Sequencing BCMA- and GPRC5D-targeting immunotherapies in multiple myeloma: Practical guidance from the European Myeloma Network

. 2025 Nov ; 9 (11) : e70260. [epub] 20251125

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid41306326

The treatment landscape of heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory MM has changed considerably in recent years with the introduction of novel BCMA- and GPRC5D-directed immunotherapies, including CAR T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Treatment selection and sequencing become increasingly complex with the broad range of therapeutic options. In this review, the European Myeloma Network provides recommendations on how to best incorporate these novel therapies into the present treatment landscape using current evidence. The optimal treatment sequence depends on various patient- and tumor-related features, but also reimbursement and availability issues. In addition, mechanisms underlying relapse (e.g., antigen loss, reduced T-cell fitness, or outgrowth of T-cell resistant clones) dictate the efficacy of sequential BCMA- or GPRC5D-directed immunotherapy. BCMA-targeting BsAbs and ADCs should preferably be avoided prior to CAR T-cell therapy, as some studies have shown that these agents negatively influence clinical outcomes after CAR T-cell therapy. Therefore, we recommend the selection of CAR T-cell therapy first, and BsAbs and/or belamaf later in the disease course, if patients are eligible for CAR T-cell therapy and in case CAR T-cell therapy is available within a short time frame. However, bridging therapy with GPRC5D-directed BsAbs (initiation after apheresis) can be considered to significantly reduce tumor burden, because this was shown to improve the efficacy of consecutive BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy. Sequential treatment with agents targeting the same antigen, but with different modes of action, is feasible, but several studies have demonstrated that target switch is a more effective strategy. In addition, there is increasing evidence indicating that the efficacy of sequential use of BsAbs can be improved by creating a BsAb-free interval.

Alfred Health Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

Ankara Liv Hospital Istinye University Ankara Turkey

Cancer Center Amsterdam Cancer Biology and Immunology Amsterdam The Netherlands

Cancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra CIMA IDISNA CIBERONC Pamplona Spain

Cancer Research Center University Hospital of Salamanca IBSAL Salamanca Spain

Clinic of Hematology University Clinical Center of Serbia Medical Faculty University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia

Department of Clinical Therapeutics School of Medicine National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece

Department of Haematology University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom

Department of Hemato Oncology Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic

Department of Hemato Oncology University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic

Department of Hematology Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Hematology and Oncology Interdisciplinary Cancer Center and Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg University of Freiburg Faculty of Freiburg Freiburg Germany

Department of Hematology Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Ankara Turkey

Department of Hematology Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam The Netherlands

Department of Hematology Lille University Hospital and INSERM UMR S1277 and CNRS UMR9020 Lille France

Department of Hematology The Royal Marsden Hospital and Division of Genetics and Epidemiology The Institute of Cancer Research London United Kingdom

Department of Hematology University Hospital Hôtel Dieu Nantes France

Department of Hematology University Hospital Leuven Leuven Belgium

Department of Internal Medicine 2 University Hospital of Würzburg Würzburg Germany

Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology HOCH Health Ostschweiz Cantonal Hospital St Gallen St Gallen Switzerland

Department of Medicine Haematology University of Galway Galway Republic of Ireland

Department of Medicine Korea University Seoul South Korea

Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences University of Torino Torino Italy

Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area Aldo Moro University School of Medicine Bari Italy

Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Università di Bologna Bologna Italy

European Myeloma Network Torino Italy

Heidelberg Myeloma Center Department of Internal Medicine 5 Heidelberg University Hospital and Medical Faculty Heidelberg Germany

Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit AOU Consorziale Policlinico Bari Italy

Hospital Clínic de Barcelona IDIBAPS University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna Istituto di Ematologia Seràgnoli Bologna Italy

Oslo Myeloma Center Department of Hematology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway

Université de Toulouse Centre Hospital Universitaire Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole Toulouse France

University Division of Hematology AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Torino Italy and Department of Biotechnology and Health Sciences University of Torino Italy

Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute 1st Department of Medicine Center for Oncology Hematology and Palliative Care Clinic Ottakring Vienna Austria

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Berdeja JG, Madduri D, Usmani SZ, et al. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, a B‐cell maturation antigen‐directed chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE‐1): a phase 1b/2 open‐label study. Lancet. 2021;398(10297):314‐324. 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00933-8 PubMed DOI

