BACKGROUND: Perianal fistulas of Crohn's disease (CD) create a significant burden on patients' lives. However, the efficacy and safety of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell treatment are contradicting, and real-world evidence is lacking. AIMS: To examine the usability of darvadstrocel therapy in managing perianal CD. METHODS: We enrolled patients with CD and perianal fistulas in this retrospective multicenter study. The primary outcome was perianal clinical remission (defined as all treated fistulas closed) at weeks 26 and 52. Secondary outcomes were clinical response rates (≥ 1 fistulas closed), perianal activity (PDAI), patient satisfaction, and adverse events. Data were recorded at baseline and weeks 12, 26 and 52. Prediction of primary outcomes was performed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, among 223 patients (male/female ratio: 0.48), perianal clinical remission was achieved in 78.2% and 62.3% until weeks 26 and 52. Baseline PDAI score (OR 0.75), number of fistulas (OR 0.28) and the number of weeks after preparation for surgery (OR 0.98) were associated with treatment failure. The clinical response rates were 84.8% and 79.8% at weeks 26 and 52. Improvement of subjective perianal symptoms was achieved in 77.8% and 78.4% of patients, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 13.5% of patients; perianal abscesses and proctalgia were the most frequently reported. CONCLUSION: Effectiveness data were higher than in clinical trials. The safety profile was reassuring, and patients' satisfaction was high. Appropriate patient selection, fistula preparation and expertise may help to achieve treatment success.

• Klíčová slova
• Crohn's disease, darvadstrocel, mesenchymal stem cell treatment, perianal disease,
• MeSH
• Crohnova nemoc * terapie   komplikace   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• indukce remise MeSH
• kohortové studie MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• rektální píštěl * terapie   etiologie   MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• spokojenost pacientů MeSH
• transplantace mezenchymálních kmenových buněk * metody   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH

Background/Objectives: Data on the real-world effectiveness and safety of selective JAK inhibitors (JAKis) in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are limited. Methods: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective study to assess clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic outcomes of selective JAKis in bio-experienced UC and CD. Results: A total of 246 patients (mean age: 40.5 ± 14.5 years; 131 UC and 115 CD) were included with a median follow-up of 7.5 months. Among the CD patients receiving upadacitinib (n = 115), 76.2% achieved clinical remission (CR) at week 12. Furthermore, 59.5% of the upadacitinib-treated UC patients (n = 100) experienced CR at week 8. Corticosteroid-free CR (CSFCR) was achieved by 76.9% of the CD patients and 80.6% of the UC patients at week 24, while 50.0% and 36.1% experienced endoscopic remission. At week 52, 66.7% of the CD and 86.2% of the UC patients achieved CSFCR, whereas 54.5% and 52.9% had endoscopic remission. In UC, the effectiveness of upadacitinib was not compromised by prior tofacitinib failure, while the upadacitinib-treated CD patients with stricturing and penetrating disease were less likely to achieve CR by the end of the induction phase (p = 0.04). C-reactive protein (p[CD] < 0.0001; p[UC] < 0.0001) and faecal calprotectin (p[CD] < 0.0001; p[UC] = 0.02) decreased significantly in both patient groups as early as week 2. Among the filgotinib-treated UC patients (n = 31), 28.6% were in CR at week 12. At week 24 and 52, 59.1% and 60% achieved CSFCR, while 0.0% and 20.0% had endoscopic remission. Both C-reactive protein (p = 0.04) and faecal calprotectin (p = 0.04) decreased significantly by week 12. Hyperlipidaemia (9.7-9.8%) was the most common adverse event. Conclusions: Selective JAKis are rapidly effective and safe for treating refractory, moderate-to-severe CD and UC.

• Klíčová slova
• Crohn’s disease, JAK-inhibitors, filgotinib, ulcerative colitis, upadacitinib,
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Tofacitinib (TFB) appears to be effective in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC); however, available real-world studies are limited by cohort size. TFB could be an option in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). We aimed to investigate efficacy and safety of TFB in moderate-to-severe colitis and ASUC. METHODS: This retrospective, international cohort study enrolling UC patients with ≥6-week follow-up period was conducted from February 1 to July 31, 2022. Indications were categorized as ASUC and chronic activity (CA). Baseline demographic and clinical data were obtained. Steroid-free remission (SFR), colectomy, and safety data were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 391 UC patients (median age 38 [interquartile range, 28-47] years; follow-up period 26 [interquartile range, 14-52] weeks) were included. A total of 27.1% received TFB in ASUC. SFR rates were 23.7% (ASUC: 26.0%, CA: 22.8%) at week 12 and 41.1% (ASUC: 34.2%, CA: 43.5%) at week 52. The baseline partial Mayo score (odds ratio [OR], 0.850; P = .006) was negatively associated with week 12 SFR, while biologic-naïve patients (OR, 2.078; P = .04) more likely achieved week 52 SFR. The colectomy rate at week 52 was higher in ASUC group (17.6% vs 5.7%; P < .001) and decreased with age (OR, 0.94; P = .013). A total of 67 adverse events were reported, and 17.9% resulted in cessation of TFB. One case of thromboembolic event was reported. CONCLUSIONS: TFB is effective in both studied indications. TFB treatment resulted in high rates of SFR in the short and long terms. Higher baseline disease activity and previous biological therapies decreased efficacy. No new adverse event signals were found.

• Klíčová slova
• acute severe ulcerative colitis, moderate-to severe ulcerative colitis, tofacitinib,
• MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• indukce remise MeSH
• inhibitory proteinkinas terapeutické užití   MeSH
• kolektomie MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• následné studie MeSH
• piperidiny * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• pyrimidiny * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
• ulcerózní kolitida * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• Názvy látek
• inhibitory proteinkinas MeSH
• piperidiny * MeSH
• pyrimidiny * MeSH
• tofacitinib MeSH Prohlížeč

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a challenge to healthcare. Staff and patients are at increased risk during an examination or intervention, so certain restrictions ought to be introduced. Hence, we aimed to measure the effect of the pandemic on endoscopy units in real-life settings. METHODS: This was an observational, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, carried out between 7 April and 15 June 2020. Responds came from many countries, and the participation was voluntary. The survey contained 40 questions, which evaluated the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the endoscopy units and assessed the infection control. RESULTS: A total of 312 questionnaires were filled, 120 from Hungary, and 192 internationally, and 54 questionnaires (17.3%) were sent from high-risk countries; 84.9% of the gastroenterologists declared that they read the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) statement, while only 32.1% participated in any advanced training at their workplace. Overall, 92.1% of gastroenterologists realized risk stratification, and 72.1% claimed to have enough protective equipment. In 52.6% of the endoscopy units, at least one endoscopist had to discontinue the work due to any risk factor, while 40.6% reported that the reduced staff did not affect the workflow. Gastroenterologists considered that the five most important examinations both in low and high-risk patients are the following: lower/upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with hemodynamic instability, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in obstructive jaundice, foreign body in the esophagus, ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis, and iron deficiency anemia with hemodynamic instability, which correlates well with the ESGE recommendation. Significant correlation was found in the usage of the necessary protective equipment in high-risk patients depending on the countries (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The survey found weak correlation in preliminary training depending on countries; nevertheless, in Hungary during the examined period, endoscopists considered the recommendations more strictly than in other countries. Although many physicians left the endoscopy lab, the workflow was not affected, probably due to the reduced number of examinations.

• Klíčová slova
• SARS-CoV-2, coronavirus, endoscopy, pandemia, personal protective equipment,
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH