Persistent progression independent of relapse activity in multiple sclerosis
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
40909095
PubMed Central
PMC12405762
DOI
10.1093/braincomms/fcaf306
PII: fcaf306
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- disability improvement, disability progression, progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA), relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS),
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) may experience disability progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA), which can be an early sign of secondary progressive MS (SPMS). We defined persistent PIRA as ongoing sustained disability over the entire available follow-up period. However, PIRA events can regress over time. Identifying factors that predict PIRA persistence is of great interest as they can refine the definition of RRMS to SPMS transition. Equally, factors associated with the non-persistence of PIRA have potential treatment implications for patients suffering from a PIRA event. We conducted a study to examine risk factors for PIRA persistence and risk differences in long-term disability progression between persistent and non-persistent PIRA. In this cohort study, we included only patients who had already experienced a PIRA event and investigated the persistence of disability progression following their first PIRA event. Therefore, PIRA occurrence time was set as the baseline. Data were collected from the MSBase registry between April 1995 and January 2024, with a median follow-up of 8.7 years. The primary outcome was time to 6-month confirmed non-persistence of PIRA. Secondary outcomes comprised time to 6-month confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 6 and time to SPMS. A stratified Cox regression model was used to identify risk factors associated with non-persistent PIRA. We then matched persistent PIRA patients with non-persistent PIRA patients in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores, and compared their risk of reaching EDSS 6 using the Cox regression model. We re-matched patients with complete Kurtzke Functional Systems Scores to compare their risks of reaching SPMS. We included 4713 RRMS patients with PIRA, of whom around one-third experienced a post-PIRA disability improvement, over a relatively long period (median of 2.6 years to improvement). Use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMT) at baseline [hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, (1.08-1.38); P = 0.0015], lower baseline EDSS [hazard ratio, 0.73 (0.69-0.78); P < 0.0001] and younger age [per 10 years; hazard ratio, 0.84 (0.80-0.89); P < 0.0001] were associated with non-persistent PIRA. Patients with non-persistent PIRA had a hazard ratio of 0.19 [95% confidence interval, (0.15-0.25); P < 0.0001] for reaching EDSS 6 and 0.18 [(0.11-0.29); P < 0.0001] for reaching SPMS compared to patients with persistent PIRA. PIRA events slowly regress in one-third of patients. Patients with persistent PIRA had a substantially higher risk of reaching EDSS 6 and SPMS than those with non-persistent PIRA. Younger age, lower baseline EDSS, and use of high-efficacy DMT during PIRA events were associated with PIRA regression.
Amiri Hospital Sharq 73767 Kuwait
Austin Health Melbourne 3084 Australia
Azienda Opsedaliera per l'Emergenza Cannizzaro Catania 95126 Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale San Giuseppe Moscati Avellino Avellino 83100 Italy
Center of Neuroimmunology Service of Neurology Hospital Clinic de Barcelona Barcelona 8916 Spain
CHUM and Universite de Montreal Montreal Canada H2L 4M1
CISSS Chaudière Appalache Levis Canada G6X 0A1
CORe Department of Medicine University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia
CSSS Saint Jérôme Saint Jerome Canada J7Z 5T3
Department Neurofarba University of Florence Florence 50123 Italy
Department of Neurology Alfred Hospital Melbourne VIC 3004 Australia
Department of Neurology Box Hill Hospital Box Hill VIC 3128 Australia
Department of Neurology Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Sao Joao Porto 4200 319 Portugal
Department of Neurology Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc Brussels 1200 Belgium
Department of Neurology Jacobs MS Center for Treatment and Research 14203 United States
Department of Neurology Karadeniz Technical University Medical Faculty Trabzon 61080 Turkey
Department of Neurology Royal Brisbane Hospital Brisbane 4000 Australia
Department of Neurology University Hospital Ghent Ghent 9000 Belgium
Department of Neuroscience Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol Badalona 8916 Spain
Department of Neuroscience S Maria delle Croci Hospital AUSL Romagna Ravenna 48121 Italy
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie Università di Bologna Bologna 40139 Italy
Eastern Health Clinical School Monash University Box Hill VIC 3128 Australia
Hospital Universitario Donostia and IIS Biodonostia San Sebastián 20014 Spain
Hunter New England Health New Lambton NSW 2050 Australia
IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Florence 50143 Italy
IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna Bologna 40139 Italy
Izmir University of Economics Medical Point Hospital Izmir 35575 Turkey
Medical and Surgical Sciences Universita di Foggia Foggia 71122 Italy
Neuroimmunology Centre Department of Neurology Royal Melbourne Hospital Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia
Neurology Institute Harley Street Medical Center Abu Dhabi 00000 UAE
Neurology Unit AST Macerata Macerata 62100 Italy
School of Clinical Sciences Monash University Clayton VIC 3168 Australia
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne VIC 3004 Australia
University Hospital and University of Basel Basel 4000 Switzerland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
McGinley MP, Goldschmidt CH, Rae-Grant AD. Diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis: A review. JAMA. 2021;325(8):765–779. PubMed
