The accumulation of dead wood can serve as a potential source of insect pests, with scolytids being the most frequently discussed group. The aim of this study was to quantify the abundance and species composition of scolytids and their natural saproxylic beetle enemies in a beech reserve. In addition, we compared the types of dead wood preferred by scolytids and their natural enemies. Beetles were sampled passively using window traps, which effectively capture the actual density of beetles within the stand. In total, 20,515 saproxylic beetles were collected; the analyses included 11 scolytids species with 3017 individuals and 51 species of natural enemies with 4976 individuals. The results revealed a significantly higher abundance of natural saproxylic beetle enemies, with no strong affiliation to specific types of dead wood. This may indicate a high mobility of natural enemies actively searching for food resources within the forest stands. In conclusion, beech reserves support high abundances of natural scolytid enemies that exceed the numbers of scolytids themselves, indicating effective natural control processes.

Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 Suchdol 165 00 Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Kunin W.E. Robust Evidence of Declines in Insect Abundance and Biodiversity. Nature. 2019;574:641–642. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03241-9. PubMed DOI

Duflot R., Fahrig L., Mönkkönen M. Management Diversity Begets Biodiversity in Production Forest Landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 2022;268:109514. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109514. DOI

Zumr V., Remeš J., Pulkrab K. How to Increase Biodiversity of Saproxylic Beetles in Commercial Stands Through Integrated Forest Management in Central Europe. Forests. 2021;12:814. doi: 10.3390/f12060814. DOI

Hilmers T., Friess N., Bässler C., Heurich M., Brandl R., Pretzsch H., Seidl R., Müller J., Butt N. Biodiversity Along Temperate Forest Succession. J. Appl. Ecol. 2018;55:2756–2766. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13238. DOI

Sabatini F.M., Burrascano S., Keeton W.S., Levers C., Lindner M., Pötzschner F., Verkerk P.J., Bauhus J., Buchwald E., Chaskovsky O., et al. Where Are Europe’s Last Primary Forests? Divers. Distrib. 2018;24:1426–1439. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12778. DOI

Brunet J., Fritz O., Richnau G. Biodiversity in European beech forests—A review with recommendations for sustainable forest management. Ecol. Bull. 2010;53:77–94.

Müller J., Bußler H., Kneib T. Saproxylic Beetle Assemblages Related to Silvicultural Management Intensity and Stand Structures in a Beech Forest in Southern Germany. J. Insect Conserv. 2008;12:107–124. doi: 10.1007/s10841-006-9065-2. DOI

Jabin M., Mohr D., Kappes H., Topp W. Influence of Deadwood on Density of Soil Macro-Arthropods in a Managed Oak–Beech Forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 2004;194:61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.053. DOI

Jonsell M., Widenfalk L.A., Hellqvist S. Substrate Specificity Among Diptera in Decaying Bioenergy Wood: Can They Be Conserved by the Same Measures as Are Currently Applied to Beetles? Biodivers. Conserv. 2020;29:2623–2662. doi: 10.1007/s10531-020-01992-w. DOI

Graf M., Seibold S., Gossner M.M., Hagge J., Weiß I., Bässler C., Müller J. Coverage Based Diversity Estimates of Facultative Saproxylic Species Highlight the Importance of Deadwood for Biodiversity. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022;517:120275. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120275. DOI

Zuo J., Muys B., Berg M.P., Hefting M.M., van Logtestijn R.S.P., van Hal J., Cornelissen J.H.C. Earthworms Are Not Just “Earth” Worms: Multiple Drivers to Large Diversity in Deadwood. For. Ecol. Manag. 2023;530:120746. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120746. DOI

Atrena A., Banelytė G.G., Læssøe T., Riis-Hansen R., Bruun H.H., Rahbek C., Heilmann-Clausen J. Quality of Substrate and Forest Structure Determine Macrofungal Richness Along a Gradient of Management Intensity in Beech Forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020;478:118512. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118512. DOI

Tillon L., Bouget C., Paillet Y., Aulagnier S. How Does Deadwood Structure Temperate Forest Bat Assemblages? Eur. J. For. Res. 2016;135:433–449. doi: 10.1007/s10342-016-0944-0. DOI

Basile M., Krištín A., Mikusiński G., Thorn S., Żmihorski M., Pasinelli G., Brockerhoff E.G. Salvage Logging Strongly Affects Woodpecker Abundance and Reproduction: A Meta-Analysis. Curr. For. Rep. 2023;9:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s40725-022-00175-w. DOI

Zumr V., Remeš J. Saproxylic beetles as an indicator of forest biodiversity and the influence of forest management on their crucial life attributes: Review. Rep. For. Res. 2020;65:242–257.

