Sequencing BCMA- and GPRC5D-targeting immunotherapies in multiple myeloma: Practical guidance from the European Myeloma Network
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
41306326
PubMed Central
PMC12645799
DOI
10.1002/hem3.70260
PII: HEM370260
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The treatment landscape of heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory MM has changed considerably in recent years with the introduction of novel BCMA- and GPRC5D-directed immunotherapies, including CAR T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Treatment selection and sequencing become increasingly complex with the broad range of therapeutic options. In this review, the European Myeloma Network provides recommendations on how to best incorporate these novel therapies into the present treatment landscape using current evidence. The optimal treatment sequence depends on various patient- and tumor-related features, but also reimbursement and availability issues. In addition, mechanisms underlying relapse (e.g., antigen loss, reduced T-cell fitness, or outgrowth of T-cell resistant clones) dictate the efficacy of sequential BCMA- or GPRC5D-directed immunotherapy. BCMA-targeting BsAbs and ADCs should preferably be avoided prior to CAR T-cell therapy, as some studies have shown that these agents negatively influence clinical outcomes after CAR T-cell therapy. Therefore, we recommend the selection of CAR T-cell therapy first, and BsAbs and/or belamaf later in the disease course, if patients are eligible for CAR T-cell therapy and in case CAR T-cell therapy is available within a short time frame. However, bridging therapy with GPRC5D-directed BsAbs (initiation after apheresis) can be considered to significantly reduce tumor burden, because this was shown to improve the efficacy of consecutive BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy. Sequential treatment with agents targeting the same antigen, but with different modes of action, is feasible, but several studies have demonstrated that target switch is a more effective strategy. In addition, there is increasing evidence indicating that the efficacy of sequential use of BsAbs can be improved by creating a BsAb-free interval.
Alfred Health Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia
Ankara Liv Hospital Istinye University Ankara Turkey
Cancer Center Amsterdam Cancer Biology and Immunology Amsterdam The Netherlands
Cancer Center Clinica Universidad de Navarra CIMA IDISNA CIBERONC Pamplona Spain
Cancer Research Center University Hospital of Salamanca IBSAL Salamanca Spain
Department of Hemato Oncology Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Department of Hemato Oncology University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Department of Hematology Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
Department of Hematology Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Ankara Turkey
Department of Hematology Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam The Netherlands
Department of Hematology University Hospital Hôtel Dieu Nantes France
Department of Hematology University Hospital Leuven Leuven Belgium
Department of Internal Medicine 2 University Hospital of Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Department of Medicine Haematology University of Galway Galway Republic of Ireland
Department of Medicine Korea University Seoul South Korea
Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences University of Torino Torino Italy
Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Università di Bologna Bologna Italy
European Myeloma Network Torino Italy
Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit AOU Consorziale Policlinico Bari Italy
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona IDIBAPS University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna Istituto di Ematologia Seràgnoli Bologna Italy
Oslo Myeloma Center Department of Hematology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Berdeja JG, Madduri D, Usmani SZ, et al. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, a B‐cell maturation antigen‐directed chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE‐1): a phase 1b/2 open‐label study. Lancet. 2021;398(10297):314‐324. 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00933-8 PubMed DOI
