Breaking stigma, discrimination and promoting rights: global evaluation of the World Health Organization QualityRights e-training on mental health, recovery and community inclusion

. 2025 Aug 18 ; 11 (5) : e185. [epub] 20250818

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid40820972
Odkazy

PubMed 40820972
PubMed Central PMC12451731
DOI 10.1192/bjo.2025.10779
PII: S2056472425107795
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need to address the poor quality of mental healthcare and human rights violations within mental health systems and communities. To achieve this, efforts must focus on changing the attitudes that perpetuate stigma and discrimination against individuals with mental health conditions, as well as psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities. The World Health Organization (WHO) QualityRights e-training on mental health, recovery and community inclusion is tackling these issues in several countries; however, its global impact has yet to be evaluated. AIMS: This study aims to assess the changes in attitudes following the completion of the WHO QualityRights e-training in countries worldwide. METHOD: Data from 3026 participants were analysed in this pre-post intervention study. Changes in scores on the WHO QualityRights Attitudes questionnaire were evaluated with the paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: The mean differences from baseline to post-training on the WHO QualityRights Attitudes questionnaire were 9.91 (95% CI 9.58-10.24, d = 1.07) for the total sample, 8.95 (95% CI 8.59-9.31, d = 0.99) for the high-income countries sample; and 12.75 (95% CI 12.03-13.47, d = 1.33) for the low- and middle-income countries sample. These findings indicate that participants, after completing the e-training, showed a decrease in negative attitudes toward individuals with mental health conditions and psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the WHO QualityRights e-training has a positive, large effect in reducing negative attitudes toward individuals with mental health conditions and psychosocial, intellectual and cognitive disabilities, and can contribute to reduced stigma and greater alignment with rights-based approaches. These findings support the scale-up of the WHO QualityRights e-training programme.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Drew N, Funk M, Tang S, Lamichhane J, Chavez E, Katontoka S, et al. Human rights violations of people with mental and psychosocial disabilities: an unresolved global crisis. Lancet 2011; 378: 1664–75. PubMed

World Health Organization. World Mental Health Report: Transforming Mental Health for All. World Health Organization, 2022. (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049338).

Mfoafo-M’Carthy M. Human rights violations and mental illness: implications for engagement and adherence. SAGE Open 2014; 4: 1–18.

Human Rights Watch.

Human Rights Watch.

Human Rights Watch.

Mental Disability Rights International.

Moro MF, Kola L, Fadahunsi O, Jah EM, Kofie H, Samba D, et al. Quality of care and respect of human rights in mental health services in four West African countries: collaboration between the mental health leadership and advocacy programme and the World Health Organization QualityRights initiative. BJPsych Open 2022; 25: e31. PubMed PMC

Moro MF, Carta MG, Gyimah L, Orrell M, Amissah C, Baingana F, et al. A nationwide evaluation study of the quality of care and respect of human rights in mental health facilities in Ghana: results from the World Health Organization QualityRights initiative. BMC Public Health 2022; 22: 639. PubMed PMC

Sashidharan S, Saraceno B. Is psychiatry becoming more coercive? The rising trend is damaging for patients, unsupported by evidence, and must be reversed. BMJ 2017; 357: 2904. PubMed

Savage MKLP, Newton-Howes G, Arnold R, Staggs VS, Kisely S, Hasegawa T, et al. Comparison of coercive practices in worldwide mental healthcare: overcoming difficulties resulting from variations in monitoring strategies. BJPsych Open 2024; 10: e26. PubMed PMC

Patel V, Saxena S, Lund C, Thornicroft G, Baingana F, Bolton P, et al. The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development. Lancet 2018; 392: 1553–98. PubMed

Lund C. Mental health and human rights in South Africa: the hidden humanitarian crisis FOREWORD. S Afr J Hum Rights 2016; 32: 403–5.

Gostin L. ‘Old’ and ‘new’ institutions for persons with mental illness: treatment, punishment or preventive confinement? Public Health 2008; 122: 906–13. PubMed

Trevillion K, Oram S, Feder G, Howard LM. Experiences of domestic violence and mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2012; 7: e51740. PubMed PMC

Hiday VA. Putting community risk in perspective: a look at correlations, causes and controls. Int J Law Psychiatry 2006; 29: 316–31. PubMed

Crump C, Sundquist K, Winkleby MA, Sundquist J. Mental disorders and vulnerability to homicidal death: Swedish nationwide cohort study. BMJ 2013; 346: f557. PubMed PMC

Khalifeh H, Johnson S, Howard LM, Borschmann R, Osborn D, Dean K, et al. Violent and non-violent crime against adults with severe mental illness. Br J Psychiatry 2015; 206: 275–82. PubMed

Puras D, Gooding P. Mental health and human rights in the 21st century. World Psychiatry 2019; 18: 42–3. PubMed PMC

United Nations.