Zahradník P. Seznam Brouk (Coleoptera) České Republiky a Slovenska. Lesnická Práce, s.r.o., Kostelec nad Černými Lesy. Lesnická Práce; Kostelec nad Černými lesy, Czechia: 2017. 544p

Pfeffer A. Fauna ČSR, Volume 6, Kůrovci—Scolytoidea. Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences; Prague, Czech Republic: 1955.

Müller J., Noss R.F., Bussler H., Brandl R. Learning from a “Benign Neglect Strategy” in a National Park: Response of Saproxylic Beetles to Dead Wood Accumulation. Biol. Conserv. 2010;143:2559–2569. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.024. DOI

Plath E., Trauth C., Gerhards J., Griebel L., Fischer K. Dieback of Managed Spruce Stands in Western Germany Promotes Beetle Diversity. J. For. Res. 2024;35:48. doi: 10.1007/s11676-024-01695-w. DOI

Hlásny T., König L., Krokene P., Lindner M., Montagné-Huck C., Müller J., Qin H., Raffa K.F., Schelhaas M.-J., Svoboda M., et al. Bark Beetle Outbreaks in Europe: State of Knowledge and Ways Forward for Management. Curr. For. Rep. 2021;7:138–165. doi: 10.1007/s40725-021-00142-x. DOI

Resco de Dios V., Schütze S.J., Cunill Camprubí À., Balaguer-Romano R., Boer M.M., Fernandes P.M. Protected Areas as Hotspots of Wildfire Activity in Fire-Prone Temperate and Mediterranean Biomes. J. Environ. Manag. 2025;385:125669. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125669. PubMed DOI

Beetz K., Marrs C., Busse A., Poděbradská M., Kinalczyk D., Kranz J., Forkel M. Effects of Bark Beetle Disturbance and Fuel Types on Fire Radiative Power and Burn Severity in the Bohemian-Saxon Switzerland. For. Int. J. For. Res. 2024;98:59–70. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpae024. DOI

Křístek J. Ochrana Lesů a Přírodního Prostředí. Učebnice; Matice lesnická; Písek, Czech Republic: 2002.

Marchioro M., Faccoli M., Dal Cortivo M., Branco M., Roques A., Garcia A., Ruzzier E. New species and new records of exotic Scolytinae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) in Europe. Biodivers. Data J. 2022;10:e93995. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.10.e93995. PubMed DOI PMC

Basile M., Lachat T., Balducci L., Chianucci F., Chojnacki L., Archaux F., Avtzis D., Bouget C., De Smedt P., Doerfler I., et al. Managed Forests Are a Stronghold of Non-Native Beetles in Europe. J. Appl. Ecol. 2025;62:1243–1257. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.70033. DOI

Fiala T., Holuša J., Procházka J., Čížek L., Dzurenko M., Foit J., Galko J., Kašák J., Kulfan J., Lakatos F., et al. Xylosandrus Germanus in Central Europe: Spread into and Within the Czech Republic. J. Appl. Entomol. 2020;144:423–433. doi: 10.1111/jen.12759. DOI

Fiala T., Holuša J. A Monitoring Network for the Detection of Invasive Ambrosia and Bark Beetles in the Czech Republic: Principles and Proposed Design. Front. For. Glob. Change. 2023;6:1239748. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2023.1239748. DOI

Langellotto G.A., Denno R.F. Responses of Invertebrate Natural Enemies to Complex-Structured Habitats: A Meta-Analytical Synthesis. Oecologia. 2004;139:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1497-3. PubMed DOI

Zumr V., Nakládal O., Gallo J., Remeš J. Deadwood Position Matters: Diversity and Biomass of Saproxylic Beetles in a Temperate Beech Forest. For. Ecosyst. 2024;11:100174. doi: 10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100174. DOI