Martin T, Usmani SZ, Berdeja JG, et al. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, an anti‐B‐cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy, for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE‐1 2‐year follow‐up. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(6):1265‐1274. 10.1200/jco.22.00842 PubMed DOI PMC
Lin Y, Martin TG, Usmani SZ, et al. CARTITUDE‐1 final results: phase 1b/2 study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8009. 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.8009 DOI
San‐Miguel J, Dhakal B, Yong K, et al. Cilta‐cel or standard care in lenalidomide‐refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(4):335‐347. 10.1056/NEJMoa2303379 PubMed DOI
Mateos M‐V, San‐Miguel J, Dhakal B, et al. OA‐65 overall survival (OS) with ciltacabtagene autoleucel (Cilta‐cel) versus standard of care (SoC) in lenalidomide (Len)‐refractory multiple myeloma (MM): phase 3 CARTITUDE‐4 study update. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24:S290. 10.1016/S2152-2650(24)02346-2 DOI
Munshi NC, Anderson LD Jr., Shah N, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):705‐716. 10.1056/NEJMoa2024850 PubMed DOI
Ailawadhi S, Arnulf B, Patel K, et al. Ide‐cel vs standard regimens in triple‐class‐exposed relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: updated KarMMa‐3 analyses. Blood. 2024;144(23):2389‐2401. 10.1182/blood.2024024582 PubMed DOI
van de Donk NWCJ, Moreau P, Garfall AL, et al. Long‐term follow‐up from MajesTEC‐1 of teclistamab, a B‐cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8011. 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.8011 DOI
Garfall AL, Nooka AK, van de Donk NWCJ, et al. Long‐term follow‐up from the phase 1/2 MajesTEC‐1 trial of teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(16_suppl):7540. 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.7540 DOI
Tomasson MH, Iida S, Niesvizky R, et al. Long‐term survival and safety of elranatamab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: update from the MagnetisMM‐3 study. HemaSphere. 2024;8(7):e136. 10.1002/hem3.136 PubMed DOI PMC
Shah MR, Richter J, Lee HC, et al. Linvoseltamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: longer follow‐up and selected high‐risk subgroup analyses of the linker‐MM1 study. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):3369. 10.1182/blood-2024-199733 DOI
Chari A, Touzeau C, Schinke C, et al. Safety and activity of talquetamab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MonumenTAL‐1): a multicentre, open‐label, phase 1‐2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2025;12(4):e269‐e281. 10.1016/s2352-3026(24)00385-5 PubMed DOI
Hungria V, Robak P, Hus M, et al. Belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(5):393‐407. 10.1056/NEJMoa2405090 PubMed DOI
Hungria V, Robak P, Hus M, et al. Belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone vs daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: overall survival analysis and updated efficacy outcomes of the phase 3 Dreamm‐7 trial. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):772. 10.1182/blood-2024-200336 DOI
Dimopoulos MA, Beksac M, Pour L, et al. Belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(5):408‐421. 10.1056/NEJMoa2403407 PubMed DOI
Rodriguez‐Otero P, Ailawadhi S, Arnulf B, et al. Ide‐cel or standard regimens in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(11):1002‐1014. 10.1056/NEJMoa2213614 PubMed DOI
Merz M, Albici AM, von Tresckow B, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel or ciltacabtagene autoleucel for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: an international multicenter study. HemaSphere. 2025;9(1):e70070. 10.1002/hem3.70070 PubMed DOI PMC
Hansen DK, Peres LC, Dima D, et al. Comparison of standard‐of‐care idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(13):1597‐1609. 10.1200/jco-24-01730 PubMed DOI PMC
Moreau P, Garfall AL, van de Donk NWCJ, et al. Teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(6):495‐505. 10.1056/NEJMoa2203478 PubMed DOI PMC
Lesokhin AM, Tomasson MH, Arnulf B, et al. Elranatamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: phase 2 MagnetisMM‐3 trial results. Nat Med. 2023;29(9):2259‐2267. 10.1038/s41591-023-02528-9 PubMed DOI PMC
Richter J, Thomas SK, Krishnan AY, et al. Cevostamab in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): updated results from an ongoing phase I study demonstrate clinically meaningful activity and manageable safety and inform the doses and regimen for combination studies. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):1021. 10.1182/blood-2024-199542 DOI