Chieze M, Hurst S, Kaiser S, Sentissi O. Effects of seclusion and restraint in adult psychiatry: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10: 491. PubMed PMC

United Nations Human Rights Council. Resolution A/HRC/32/18, Mental Health and Human Rights. United Nations Human Rights Council, 2016. (https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/845623/files/A_HRC_RES_32_18-EN.pdf).

United Nations Human Rights Council. Resolution A/HRC/RES/36/13, Mental Health and Human Rights. United Nations Human Rights Council, 2017. (https://undocs.org/A/HRC/RES/36/13).

United Nations Human Rights Council. Resolution A/HRC/RES/43/13, Mental Health and Human Rights. United Nations Human Rights Council, 2020. (https://undocs.org/A/HRC/RES/43/13).

United Nations Human Rights Council. Resolution A/HRC/52/L.15, Mental Health and Human Rights. United Nations Human Rights Council, 2023. (https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4013136?ln=en).

United Nations General Assembly. Resolution A/RES/77/300, Mental Health and Psychosocial Support. United Nations General Assembly, 2023. (https://docs.un.org/en/A/RES/77/300).

Gill N, Drew N, Rodrigues M, Muhsen H, Morales Cano G, Savage M, et al. Bringing together the World Health Organization’s QualityRights initiative and the World Psychiatric Association’s programme on implementing alternatives to coercion in mental healthcare: a common goal for action. BJPsych Open 2024; 10: e23. PubMed PMC

World Health Organization. WHO QualityRights Materials for Training, Guidance and Transformation. World Health Organization, 2015. (https://www.who.int/mental_health/policy/quality_rights/en/). PubMed

Funk MB, Ansong J, Chisholm D, Murko M, Nato J, Ohene SA, et al. Strategies to achieve a rights-based approach through WHO QualityRights. In Mental Health, Legal Capacity, and Human Rights (eds Stein MM, Patel F, Sunkel V): 244–59. Cambridge University Press, 2021.

Thornicroft G, Sunkel C, Alikhon Aliev A, Baker S, Brohan E, el Chammay R, et al. The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health. Lancet 2022; 400: 1438–80. PubMed

World Health Organization. Mental Health, Brain Health and Substance Use: WHO QualityRights e-Training on Mental Health. World Health Organization, 2017. (https://www.who.int/teams/mental-health-and-substance-use/policy-law-rights/qr-e-training).

Moro MF, Pathare S, Zinkler M, Osei A, Puras D, Paccial R, et al. The WHO QualityRights initiative: building partnerships among psychiatrists, people with lived experience and other key stakeholders to improve the quality of mental healthcare. Br J Psychiatry 2022; 220: 49–51. PubMed

Poynton-Smith E, Orrell M, Osei A, Ohene SA, Ansong J, Gyimah L, et al. A quantitative analysis of human rights-related attitude changes towards people with mental health conditions and psychosocial, intellectual, or cognitive disabilities following completion of the WHO QualityRights e-training in Ghana. Int J Ment Health Syst 2023; 17: 46. PubMed PMC

Funk M, Drew N. WHO QualityRights: transforming mental health services. Lancet Psychiatry 2017; 4: 826–7. PubMed

World Health Organization. QualityRights Materials for Training, Guidance and Transformation. WHO, 2019. (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-qualityrights-guidance-and-training-tools). PubMed

Moro MF. Evaluating the psychometric properties of three WHO instruments to assess knowledge about human rights, attitudes toward persons with mental health conditions and psychosocial disabilities, and practices related to substitute decision-making and coercion in mental health. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15: 1435608. PubMed PMC

World Health Organization. Countries. World Health Organization, 2017. (https://www.who.int/countries).

World Bank. World Bank Country and Lending Groups. World Bank, 2023. (https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups).

Morris SB. Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organ Res Methods 2008; 11: 364–86.

Jordan K. Massive Open Online Course completion rates revisited: assessment, length and attrition. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 2015; 16: 341–58.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...