Portaccio E, Bellinvia A, Fonderico M, et al. Progression is independent of relapse activity in early multiple sclerosis: A real-life cohort study. Brain. 2022;145(8):2796–2805. PubMed
Ransohoff RM. Multiple sclerosis: Role of meningeal lymphoid aggregates in progression independent of relapse activity. Trends Immunol. 2023;44(4):266–275. PubMed
Cagol A, Schaedelin S, Barakovic M, et al. Association of brain atrophy with disease progression independent of relapse activity in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79(7):682–692. PubMed PMC
Tur C, Carbonell-Mirabent P, Cobo-Calvo Á, et al. Association of early progression independent of relapse activity with long-term disability after a first demyelinating event in multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2023;80(2):151–160. PubMed PMC
Dzau W, Sharmin S, Patti F, et al. Risk of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis after early worsening of disability. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2023;94(12):984–991. PubMed
Lublin FD, Häring DA, Ganjgahi H, et al. How patients with multiple sclerosis acquire disability. Brain. 2022;145(9):3147–3161. PubMed PMC
Gärtner J, Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, et al. Efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in recently diagnosed, treatment-naive patients with multiple sclerosis: Results from ASCLEPIOS I and II. Mult Scler. 2022;28(10):1562–1575. PubMed PMC
von Wyl V, Benkert P, Moser A, et al. Disability progression in relapse-free multiple sclerosis patients on fingolimod versus interferon-beta/glatiramer acetate. Mult Scler. 2021;27(3):439–448. PubMed
Sharrad D, Chugh P, Slee M, Bacchi S. Defining progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) in adult patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023;78:104899. PubMed
Müller J, Cagol A, Lorscheider J, et al. Harmonizing definitions for progression independent of relapse activity in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. JAMA Neurol. 2023;80(11):1232. PubMed
Butzkueven H, Chapman J, Cristiano E, et al. MSBase: An international, online registry and platform for collaborative outcomes research in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2006;12(6):769–774. PubMed
Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(2):162–173. PubMed
Schumacher GA, Beebe G, Kibler RF, et al. Problems of experimental trials of therapy in multiple sclerosis: Report by the panel on the evaluation of experimental trials of therapy in multiple sclerosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1965;122:552–568. PubMed
Lorscheider J, Buzzard K, Jokubaitis V, et al. Defining secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2016;139(9):2395–2405. PubMed
Kleinbaum DG, Klein M. Survival analysis. 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag; 2010.
Zhang Z, Reinikainen J, Adeleke KA, Pieterse ME, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM. Time-varying covariates and coefficients in Cox regression models. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(7):121. PubMed PMC
Schoenfeld D. Chi-squared goodness-of-fit tests for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika. 1980;67(1):145–153.
Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28(25):3083–3107. PubMed PMC
Barzegar M, Najdaghi S, Afshari-Safavi A, Nehzat N, Mirmosayyeb O, Shaygannejad V. Early predictors of conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021;54:103115. PubMed
Prosperini L, Ruggieri S, Haggiag S, Tortorella C, Pozzilli C, Gasperini C. Prognostic accuracy of NEDA-3 in long-term outcomes of multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021;8(6):e1059. PubMed PMC
Iaffaldano P, Portaccio E, Lucisano G, et al. Multiple sclerosis progression and relapse activity in children. JAMA Neurol. 2024;81(1):50–58. PubMed PMC
Cree BAC, Hollenbach JA, Bove R, et al. Silent progression in disease activity-free relapsing multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2019;85(5):653–666. PubMed PMC
Hirst C, Ingram G, Swingler R, Compston DAS, Pickersgill T, Robertson NP. Change in disability in patients with multiple sclerosis: A 20-year prospective population-based analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(10):1137–1143. PubMed
Ramsaransing G, Maurits N, Zwanikken C, De Keyser J. Early prediction of a benign course of multiple sclerosis on clinical grounds: A systematic review. Mult Scler. 2001;7(5):345–347. PubMed
Yang Y, Wang M, Xu L, et al. Cerebellar and/or brainstem lesions indicate poor prognosis in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. Front Neurol. 2022;13:874388. PubMed PMC
Akaike S, Okamoto T, Miyazawa A, Takahashi Y. Multiple sclerosis presenting with progressive visual impairment independent of relapse activity: A case report. Neuroimmunol Rep. 2023;3:100172.
Read SJ, Harrison JD, Pender MP. Progressive visual loss: An unusual presentation of multiple sclerosis. J Clin Neurosci. 1996;3(3):264–267. PubMed
Calvi A, Carrasco FP, Tur C, et al. Association of slowly expanding lesions on MRI with disability in people with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2022;98(17):e1783–e1793. PubMed
Graf J, Leussink VI, Soncin G, et al. Relapse-independent multiple sclerosis progression under natalizumab. Brain Commun. 2021;3(4):fcab229. PubMed PMC
Kappos L, Wolinsky JS, Giovannoni G, et al. Contribution of relapse-independent progression vs relapse-associated worsening to overall confirmed disability accumulation in typical relapsing multiple sclerosis in a pooled analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(9):1132–1140. PubMed PMC
Kuhlmann T, Moccia M, Coetzee T, et al. Multiple sclerosis progression: Time for a new mechanism-driven framework. Lancet Neurol. 2023;22(1):78–88. PubMed PMC
Yuan W, Beaulieu-Jones BK, Yu K-H, et al. Temporal bias in case-control design: Preventing reliable predictions of the future. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1107. PubMed PMC