Isatuximab Subcutaneous by On-Body Injector Versus Isatuximab Intravenous Plus Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Phase III IRAKLIA Study
Status Publisher Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
40459178
DOI
10.1200/jco-25-00744
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE: To report the results of the multicenter, open-label IRAKLIA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05405166) of isatuximab subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV), plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), to our knowledge, the first phase III MM trial using an on-body injector (OBI). METHODS: Patients with ≥1 prior line of therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to Isa OBI (1,400 mg) or IV (10 mg/kg) once weekly in cycle (C)1 and then every 2 weeks, plus pomalidomide (4 mg once daily, day [D]1-21) and dexamethasone (40 mg once weekly [age ≥75: 20 mg]) and treated until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient request. Coprimary end points were overall response rate (ORR; noninferiority margin, 0.839) and Isa Ctrough (C6D1 predose; noninferiority margin, 0.8). Noninferiority of OBI versus IV was demonstrated if both coprimary end points achieved noninferiority. RESULTS: IRAKLIA randomly assigned 531 patients (OBI, n=263; IV, n=268). After 12-month median follow-up, the ORR was 71.1% (OBI) and 70.5% (IV; relative risk, 1.008 [95% CI, 0.903 to 1.126]; lower CI exceeded noninferiority margin). The mean (standard deviation) C6D1 Ctrough was 499 (259) μg/mL (OBI) and 340 (169) μg/mL (IV). The Ctrough geometric mean ratio (90% CI) was 1.532 (1.316 to 1.784); lower CI exceeded noninferiority margin. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse event incidences were 81.7% (OBI) and 76.1% (IV); infusion reaction incidences were 1.5% and 25.0%. Injection site reactions occurred in 0.4% of OBI injections (all grade 1-2); 99.9% of injections completed without interruption. CONCLUSION: IRAKLIA demonstrated efficacy and pharmacokinetic noninferiority between Isa OBI and IV. No unexpected safety signal was observed, with excellent local tolerability of Isa OBI. Efficacy and safety were comparable with Isa IV in ICARIA-MM, except the lower OBI infusion reaction rate. These results support potential use of the OBI, designed to improve practice efficiency.
Department of Hematology and Oncology Clínica São Germano São Paulo Brazil
Department of Hematooncology and Bone Marrow Medical University of Lublin Lublin Poland
Department of Internal Medicine 5 University Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
Department of Internal Medicine Istanbul Medical Faculty Istanbul University Istanbul Turkey
Department of Medicine Korea University Seoul South Korea
Division of Hematology Oncology Mayo Clinic Jacksonville FL
Faculty of Health Sciences Institute of Diagnostics University of Pécs Pécs Hungary
Hematology AOU Federico 2 Naples Italy
Hematology Department CHU Nantes Nantes France
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca Instituto Biosanitario de Salamanca Salamanca Spain
Human Institute ShanghaiTech University Shanghai China
Illawarra Cancer Care Centre Wollongong NSW Australia
Inmunocel Las Condes Santiago Chile
Japanese Red Cross Medical Center Tokyo Japan
Mór Kaposi Teaching Hospital Department of Hematology Kaposvár Hungary
Oslo Myeloma Center Department of Hematology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
Sanofi R and D Vitry sur Seine France
Service d'Hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire CHU and CIC Inserm 1402 Poitiers Cedex France
Spartanburg Medical Center Center for Hematology Oncology Spartanburg SC
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05405166