Martin T, Usmani SZ, Berdeja JG, et al. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, an anti‐B‐cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy, for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE‐1 2‐year follow‐up. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(6):1265‐1274. 10.1200/jco.22.00842 PubMed DOI PMC

Lin Y, Martin TG, Usmani SZ, et al. CARTITUDE‐1 final results: phase 1b/2 study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8009. 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.8009 DOI

San‐Miguel J, Dhakal B, Yong K, et al. Cilta‐cel or standard care in lenalidomide‐refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(4):335‐347. 10.1056/NEJMoa2303379 PubMed DOI

Mateos M‐V, San‐Miguel J, Dhakal B, et al. OA‐65 overall survival (OS) with ciltacabtagene autoleucel (Cilta‐cel) versus standard of care (SoC) in lenalidomide (Len)‐refractory multiple myeloma (MM): phase 3 CARTITUDE‐4 study update. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24:S290. 10.1016/S2152-2650(24)02346-2 DOI

Munshi NC, Anderson LD Jr., Shah N, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):705‐716. 10.1056/NEJMoa2024850 PubMed DOI

Ailawadhi S, Arnulf B, Patel K, et al. Ide‐cel vs standard regimens in triple‐class‐exposed relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: updated KarMMa‐3 analyses. Blood. 2024;144(23):2389‐2401. 10.1182/blood.2024024582 PubMed DOI

van de Donk NWCJ, Moreau P, Garfall AL, et al. Long‐term follow‐up from MajesTEC‐1 of teclistamab, a B‐cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8011. 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.8011 DOI

Garfall AL, Nooka AK, van de Donk NWCJ, et al. Long‐term follow‐up from the phase 1/2 MajesTEC‐1 trial of teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(16_suppl):7540. 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.7540 DOI

Tomasson MH, Iida S, Niesvizky R, et al. Long‐term survival and safety of elranatamab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: update from the MagnetisMM‐3 study. HemaSphere. 2024;8(7):e136. 10.1002/hem3.136 PubMed DOI PMC

Shah MR, Richter J, Lee HC, et al. Linvoseltamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: longer follow‐up and selected high‐risk subgroup analyses of the linker‐MM1 study. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):3369. 10.1182/blood-2024-199733 DOI

Chari A, Touzeau C, Schinke C, et al. Safety and activity of talquetamab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MonumenTAL‐1): a multicentre, open‐label, phase 1‐2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2025;12(4):e269‐e281. 10.1016/s2352-3026(24)00385-5 PubMed DOI

Hungria V, Robak P, Hus M, et al. Belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(5):393‐407. 10.1056/NEJMoa2405090 PubMed DOI

Hungria V, Robak P, Hus M, et al. Belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone vs daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: overall survival analysis and updated efficacy outcomes of the phase 3 Dreamm‐7 trial. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):772. 10.1182/blood-2024-200336 DOI

Dimopoulos MA, Beksac M, Pour L, et al. Belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(5):408‐421. 10.1056/NEJMoa2403407 PubMed DOI

Rodriguez‐Otero P, Ailawadhi S, Arnulf B, et al. Ide‐cel or standard regimens in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(11):1002‐1014. 10.1056/NEJMoa2213614 PubMed DOI

Merz M, Albici AM, von Tresckow B, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel or ciltacabtagene autoleucel for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: an international multicenter study. HemaSphere. 2025;9(1):e70070. 10.1002/hem3.70070 PubMed DOI PMC

Hansen DK, Peres LC, Dima D, et al. Comparison of standard‐of‐care idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(13):1597‐1609. 10.1200/jco-24-01730 PubMed DOI PMC

Moreau P, Garfall AL, van de Donk NWCJ, et al. Teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(6):495‐505. 10.1056/NEJMoa2203478 PubMed DOI PMC

Lesokhin AM, Tomasson MH, Arnulf B, et al. Elranatamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: phase 2 MagnetisMM‐3 trial results. Nat Med. 2023;29(9):2259‐2267. 10.1038/s41591-023-02528-9 PubMed DOI PMC

Richter J, Thomas SK, Krishnan AY, et al. Cevostamab in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): updated results from an ongoing phase I study demonstrate clinically meaningful activity and manageable safety and inform the doses and regimen for combination studies. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):1021. 10.1182/blood-2024-199542 DOI

