BACKGROUND: Percutaneous microwave ablation is a clinically established method for treatment of unresectable lung nodules. When planning the intervention, the size of ablation zone, which should encompass the nodule as well as a surrounding margin of normal tissue, is predicted via manufacturer-provided geometric models, which do not consider patient-specific characteristics. However, the size and shape of ablation is dependent on tissue composition and properties and can vary between patients. PURPOSE: To comparatively assess performance of a computational model-based approach and manufacturer geometric model for predicting extent of ablation zones following microwave lung ablation procedures on a retrospectively collected clinical imaging dataset. METHODS: A retrospective computed-tomography (CT) imaging dataset was assembled of 50 patients treated with microwave ablation of lung tumors at a single institution. For each case, the dataset consisted of a pre-procedure CT acquired without the ablation applicator, a peri-procedure CT scan with the ablation applicator in position, and post-procedure CT scan to assess the ablation zone extent acquired on the first follow-up visit. A physics-based computational model of microwave absorption and bioheat transfer was implemented using the finite element method, with the model geometry incorporating key tissue types within 2 cm of the applicator as informed by imaging data. The model-predicted extent of the ablation zone was estimated using the Arrhenius thermal damage model. The ablation zone predicted by the manufacturer geometric model consisted of an ellipsoid registered with the applicator position and dimensions provided by instructions for use documentation. Both ablation estimates were compared to ground truth ablation zone segmented from post-procedure CT via Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average absolute error (AAE). The statistically significant difference at level 0.05 in performance between both ablation prediction methods was tested with permutation test on DSC as well as AAE datasets with applied Bonferroni multiple-comparison correction. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the predictive power of the volume of insufficient coverage (i.e. tumor volume which did not receive an ablative thermal dose) as an indicator of local tumor recurrence yielded an area under the curve of 0.84, illustrating the clinical significance of accurate prediction of ablation zone extents. Across all cases, AAEs were 3.65 ± 1.12 mm, and 5.11 ± 1.93 mm for patient-specific computational and manufacturer geometric models respectively. Similarly, average DSCs were 0.55 ± 0.14, and 0.46 ± 0.19 for computational and manufacturer geometric models respectively. The manufacturer geometric model overpredicted volume of the ablation zone compared to ground truth by 141% on average, whereas the patient-specific computational model overpredicted ablation zone volumes by 31.5% on average. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific physics-based computational models of lung microwave ablation yield improved prediction of microwave ablation extent compared to the manufacturer geometric model.

Department of Biomedical Engineering The George Washington University Washington D C USA

Department of Circuit Theory Czech Technical University Prague Praha

Department of Diagnostic Imaging Rhode Island Hospital The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Kansas State University Manhattan Kansas USA

Department of Radiology Cape Cod Hospital Hyannis Massachusetts USA

phenoMapper LLC San Jose California USA

See more in PubMed

Bao F, Yu F, Wang R, et al. Electromagnetic bronchoscopy guided microwave ablation for early stage lung cancer presenting as ground glass nodule. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021;10(9):3759.

Chaddha U, Hogarth DK, Murgu S. Bronchoscopic ablative therapies for malignant central airway obstruction and peripheral lung tumors. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(10):1220‐1229.

De Leon H, Royalty K, Mingione L, et al. Device safety assessment of bronchoscopic microwave ablation of normal swine peripheral lung using robotic‐assisted bronchoscopy. Int J Hyperthermia. 2023;40(1):2187743.

Chan JWY, Lau RWH, Ngai JCL, et al. Transbronchial microwave ablation of lung nodules with electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy guidance‐a novel technique and initial experience with 30 cases. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021;10(4):1608.

Sabath BF, Casal RF. Bronchoscopic ablation of peripheral lung tumors. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(6):2628.

Yuan H, Wang X, Sun J, et al. Flexible bronchoscopy‐guided microwave ablation in peripheral porcine lung: a new minimally‐invasive ablation. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019;8(6):787.

Zeng C, Fu X, Yuan Z, et al. Application of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy‐guided microwave ablation in multiple pulmonary nodules: a single‐centre study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;62(4):ezac071.

Sebek J, Kramer S, Rocha R, et al. Bronchoscopically delivered microwave ablation in an in vivo porcine lung model. ERJ Open Res. 2020;6(4):00146‐2020.

Ferguson J, Egressy K, Schefelker R, et al. Bronchoscopically‐guided microwave ablation in the lung. Chest. 2013;144(4):87A.