Bumma N, Richter J, Jagannath S, et al. Linvoseltamab for treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(22):2702‐2712. 10.1200/jco.24.01008 PubMed DOI PMC
Lonial S, Lee HC, Badros A, et al. Belantamab mafodotin for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (DREAMM‐2): a two‐arm, randomised, open‐label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(2):207‐221. 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30788-0 PubMed DOI
Terpos E, Trudel S, Mateos MV, et al. Practical guidance on clinical management of belantamab mafodotin‐associated ocular events. Am J Hematol. 2025;100(10):1839‐1850. 10.1002/ajh.70015 PubMed DOI PMC
Dimopoulos MA, Hungria VTM, Radinoff A, et al. Efficacy and safety of single‐agent belantamab mafodotin versus pomalidomide plus low‐dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (DREAMM‐3): a phase 3, open‐label, randomised study. Lancet Haematol. 2023;10(10):e801‐e812. 10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00243-0 PubMed DOI
Duell J, Leipold AM, Appenzeller S, et al. Sequential antigen loss and branching evolution in lymphoma after CD19‐ and CD20‐targeted T‐cell‐redirecting therapy. Blood. 2024;143(8):685‐696. 10.1182/blood.2023021672 PubMed DOI PMC
Lee H, Ahn S, Maity R, et al. Mechanisms of antigen escape from BCMA‐ or GPRC5D‐targeted immunotherapies in multiple myeloma. Nat Med. 2023;29(9):2295‐2306. 10.1038/s41591-023-02491-5 PubMed DOI PMC
Topp MS, Duell J, Zugmaier G, et al. Anti‐B‐cell maturation antigen BiTE molecule AMG 420 induces responses in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(8):775‐783. 10.1200/jco.19.02657 PubMed DOI
Verkleij CPM, O'Neill CA, Broekmans MEC, et al. T‐cell characteristics impact response and resistance to T‐cell‐redirecting bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2024;30(14):3006‐3022. 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-23-3333 PubMed DOI
Mouhieddine TH, Van Oekelen O, Melnekoff DT, et al. Sequencing T‐cell redirection therapies leads to deep and durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma. Blood Adv. 2023;7(6):1056‐1064. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007923 PubMed DOI PMC
Riedhammer C, Bassermann F, Besemer B, et al. Real‐world analysis of teclistamab in 123 RRMM patients from Germany. Leukemia. 2024;38(2):365‐371. 10.1038/s41375-024-02154-5 PubMed DOI PMC
Nooka AK, Lesokhin AM, Mohty M, et al. Efficacy and safety of elranatamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and prior B‐cell maturation antigen (BCMA)‐directed therapies: a pooled analysis from MagnetisMM studies. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8008. 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.8008 DOI
Cohen AD, Mateos MV, Cohen YC, et al. Efficacy and safety of cilta‐cel in patients with progressive multiple myeloma after exposure to other BCMA‐targeting agents. Blood. 2023;141(3):219‐230. 10.1182/blood.2022015526 PubMed DOI PMC
Sidana S, Patel KK, Peres LC, et al. Safety and efficacy of standard‐of‐care ciltacabtagene autoleucel for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2025;145(1):85‐97. 10.1182/blood.2024025945 PubMed DOI PMC
Ferreri CJ, Hildebrandt MAT, Hashmi H, et al. Real‐world experience of patients with multiple myeloma receiving ide‐cel after a prior BCMA‐targeted therapy. Blood Cancer J. 2023;13(1):117. 10.1038/s41408-023-00886-8 PubMed DOI PMC
Sidana S, Ahmed N, Akhtar OS, et al. Standard‐of‐care idecabtagene vicleucel for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2025;146(2):167‐177. 10.1182/blood.2024026216 PubMed DOI
Gagelmann N, Dima D, Merz M, et al. Development and validation of a prediction model of outcome after B‐cell maturation antigen‐directed chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(14):1665‐1675. 10.1200/jco.23.02232 PubMed DOI PMC
Ferment B, Lambert J, Caillot D, et al. French early nationwide idecabtagene vicleucel chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy experience in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (FENIX): a real‐world IFM study from the DESCAR‐T registry. Br J Haematol. 2024;205(3):990‐998. 10.1111/bjh.19505 PubMed DOI