Bumma N, Richter J, Jagannath S, et al. Linvoseltamab for treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(22):2702‐2712. 10.1200/jco.24.01008 PubMed DOI PMC

Lonial S, Lee HC, Badros A, et al. Belantamab mafodotin for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (DREAMM‐2): a two‐arm, randomised, open‐label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(2):207‐221. 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30788-0 PubMed DOI

Terpos E, Trudel S, Mateos MV, et al. Practical guidance on clinical management of belantamab mafodotin‐associated ocular events. Am J Hematol. 2025;100(10):1839‐1850. 10.1002/ajh.70015 PubMed DOI PMC

Dimopoulos MA, Hungria VTM, Radinoff A, et al. Efficacy and safety of single‐agent belantamab mafodotin versus pomalidomide plus low‐dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (DREAMM‐3): a phase 3, open‐label, randomised study. Lancet Haematol. 2023;10(10):e801‐e812. 10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00243-0 PubMed DOI

Duell J, Leipold AM, Appenzeller S, et al. Sequential antigen loss and branching evolution in lymphoma after CD19‐ and CD20‐targeted T‐cell‐redirecting therapy. Blood. 2024;143(8):685‐696. 10.1182/blood.2023021672 PubMed DOI PMC

Lee H, Ahn S, Maity R, et al. Mechanisms of antigen escape from BCMA‐ or GPRC5D‐targeted immunotherapies in multiple myeloma. Nat Med. 2023;29(9):2295‐2306. 10.1038/s41591-023-02491-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Topp MS, Duell J, Zugmaier G, et al. Anti‐B‐cell maturation antigen BiTE molecule AMG 420 induces responses in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(8):775‐783. 10.1200/jco.19.02657 PubMed DOI

Verkleij CPM, O'Neill CA, Broekmans MEC, et al. T‐cell characteristics impact response and resistance to T‐cell‐redirecting bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2024;30(14):3006‐3022. 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-23-3333 PubMed DOI

Mouhieddine TH, Van Oekelen O, Melnekoff DT, et al. Sequencing T‐cell redirection therapies leads to deep and durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma. Blood Adv. 2023;7(6):1056‐1064. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007923 PubMed DOI PMC

Riedhammer C, Bassermann F, Besemer B, et al. Real‐world analysis of teclistamab in 123 RRMM patients from Germany. Leukemia. 2024;38(2):365‐371. 10.1038/s41375-024-02154-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Nooka AK, Lesokhin AM, Mohty M, et al. Efficacy and safety of elranatamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and prior B‐cell maturation antigen (BCMA)‐directed therapies: a pooled analysis from MagnetisMM studies. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8008. 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.8008 DOI

Cohen AD, Mateos MV, Cohen YC, et al. Efficacy and safety of cilta‐cel in patients with progressive multiple myeloma after exposure to other BCMA‐targeting agents. Blood. 2023;141(3):219‐230. 10.1182/blood.2022015526 PubMed DOI PMC

Sidana S, Patel KK, Peres LC, et al. Safety and efficacy of standard‐of‐care ciltacabtagene autoleucel for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2025;145(1):85‐97. 10.1182/blood.2024025945 PubMed DOI PMC

Ferreri CJ, Hildebrandt MAT, Hashmi H, et al. Real‐world experience of patients with multiple myeloma receiving ide‐cel after a prior BCMA‐targeted therapy. Blood Cancer J. 2023;13(1):117. 10.1038/s41408-023-00886-8 PubMed DOI PMC

Sidana S, Ahmed N, Akhtar OS, et al. Standard‐of‐care idecabtagene vicleucel for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2025;146(2):167‐177. 10.1182/blood.2024026216 PubMed DOI

Gagelmann N, Dima D, Merz M, et al. Development and validation of a prediction model of outcome after B‐cell maturation antigen‐directed chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(14):1665‐1675. 10.1200/jco.23.02232 PubMed DOI PMC

Ferment B, Lambert J, Caillot D, et al. French early nationwide idecabtagene vicleucel chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy experience in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (FENIX): a real‐world IFM study from the DESCAR‐T registry. Br J Haematol. 2024;205(3):990‐998. 10.1111/bjh.19505 PubMed DOI

Hashmi H, Hansen DK, Peres LC, et al. Factors associated with refractoriness or early progression after idecabtagene vicleucel in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: US Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium real world experience. Haematologica. 2020;109(5):1514‐1524. 10.3324/haematol.2023.283888 PubMed DOI PMC

