Evaluation of survival and mortality in pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: a systematic review, meta-analyses, and meta-regression study
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis
PubMed
40373347
DOI
10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101829
PII: S1048-891X(25)00948-X
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Cervical Cancer, Endometrial Cancer, Gynecologic, Pelvic Exenteration, Vulvar Cancer,
- MeSH
- Pelvic Exenteration * mortality methods MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Genital Neoplasms, Female * surgery mortality MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Meta-Analysis MeSH
- Systematic Review MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Pelvic exenteration is a radical surgery for advanced or recurrent pelvic tumors, requiring careful patient selection and a multi-disciplinary approach. Despite advancements, it remains high-risk, with limited data on outcomes. The present meta-analysis evaluates survival, mortality, and trends to clarify its role in gynecologic oncology. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in January 2025 to identify studies on pelvic exenteration outcomes for gynecologic malignancies. Studies with at least 10 patients reporting 5-year overall survival or 30-day mortality were included. Data extracted included patient and surgical characteristics, and a scoring system based on study design, sample size, and center volume was used to include high-quality studies (score ≥3). Poisson regression models were used to analyze the associations between predictors and outcomes, with results expressed as incidence rate ratios and a 95% CI. RESULTS: A total of 46 studies involving 4417 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients underwent pelvic exenteration for cervical cancer (N = 3183). Positive pelvic and aortic nodal involvement were key predictors of reduced 5-year overall survival, decreasing by 3.9% and 5.9% per 1% increase in nodal positivity, respectively. Pelvic wall involvement also significantly reduced survival by 15.9%. The 30-day mortality rate was 5.1%, with sepsis (27.2%) being the leading cause of death. Peri-operative mortality decreased significantly over time, with each year of publication associated with a 2.6% decrease in incidence rate. However, pelvic sidewall involvement and total exenteration increased 30-day mortality by 11.5% and 0.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic exenteration remains a viable but high-risk option for select patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. Pre-operative assessment and multi-disciplinary planning are essential for optimizing outcomes.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Gynecological Oncology Unit Milan Italy
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Department of Surgery Gynecology Service New York NY USA
University of Manchester Division of Informatics Imaging and Data Sciences Manchester UK
University of Rome Campus Bio Medico Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Rome Italy
University Sapienza of Roma Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Rome Italy
References provided by Crossref.org