Beland MD, Wasser EJ, Mayo‐Smith WW, Dupuy DE. Primary non‐small cell lung cancer: review of frequency, location, and time of recurrence after radiofrequency ablation. Radiology. 2010;254(1):301‐307. doi:10.1148/radiol.00000090174

Sebek J, Albin N, Bortel R, Natarajan B, Prakash P. Sensitivity of microwave ablation models to tissue biophysical properties: a first step toward probabilistic modeling and treatment planning. Med Phys. 2016;43(5):2649‐2661.

Nelson DB, Tam AL, Mitchell KG, et al. Local recurrence after microwave ablation of lung malignancies: a systematic review. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107(6):1876‐1883. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.10.049

Timmerman RD, Paulus R, Pass HI, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for operable early‐stage lung cancer: findings from the NRG oncology RTOG 0618 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(9):1263‐1266. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1251

Chiang J, Wang P, Brace CL. Computational modelling of microwave tumour ablations. Int J Hyperthermia. 2013;29(4):308‐317. doi:10.3109/02656736.2013.799295

Servin F, et al.. Simulation of image‐guided microwave ablation therapy using a digital twin computational model. IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol 2023, vailable: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10375319/

Sebek J, Taeprasartsit P, Wibowo H, Beard WL, Bortel R, Prakash P. Microwave ablation of lung tumors: a probabilistic approach for simulation‐based treatment planning. Med Phys. 2021;48(7):3991‐4003.

Moche M, Busse H, Futterer JJ, et al. Clinical evaluation of in silico planning and real‐time simulation of hepatic radiofrequency ablation (ClinicIMPPACT Trial). Eur Radiol. 2020;30(2):934‐942. doi:10.1007/s00330‐019‐06411‐5

Schumann C, Rieder C, Haase S, et al. Interactive multi‐criteria planning for radiofrequency ablation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015;10(6):879‐889. doi:10.1007/s11548‐015‐1201‐6

Hoffer EK, Borsic A, Patel SD. Validation of software for patient‐specific real‐time simulation of hepatic radiofrequency ablation. Acad Radiol. 2022;29(10):e219‐e227.

Frackowiak B, Van den Bosch V, Tokoutsi Z, et al. First validation of a model‐based hepatic percutaneous microwave ablation planning on a clinical dataset. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):16862. doi:10.1038/s41598‐023‐42543‐x

Cindric H, Mariappan P, Beyer L, et al. Retrospective study for validation and improvement of numerical treatment planning of irreversible electroporation ablation for treatment of liver tumors. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021;68(12):3513‐3524. pp. 1–1, doi:10.1109/TBME.2021.3075772

Boas FE, Srimathveeravalli G, Durack JC, et al. Development of a searchable database of cryoablation simulations for use in treatment planning. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(5):761‐768. doi:10.1007/s00270‐016‐1562‐4

Keshavamurthy KN, Eickhoff C, Ziv E. Pre‐operative lung ablation prediction using deep learning. Eur Radiol. 2024;34(11):7161‐7172. doi:10.1007/s00330‐024‐10767‐8

Taeprasartsit P, Sebek J, Prakash P, Short RF, Wibowo H. Prediction model for local tumor progression following microwave ablation treatment of early‐stage lung cancer. in Medical imaging 2024: image‐guided procedures, robotic interventions, and modeling, SPIE, 2024, pp. 326‐331. Available: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference‐proceedings‐of‐spie/12928/129281H/Prediction‐model‐for‐local‐tumor‐progression‐following‐microwave‐ablation‐treatment/10.1117/12.3006299.short

Taeprasartsit P, Pathompatai C, Jusomjai K, Wibowo H, Sebek J, Prakash P. A personalized approach for microwave ablation treatment planning fusing radiomics and bioheat transfer modeling. in Medical imaging 2020: image‐guided procedures, robotic interventions, and modeling, SPIE, 2020, pp. 780‐795. doi:10.1117/12.2549790

Sebek J, Cappiello G, Rahmani G, et al. Image‐based computer modeling assessment of microwave ablation for treatment of adrenal tumors. Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):1264‐1275.

Pennes HH. Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm. J Appl Physiol. 1948;1(2):93‐122.

Jarrard J, Wizeman B, Brown RH, Mitzner W. A theoretical model of the application of RF energy to the airway wall and its experimental validation. Biomed Eng Online. 2010;9(1):1‐17.

Pearce JA. Models for thermal damage in tissues: processes and applications. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2010;38(1):1‐20.

Sebek J, Bortel R, Prakash P. Broadband lung dielectric properties over the ablative temperature range: experimental measurements and parametric models. Med Phys. 2019;46(10):4291‐4303.