Afrough A, Hashmi H, Hansen DK, et al. Real‐world impact of bridging therapy on outcomes of ide‐cel for myeloma in the U.S. Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium. Blood Cancer J. 2024;14(1):63. 10.1038/s41408-024-00993-0 PubMed DOI PMC

Freeman CL, Noble J, Menges M, et al. Tumor burden quantified by soluble B‐cell maturation antigen and metabolic tumor volume determines myeloma CAR‐T outcomes. Blood. 2025;145(15):1645‐1657. 10.1182/blood.2024024965 PubMed DOI

Mohan Lal B, Alzubi M, Alrawabdeh J, et al. Prior exposure to belantamab mafodotin influences outcomes with idecabtagene vicleucel in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2025;9(9):2155‐2158. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015648 PubMed DOI PMC

Magen H, Fried S, Itzhaki O, et al. P889: point‐of‐care anti‐BCMA CAR T‐cell therapy induces encouraging response rates in high‐risk relapse/refractory multiple myeloma. HemaSphere. 2023;7(S3):e94543ab. 10.1097/01.HS9.0000970460.94543.ab DOI

Cowan AJ, Pont MJ, Sather BD, et al. γ‐Secretase inhibitor in combination with BCMA chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell immunotherapy for individuals with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a phase 1, first‐in‐human trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(7):811‐822. 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00246-2 PubMed DOI PMC

Firestone RS, Socci ND, Shekarkhand T, et al. Antigen escape as a shared mechanism of resistance to BCMA‐directed therapies in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2024;144(4):402‐407. 10.1182/blood.2023023557 PubMed DOI PMC

Marvel D, Choudhary G, Song Q, et al. Preclinical analysis of ciltacabtagene autoleucel combination strategies with T cell bispecifics and daratumumab to support optimization of clinical benefit in myeloma patients. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):7167. 10.1182/blood-2024-211334 DOI

van de Donk NWCJ, Moreau P, San‐Miguel JF, et al. Optimising T‐cell immunotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma: practical considerations from the European Myeloma Network. The Lancet Haematology. 2025;12(8):e635‐e649. 10.1016/s2352-3026(25)00117-6 PubMed DOI

Touzeau C, Krishnan AY, Moreau P, et al. Efficacy and safety of teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after BCMA‐targeting therapies. Blood. 2024;144(23):2375‐2388. 10.1182/blood.2023023616 PubMed DOI

Krishnan A, Costa L, Schinke C, et al. P‐023 Talquetamab, a G protein–coupled receptor family C group 5 member D × CD3 bispecific antibody, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: efficacy and safety of patient subgroups from monumenTAL‐1. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023;23:S45‐S46. 10.1016/S2152-2650(23)01641-5 DOI

Dima D, Davis JA, Ahmed N, et al. Safety and efficacy of teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a real‐world experience. Transpl Cell Ther. 2024;30(3):308.e1‐308.e13. 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.12.016 PubMed DOI

Reyes KR, Liu YC, Huang CY, et al. Salvage therapies including retreatment with BCMA‐directed approaches after BCMA CAR‐T relapses for multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2024;8(9):2207‐2216. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012066 PubMed DOI PMC

Bansal R, De Menezes Silva Corraes A, Brunaldi L, et al. Real world outcome of patients with multiple myeloma who received bispecific antibodies after CAR‐T therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(16_suppl):7520. 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.7520 DOI

Dima D, Vazquez‐Martinez MA, Davis JA, et al. Outcomes of Teclistamab (Tec) in patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) with prior exposure to BCMA‐directed therapy (BCMA‐DT): a multicenter study from the U.S. Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):897. 10.1182/blood-2024-203409 DOI

Mohan M, Monge J, Shah N, et al. Teclistamab in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma: multi‐institutional real‐world study. Blood Cancer J. 2024;14(1):35. 10.1038/s41408-024-01003-z PubMed DOI PMC

Perrot A, Hulin C, Boumendil A, et al. Teclistamab in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma: a multi‐institutional real‐world study from the French early access program. Haematologica. 2025;110(4):990‐994. 10.3324/haematol.2024.286118 PubMed DOI PMC

