Stereotactic radiosurgery versus observation for intracranial low-grade dural arteriovenous fistulas
Status Publisher Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
40480804
DOI
10.1136/jnnp-2024-335675
PII: jnnp-2024-335675
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- CEREBROVASCULAR, NEURORADIOLOGY, NEUROSURGERY, Patient Outcome Assessment, QUALITY OF LIFE,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Given the low haemorrhagic risk of intracranial low-grade dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs), the benefits of routine intervention remain controversial. This study compares patient outcomes treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus conservative management. METHOD: Multicentre retrospective analysis of the Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research and the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation data. Inclusion criteria were (1) intracranial low-grade dAVF diagnosed by catheter-based angiography, (2) no prior dAVF-related haemorrhage and (3) management with upfront SRS (intervention group) or conservative management (observation group). The primary outcome was symptomatic improvement. Secondary outcomes included dAVF obliteration, up-conversion, haemorrhage, improvement and favourable modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at follow-up. RESULTS: 304 patients with a mean age of 56 years (SD 13.5) and a follow-up of 46.7 months (SD 45.5) were included. 135 (44.4%) were managed conservatively and 169 (55.6%) had upfront SRS. Compared with the observation group, symptomatic and mRS Score improvement (≥1-point decrease in baseline score) was more likely in the intervention group (95.1% vs 58.5%; OR=13.75 (5.61-33.69) and 37.0% vs 24.0%; OR=1.85 (1.09-3.15), respectively). These findings remained significant after multiple imputation and propensity score matching. Remaining outcomes were similar between groups. The all-cause mortality rate was 5.4% (n=16), unrelated to the dAVF or treatment. Five (3.0%) SRS-related complications were reported and resolved during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: SRS was associated with increased symptomatic and mRS Score improvement for low-grade dAVFs compared with conservative management. SRS had a low complication risk and did not appear to alter dAVF obliteration or haemorrhage. Future prospective trials on SRS as a first-line intervention for symptomatic low-grade dAVFs should be considered.
Barrow Neurological Institute Phoenix Arizona USA
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
Department of Neurological Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
Department of Neurology University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
Department of Neurology University of Iowa Health Care Iowa City Iowa USA
Department of Neurosurgery Barrow Neurological Institute Phoenix Arizona USA
Department of Neurosurgery Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
Department of Neurosurgery Neurological Institute Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Japan
Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA
Department of Radiology Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan
Internal Medicine The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA
Neuroimaging Center University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
Neurological Surgery University of Washington School of Medicine Seattle Washington USA
Neurology and Neurointerventional Radiology University of Iowa Health Care Iowa City Iowa USA
Neurosurgery Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA
Neurosurgery Dokkyo Medical University Shimotsuga District Japan
Neurosurgery Norton Healthcare Louisville Kentucky USA
Neurosurgery NYU Langone Medical Center New York New York USA
Neurosurgery Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh Delhi India
Neurosurgery The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA
Neurosurgery The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
Neurosurgery Tokushima University Tokushima Tokushima Prefecture Japan
Neurosurgery University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA
Neurosurgery University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA
Neurosurgery University of Groningen Groningen GR Netherlands
Neurosurgery University of Illinois Chicago Chicago Illinois USA
Neurosurgery University of Miami Health System Miami Florida USA
Neurosurgery University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
Neurosurgery University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA
Neurosurgery Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis Saint Louis Missouri USA
Radiation Oncology NYU Langone Medical Center New York New York USA
Radiation Oncology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA
Radiology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
School of Medicine National Yang Ming University Hsinchu Taiwan Province Taiwan
Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czech Republic
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Cleveland Ohio USA
University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA
Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis St Louis Missouri USA
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org