Risk-sharing agreements for medical devices: a stakeholder-based qualitative study in Czechia
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
40969652
PubMed Central
PMC12440917
DOI
10.3389/fpubh.2025.1627299
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Central and Eastern Europe, medical devices, outcome based healthcare, post-transition healthcare systems, risk-sharing,
- MeSH
- kvalitativní výzkum MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- rozhovory jako téma MeSH
- sdílení finančního rizika * MeSH
- účast zainteresovaných stran * MeSH
- zdravotnické prostředky * ekonomika MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The rising costs and uncertain clinical value of innovative health technologies have spurred growing interest in alternative reimbursement models, particularly outcome-based risk-sharing agreements. While such models are increasingly discussed and applied in the pharmaceutical sector, their use in the context of medical devices remains limited and underexplored, despite similar challenges regarding evidence generation and financial risk. This qualitative study examines stakeholders' perspectives and identifies key barriers to the implementation of outcome-based agreements for medical devices. METHODS: A qualitative design was employed, based on 16 semi-structured interviews with stakeholders from payer organizations, providers, regulatory authorities, and the medical device industry. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed based on the inductive coding principle. RESULTS: Participants most frequently reported three dominant barrier domains: regulatory and legal uncertainty, weak infrastructure for real-world outcome measurement, and institutional reluctance to engage in shared-risk models. Nevertheless, respondents acknowledged the conceptual benefits of outcome-based agreements and supported the idea of small-scale pilot programs in selected high-cost therapeutic areas. CONCLUSION: Enabling broader adoption of such models requires not only regulatory and institutional evolution but also targeted investment in data infrastructure. In particular, the capacity to generate and interpret real-world evidence through Big Data analytics will be crucial for supporting sustainable, transparent, and evidence-based reimbursement decisions in the medical device sector.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Phillips KA. CMS coverage with evidence development - challenges and opportunities for improvement. JAMA Health Forum. (2022) 3:E223061. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.3061, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Tang B, Li Z, Liu Y, Zhu F. Transforming healthcare through value: a fiscal perspective on OECD countries. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. (2025) 18:479–90. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S504275, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Douglas AO, Senkaiahliyan S, Bulstra CA, Mita C, Reddy CL, Atun R. Global adoption of value-based health care initiatives within health systems. JAMA Health Forum. (2025) 6:e250746. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0746, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Ádám I, Callenbach M, Németh B, Vreman RA, Tollin C, Pontén J, et al. Outcome-based reimbursement in Central-Eastern Europe and middle-east. Front Med. (2022) 9:940886. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.940886, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Ádám I, Callenbach M, Németh B, Vreman RA, Pontén J, Strbad T, et al. Delayed payment schemes in Central-Eastern Europe and middle-east. Front Med. (2022) 9:940371. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.940371, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Kovács S, Kaló Z, Daubner-Bendes R, Kolasa K, Hren R, Tesar T, et al. Implementation of coverage with evidence development schemes for medical devices: a decision tool for late technology adopter countries. Health Econ. (2022) 31:195–206. doi: 10.1002/hec.4504, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Saing S, van der Linden N, Hayward C, Goodall S. Why is there discordance between the reimbursement of high-cost ‘life-extending’ pharmaceuticals and medical devices? The funding of ventricular assist devices in Australia. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. (2019) 17:421–31. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00470-x, PMID: PubMed DOI
Towse A, Fenwick E. It takes 2 to tango. Setting out the conditions in which performance-based risk-sharing arrangements work for both parties. Value Health. (2024) 27:1058–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.2196, PMID: PubMed DOI
García-Collado CG, Martínez-de-la-Plata JE, Montoro M d MM, Morales AJ, Hernández MÁC, Martínez FM. Impact of a risk-sharing agreement in rheumatoid arthritis in Spain. Health Policy. (2021) 125:335–40. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.11.009, PMID: PubMed DOI
Verma A, Rai MK, Prasanna R. HPR123 risk sharing agreements in the Asia-Pacific region: a systematic literature review on new pricing modalities to improve value access. Value Health. (2023) 26:S275–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.09.1441 DOI
Agresta B, Addison D, Livingstone A. HPR8 an analysis of risk sharing arrangements (RSAS) between 2013 and 2021 in Australia. Value Health. (2022) 25:S233. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.09.1140 DOI
Gajadien CS, Dohmen PJG, Eijkenaar F, Schut FT, van Raaij EM, Heijink R. Financial risk allocation and provider incentives in hospital–insurer contracts in the Netherlands. Eur J Health Econ. (2023) 24:125–38. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01459-5, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Hospodková P, Karásek P, Tichopád A. Stakeholder insights into Czech performance-based managed entry agreements: potential for transformative change in pharmaceutical access? Healthcare. (2024) 12:119. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010119, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Ciani O, Wilcher B, van Giessen A, Taylor RS. Linking the regulatory and reimbursement processes for medical devices: the need for integrated assessments. Health Econ. (2017) 26:13–29. doi: 10.1002/hec.3479, PMID: PubMed DOI