Razzo BM, Midha S, Portuguese AJ, et al. Real‐world experience with teclistamab for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma from the U.S. Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium. Blood Cancer Discovery. 2025;6:561‐571. 10.1158/2643-3230.Bcd-24-0354 PubMed DOI

Hultcrantz M, Derkach A, Hassoun H, et al. Belantamab mafodotin in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a real‐world experience. Blood Neoplasia. 2025;2(3):100103. 10.1016/j.bneo.2025.100103 PubMed DOI PMC

Browning S, Li F, Parker TL, et al. Open‐label, single‐arm phase Ib/II study of immune combination therapy with elotuzumab and belantamab mafodotin in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(16_suppl):7559. 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.7559 DOI

Vaxman I, Abeykoon J, Dispenzieri A, et al. “Real‐life” data of the efficacy and safety of belantamab mafodotin in relapsed multiple myeloma—the Mayo Clinic experience. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(12):196. 10.1038/s41408-021-00592-3 PubMed DOI PMC

Mi JQ, Zhao W, Jing H, et al. Phase II, open‐label study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel, an anti‐B‐cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor‐T‐cell therapy, in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (CARTIFAN‐1). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(6):1275‐1284. 10.1200/jco.22.00690 PubMed DOI

Wang Y, Cao J, Gu W, et al. Long‐term follow‐up of combination of B‐cell maturation antigen and cd19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(20):2246‐2256. 10.1200/jco.21.01676 PubMed DOI

Wang D, Wang J, Hu G, et al. A phase 1 study of a novel fully human BCMA‐targeting CAR (CT103A) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2021;137(21):2890‐2901. 10.1182/blood.2020008936 PubMed DOI

Mobascher P, Engelhardt M, Wäsch R. Successful sequential application of CAR T‐cell‐therapies in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol. 2025;104(3):2055‐2058. 10.1007/s00277-025-06340-y PubMed DOI PMC

Dholaria B, Kocoglu M, Andrew K, et al. OA‐04 A phase 1 study of P‐BCMA‐ ALLO1, a non‐viral, allogeneic BCMA directed CAR‐T in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24:S3. 10.1016/S2152-2650(24)01845-7 DOI

Samur MK, Fulciniti M, Aktas Samur A, et al. Biallelic loss of BCMA as a resistance mechanism to CAR T cell therapy in a patient with multiple myeloma. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):868. 10.1038/s41467-021-21177-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Da Vià MC, Dietrich O, Truger M, et al. Homozygous PubMed DOI

Ye JC, Schinke C, Touzeau C, et al. P‐098 long‐term efficacy and safety results from the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL‐1 study of talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24:S99. 10.1016/S2152-2650(24)02001-9 DOI

Jakubowiak AJ, Anguille S, Karlin L, et al. Updated results of talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with prior exposure to T‐cell redirecting therapies: results of the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL‐1 study. Blood. 2023;142(Suppl 1):3377. 10.1182/blood-2023-187242 DOI

Merz M, Dima D, Hashmi H, et al. Bispecific antibodies targeting BCMA or GPRC5D are highly effective in relapsed myeloma after CAR T‐cell therapy. Blood Cancer J. 2024;14(1):214. 10.1038/s41408-024-01197-2 PubMed DOI PMC

Puertas B, Fernández‐Sánchez A, Alejo E, et al. A research center's experience of T‐cell‐redirecting therapies in triple‐class refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2024;8(13):3478‐3487. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024012773 PubMed DOI PMC

Frenking JH, Riedhammer C, Teipel R, et al. A German multicenter real‐world analysis of talquetamab in 138 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. HemaSphere. 2025;9(4):e70114. 10.1002/hem3.70114 PubMed DOI PMC

Kumar S, Berdeja J, Sborov D, et al. CEVOSTAMAB in patients with RRMM who are triple‐classrefractory and have received a prior BCMA‐targeted ADC or CAR T‐cell: initial results from the phase I/II CAMMA 2 study. HemaSphere. 2024;8(S1):236‐237.

