Salvage therapies for first relapse of SHH medulloblastoma in early childhood
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
IWK Health
PubMed
40186336
PubMed Central
PMC12448823
DOI
10.1093/neuonc/noaf092
PII: 8106615
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- SHH, infant and early childhood, medulloblastoma, relapse,
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- kombinovaná terapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru * terapie patologie mortalita MeSH
- meduloblastom * terapie patologie mortalita genetika MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- nádory mozečku * terapie patologie mortalita genetika MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- proteiny hedgehog genetika metabolismus MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- záchranná terapie * mortalita metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- proteiny hedgehog MeSH
- SHH protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
BACKGROUND: Sonic hedgehog (SHH) medulloblastoma is the most common molecular group of infant and early childhood medulloblastoma (iMB) and has no standard of care at relapse. This work aimed to evaluate the post-relapse survival (PRS) and explore prognostic factors of patients with nodular desmoplastic (ND) and/or SHH iMB. METHODS: This international retrospective study included 147 subjects diagnosed with relapsed ND/SHH iMB between 1995 and 2017, <6 years old at original diagnosis, and treated without initial craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Univariable and multivariable Cox models with propensity score analyses were used to assess PRS for those in the curative intent cohort. RESULTS: The 3-year PRS was 61.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.2-69.6). The median age at relapse was 3.4 years (interquartile range [IQR], 2.6-4.1). Those with local relapse (40.8%) more often received salvage treatment with surgery (P < .001), low-dose CSI (≤24 Gy; P < .001), or focal radiotherapy (P = .008). Patients not receiving CSI (40.5%) more often received salvage marrow-ablative chemotherapy (HDC + AuHCR [P < .001]). On multivariable analysis, CSI was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33 [95% CI, 0.13-0.86], P = .04). Salvage HDC + AuHCR, while clinically important, did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.24 [95% CI, 0.0054-1.025], P = .065). CONCLUSIONS: Survival of patients with relapsed SHH iMB is not satisfactory and relies on treatments associated with toxicities including CSI and/or HDC + AuHCR. Cure at initial diagnosis to avoid relapse is crucial. For patients with localized relapse undergoing resection, alternative salvage regimens that avoid high-dose CSI (>24 Gy) can be considered.
Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders Phoenix Children's Hospital Phoenix Arizona USA
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte Justine Université de Montreal Montreal Quebec Canada
Children's Hospital of Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine Denver Colorado USA
Department of Child and Adolescent Oncology Gustave Roussy Paris Saclay University Villejuif France
Department of Oncology St Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis Tennessee USA
Department of Oncology University Children's Hospital Zurich Switzerland
Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology King Hussein Cancer Center Amman Jordan
Department of Pediatrics and Division of Hematology and Oncology Mount Sinai New York USA
Department of Pediatrics University of Zurich Switzerland
Division of Oncology The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City Missouri USA
Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology Cook Children's Medical Center Fort Worth Texas USA
Division of Pediatric Oncology BMT Instituto de Oncologia Pediátrica GRAACC UNIFESP São Paulo Brazil
Pediatric Cancer Center Barcelona Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Spain
Pediatrics 3 Pediatric Oncology and Hematology University Hospital Essen Essen Germany
Research Methods Unit Nova Scotia Health Authority Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
Service of Hematology Oncology Hospital JP Garrahan Buenos Aires Argentina
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Ottensmeier H, Schlegel PG, Eyrich M, et al. Treatment of children under 4 years of age with medulloblastoma and ependymoma in the HIT2000/HIT-REZ 2005 trials: neuropsychological outcome 5 years after treatment. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0227693. PubMed PMC
Merlin M-S, Schmitt E, Mezloy-Destracque M, et al. Neurocognitive and radiological follow-up of children under 5 years of age treated for medulloblastoma according to the HIT-SKK protocol. J Neurooncol. 2023;163(1):195–205. PubMed
O’Neil SH, Whitaker AM, Kayser K, et al. Neuropsychological outcomes on Head Start III: a prospective, multi-institutional clinical trial for young children diagnosed with malignant brain tumors. Neurooncol Pract. 2020;7(3):329–337. PubMed PMC
Levitch CF, Malkin B, Latella L, et al. Long-term neuropsychological outcomes of survivors of young childhood brain tumors treated on the Head Start II protocol. Neurooncol Pract. 2021;8(5):609–619. PubMed PMC
Mynarek M, von Hoff K, Pietsch T, et al. Nonmetastatic medulloblastoma of early childhood: results from the prospective clinical trial HIT-2000 and an extended validation cohort. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(18):2028–2040. PubMed
Mulhern RK, Palmer SL, Merchant TE, et al. Neurocognitive consequences of risk-adapted therapy for childhood medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(24):5511–5519. PubMed
Lafay‐Cousin L, Smith A, Chi SN, et al. Clinical, pathological, and molecular characterization of infant medulloblastomas treated with sequential high‐dose chemotherapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63(9):1527–1534. PubMed PMC
