Implementing performance-based risk-sharing agreements in non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy: a real-world data case study
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
101059788
CREATIC funded from the European Union's Horizon Europe Coordination and Support Action
101059788
CREATIC funded from the European Union's Horizon Europe Coordination and Support Action
101059788
CREATIC funded from the European Union's Horizon Europe Coordination and Support Action
MUNI/A/1722/2024
Specific University Research provided by MŠMT
PubMed
40489036
PubMed Central
PMC12150588
DOI
10.1186/s13561-025-00646-3
PII: 10.1186/s13561-025-00646-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Performance-based risk-sharing agreements (PBRSA) represent an innovative tool for managing uncertainty and balanced distribution of the financial risk of high-cost drugs. By linking reimbursement to real-world treatment performance, these agreements help mitigate budgetary impacts. This study poses an illustrative patient-level PBRSA reimbursement model for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) immunotherapy based on collected real-world data (RWD). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 266 patients with NSCLC treated with immunotherapy was performed. Progression-free survival (PFS) served as the primary outcome measure of therapeutic effectiveness. An illustrative patient-level PBRSA model was developed to quantify the manufacturer’s financial participation based on deviations from established PFS thresholds reported in randomised controlled trials (RCT). The manufacturer’s financial responsibility increased proportionally to greater deviations in patient outcomes from the RCT benchmark. Cost calculations were limited exclusively to the acquisition price of immunotherapies, excluding administration, toxicity management, and other indirect costs. The potential PBRSA scenario was compared with the current reimbursement situation. RESULTS: Using this reimbursement method, cost savings per checkpoint inhibitor for healthcare payers could represent between 27.3% and 66.2% of the total cost, depending on the individual PFS reached. For the RWD cohort of NSCLC patients unsuccessfully treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy was 57.5% (a reduction in cost to payers from $27 996 to $11 893 per patient); pembrolizumab in combination 51.7% ($33 595 to $16 237); nivolumab 37.1% ($5 608 to $3 531); atezolizumab 27.3% ($11 799 to $8 583); and durvalumab 66.2% ($44 005 to $14 882). CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes an illustrative patient-level PBRSA reimbursement model leveraging real-world clinical data to enhance risk-sharing for high-cost therapies. Unlike conventional cost-effectiveness analyses, this method directly links clinical performance and manufacturer financial responsibility. Future research should integrate comprehensive cost considerations and validate model performance in broader clinical settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13561-025-00646-3.
Centre of Excellence CREATIC Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Pharmacology Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Graduate School of Health Economics and Management Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Rome Italy
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229–63. 10.3322/caac.21834. PubMed
Rodríguez-Abreu D, Powell SF, Hochmair MJ, Gadgeel S, Esteban E, Felip E, Speranza G, De Angelis F, Dómine M, Cheng SY, Bischoff HG, Peled N, Reck M, Hui R, Garon EB, Boyer M, Kurata T, Yang J, Pietanza MC, Souza F, Garassino MC. Pemetrexed plus platinum with or without pembrolizumab in patients with previously untreated metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC: protocol-specified final analysis from KEYNOTE-189. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:881–895. 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.04.008 PubMed
Borilova S, Dusek L, Jakubikova L, Turcani P, Matej R, Hanke I, Dymackova R, Bilek O, Pauk N, Svoboda M. Lung Cancer in the Czech Republic. J Thorac Oncol. 2023;18:271–7. 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.11.023. PubMed
Dantoing E, Piton N, Salaün M, Thiberville L, Guisier F. Anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for Non-Small cell lung Cancer with actionable oncogenic driver mutations. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:6288. 10.3390/ijms22126288. PubMed PMC
Shields MD, Marin-Acevedo JA, Pellini B. Immunotherapy for advanced Non–Small cell lung cancer: A decade of progress. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2021;e105–27. 10.1200/EDBK_321483. PubMed
Aguiar P, Perry LA, Lopes GL. Cost–effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC according to PD-L1 expression. Lung Cancer Manag. 2016;5:119–22. 10.2217/lmt-2016-0016. PubMed PMC
Dabbous M, Chachoua L, Caban A, Toumi M. Managed entry agreements: policy analysis from the European perspective. Value Health. 2020;23:425–33. 10.1016/j.jval.2019.12.008. PubMed
Hospodková P, Karásek P, Tichopád A. Stakeholder insights into Czech Performance-Based managed entry agreements: potential for transformative change in pharmaceutical access?? Healthcare. 2024;12:119. 10.3390/healthcare12010119. PubMed PMC
Kim H, Liew D, Goodall S. Cost-effectiveness and financial risks associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;86:1703–10. 10.1111/bcp.14337. PubMed PMC
Performance-based managed entry. agreements for new medicines in OECD countries and EU member states: How they work and possible improvements going forward| READ online. In: Oecd-Ilibraryorg. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/performance-based-managed-entry-agreements-for-new-medicines-in-oecd-countries-and-eu-member-states_6e5e4c0f-en. Accessed 11 Jan 2024.