Müller J., Brunet J., Brin A., Bouget C., Brustel H., Bussler H., Forster B., Isacsson G., Kohler F., Lachat T., et al. Implications from large-scale spatial diversity patterns of saproxylic beetles for the conservation of European Beech forests. Insect Conserv. Divers. 2013;6:162–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00200.x. DOI

Holuša J., Resnerová K., Dvořáková B., Hradecký J., Šipoš J., Fiala T. The Relationship Between Nemozoma Elongatum (Coleoptera: Trogossitidae) And Its Primary Bark-Beetle Prey-Species. Ann. For. Sci. 2025;82:11. doi: 10.1186/s13595-025-01280-z. DOI

Horák J., Nakládal O. Lesn. Čas.—For. J. Vol. 55. 2009. Beetles associated with trees and predation between them: Part III—Annotated checklist of beetles with predation potential; pp. 181–193.

Šrámek O. Základní Informace o Státní Přírodní Rezervaci “Voděradské bučiny”,—Ms., dep. in Rezervační Kniha AOPK ČR. RP Střední Čechy; Praha 6, Czech Republic: 1976. 8p

Care Plan Voděradské Bučiny. [(accessed on 3 September 2025)]. Available online: https://portal.nature.cz/w/uzemi-3274#/

Seibold S., Brandl R., Buse J., Hothorn T., Schmidl J., Thorn S., Müller J. Association of Extinction Risk of Saproxylic Beetles with Ecological Degradation of Forests in Europe. Conserv. Biol. 2014;29:382–390. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12427. PubMed DOI

Ulyshen M.D. Saproxylic Insects, Zoological Monographs. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2018. DOI

Bracalini M., Martini A., Tagliaferri L., Panzavolta T. Impact of Trapping Programs for Ips typographus (Linnaeus) (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) on Predators, Parasitoids, and Other Non-Target Insects. Forests. 2025;16:1510. doi: 10.3390/f16101510. DOI

Montgomery G.A., Belitz M.W., Guralnick R.P., Tingley M.W. Standards and Best Practices for Monitoring and Benchmarking Insects. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2021;8:579193. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.579193. DOI

Parmain G., Bouget C., Müller J., Horak J., Gossner M.M., Lachat T., Isacsson G. Can Rove Beetles (Staphylinidae) Be Excluded in Studies Focusing on Saproxylic Beetles in Central European Beech Forests? Bull. Entomol. Res. 2015;105:101–109. doi: 10.1017/S0007485314000741. PubMed DOI

Zumr V., Nakládal O., Bílek L., Remeš J. The Diameter of Beech Snags Is an Important Factor for Saproxylic Beetle Richness: Implications for Forest Management and Conservation. For. Ecosyst. 2023;10:100143. doi: 10.1016/j.fecs.2023.100143. DOI

Alinvi O., Ball J.P., Danell K., Hjältén J., Pettersson R.B. Sampling Saproxylic Beetle Assemblages in Dead Wood Logs: Comparing Window and Eclector Traps to Traditional Bark Sieving and a Refinement. J. Insect Conserv. 2007;11:99–112. doi: 10.1007/s10841-006-9012-2. DOI

Fox J., Weisberg S. An R Companion to Applied Regression. 3rd ed. Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: 2019. [(accessed on 10 September 2025)]. Available online: https://www.john-fox.ca/Companion/

Brooks M.E., Kristensen K., van Benthem K.J., Magnusson A., Berg C.W., Nielsen A., Skaug H.J., Mächler M., Bolker B.M. Glmmtmb Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-Inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling. R J. 2017;9:378–400. doi: 10.32614/RJ-2017-066. DOI

Huang A. Mean-parametrized Conway–Maxwell–Poisson regression models for dispersed counts. Stat. Model. 2017;17:1–22. doi: 10.1177/1471082X17697749. DOI

Hartig F. DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level/Mixed) Regression Models. 2024. [(accessed on 10 September 2025)]. R package version 0.4.7. Available online: https://github.com/florianhartig/dharma.