Hashmi H, Hansen DK, Peres LC, et al. Factors associated with refractoriness or early progression after idecabtagene vicleucel in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: US Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium real world experience. Haematologica. 2020;109(5):1514‐1524. 10.3324/haematol.2023.283888 PubMed DOI PMC
Afrough A, Hashmi H, Hansen DK, et al. Real‐world impact of bridging therapy on outcomes of ide‐cel for myeloma in the U.S. Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium. Blood Cancer J. 2024;14(1):63. 10.1038/s41408-024-00993-0 PubMed DOI PMC
Freeman CL, Noble J, Menges M, et al. Tumor burden quantified by soluble B‐cell maturation antigen and metabolic tumor volume determines myeloma CAR‐T outcomes. Blood. 2025;145(15):1645‐1657. 10.1182/blood.2024024965 PubMed DOI
Mohan Lal B, Alzubi M, Alrawabdeh J, et al. Prior exposure to belantamab mafodotin influences outcomes with idecabtagene vicleucel in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2025;9(9):2155‐2158. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015648 PubMed DOI PMC
Magen H, Fried S, Itzhaki O, et al. P889: point‐of‐care anti‐BCMA CAR T‐cell therapy induces encouraging response rates in high‐risk relapse/refractory multiple myeloma. HemaSphere. 2023;7(S3):e94543ab. 10.1097/01.HS9.0000970460.94543.ab DOI
Cowan AJ, Pont MJ, Sather BD, et al. γ‐Secretase inhibitor in combination with BCMA chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell immunotherapy for individuals with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a phase 1, first‐in‐human trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(7):811‐822. 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00246-2 PubMed DOI PMC
Firestone RS, Socci ND, Shekarkhand T, et al. Antigen escape as a shared mechanism of resistance to BCMA‐directed therapies in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2024;144(4):402‐407. 10.1182/blood.2023023557 PubMed DOI PMC
Marvel D, Choudhary G, Song Q, et al. Preclinical analysis of ciltacabtagene autoleucel combination strategies with T cell bispecifics and daratumumab to support optimization of clinical benefit in myeloma patients. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):7167. 10.1182/blood-2024-211334 DOI
van de Donk NWCJ, Moreau P, San‐Miguel JF, et al. Optimising T‐cell immunotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma: practical considerations from the European Myeloma Network. The Lancet Haematology. 2025;12(8):e635‐e649. 10.1016/s2352-3026(25)00117-6 PubMed DOI
Touzeau C, Krishnan AY, Moreau P, et al. Efficacy and safety of teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after BCMA‐targeting therapies. Blood. 2024;144(23):2375‐2388. 10.1182/blood.2023023616 PubMed DOI
Krishnan A, Costa L, Schinke C, et al. P‐023 Talquetamab, a G protein–coupled receptor family C group 5 member D × CD3 bispecific antibody, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: efficacy and safety of patient subgroups from monumenTAL‐1. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023;23:S45‐S46. 10.1016/S2152-2650(23)01641-5 DOI
Dima D, Davis JA, Ahmed N, et al. Safety and efficacy of teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a real‐world experience. Transpl Cell Ther. 2024;30(3):308.e1‐308.e13. 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.12.016 PubMed DOI
Reyes KR, Liu YC, Huang CY, et al. Salvage therapies including retreatment with BCMA‐directed approaches after BCMA CAR‐T relapses for multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2024;8(9):2207‐2216. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012066 PubMed DOI PMC
Bansal R, De Menezes Silva Corraes A, Brunaldi L, et al. Real world outcome of patients with multiple myeloma who received bispecific antibodies after CAR‐T therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(16_suppl):7520. 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.7520 DOI
Dima D, Vazquez‐Martinez MA, Davis JA, et al. Outcomes of Teclistamab (Tec) in patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) with prior exposure to BCMA‐directed therapy (BCMA‐DT): a multicenter study from the U.S. Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):897. 10.1182/blood-2024-203409 DOI
Mohan M, Monge J, Shah N, et al. Teclistamab in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma: multi‐institutional real‐world study. Blood Cancer J. 2024;14(1):35. 10.1038/s41408-024-01003-z PubMed DOI PMC