Vreman A, Broekhoff RF, Leufkens TGM, Mantel-Teeuwisse HK, Goettsch AG W. Application of managed entry agreements for innovative therapies in different settings and combinations: A feasibility analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:8309. 10.3390/ijerph17228309. PubMed PMC
Kim AE, Choi DH, Chang J, Kim SH. Performance-Based Risk-Sharing arrangements (PBRSA): is it a solution to increase Bang for the Buck for pharmaceutical reimbursement strategy for our Nation and around the world?? Clin Drug Investig. 2020;40:1107–13. 10.1007/s40261-020-00972-w. PubMed PMC
Jommi C, Bertolani A, Armeni P, Costa F, Otto M. Pharmaceutical pricing and managed entry agreements: an exploratory study on future perspectives in Europe. Health Policy Technol. 2023;12:100771. 10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100771.
Towse A, Fenwick E. It takes 2 to tango. Setting out the conditions in which Performance-Based Risk-Sharing arrangements work for both parties. Value Health. 2024;27:1058–65. 10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.2196. PubMed
Drummond M, Federici C, Busink E, Apel C, Kendzia D, Brouwer W. Performance-based risk-sharing agreements in renal care: current experience and future prospects. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021;21:197–210. 10.1080/14737167.2021.1876566. PubMed
Morgan SG, Thomson PA, Daw JR, Friesen MK. Canadian policy makers’ views on pharmaceutical reimbursement contracts involving confidential discounts from drug manufacturers. Health Policy. 2013;112:248–54. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.022. PubMed
Brixner D, Biskupiak J, Oderda G, Burgoyne D, Malone DC, Arondekar B, Niyazov A. Payer perceptions of the use of real-world evidence in oncology-based decision making. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021;27:1096–105. 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.8.1096. PubMed PMC
Baumfeld Andre E, Reynolds R, Caubel P, Azoulay L, Dreyer NA. Trial designs using real-world data: the changing landscape of the regulatory approval process. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020;29:1201–12. 10.1002/pds.4932. PubMed PMC
Dang A. Real-World evidence: A primer. Pharm Med. 2023;37:25–36. 10.1007/s40290-022-00456-6. PubMed PMC
Buch C, Schildmann J, Zerth J, Kohlhammer VW. Risk-sharing schemes to finance expensive pharmaceuticals: interdisciplinary analyses. In: Schildmann J, Buch C, Zerth J, editors. Defining the value of medical interventions: normative and empirical challenges. Stuttgart (DE): W. Kohlhammer GmbH; 2021. PubMed
Zampirolli Dias C, Godman B, Gargano LP, Azevedo PS, Garcia MM, Souza Cazarim M, Pantuzza LLN, Ribeiro-Junior NG, Pereira AL, Borin MC, de Figueiredo Zuppo I, Iunes R, Pippo T, Hauegen RC, Vassalo C, Laba T-L, Simoens S, Márquez S, Gomez C, Voncina L, Selke GW, Garattini L, Kwon H-Y, Gulbinovic J, Lipinska A, Pomorski M, McClure L, Fürst J, Gambogi R, Ortiz CH, Canuto Santos VC, Araújo DV, Araujo VE, Acurcio F, de Alvares-Teodoro A, Guerra-Junior J AA. Integrative review of managed entry agreements: chances and limitations. PharmacoEconomics. 2020;38:1165–85. 10.1007/s40273-020-00943-1. PubMed