Delforge M, Richter J, Cohen YC, et al. Biomarker correlates and clinical activity of cevostamab in patients (pts) with triple‐class refractory multiple myeloma (MM) who have received ≥1 prior B‐cell maturation antigen (BCMA)‐targeted bispecific antibody (BsAb): results from the phase I/II CAMMA 2 study. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):4732. 10.1182/blood-2024-199519 DOI

Cohen AD, Hwang W‐T, Susanibar‐Adaniya S, et al. Sequential T‐cell engagement for myeloma (“STEM”) Trial: a phase 2 study of cevostamab consolidation following BCMA CAR T cell therapy. Blood. 2023;142(Suppl 1):3389. 10.1182/blood-2023-187409 DOI

Fandrei D, Seiffert S, Rade M, et al. Bispecific antibodies as bridging to BCMA CAR‐T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer Discovery. 2025;6(1):38‐54. 10.1158/2643-3230.Bcd-24-0118 PubMed DOI PMC

Vucinic V, Fandrei D, Kirchberg J, et al. Cellular composition and clinical factors influencing manufacturing outcomes for anti‐BCMA CAR T cell therapy in a large real‐world cohort of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):2094. 10.1182/blood-2024-207117 DOI

Dhakal B, Akhtar OS, Fandrei D, et al. Sequential targeting in multiple myeloma: talquetamab, a GPRC5D bispecific antibody, as a bridge to BCMA CAR‐T therapy. Blood. 2025;146:2063‐2072. 10.1182/blood.2025029773 PubMed DOI

Vishwamitra D, Skerget S, Cortes D, et al. Pharmacodynamic signatures and correlatives of response in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) treated with talquetamab or teclistamab plus daratumumab and pomalidomide. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):594. 10.1182/blood-2024-200300 DOI

Friedrich MJ, Neri P, Kehl N, et al. The pre‐existing T cell landscape determines the response to bispecific T cell engagers in multiple myeloma patients. Cancer Cell. 2023;41(4):711‐725. 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.02.008 PubMed DOI

Waldschmidt J, Fandrei D, Vucinic V, et al. Efficacy of anti‐BCMA CAR‐T cell therapies in multiple myeloma patients with prior exposure to bispecific antibodies—results from a retrospective multi‐center registry analysis. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):2007. 10.1182/blood-2024-210451 DOI

Godby K, Bal S, Giri S, et al. P‐026 combined GPRC5D and BCMA‐targeted T‐cell redirecting therapy in the treatment of RRMM. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24:S55‐S56. 10.1016/S2152-2650(24)01929-3 DOI

Grajales‐cruz A, Graeter A, Hansen D, et al. P‐027 real world experience of standard of care talquetamab in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24:S56. 10.1016/S2152-2650(24)01930-X DOI

Rejeski K, Hansen DK, Cordas Dos Santos DM, et al. Pre‐apheresis prediction of toxicity and response in patients receiving BCMA‐directed CAR‐T for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):895. 10.1182/blood-2024-208376 DOI

Rytlewski J, Fuller J, Mertz DR, et al. Correlative analysis to define patient profiles associated with manufacturing and clinical endpoints in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients treated with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide‐cel; bb2121), an anti‐BCMA CAR T cell therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):8021. 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.8021 DOI

Einsele H, Rodriguez‐Otero P, Arnulf B, et al. P‐008 Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide‐cel) vs standard regimens in triple‐class–exposed (TCE) relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): KarMMa‐3 subgroup analysis in patients receiving bridging therapy. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023;23:S37. 10.1016/S2152-2650(23)01626-9 DOI

Anguille S, Leleu X, Gatt M, et al. P‐005 effectiveness of bridging therapy corresponds to improved outcomes after receiving CAR‐T therapy: phase 3 CARTITUDE‐4 study of patients with relapsed, lenalidomide‐refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24:S42‐S43. 10.1016/S2152-2650(24)01908-6 DOI

Sanchez L, Schinke C, Krishnan A, et al. Clinical outcomes of subsequent therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma following talquetamab treatment: analyses from the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL‐1 study. Blood. 2023;142(Suppl 1):2007. 10.1182/blood-2023-182330 DOI

Harrison S, Riley CH, Manier S, et al. OA‐05 efficacy of forimtamig, a GPRC5DxCD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): analysis of patient and disease‐related factors associated with responses. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023;23:S3‐S4. 10.1016/S2152-2650(23)01572-0 DOI

Trudel S, Cohen AD, Krishnan AY, et al. Cevostamab monotherapy continues to show clinically meaningful activity and manageable safety in patients with heavily pre‐treated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): updated results from an ongoing phase I study. Blood. 2021;138(Suppl 1):157. 10.1182/blood-2021-147983 DOI

Aleman A, Kogan Zajdman A, Ghodke‐Puranik Y, et al. Salvage with sequential T cell redirection for myeloma patients who have previously progressed on T cell directed therapy is associated with significant cellular activation of the immune microenvironment. Blood. 2022;140(Suppl 1):4193‐4195. 10.1182/blood-2022-169538 DOI

Shekarkhand T, Nemirovsky D, Derkach A, et al. Real‐world analysis of talquetamab in heavily pretreated and high‐risk patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). HemaSphere. 2025;9(S1):3056‐3057.