Perrot A, Hulin C, Boumendil A, et al. Teclistamab in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma: a multi‐institutional real‐world study from the French early access program. Haematologica. 2025;110(4):990‐994. 10.3324/haematol.2024.286118 PubMed DOI PMC
Razzo BM, Midha S, Portuguese AJ, et al. Real‐world experience with teclistamab for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma from the U.S. Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium. Blood Cancer Discovery. 2025;6:561‐571. 10.1158/2643-3230.Bcd-24-0354 PubMed DOI
Hultcrantz M, Derkach A, Hassoun H, et al. Belantamab mafodotin in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a real‐world experience. Blood Neoplasia. 2025;2(3):100103. 10.1016/j.bneo.2025.100103 PubMed DOI PMC
Browning S, Li F, Parker TL, et al. Open‐label, single‐arm phase Ib/II study of immune combination therapy with elotuzumab and belantamab mafodotin in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(16_suppl):7559. 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.7559 DOI
Vaxman I, Abeykoon J, Dispenzieri A, et al. “Real‐life” data of the efficacy and safety of belantamab mafodotin in relapsed multiple myeloma—the Mayo Clinic experience. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(12):196. 10.1038/s41408-021-00592-3 PubMed DOI PMC
Mi JQ, Zhao W, Jing H, et al. Phase II, open‐label study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel, an anti‐B‐cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor‐T‐cell therapy, in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (CARTIFAN‐1). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(6):1275‐1284. 10.1200/jco.22.00690 PubMed DOI
Wang Y, Cao J, Gu W, et al. Long‐term follow‐up of combination of B‐cell maturation antigen and cd19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(20):2246‐2256. 10.1200/jco.21.01676 PubMed DOI
Wang D, Wang J, Hu G, et al. A phase 1 study of a novel fully human BCMA‐targeting CAR (CT103A) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2021;137(21):2890‐2901. 10.1182/blood.2020008936 PubMed DOI
Mobascher P, Engelhardt M, Wäsch R. Successful sequential application of CAR T‐cell‐therapies in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol. 2025;104(3):2055‐2058. 10.1007/s00277-025-06340-y PubMed DOI PMC
Dholaria B, Kocoglu M, Andrew K, et al. OA‐04 A phase 1 study of P‐BCMA‐ ALLO1, a non‐viral, allogeneic BCMA directed CAR‐T in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24:S3. 10.1016/S2152-2650(24)01845-7 DOI
Samur MK, Fulciniti M, Aktas Samur A, et al. Biallelic loss of BCMA as a resistance mechanism to CAR T cell therapy in a patient with multiple myeloma. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):868. 10.1038/s41467-021-21177-5 PubMed DOI PMC
Da Vià MC, Dietrich O, Truger M, et al. Homozygous PubMed DOI
Ye JC, Schinke C, Touzeau C, et al. P‐098 long‐term efficacy and safety results from the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL‐1 study of talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24:S99. 10.1016/S2152-2650(24)02001-9 DOI
Jakubowiak AJ, Anguille S, Karlin L, et al. Updated results of talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with prior exposure to T‐cell redirecting therapies: results of the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL‐1 study. Blood. 2023;142(Suppl 1):3377. 10.1182/blood-2023-187242 DOI
Merz M, Dima D, Hashmi H, et al. Bispecific antibodies targeting BCMA or GPRC5D are highly effective in relapsed myeloma after CAR T‐cell therapy. Blood Cancer J. 2024;14(1):214. 10.1038/s41408-024-01197-2 PubMed DOI PMC
Puertas B, Fernández‐Sánchez A, Alejo E, et al. A research center's experience of T‐cell‐redirecting therapies in triple‐class refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2024;8(13):3478‐3487. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024012773 PubMed DOI PMC
Frenking JH, Riedhammer C, Teipel R, et al. A German multicenter real‐world analysis of talquetamab in 138 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. HemaSphere. 2025;9(4):e70114. 10.1002/hem3.70114 PubMed DOI PMC
Kumar S, Berdeja J, Sborov D, et al. CEVOSTAMAB in patients with RRMM who are triple‐classrefractory and have received a prior BCMA‐targeted ADC or CAR T‐cell: initial results from the phase I/II CAMMA 2 study. HemaSphere. 2024;8(S1):236‐237.