Chao A., Jost L. Coverage-Based Rarefaction and Extrapolation: Standardizing Samples by Completeness Rather Than Size. Ecology. 2012;93:2533–2547. doi: 10.1890/11-1952.1. PubMed DOI

Chao A., Gotelli N.J., Hsieh T.C., Sander E.L., Ma K.H., Colwell R.K., Ellison A.M. Rarefaction and Extrapolation with Hill Numbers: A Framework for Sampling and Estimation in Species Diversity Studies. Ecol. Monogr. 2014;84:45–67. doi: 10.1890/13-0133.1. DOI

Hsieh T.C., Ma K.H., Chao A. iNEXT: iNterpolation and EXTrapolation for Species Diversity. 2022. [(accessed on 10 September 2025)]. R Package Version 3.0.0. Available online: http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/wordpress/software-download/

R Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2023. [(accessed on 2 October 2023)]. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/

Šmilauer P., Lepš J. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using Canoco 5. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2014. DOI

Dufrene M., Legendre P. Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 1997;67:345–366. doi: 10.2307/2963459. DOI

De Cáceres M., Legendre P. Associations between species and groups of sites: Indices and statistical inference. Ecology. 2009;90:3566–3574. doi: 10.1890/08-1823.1. PubMed DOI

Fürjes-Mikó Á., Csősz S., Paulin M.J., Csóka G. The Role of Red Wood Ants (Formica rufa Species Group) in Central European Forest Ecosystems—A Literature Review. Insects. 2025;16:518. doi: 10.3390/insects16050518. PubMed DOI PMC

Zahradník P. Ips typographus (L.), Lesní Ochraná Služba, Lesnická Práce 4/2007. [(accessed on 10 September 2025)]. Available online: https://www.silvarium.cz/images/letaky-los/2007/2007_lykozrout_smrkovy.pdf.

Parisi F., Mazziotta A., Chirici G., D’amico G., Vangi E., Francini S., Travaglini D. Effects of Forest Management on Beetle (Coleoptera) Communities in Beech Forests (Fagus sylvatica) in the Apennines of Central Italy (Tuscany) Forests. 2024;15:1085. doi: 10.3390/f15071085. DOI

Bouget C., Brustel H., Brin A., Noblecourt T. Sampling saproxylic beetles with window flight traps: Methodological insights. Rev. D’ecologie Terre Vie. 2008;63:21–32. doi: 10.3406/revec.2008.1457. DOI

Seibold S., Bässler C., Brandl R., Büche B., Szallies A., Thorn S., Ulyshen M.D., Müller J. Microclimate and Habitat Heterogeneity as the Major Drivers of Beetle Diversity in Dead Wood. J. Appl. Ecol. 2016;53:934–943. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12607. DOI

Lettenmaier L., Seibold S., Bässler C., Brandl R., Gruppe A., Müller J., Hagge J. Beetle Diversity Is Higher in Sunny Forests Due to Higher Microclimatic Heterogeneity in Deadwood. Oecologia. 2022;198:825–834. doi: 10.1007/s00442-022-05141-8. PubMed DOI

Gossner M.M., Falck K., Weisser W.W. Effects of Management on Ambrosia Beetles and Their Antagonists in European Beech Forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2019;437:126–133. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.01.034. DOI

Bilek L., Remes J., Zahradnik D. Managed Vs. Unmanaged. Structure Of Beech Forest Stands (Fagus Sylvatica L.) After 50 Years of Development, Central Bohemia. For. Syst. 2011;20:122–138. doi: 10.5424/fs/2011201-10243. DOI

Christensen M., Hahn K., Mountford E.P., Ódor P., Standovár T., Rozenbergar D., Diaci J., Wijdeven S., Meyer P., Winter S., et al. Dead Wood in European Beech (Fagus Sylvatica) Forest Reserves. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005;210:267–282. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.032. DOI

Přívětivý T., Janík D., Unar P., Adam D., Král K., Vrška T. How Do Environmental Conditions Affect the Deadwood Decomposition of European Beech (Fagus Sylvatica L.)? For. Ecol. Manag. 2016;381:177–187. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.033. DOI

Holuša J., Henzlová I., Dvořáková B., Resnerová K., Šipoš J., Holuša O., Bláha J., Berčák R., Procházka J., Trombik J., et al. Abundance of Taphrorychus Bicolor in Beech Forests: Influence of Forest Size and Optimal Conditions. For. Ecol. Manag. 2025;575:122362. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122362. DOI

Bouget C., Duelli P. The Effects of Windthrow On Forest Insect Communities: A Literature Review. Biol. Conserv. 2004;118:281–299. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.09.009. DOI