Dhall G, O’Neil SH, Ji L, et al. Excellent outcome of young children with nodular desmoplastic medulloblastoma treated on “Head Start” III: a multi-institutional, prospective clinical trial. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22(12):1862–1872. PubMed PMC
Robinson GW, Rudneva VA, Buchhalter I, et al. Risk-adapted therapy for young children with medulloblastoma (SJYC07): therapeutic and molecular outcomes from a multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(6):768–784. PubMed PMC
Lafay-Cousin L, Bouffet E, Strother D, et al. Phase II study of nonmetastatic desmoplastic medulloblastoma in children younger than 4 years of age: a report of the Children’s Oncology Group (ACNS1221). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(3):223–231. PubMed PMC
Erker C, Mynarek M, Bailey S, et al. Outcomes of infants and young children with relapsed medulloblastoma after initial craniospinal irradiation–sparing approaches: an international cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(10):1921–1932. PubMed
Chang CH, Housepian EM, Herbert C.. An operative staging system and a megavoltage radiotherapeutic technic for cerebellar medulloblastomas. Radiology. 1969;93(6):1351–1359. PubMed
Garcia-Lopez J, Kumar R, Smith KS, Northcott PA.. Deconstructing sonic hedgehog medulloblastoma: molecular subtypes, drivers, and beyond. Trends Genet. 2021;37(3):235–250. PubMed
Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(8):1231–1251. PubMed PMC
Mulhern RK, Kepner JL, Thomas PR, et al. Neuropsychologic functioning of survivors of childhood medulloblastoma randomized to receive conventional or reduced-dose craniospinal irradiation: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(5):1723–1728. PubMed
Austin PC, Stuart EA.. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med. 2015;34(28):3661–3679. PubMed PMC
Rutkowski S, Bode U, Deinlein F, et al. Treatment of early childhood medulloblastoma by postoperative chemotherapy alone. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):978–986. PubMed
Hill RM, Richardson S, Schwalbe EC, et al. Time, pattern, and outcome of medulloblastoma relapse and their association with tumour biology at diagnosis and therapy: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(12):865–874. PubMed PMC
Huybrechts S, Le Teuff G, Tauziède-Espariat A, et al. Prognostic clinical and biologic features for overall survival after relapse in childhood medulloblastoma. Cancers. 2020;13(1):53. PubMed PMC
Müller K, Mynarek M, Zwiener I, et al. Postponed is not canceled: role of craniospinal radiation therapy in the management of recurrent infant medulloblastoma—an experience from the HIT-REZ 1997 & 2005 studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88(5):1019–1024. PubMed
Mazewski C, Kang G, Kellie S, et al. MBCL-34. Efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) according to molecular sub-type in young children with medulloblastoma (MB): a report from Children’s Oncology Group phase III trial ACNS0334. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22(Supplement_3):iii396.
Bagchi A, Dhanda SK, Dunphy P, Sioson E, Robinson GW.. Molecular classification improves therapeutic options for infants and young children with medulloblastoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21(10):1097–1105. PubMed PMC
Packer RJ, Zhou T, Holmes E, Vezina G, Gajjar A.. Survival and secondary tumors in children with medulloblastoma receiving radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy: results of Children’s Oncology Group trial A9961. Neuro Oncol. 2013;15(1):97–103. PubMed PMC
Guerrini-Rousseau L, Dufour C, Varlet P, et al. Germline SUFU mutation carriers and medulloblastoma: clinical characteristics, cancer risk, and prognosis. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20(8):1122–1132. PubMed PMC
Waszak SM, Northcott PA, Buchhalter I, et al. Spectrum and prevalence of genetic predisposition in medulloblastoma: a retrospective genetic study and prospective validation in a clinical trial cohort. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(6):785–798. PubMed PMC
Foulkes WD, Kamihara J, Evans DGR, et al. Cancer surveillance in Gorlin syndrome and rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(12):e62–e67. PubMed PMC
Hansford JR, Das A, McGee RB, et al. Update on cancer predisposition syndromes and surveillance guidelines for childhood brain tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2024;30(11):2342–2350. PubMed PMC
Lee SG, Evans G, Stephen M, et al. Medulloblastoma and other neoplasms in patients with heterozygous germline SUFU variants: a scoping review. Am J Med Genet A. 2024;194(6). PubMed
Waszak SM, Robinson GW, Gudenas BL, et al. Germline elongator mutations in sonic hedgehog medulloblastoma. Nature. 2020;580(7803):396–401. PubMed PMC
Guerrini-Rousseau L, Masliah-Planchon J, Filser M, et al. Medulloblastomas with ELP1 pathogenic variants: a weakly penetrant syndrome with a restricted spectrum in a limited age window. Neurooncol Adv. 2024;6(1):vdae075. PubMed PMC
Kool M, Jones DT, Jäger N, et al. ; ICGC PedBrain Tumor Project. Genome sequencing of SHH medulloblastoma predicts genotype-related response to smoothened inhibition. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(3):393–405. PubMed PMC
Kolodziejczak AS, Guerrini-Rousseau L, Planchon JM, et al. Clinical outcome of pediatric medulloblastoma patients with Li–Fraumeni syndrome. Neuro Oncol. 2023;25(12):2273–2286. PubMed PMC
Cavalli FM, Remke M, Rampasek L, et al. Intertumoral heterogeneity within medulloblastoma subgroups. Cancer Cell. 2017;31(6):737–754.e6. PubMed PMC
Hicks D, Rafiee G, Schwalbe EC, et al. The molecular landscape and associated clinical experience in infant medulloblastoma: prognostic significance of second‐generation subtypes. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2021;47(2):236–250. PubMed
Tonn S, Korshunov A, Obrecht D, et al. Risk prediction in early childhood sonic hedgehog medulloblastoma treated with radiation-avoiding chemotherapy: evidence for more than 2 subgroups. Neuro Oncol. 2023;25(8):1518–1529. PubMed PMC