Delforge M, Richter J, Cohen YC, et al. Biomarker correlates and clinical activity of cevostamab in patients (pts) with triple‐class refractory multiple myeloma (MM) who have received ≥1 prior B‐cell maturation antigen (BCMA)‐targeted bispecific antibody (BsAb): results from the phase I/II CAMMA 2 study. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):4732. 10.1182/blood-2024-199519 DOI
Cohen AD, Hwang W‐T, Susanibar‐Adaniya S, et al. Sequential T‐cell engagement for myeloma (“STEM”) Trial: a phase 2 study of cevostamab consolidation following BCMA CAR T cell therapy. Blood. 2023;142(Suppl 1):3389. 10.1182/blood-2023-187409 DOI
Fandrei D, Seiffert S, Rade M, et al. Bispecific antibodies as bridging to BCMA CAR‐T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer Discovery. 2025;6(1):38‐54. 10.1158/2643-3230.Bcd-24-0118 PubMed DOI PMC
Vucinic V, Fandrei D, Kirchberg J, et al. Cellular composition and clinical factors influencing manufacturing outcomes for anti‐BCMA CAR T cell therapy in a large real‐world cohort of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):2094. 10.1182/blood-2024-207117 DOI
Dhakal B, Akhtar OS, Fandrei D, et al. Sequential targeting in multiple myeloma: talquetamab, a GPRC5D bispecific antibody, as a bridge to BCMA CAR‐T therapy. Blood. 2025;146:2063‐2072. 10.1182/blood.2025029773 PubMed DOI
Vishwamitra D, Skerget S, Cortes D, et al. Pharmacodynamic signatures and correlatives of response in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) treated with talquetamab or teclistamab plus daratumumab and pomalidomide. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):594. 10.1182/blood-2024-200300 DOI
Friedrich MJ, Neri P, Kehl N, et al. The pre‐existing T cell landscape determines the response to bispecific T cell engagers in multiple myeloma patients. Cancer Cell. 2023;41(4):711‐725. 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.02.008 PubMed DOI
Waldschmidt J, Fandrei D, Vucinic V, et al. Efficacy of anti‐BCMA CAR‐T cell therapies in multiple myeloma patients with prior exposure to bispecific antibodies—results from a retrospective multi‐center registry analysis. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):2007. 10.1182/blood-2024-210451 DOI
Godby K, Bal S, Giri S, et al. P‐026 combined GPRC5D and BCMA‐targeted T‐cell redirecting therapy in the treatment of RRMM. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24:S55‐S56. 10.1016/S2152-2650(24)01929-3 DOI
Grajales‐cruz A, Graeter A, Hansen D, et al. P‐027 real world experience of standard of care talquetamab in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24:S56. 10.1016/S2152-2650(24)01930-X DOI
Rejeski K, Hansen DK, Cordas Dos Santos DM, et al. Pre‐apheresis prediction of toxicity and response in patients receiving BCMA‐directed CAR‐T for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):895. 10.1182/blood-2024-208376 DOI
Rytlewski J, Fuller J, Mertz DR, et al. Correlative analysis to define patient profiles associated with manufacturing and clinical endpoints in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients treated with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide‐cel; bb2121), an anti‐BCMA CAR T cell therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):8021. 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.8021 DOI
Einsele H, Rodriguez‐Otero P, Arnulf B, et al. P‐008 Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide‐cel) vs standard regimens in triple‐class–exposed (TCE) relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): KarMMa‐3 subgroup analysis in patients receiving bridging therapy. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023;23:S37. 10.1016/S2152-2650(23)01626-9 DOI
Anguille S, Leleu X, Gatt M, et al. P‐005 effectiveness of bridging therapy corresponds to improved outcomes after receiving CAR‐T therapy: phase 3 CARTITUDE‐4 study of patients with relapsed, lenalidomide‐refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24:S42‐S43. 10.1016/S2152-2650(24)01908-6 DOI
Sanchez L, Schinke C, Krishnan A, et al. Clinical outcomes of subsequent therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma following talquetamab treatment: analyses from the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL‐1 study. Blood. 2023;142(Suppl 1):2007. 10.1182/blood-2023-182330 DOI
Harrison S, Riley CH, Manier S, et al. OA‐05 efficacy of forimtamig, a GPRC5DxCD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): analysis of patient and disease‐related factors associated with responses. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023;23:S3‐S4. 10.1016/S2152-2650(23)01572-0 DOI
Trudel S, Cohen AD, Krishnan AY, et al. Cevostamab monotherapy continues to show clinically meaningful activity and manageable safety in patients with heavily pre‐treated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): updated results from an ongoing phase I study. Blood. 2021;138(Suppl 1):157. 10.1182/blood-2021-147983 DOI
Aleman A, Kogan Zajdman A, Ghodke‐Puranik Y, et al. Salvage with sequential T cell redirection for myeloma patients who have previously progressed on T cell directed therapy is associated with significant cellular activation of the immune microenvironment. Blood. 2022;140(Suppl 1):4193‐4195. 10.1182/blood-2022-169538 DOI
Shekarkhand T, Nemirovsky D, Derkach A, et al. Real‐world analysis of talquetamab in heavily pretreated and high‐risk patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). HemaSphere. 2025;9(S1):3056‐3057.