Hall SK, Ooi EH, Payne SJ. Cell death, perfusion and electrical parameters are critical in models of hepatic radiofrequency ablation. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31(5):538‐550.

Chen SS, Wright NT, Humphrey JD. Heat‐induced changes in the mechanics of a collagenous tissue: isothermal, isotonic shrinkage. 1998.

Farina L, Ruvio G, O'Halloran M. Lung tumor mimicking models for usability validation of transbronchial microwave thermal ablation procedures. in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Antennas, Communications and Electronic Systems (COMCAS), IEEE, 2021, pp. 135‐139.

Kawai T, Kaminou T, Sugiura K, et al. Creation of a tumor‐mimic model using a muscle paste for radiofrequency ablation of the lung. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;32:296‐302.

Planché O, Teriitehau C, Boudabous S, et al. In vivo evaluation of lung microwave ablation in a porcine tumor mimic model. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36:221‐228.

Prud'homme C, Teriitehau C, Adam J, et al. Lung microwave ablation–an in vivo swine tumor model experiment to evaluate ablation zones. Int J Hyperthermia. 2020;37(1):879‐886.

Jacques SL, Gaeeni MO. Thermically induced changes in optical properties of heart. in Images of the Twenty‐First Century. Proceedings of the Annual International Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, IEEE. 1989, pp. 1199‐1200.

IT'IS Foundation. “Tissue Properties Database V4.1.” IT'IS Foundation, 2022. doi: 10.13099/VIP21000‐04‐1

Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size—or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(3):279‐282.

Kaye EA, Cornelis FH, Petre EN, et al. Volumetric 3D assessment of ablation zones after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases to improve prediction of local tumor progression. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:2698‐2705.

Chen X, Diederich CJ, Wootton JH, Pouliot J, Hsu I. Optimisation‐based thermal treatment planning for catheter‐based ultrasound hyperthermia. Int J Hyperthermia. 2010;26(1):39‐55. doi:10.3109/02656730903341332

Lakshmi Narasimhan P, Tokoutsi Z, Baroli D, et al. Global sensitivity study for irreversible electroporation: towards treatment planning under uncertainty. Med Phys. 2023;50(3):1290‐1304. doi:10.1002/mp.16220

Mariappan P, Weir P, Flanagan R, et al. GPU‐based RFA simulation for minimally invasive cancer treatment of liver tumours. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017;12(1):59‐68. doi:10.1007/s11548‐016‐1469‐1

Zhang J, Hills J, Zhong Y, Shirinzadeh B, Smith J, Gu C. Modeling of soft tissue thermal damage based on GPU acceleration. Comput Assist Surg Abingdon Engl. 2019;24(sup1):5‐12, doi:10.1080/24699322.2018.1557891

Bottiglieri A, Ruvio G, O'Halloran M, Farina L. Exploiting tissue dielectric properties to shape microwave thermal ablation zones. Sensors. 2020;20(14):3960.

Farina L, Ruvio G, Shatwan R, et al. Histology‐validated dielectric characterisation of lung carcinoma tissue for microwave thermal ablation applications. Cancers. 2023;15(14):3738.

Evans AL, Buehler D, Schulte JJ, McCarthy DP, Hagness SC. Microwave dielectric properties of normal, fibroelastotic, and malignant human lung tissue. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2024;10(5):055027.

Brace CL, Diaz TA, Hinshaw JL, Lee FT. Tissue contraction caused by radiofrequency and microwave ablation: a laboratory study in liver and lung. J Vasc Interv Radiol JVIR. 2010;21(8):1280‐1286. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2010.02.038

Kodama H, Ueshima E, Howk K, et al. Temporal evaluation of the microwave ablation zone and comparison of CT and gross sizes during the first month post‐ablation in swine lung. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019;100(5):279‐285. doi:10.1016/j.diii.2018.10.008

Ohno Y, Koyama H, Fujisawa Y, et al. Dynamic contrast‐enhanced perfusion area detector CT for non‐small cell lung cancer patients: influence of mathematical models on early prediction capabilities for treatment response and recurrence after chemoradiotherapy. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(1):176‐186.

Cornelis FH, Solomon SB, Ahmed M. Expanding the horizons of interventional radiology with advanced image guidance and robotics. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023;26(3):100910. doi:10.1016/j.tvir.2023.100910

Laimer G, Jaschke N, Schullian P, et al. Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(9):6489‐6499. doi:10.1007/s00330‐020‐07579‐x