Treatment guided by cerebral oximetry in mechanically ventilated newborns: a statistical analysis plan for step one of the SafeBoosC-IIIv randomised clinical trial
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, protokol klinické studie
Grantová podpora
3165-00094B
Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
PubMed
41413912
PubMed Central
PMC12821886
DOI
10.1186/s13063-025-09387-4
PII: 10.1186/s13063-025-09387-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Cerebral oximetry monitoring, Mechanical ventilation, Neonatology, Randomised clinical trial, Statistics,
- MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- gestační stáří MeSH
- interpretace statistických dat MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mozkový krevní oběh * MeSH
- multicentrické studie jako téma MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- oxymetrie * statistika a číselné údaje metody MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- umělé dýchání * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- protokol klinické studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Newborns requiring invasive mechanical ventilation are at high risk of neurodevelopmental impairment, prolonged hospitalisation, and increased mortality. Treatment guided by cerebral oximetry monitoring has been proposed to reduce morbidity and mortality. METHODS: The SafeBoosC-IIIv trial is a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised clinical trial. The trial will be conducted in two steps. This is a statistical analysis plan for step one. The objective of step one is to assess whether treatment guided by cerebral oximetry monitoring, compared with usual care, increases the number of hospital-free days in newborns receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. Inclusion criteria are gestational age ≥ 28 + 0 weeks, postnatal age less than 28 days, expected to receive invasive mechanical ventilation (intubation) for at least 24 h, and a cerebral oximeter available so monitoring can be started within 6 h after initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation. Exclusion criteria are suspicion of or confirmed brain injury or congenital heart malformation likely to require surgery. A total of 1610 participants will be randomised 1:1 to treatment guided by cerebral oximetry monitoring or usual care. The primary outcome will be hospital-free days within 90 days of randomisation, which will be analysed with the van Elteren test stratified by 'centre'. This statistical analysis plan provides a detailed description of the planned analyses, including methods for handling missing data and assessing statistical assumptions. Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle and will be performed independently by two statisticians. CONCLUSION: This statistical analysis plan describes the planned statistical analyses in detail for step one of the SafeBoosC-IIIv trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05907317. First submitted on 8 June 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05907317 .
Department of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Canada
Department of Neonatology Clinical County Emergency Hospital Sibiu Sibiu Romania
Department of Neonatology Copenhagen Denmark
Department of Neuroanaesthesiology Neuroscience Centre The Capital Region Copenhagen Denmark
Department of Pediatrics 2 Medical University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
Department of Pediatrics School of Medicine Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile Santiago Chile
Department of Pediatrics University of Alberta Edmonton Canada
Faculty of Medicine Lucian Blaga University Sibiu Sibiu Romania
Grace Centre for Newborn Intensive Care in The Children's Hospital at Westmead Sydney Australia
Hospital Clinico San Carlos IdISSC Madrid Spain
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain
Hospital Universitario Austral Pilar Argentina
Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar Cádiz Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen Las Nieves Granada Spain
Infant Research Centre University College Cork Cork Ireland
Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
Ippokrateion General Hospital of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Greece
Medical Center University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre University of Sydney Sydney Australia
Red de Salud UC Christus Santiago Chile
St John's Medical College Hospital Bengaluru Karnataka India
University Hospital Leuven Louvain Belgium
University Hospital Motol Prague Czech Republic
University Hospital of Heraklion Heraklion Greece
University of Patras General Hospital Rio Greece
UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas USA
Women and Newborn Hospital University Teaching Hospitals Lusaka Zambia
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Parker JC, Hernandez LA, Peevy KJ. Mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury. Crit Care Med. 1993;21(1):131–43. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8420720. PubMed
Attar MA, Donn SM. Mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury in premature infants. Semin Neonatol. 2002;7(5):353–60. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12464497. PubMed
Greisen G, Andresen B, Plomgaard AM, et al. Cerebral oximetry in preterm infants: an agenda for research with a clear clinical goal. Neurophotonics. 2016;3(3):031407. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27158632. PubMed PMC
Hansen ML, Pellicer A, Hyttel-Sorensen S, et al. Cerebral Oximetry Monitoring in Extremely Preterm Infants. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(16):1501–11. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37075142. PubMed
Plomgaard AM, van Oeveren W, Petersen TH, et al. The safeboosc II randomized trial: treatment guided by near-infrared spectroscopy reduces cerebral hypoxia without changing early biomarkers of brain injury. Pediatr Res. 2015;79(4):528–35. PubMed DOI PMC
Kamp CB, Petersen JJ, Olsen MH, et al. Treatment guided by cerebral oximetry in newborns receiving invasive mechanical ventilation: a protocol for step one of the SafeBoosC-IIIv randomised clinical trial. Submitted to Trials september 2025. 2025. PubMed PMC
Gamble C, Krishan A, Stocken D, et al. Guidelines for the content of statistical analysis plans in clinical trials. JAMA. 2017;318(23):2337–43. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29260229. PubMed
Pellicer A, Greisen G, Benders M, et al. The SafeBoosC phase II randomised clinical trial: a treatment guideline for targeted near-infrared-derived cerebral tissue oxygenation versus standard treatment in extremely preterm infants. Neonatology. 2013;104(3):171–8. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23921600. PubMed
Coveney J. VANELTEREN: Stata module to perform van Elteren's test (generalized Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney ranksum test). Statistical Software Components S439101, Boston College Department of Economics. 2004.
Hein-Nielsen AL, Petersen SM, Greisen G. Unchanged incidence of necrotising enterocolitis in a tertiary neonatal department 2015. Available from: https://ugeskriftet.dk/dmj/unchanged-incidence-necrotising-enterocolitis-tertiary-neonatal-department. PubMed
Statistics Denmark. Statistics Denmark 2023. Available from: https://www.dst.dk/en.
Jakobsen JC, Gluud C, Winkel P, et al. The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance - a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(34. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588900. PubMed PMC
Kahan BC, Morris TP. Improper analysis of trials randomised using stratified blocks or minimisation. Stat Med. 2012;31(4):328–40. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22139891. PubMed
Kahan BC, Morris TP. Reporting and analysis of trials using stratified randomisation in leading medical journals: review and reanalysis. BMJ. 2012;345(e5840. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22983531. PubMed PMC
Montgomery AA, Peters TJ, Little P. Design, analysis and presentation of factorial randomised controlled trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3(26. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14633287. PubMed PMC
Jakobsen JC, Gluud C, Wetterslev J, et al. When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials–a practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):162. PubMed DOI PMC
Nielsen EE, Norskov AK, Lange T, et al. Assessing assumptions for statistical analyses in randomised clinical trials. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2019;24(5):185–9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948454. PubMed
Norskov AK, Lange T, Nielsen EE, et al. Assessment of assumptions of statistical analysis methods in randomised clinical trials: the what and how. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021;26(3):121–6. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31988195. PubMed
Juul S, Frydenberg M. An introduction to Stata for health researchers. 4 ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2014.
Oliveira AG. Biostatistics decoded. 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2013.
Pocock SJ, Ariti CA, Collier TJ, et al. The win ratio: a new approach to the analysis of composite endpoints in clinical trials based on clinical priorities. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(2):176–82. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21900289. PubMed
Pocock SJ, Gregson J, Collier TJ, et al. The win ratio in cardiology trials: lessons learnt, new developments, and wise future use. Eur Heart J. 2024;45(44):4684–99. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39405050. PubMed PMC
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05907317