Amatangelo M, Flynt E, Stong N, et al. Pharmacodynamic changes in tumor and immune cells drive iberdomide's clinical mechanisms of activity in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Cell Rep Med. 2024;5(6):101571. 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101571 PubMed DOI PMC
Bahlis NJ, van de Donk N, Reece D, et al. OA‐01 talquetamab (tal) + daratumumab (dara) + pomalidomide (pom) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): results from the phase 1b TRIMM‐2 study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24:S1. 10.1016/S2152-2650(24)01842-1 DOI
Dholaria BR, Weisel K, Mateos M‐V, et al. Talquetamab (tal) + daratumumab (dara) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): updated TRIMM‐2 results. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8003. 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.8003 DOI
Perrot A, Touzeau C, Rodriguez‐Otero P, et al. Talquetamab + cetrelimab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Initial safety and efficacy results from the phase 1B TRIMM‐3 study. HemaSphere. 2025;9(S1):233‐234.
Paiva B, Gaffney B, Burnett K, et al. Synergistic antitumor activity of alnuctamab (ALNUC; BMS‐986349; CC‐93269), a BCMA 2+1 T cell engager (TCE), and celmod agents in multiple myeloma (MM) preclinical models. Blood. 2022;140(Suppl 1):7054‐7055. 10.1182/blood-2022-157987 DOI
Olson K, DiLillo D, Sineshchekova O, et al. A CD38xCD28 costimulatory bispecific antibody demonstrates potent preclinical combinatorial activity with a BCMAxCD3 T cell‐engager. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):3283. 10.1182/blood-2024-194830 DOI
Hungria V, Hus M, Zherebtsova V, et al. DREAMM‐7 study of belantamab mafodotin + bortezomib + dexamethasone vs daratumumab + bortezomib + dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: efficacy in paytients by subsequent therapy. HemaSphere. 2025;9(S1):2982‐2983.
Mailankody S, Devlin SM, Landa J, et al. GPRC5D‐targeted CAR T cells for myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(13):1196‐1206. 10.1056/NEJMoa2209900 PubMed DOI PMC
Bal S, Htut M, Nadeem O, et al. BMS‐986393 (CC‐95266), a G protein‐coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D)‐targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): updated results from a phase 1 study. Blood. 2023;142(Suppl 1):219. 10.1182/blood-2023-181857 DOI
Zhang M, Wei G, Zhou L, et al. GPRC5D CAR T cells (OriCAR‐017) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (POLARIS): a first‐in‐human, single‐centre, single‐arm, phase 1 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2023;10(2):e107‐e116. 10.1016/s2352-3026(22)00372-6 PubMed DOI
Xia J, Li H, Yan Z, et al. Anti‐G protein‐coupled receptor, class C group 5 member D chimeric antigen receptor T cells in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a single‐arm, phase Ⅱ trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(14):2583‐2593. 10.1200/jco.22.01824 PubMed DOI PMC
Huang H, Hu Y, Zhang M, et al. Phase I open‐label single‐arm study of GPRC5D CAR T‐cells (OriCAR‐017) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (POLARIS). J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_suppl):8004. 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.8004 DOI
Jurgens EM, Firestone RS, Chaudhari J, et al. Phase I trial of MCARH109, a G protein‐coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D)‐targeted chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy for multiple myeloma: an updated analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(5):498‐504. 10.1200/jco-24-01785 PubMed DOI PMC
Bal S, Anderson LD Jr., Nadeem O, et al. Efficacy and safety with extended follow‐up in a phase 1 study of BMS‐986393, a G protein‐coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D)‐targeted CAR T cell therapy, in patients (pts) with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM). Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):922. 10.1182/blood-2024-201356 DOI
Xia J, Sun Q, Zhou D, et al. Anti‐GPRC5D CAR T‐cell therapy as a salvage treatment in patients with progressive multiple myeloma after anti‐BCMA CAR T‐cell therapy: a single‐centre, single‐arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2025;12(5):e365‐e375. 10.1016/s2352-3026(25)00048-1 PubMed DOI