Amatangelo M, Flynt E, Stong N, et al. Pharmacodynamic changes in tumor and immune cells drive iberdomide's clinical mechanisms of activity in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Cell Rep Med. 2024;5(6):101571. 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101571 PubMed DOI PMC

Bahlis NJ, van de Donk N, Reece D, et al. OA‐01 talquetamab (tal) + daratumumab (dara) + pomalidomide (pom) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): results from the phase 1b TRIMM‐2 study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24:S1. 10.1016/S2152-2650(24)01842-1 DOI

Dholaria BR, Weisel K, Mateos M‐V, et al. Talquetamab (tal) + daratumumab (dara) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): updated TRIMM‐2 results. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8003. 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.8003 DOI

Perrot A, Touzeau C, Rodriguez‐Otero P, et al. Talquetamab + cetrelimab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Initial safety and efficacy results from the phase 1B TRIMM‐3 study. HemaSphere. 2025;9(S1):233‐234.

Paiva B, Gaffney B, Burnett K, et al. Synergistic antitumor activity of alnuctamab (ALNUC; BMS‐986349; CC‐93269), a BCMA 2+1 T cell engager (TCE), and celmod agents in multiple myeloma (MM) preclinical models. Blood. 2022;140(Suppl 1):7054‐7055. 10.1182/blood-2022-157987 DOI

Olson K, DiLillo D, Sineshchekova O, et al. A CD38xCD28 costimulatory bispecific antibody demonstrates potent preclinical combinatorial activity with a BCMAxCD3 T cell‐engager. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):3283. 10.1182/blood-2024-194830 DOI

Hungria V, Hus M, Zherebtsova V, et al. DREAMM‐7 study of belantamab mafodotin + bortezomib + dexamethasone vs daratumumab + bortezomib + dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: efficacy in paytients by subsequent therapy. HemaSphere. 2025;9(S1):2982‐2983.

Mailankody S, Devlin SM, Landa J, et al. GPRC5D‐targeted CAR T cells for myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(13):1196‐1206. 10.1056/NEJMoa2209900 PubMed DOI PMC

Bal S, Htut M, Nadeem O, et al. BMS‐986393 (CC‐95266), a G protein‐coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D)‐targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): updated results from a phase 1 study. Blood. 2023;142(Suppl 1):219. 10.1182/blood-2023-181857 DOI

Zhang M, Wei G, Zhou L, et al. GPRC5D CAR T cells (OriCAR‐017) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (POLARIS): a first‐in‐human, single‐centre, single‐arm, phase 1 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2023;10(2):e107‐e116. 10.1016/s2352-3026(22)00372-6 PubMed DOI

Xia J, Li H, Yan Z, et al. Anti‐G protein‐coupled receptor, class C group 5 member D chimeric antigen receptor T cells in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a single‐arm, phase Ⅱ trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(14):2583‐2593. 10.1200/jco.22.01824 PubMed DOI PMC

Huang H, Hu Y, Zhang M, et al. Phase I open‐label single‐arm study of GPRC5D CAR T‐cells (OriCAR‐017) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (POLARIS). J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):8004. 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.8004 DOI

Jurgens EM, Firestone RS, Chaudhari J, et al. Phase I trial of MCARH109, a G protein‐coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D)‐targeted chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy for multiple myeloma: an updated analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(5):498‐504. 10.1200/jco-24-01785 PubMed DOI PMC

Bal S, Anderson LD Jr., Nadeem O, et al. Efficacy and safety with extended follow‐up in a phase 1 study of BMS‐986393, a G protein‐coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D)‐targeted CAR T cell therapy, in patients (pts) with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM). Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):922. 10.1182/blood-2024-201356 DOI

