IMPORTANCE: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare but potentially fatal drug hypersensitivity reaction. To our knowledge, there is no international consensus on its severity assessment and treatment. OBJECTIVE: To reach an international, Delphi-based multinational expert consensus on the diagnostic workup, severity assessment, and treatment of patients with DRESS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Delphi method was used to assess 100 statements related to baseline workup, evaluation of severity, acute phase, and postacute management of DRESS. Fifty-seven international experts in DRESS were invited, and 54 participated in the survey, which took place from July to September 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES/MEASURES: The degree of agreement was calculated with the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. Consensus was defined as a statement with a median appropriateness value of 7 or higher (appropriate) and a disagreement index of lower than 1. RESULTS: In the first Delphi round, consensus was reached on 82 statements. Thirteen statements were revised and assessed in a second round. A consensus was reached for 93 statements overall. The experts agreed on a set of basic diagnostic workup procedures as well as severity- and organ-specific further investigations. They reached a consensus on severity assessment (mild, moderate, and severe) based on the extent of liver, kidney, and blood involvement and the damage of other organs. The panel agreed on the main lines of DRESS management according to these severity grades. General recommendations were generated on the postacute phase follow-up of patients with DRESS and the allergological workup. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This Delphi exercise represents, to our knowledge, the first international expert consensus on diagnostic workup, severity assessment, and management of DRESS. This should support clinicians in the diagnosis and management of DRESS and constitute the basis for development of future guidelines.
Background. The outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) remains poor. The programmed cell-death-protein-1 (PD-1), a co-inhibitory receptor primarily expressed by T-cells, represents a potential new therapeutic target. PD-1, PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1), and PD-L2 expression have all been described as prognostic factors in a variety of cancers. Their expression patterns in AEG, however, are poorly understood. We analyzed PD-L1, PD-L2 and PD-1 expression by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and cancer-cells in tumor-biospecimens in AEG-patients. Methods. 168 patients who underwent esophagectomy because of AEG between 1992-2011 were included in this study. PD-L1, PD-L2 and PD-1 expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and correlated with various clinicopathological parameters, disease-free survival (DFS) and long-term overall survival (OS). Results. PD-L1 expression by cancer-cells (cancer-cell-PD-L1+) was found in 43.5% of patients whereas PD-L1 expression by TILs (TILs-PD-L1+) was observed in 69%. PD-L2 expression by cancer-cells and TILs was only found in 3.5% and 1.8%, respectively. Additionally, 77.4% of tumors contained PD-1+-cancer-cells and 81% PD-1+-TILs. Patients with increased expression of PD-1 by cancer-cells and TILs showed significantly reduced OS and DFS, as determined by univariate, but not multivariate analysis. Expression of PD-L1 by cancer-cells was found to be an independent predictor for improved DFS (p = 0.038) and OS (p = 0.042) in multivariate analysis. Conclusions. Cancer cells and TILs displayed PD-L1 expression in around 50% and PD-1 expression in around 80% of tumor-biospecimens obtained from AEG patients. Expression of PD-L1 is an independent predictor of favorable outcome in AEG, whereas PD-1 expression is associated with worse outcome and advanced tumor stage.
- Klíčová slova
- PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, esophageal adenocarcinoma, esophageal carcinoma,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
