Psychological distress in health care workers during the beginning, the middle, and the last part of the COVID-19 pandemic

. 2025 Apr 09 ; 15 (1) : 12163. [epub] 20250409

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid40204849

Grantová podpora
NU22J-09-00064 Ministry of Health Czech Republic
NU22J-09-00064 Ministry of Health Czech Republic
NU22J-09-00064 Ministry of Health Czech Republic
NU22J-09-00064 Ministry of Health Czech Republic
NU22J-09-00064 Ministry of Health Czech Republic
NU22J-09-00064 Ministry of Health Czech Republic

Odkazy

PubMed 40204849
PubMed Central PMC11982212
DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-95363-6
PII: 10.1038/s41598-025-95363-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

The COVID-19 pandemic placed significant psychological strain on healthcare workers. Our study tracked health care workers in the Czech Republic throughout the pandemic to examine the impact of stressors on psychological distress over time and explore gender differences in these associations. We studied health care workers from the Czech arm of the international COVID-19 HEROES Study who took part in all three waves of data collection in 2020, 2021 and 2022 (n = 264). We employed a path model to examine the relationships among six stressors (low trust in workplace, assignment of new tasks, prioritization of patients, experience of death due to COVID-19, experience of discrimination or violence, contact with COVID-19 patients), psychological distress (measured by General Health Questionnaire), and covariates (age, gender, occupation). We incorporated autoregressive paths and interactions to assess the longitudinal impact of stressors. Prior levels of distress predicted subsequent distress, with significant carry-over effects observed between each wave. Stressors had direct association to distress in the same wave of data collection (2020 and 2021), but not in subsequent waves, and stressors in 2022 did not have a significant direct effect to distress. Men reported lower distress in 2020 and 2021, but not in 2022. Furthermore, no significant interactions between stressors and gender were found. Age and occupation were not related to distress levels. There is a need for adaptable mental health support that addresses current stressors through targeted interventions, while also providing ongoing monitoring beyond crises, particularly for individuals with high distress levels.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Lai, J. et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Netw. Open.3, e203976–e203976 (2020). PubMed PMC

Ridner, S. H. Psychological distress: concept analysis. J. Adv. Nurs.45, 536–545 (2004). PubMed

Kearns, P. B. et al. Trajectories of symptoms of depression, distress and resilience in health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and towards its end in Czechia. Eur. Psychiatry, 1–26 (2024). PubMed PMC

Cermakova, P. et al. Depression in healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic: results from Czech arm of HEROES study. Sci. Rep.13, 12430 (2023). PubMed PMC

Janoušková, M. et al. Experiences of stigma, discrimination and violence and their impact on the mental health of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci. Rep.14, 10534 (2024). PubMed PMC

Pestana, D. et al. The impact of COVID-19 workload on psychological distress amongst Canadian intensive care unit healthcare workers during the 1st wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal cohort study. PloS One. 19, e0290749 (2024). PubMed PMC

Breslau, J., Roth, E. A., Baird, M. D., Carman, K. G. & Collins, R. L. A longitudinal study of predictors of serious psychological distress during COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol. Med.53, 2418–2426 (2023). PubMed PMC

Sirois, F. M. & Owens, J. Factors associated with psychological distress in health-care workers during an infectious disease outbreak: a rapid systematic review of the evidence. Front. Psychiatry. 11, 589545 (2021). PubMed PMC

Mascayano, F. et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of healthcare workers: study protocol for the COVID-19 health care wOrkErS (HEROES) study. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol.57, 633–645 (2022). PubMed PMC

Goldberg, D. P. & Hillier, V. F. A scaled version of the general health questionnaire. Psychol. Med.9, 139–145 (1979). PubMed

Comotti, A. et al. Psychometric evaluation of GHQ-12 as a screening tool for psychological impairment of healthcare workers facing COVID-19 pandemic. Med. Lav. 114, e2023009. 10.23749/mdl.v114i1.13918 (2023). PubMed PMC

Van Buuren, S. & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J. Stat. Softw.45, 1–67 (2011).

Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Phelan, J. C. & Link, B. G. Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities. Am. J. Public Health. 103, 813–821 (2013). PubMed PMC

Shrestha, R. M. et al. The association between experience of COVID-19-related discrimination and psychological distress among healthcare workers for six National medical research centers in Japan. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol.58, 1421–1429 (2023). PubMed PMC

Pan, S. W., Shen, G. C., Liu, C. & Hsi, J. H. Coronavirus stigmatization and psychological distress among Asians in the united States. Ethn. Health. 26, 110–125 (2021). PubMed

Basic, D. et al. Trusting in Times of the COVID-19 Crisis: Workplace and Government Trust and Depressive Symptoms among Healthcare Workers. (2024).

Hungerford, C. & Cleary, M. High trust’and ‘low trust’workplace settings: implications for our mental health and wellbeing. Issues Ment. Health Nurs.42, 506–514 (2021). PubMed

Tschannen-Moran, M. & Gareis, C. R. Principals, trust, and cultivating vibrant schools. Societies5, 256–276 (2015).

Infurna, F. J. & Luthar, S. S. Re-evaluating the notion that resilience is commonplace: A review and distillation of directions for future research, practice, and policy. Clin. Psychol. Rev.65, 43–56 (2018). PubMed

Daly, M. & Robinson, E. Acute and longer-term psychological distress associated with testing positive for COVID-19: longitudinal evidence from a population-based study of US adults. Psychol. Med.53, 1603–1610 (2023). PubMed PMC

Zapf, D., Dormann, C. & Frese, M. Longitudinal studies in organizational stress research: a review of the literature with reference to methodological issues. J. Occup. Health Psychol.1, 145 (1996). PubMed

North, C. S. Current research and recent breakthroughs on the mental health effects of disasters. Curr. Psychiatry Rep.16, 1–8 (2014). PubMed

Sun, Y. et al. Comparison of mental health symptoms before and during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 134 cohorts. Bmj 380 (2023). PubMed PMC

Mele, B. S. et al. Healthcare workers’ perception of gender and work roles during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods study. BMJ Open.11, e056434 (2021). PubMed PMC

Borrescio-Higa, F. & Valenzuela, P. Gender inequality and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Public. Health. 66, 1604220 (2021). PubMed PMC

Czepiel, D. et al. Inequality on the frontline: A multi-country study on gender differences in mental health among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Camb. Prisms: Global Mental Health. 11, e34 (2024). PubMed PMC

Gertler, J. et al. Resilient, but for how long? The relationships between temperament, burnout, and mental health in healthcare workers during the Covid-19 pandemic. Front. Psychiatry. 14, 1163579 (2023). PubMed PMC

Elsayes, H. A. et al. Attachment Style, Affective Temperament, and Psychological Distress among Mental Health Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 7281075 (2023). (2023).

Cena, L. et al. Psychological distress in healthcare workers between the first and second COVID-19 waves: the role of personality traits, attachment style, and metacognitive functioning as protective and vulnerability factors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 18, 11843 (2021). PubMed PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...