Xia J, Sun Q, Zhou D, et al. Anti‐GPRC5D CAR T‐cell therapy as a salvage treatment in patients with progressive multiple myeloma after anti‐BCMA CAR T‐cell therapy: a single‐centre, single‐arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2025;12(5):e365‐e375. 10.1016/s2352-3026(25)00048-1 PubMed DOI

Dimopoulos MA, Terpos E, Boccadoro M, et al. EHA‐EMN evidence‐based guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up of patients with multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025;22(9):680‐700. 10.1038/s41571-025-01041-x PubMed DOI

Steinhardt MJ, Schaefers C, Leypoldt LB, et al. Activity of CAR‐T cells and bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma with extramedullary involvement. Blood Cancer J. 2025;15(1):126. 10.1038/s41408-025-01330-9 PubMed DOI PMC

van de Donk NWCJ, Zweegman S. BCMA‐directed therapy for early relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2024;21(10):707‐708. 10.1038/s41571-024-00927-6 PubMed DOI

Manteca M‐VM, Jakubowiak A, Einsele H, et al. P‐050 talquetamab vs real‐world physician's choice in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and prior B‐cell maturation antigen therapy: analyses of monumenTAL‐1 vs LocoMMotion/MoMMent. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24:S69‐S70. 10.1016/S2152-2650(24)01953-0 DOI

Van Oekelen O, Nath K, Mouhieddine TH, et al. Interventions and outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma receiving salvage therapy after BCMA‐directed CAR T therapy. Blood. 2023;141(7):756‐765. 10.1182/blood.2022017848 PubMed DOI PMC

van de Donk NWCJ, Chari A, Mateos MV. Mechanisms of resistance against T‐cell engaging bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma: implications for novel treatment strategies. Lancet Haematol. 2024;11(9):e693‐e707. 10.1016/s2352-3026(24)00186-8 PubMed DOI

Du J, Fu W‐J, Jiang H, et al. Updated results of a phase I, open‐label study of BCMA/CD19 dual‐targeting fast CAR‐T GC012F for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8005. 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.8005 DOI

Frigault MJ, Bishop MR, Rosenblatt J, et al. Phase 1 study of CART‐ddBCMA for the treatment of subjects with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2023;7(5):768‐777. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007210 PubMed DOI PMC

Zamagni E, Silzle T, Špička I, et al. Phase 3 study of teclistamab (Tec) in combination with lenalidomide (Len) and Tec alone versus Len alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) as maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT): safety run‐in (SRI) results from the majestec‐4/EMN30 trial. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):494. 10.1182/blood-2024-205608 DOI

van de Donk NWCJ, Rasche L, Sidana S, Zweegman S, Garfall AL. T cell‐redirecting bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma: optimal dosing schedule and duration of treatment. Blood Cancer Discovery. 2024;5(6):388‐399. 10.1158/2643-3230.Bcd-24-0124 PubMed DOI PMC

Raab MS, Weinhold N, Kortüm KM, et al. Phase 2 study of teclistamab‐based induction regimens in patients with transplant‐eligible (TE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): results from the GMMG‐HD10/DSMM‐XX (MajesTEC‐5) Trial. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):493. 10.1182/blood-2024-206003 DOI

van de Donk NWCJ, Vega G, Perrot A, et al. First‐in‐human study of JNJ‐79635322 (JNJ‐5322), a novel, next‐generation trispecific antibody (TsAb), in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Initial phase 1 results. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(16_suppl):7505. 10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.7505 DOI

Cohen YC, Magen H, Gatt M, et al. Talquetamab plus teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(2):138‐149. 10.1056/NEJMoa2406536 PubMed DOI

Fernández de Larrea C, Staehr M, Lopez AV, et al. Defining an optimal dual‐targeted CAR T‐cell therapy approach simultaneously targeting BCMA and GPRC5D to prevent BCMA escape–driven relapse in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer Discovery. 2020;1(2):146‐154. 10.1158/2643-3230.Bcd-20-0020 PubMed DOI PMC

Lichtman EI, Khot A, Augustson B, et al. Phase 1, first‐in‐human study of ISB 2001: a BCMAxCD38xCD3‐targeting trispecific antibody for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)—dose escalation (DE) results. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(16_suppl):7514. 10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.7514 DOI

Lim S‐L, Augustson B, Mian HS, et al. A phase I/II study of AZD0305, a novel antibody‐drug conjugate (ADC) targeting GPRC5D, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):2000.2. 10.1182/blood-2024-207816 DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...