M, Bellevicine C, Vigliar E, Negri G, Troncone G, Fadda G, Parwani A, Marletta S, Eccher A (2023) Relevance of the College of American Pathologists guideline for validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes to cytopathology. Cytopathology 34:5–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/cyt.13178 PubMed DOI

S C (2018) Best practice recommendations for implementing digital pathology from the Royal College of Pathologists. https://www.rcpath.org/static/f465d1b3-797b-4297-b7fedc00b4d77e51/Best-practice-recommendations-forimplementing-digital-pathology.pdf . Accessed 13 Dec 2024

Haroske GZR, Hufnagl P, Kommission Digitale Pathologie (2018) Leitfaden des bundesverbandes deutscher pathologen digitale pathologie in der diagnostik – befunderstellung an digitalen bildern. Der Pathologe 39:250–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-018-0528-5 PubMed DOI

Janowczyk A, Zlobec I, Walker C, Berezowska S, Huschauer V, Tinguely M, Kupferschmid J, Mallet T, Merkler D, Kreutzfeldt M, Gasic R, Rau TT, Mazzucchelli L, Eyberg I, Cathomas G, Mertz KD, Koelzer VH, Soldini D, Jochum W, Rossle M, Henkel M, Grobholz R (2024) Swiss digital pathology recommendations: results from a delphi process conducted by the swiss digital pathology consortium of the swiss society of pathology. Virchows Archiv 485:13–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-023-03712-5 PubMed DOI

Choi JE, Kim KH, Lee Y, Kang DW (2024) Digital validation in breast cancer needle biopsies: comparison of histological grade and biomarker expression assessment using conventional light microscopy, whole slide imaging, and digital image analysis J Pers Med 14 https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14030312

Regitnig P, Reiner A, Dinges HP, Hofler G, Muller-Holzner E, Lax SF, Obrist P, Rudas M, Quehenberger F (2002) Quality assurance for detection of estrogen and progesterone receptors by immunohistochemistry in Austrian pathology laboratories. Virchows Arch 441:328–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-002-0646-5 PubMed DOI

Rakha EA, Bennett RL, Coleman D, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Pathology UKNCCfB (2017) Review of the national external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for breast pathology in the UK. J Clin Pathol 70:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2016-203800 PubMed DOI

Xue X, Guo L, Guo C, Li L, Yang L, Wang X, Rao W, Yuan P, Mu J, Li J, Wang B, Zhou Q, Yang W, Liu Y, Xue W, Jia R, Yang W, Ying J (2024) Proficiency testing of diagnosis in histopathology and immunohistochemistry of breast pathology in China: results from a pilot work of National Single Disease Quality Control Program for breast cancer. BMC Cancer 24:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11777-3 PubMed DOI PMC