Dimopoulos MA, Terpos E, Boccadoro M, et al. EHA‐EMN evidence‐based guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up of patients with multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025;22(9):680‐700. 10.1038/s41571-025-01041-x PubMed DOI
Steinhardt MJ, Schaefers C, Leypoldt LB, et al. Activity of CAR‐T cells and bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma with extramedullary involvement. Blood Cancer J. 2025;15(1):126. 10.1038/s41408-025-01330-9 PubMed DOI PMC
van de Donk NWCJ, Zweegman S. BCMA‐directed therapy for early relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2024;21(10):707‐708. 10.1038/s41571-024-00927-6 PubMed DOI
Manteca M‐VM, Jakubowiak A, Einsele H, et al. P‐050 talquetamab vs real‐world physician's choice in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and prior B‐cell maturation antigen therapy: analyses of monumenTAL‐1 vs LocoMMotion/MoMMent. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24:S69‐S70. 10.1016/S2152-2650(24)01953-0 DOI
Van Oekelen O, Nath K, Mouhieddine TH, et al. Interventions and outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma receiving salvage therapy after BCMA‐directed CAR T therapy. Blood. 2023;141(7):756‐765. 10.1182/blood.2022017848 PubMed DOI PMC
van de Donk NWCJ, Chari A, Mateos MV. Mechanisms of resistance against T‐cell engaging bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma: implications for novel treatment strategies. Lancet Haematol. 2024;11(9):e693‐e707. 10.1016/s2352-3026(24)00186-8 PubMed DOI
Du J, Fu W‐J, Jiang H, et al. Updated results of a phase I, open‐label study of BCMA/CD19 dual‐targeting fast CAR‐T GC012F for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(16_suppl):8005. 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.8005 DOI
Frigault MJ, Bishop MR, Rosenblatt J, et al. Phase 1 study of CART‐ddBCMA for the treatment of subjects with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2023;7(5):768‐777. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007210 PubMed DOI PMC
Zamagni E, Silzle T, Špička I, et al. Phase 3 study of teclistamab (Tec) in combination with lenalidomide (Len) and Tec alone versus Len alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) as maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT): safety run‐in (SRI) results from the majestec‐4/EMN30 trial. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):494. 10.1182/blood-2024-205608 DOI
van de Donk NWCJ, Rasche L, Sidana S, Zweegman S, Garfall AL. T cell‐redirecting bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma: optimal dosing schedule and duration of treatment. Blood Cancer Discovery. 2024;5(6):388‐399. 10.1158/2643-3230.Bcd-24-0124 PubMed DOI PMC
Raab MS, Weinhold N, Kortüm KM, et al. Phase 2 study of teclistamab‐based induction regimens in patients with transplant‐eligible (TE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): results from the GMMG‐HD10/DSMM‐XX (MajesTEC‐5) Trial. Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):493. 10.1182/blood-2024-206003 DOI
van de Donk NWCJ, Vega G, Perrot A, et al. First‐in‐human study of JNJ‐79635322 (JNJ‐5322), a novel, next‐generation trispecific antibody (TsAb), in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Initial phase 1 results. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(16_suppl):7505. 10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.7505 DOI
Cohen YC, Magen H, Gatt M, et al. Talquetamab plus teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(2):138‐149. 10.1056/NEJMoa2406536 PubMed DOI
Fernández de Larrea C, Staehr M, Lopez AV, et al. Defining an optimal dual‐targeted CAR T‐cell therapy approach simultaneously targeting BCMA and GPRC5D to prevent BCMA escape–driven relapse in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer Discovery. 2020;1(2):146‐154. 10.1158/2643-3230.Bcd-20-0020 PubMed DOI PMC
Lichtman EI, Khot A, Augustson B, et al. Phase 1, first‐in‐human study of ISB 2001: a BCMAxCD38xCD3‐targeting trispecific antibody for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)—dose escalation (DE) results. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(16_suppl):7514. 10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.7514 DOI
Lim S‐L, Augustson B, Mian HS, et al. A phase I/II study of AZD0305, a novel antibody‐drug conjugate (ADC) targeting GPRC5D, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood. 2024;144(Suppl 1):2000.2. 10.1182/blood-2024-207816 DOI