Efthymiadou O, Kanavos P. Impact of managed entry agreements on availability of and timely access to medicines: an ex-post evaluation of agreements implemented for oncology therapies in four countries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22:1066. 10.1186/s12913-022-08437-w. PubMed PMC
Kang J, Cairns J. “Don’t Think Twice, It’s All Right”: Using additional data to reduce uncertainty regarding oncologic drugs provided through managed access agreements in England. Pharmaco Econ Open. 2022;7:77–91. 10.1007/s41669-022-00369-9 PubMed PMC
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. PubMed
List of reimbursed medicinal products valid as of 1.2.2024. In State Institute for Drug Control. Accessed 22 Apr 2024. https://sukl.gov.cz/en/list-of-reimbursed-medicinal-products/list-of-reimbursed-medicinal-products-valid-as-of-1-2-2024-2/
Kurzy.cz Graf USD, Kč. ČNB, grafy kurzů měn| Kurzy.cz. https://www.kurzy.cz/kurzy-men/grafy/CZK-USD/. Accessed 13 Aug 2024.
Korn RL, Crowley JJ. Overview: Progression-Free survival as an endpoint in clinical trials with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2013;19:2607–12. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2934. PubMed PMC
Medicinal products overviews. In State Institute for Drug Control. https://prehledy.sukl.cz/prehled_leciv.html#/. Accessed 24 Sep 2024.
Felip E, Altorki N, Zhou C, Csőszi T, Vynnychenko I, Goloborodko O, Luft A, Akopov A, Martinez-Marti A, Kenmotsu H, Chen Y-M, Chella A, Sugawara S, Voong D, Wu F, Yi J, Deng Y, McCleland M, Bennett E, Gitlitz B, Wakelee H. Adjuvant Atezolizumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage IB–IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower010): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;398:1344–57. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02098-5. PubMed
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in. Health care (IQWiG). General Methods – Version 7.0. Cologne: IQWiG; 2023. PubMed
Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csőszi T, Fülöp A, Gottfried M, Peled N, Tafreshi A, Cuffe S, O’Brien M, Rao S, Hotta K, Leiby MA, Lubiniecki GM, Shentu Y, Rangwala R, Brahmer JR, KEYNOTE-024 Investigators. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1823–33. 10.1056/NEJMoa1606774. PubMed
Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, Esteban E, Felip E, Angelis FD, Domine M, Clingan P, Hochmair MJ, Powell SF, Cheng SY-S, Bischoff HG, Peled N, Grossi F, Jennens RR, Reck M, Hui R, Garon EB, Boyer M, Rubio-Viqueira B, Novello S, Kurata T, Gray JE, Vida J, Wei Z, Yang J, Raftopoulos H, Pietanza MC, Garassino MC. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic Non–Small-Cell lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2078–92. 10.1056/NEJMoa1801005. PubMed
Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Borghaei H, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready N, Chow LQM, Vokes EE, Felip E, Holgado E, Barlesi F, Kohlhaeufl M, Rodriguez O, Burgio MA, Fayette J, Gettinger SN, Harbison C, Dorange C, Finckenstein FG, Brahmer JR. Phase III, randomized trial (CheckMate 057) of nivolumab (NIVO) versus docetaxel (DOC) in advanced non-squamous cell (non-SQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:LBA109–109. 10.1200/jco.2015.33.18_suppl.lba109.
Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, Park K, Ciardiello F, von Pawel J, Gadgeel SM, Hida T, Kowalski DM, Dols MC, Cortinovis DL, Leach J, Polikoff J, Barrios C, Kabbinavar F, Frontera OA, Marinis FD, Turna H, Lee J-S, Ballinger M, Kowanetz M, He P, Chen DS, Sandler A, Gandara DR. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389:255–65. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32517-X. PubMed PMC
Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, Vicente D, Murakami S, Hui R, Yokoi T, Chiappori A, Lee KH, de Wit M, Cho BC, Bourhaba M, Quantin X, Tokito T, Mekhail T, Planchard D, Kim Y-C, Karapetis CS, Hiret S, Ostoros G, Kubota K, Gray JE, Paz-Ares L, Carpeño J, de Wadsworth C, Melillo C, Jiang G, Huang H, Dennis Y, Özgüroğlu PA M. Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III Non–Small-Cell lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1919–29. 10.1056/NEJMoa1709937. PubMed
Paz-Ares L, Ciuleanu T-E, Cobo M, Schenker M, Zurawski B, Menezes J, Richardet E, Bennouna J, Felip E, Juan-Vidal O, Alexandru A, Sakai H, Lingua A, Salman P, Souquet P-J, Marchi PD, Martin C, Pérol M, Scherpereel A, Lu S, John T, Carbone DP, Meadows-Shropshire S, Agrawal S, Oukessou A, Yan J, Reck M. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined with two cycles of chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 9LA): an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:198–211. 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30641-0. PubMed
Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, Tykodi SS, Sosman JA, Procopio G, Plimack ER, Castellano D, Choueiri TK, Gurney H, Donskov F, Bono P, Wagstaff J, Gauler TC, Ueda T, Tomita Y, Schutz FA, Kollmannsberger C, Larkin J, Ravaud A, Simon JS, Xu L-A, Waxman IM, Sharma P, CheckMate 025 Investigators. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced Renal-Cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1803–13. 10.1056/NEJMoa1510665. PubMed PMC
Gandjour A. Pharmaceutical Risk-Sharing agreements. PharmacoEconomics. 2009;27:431–2. 10.2165/00019053-200927050-00007. PubMed
Passaro A, Brahmer J, Antonia S, Mok T, Peters S. Managing resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer: treatment and novel strategies. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:598–610. 10.1200/JCO.21.01845. PubMed
Arrieta O, Ramos-Ramírez M, Garcés-Flores H, Cabrera-Miranda LA, Gómez-García AP, Soto-Molina H, Cardona AF, Valencia-Velarde Á, Gálvez-Niño M, Guzmán-Vázquez S. Evaluation of a risk-sharing agreement for Atezolizumab treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a strategy to improve access in low-income countries. Oncologist. 2024;oyae272. 10.1093/oncolo/oyae272. PubMed
Zaric GS. How risky is that risk sharing agreement?? Mean-Variance tradeoffs and unintended consequences of six common risk sharing agreement?s. MDM Policy Pract. 2021;6:2381468321990404. 10.1177/2381468321990404. PubMed PMC
Bouvy JC, Sapede C, Garner S. Managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals in the context of adaptive pathways in Europe. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:280. 10.3389/fphar.2018.00280. PubMed PMC
Kefalas P, Ali O, Jørgensen J, Merryfield N, Richardson T, Meads A, Mungapen L, Durdy M. Establishing the cost of implementing a performance-based, managed entry agreement for a hypothetical CAR T-cell therapy. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2018;6:1511679. 10.1080/20016689.2018.1511679. PubMed PMC
Trotta F, Guerrizio MA, Di Filippo A, Cangini A. Financial outcomes of managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals in Italy. JAMA Health Forum. 2023;4:e234611. 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4611. PubMed PMC
Horn L, Spigel DR, Vokes EE, Holgado E, Ready N, Steins M, Poddubskaya E, Borghaei H, Felip E, Paz-Ares L, Pluzanski A, Reckamp KL, Burgio MA, Kohlhäeufl M, Waterhouse D, Barlesi F, Antonia S, Arrieta O, Fayette J, Crinò L, Rizvi N, Reck M, Hellmann MD, Geese WJ, Li A, Blackwood-Chirchir A, Healey D, Brahmer J, Eberhardt WEE. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: two-year outcomes from two randomized, open-label, Phase III Trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057). J Clin Oncol. 2017;10;35(35):3924–3933. 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.3062 PubMed PMC