Drummond M, Federici C, Reckers-Droog V, Torbica A, Blankart CR, Ciani O, et al. Coverage with evidence development for medical devices in Europe: can practice meet theory? Health Econ. (2022) 31:179–94. doi: 10.1002/hec.4478, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Polisena J, Castaldo R, Ciani O, Federici C, Borsci S, Ritrovato M, et al. Health technology assessment methods guidelines for medical devices: how can we address the gaps? The International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering perspective. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. (2018) 34:276–89. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000314, PMID: PubMed DOI
Carlson JJ, Chen S, Garrison LP. Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements: an updated international review. PharmacoEconomics. (2017) 35:1063–72. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0535-z, PMID: PubMed DOI
Zaccherini T, Planel MP, Rumeau-Pichon C, De Joannis PE. Pmd30 medical devices managed entry agreements in France: a retrospective analysis (2018-2019). Value Health. (2019) 22:S674–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.09.1443 DOI
Matinheikki J, Kenny K, Kauppi K, van Raaij E, Brandon-Jones A. Realising the promise of value-based purchasing: experimental evidence of medical device selection. Int J Oper Prod Manag. (2024) 44:100–26. doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-09-2023-0779 DOI
Boriani G, Vitolo M, Svennberg E, Casado-Arroyo R, Merino JL, Leclercq C. Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements for devices and procedures in cardiac electrophysiology: an innovative perspective. Europace. (2022) 24:1541–7. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac045, PMID: PubMed DOI
Federici C, Reckers-Droog V, Ciani O, Dams F, Grigore B, Kaló Z, et al. Coverage with evidence development schemes for medical devices in Europe: characteristics and challenges. Eur J Health Econ. (2021) 22:1253–73. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01334-9, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Chen Y, Carlson JJ. Performance-based risk-sharing arrangements for devices and diagnostics in the United States: a systematic review. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. (2022) 28:78–83. doi: 10.18553/JMCP.2022.28.1.78, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. (2007) 19:349–57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 PubMed DOI
Pyo J, Lee W, Choi EY, Jang SG, Ock M. Qualitative research in healthcare: necessity and characteristics. J Prev Med Public Health. (2023) 56:12–20. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.22.451, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Rana K, Poudel P, Chimoriya R. Qualitative methodology in translational Health Research: current practices and future directions. Healthcare. (2023) 11:2665. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11192665, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Bowling A. Research methods in health: Investigating health and health services. Open University Press. (2014). Available online at: https://books.google.cz/books?id=6lOLBgAAQBAJ.
Barcina Lacosta T, Vulto AG, Turcu-Stiolica A, Huys I, Simoens S. Qualitative analysis of the design and implementation of benefit-sharing programs for biologics across Europe. BioDrugs. (2022) 36:217–29. doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00523-z, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Hospodková P, Gilíková K, Barták M, Marušáková E, Tichopád A. Opportunities and threats of the legally facilitated performance-based managed entry agreements in Slovakia: the early-adoption perspective. Healthcare. (2023) 11:1179. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081179, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. (2005) 15:1277–88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687, PMID: PubMed DOI
Bonisteel I, Shulman R, Newhook LA, Guttmann A, Smith S, Chafe R. Reconceptualizing recruitment in qualitative research. Int J Qual Method. (2021) 20:160940692110424. doi: 10.1177/16094069211042493 DOI
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. (2006) 3:77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI
Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. (2019) 11:589–97. doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 DOI
Liebregts N, Rigoni R, Petruželka B, Barták M, Rowicka M, Zurhold H, et al. Different phases of ATS use call for different interventions: a large qualitative study in Europe. Harm Reduct J. (2022) 19:36. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00617-5, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Piatkiewicz TJ, Traulsen JM, Holm-Larsen T. Risk-sharing agreements in the EU: a systematic review of major trends. Pharmacoecon Open. (2018) 2:109–23. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0044-1, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Gonçalves FR, Santos S, Silva C, Sousa G. Risk-sharing agreements, present and future. Ecancermedicalscience. (2018) 12:823. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.823, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC
Wenzel M, Chapman S. Performance-based managed entry agreements for new medicines in OECD countries and EU member states (2019). doi: 10.1787/6e5e4c0f-en, DOI
Makady A, de Boer A, Hillege H, Klungel O, Goettsch W. What is real-world data? A review of definitions based on literature and stakeholder interviews. Value Health. (2017) 20:858–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.03.008, PMID: PubMed DOI
Pecchia L, Maccaro A, Matarrese MAG, Folkvord F, Fico G. Artificial intelligence, data protection and medical device regulations: squaring the circle with a historical perspective in Europe. Health Technol. (2024) 14:663–70. doi: 10.1007/s12553-024-00878-z DOI
Tarricone R, Callea G, Ogorevc M, Prevolnik Rupel V. Improving the methods for the economic evaluation of medical devices. Health Econ. (2017) 26:70–92. doi: 10.1002/hec.3471, PMID: PubMed DOI