BACKGROUND: In the primary (first interim) analysis of the DREAMM-7 trial (median follow-up 28·2 months), belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (BVd) showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival benefit versus daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after at least one line of therapy. The aim of this study is to report overall survival from the second interim analysis, with extended follow-up. METHODS: In the ongoing global, open-label, randomised, phase 3 DREAMM-7 trial done at 142 study centres (research facilities, hospitals, and institutions) in 20 countries across North America, South America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region, eligible patients were aged at least 18 years and had confirmed multiple myeloma (according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, and progression on or after at least one previous line of therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by use of a central interactive response technology system to receive BVd, which comprised belantamab mafodotin 2·5 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks plus bortezomib 1·3 mg/m2 subcutaneously (twice weekly in 21-day cycles, for up to eight cycles) plus dexamethasone 20 mg orally or intravenously (on the day of, and after, bortezomib; for up to eight cycles), or DVd, which comprised daratumumab 16 mg/kg intravenously (21-day cycles; once weekly in cycles 1-3, every 3 weeks in cycles 4-8, and every 4 weeks in cycle 9 and beyond) plus bortezomib and dexamethasone; bortezomib and dexamethasone doses and schedules were the same as those in the BVd group. Randomisation was stratified by number of previous lines of therapy, previous bortezomib, and Revised International Staging System stage. Treatment assignments were unmasked for study personnel and patients; however, they were masked to the independent review committee. Patients received treatment until progressive disease, death, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or loss to follow-up, whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival; key secondary endpoints were overall survival, minimal residual disease negativity in patients with a complete response or better, duration of response to treatment, and safety. Analysis of efficacy endpoints was based on assessments in all patients who were randomly assigned (ie, the intention-to-treat population). The safety population included all randomly assigned patients who received one or more doses of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04246047, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: From May 7, 2020, to June 28, 2021, of 623 patients assessed for eligibility, 494 were randomly assigned to receive BVd (n=243) or DVd (n=251); 272 (55%) were male, and 409 (83%) were White. The median age of the patients was 64·5 years (IQR 57·0-71·0). At the updated data cutoff (Oct 7, 2024) and median follow-up (39·4 months [IQR 14·6-42·9]), early, sustained, and significant overall survival benefit was observed with BVd versus DVd. Median overall survival was not reached (NR; 95% CI NR-NR) with BVd and NR (41·0 months-NR) with DVd (hazard ratio [HR] 0·58; 95% CI 0·43-0·79; p=0·0002). BVd versus DVd led to greater than double the minimal residual disease-negativity rates in patients with a complete response or better (25% [95% CI 19·8%-31·0%] vs 10% [6·9%-14·8%]) and median duration of response (40·8 months [95% CI 30·5 months-NR] vs 17·8 months [13·8-23·6]). Analysis of progression-free survival 2 showed that the treatment benefit favouring BVd versus DVd was maintained following subsequent antimyeloma therapy; median progression-free survival 2 was NR with BVd (95% CI 45·6-NR) versus 33·4 months (95% CI 26·7-44·9) with DVd (HR, 0·59; 95% CI, 0·45-0·77). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was thrombocytopenia (135 [56%] of 242 with BVd vs 87 [35%] of 246 with DVd). Serious adverse events occurred in 129 (53%) of 242 patients receiving BVd and 94 (38%) of 246 patients receiving DVd; the most common events were pneumonia (29 [12%] vs 11 [4%]), pyrexia (12 [5%] vs 10 [4%]), and COVID-19 (11 [5%] vs 10 [4%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events that led to death occurred in seven (3%) of 242 patients receiving BVd (pneumonia [n=4], gastrointestinal haemorrhage [n=1], subdural haemorrhage [n=1], or mesenteric vessel thrombosis [n=1]) and two (1%) of 246 receiving DVd (COVID-19 [n=2]). INTERPRETATION: DREAMM-7 showed significant and clinically meaningful overall survival, progression-free survival, minimal residual disease negativity, and duration of response benefits with BVd versus DVd. BVd could be a new standard of care for RRMM. FUNDING: GSK.

• MeSH
• bortezomib * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• chemorezistence MeSH
• dexamethason aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• doba přežití bez progrese choroby MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• lokální recidiva nádoru * farmakoterapie   mortalita   patologie   MeSH
• mnohočetný myelom * farmakoterapie   mortalita   patologie   MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• belantamab mafodotin MeSH Prohlížeč
• bortezomib * MeSH
• daratumumab MeSH Prohlížeč
• dexamethason MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky MeSH

BACKGROUND: Belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone showed significant progression-free survival benefit compared with daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the phase 3 DREAMM-7 study. We aimed to evaluate the effect of belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone compared with daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using various patient-reported outcomes in patients who participated in DREAMM-7. METHODS: This phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial, done at 142 hospitals in 20 countries included adult patients aged 18 years or older with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who received at least one previous line of therapy and progressed during or after their most recent treatment and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a central interactive response technology system to receive intravenous belantamab mafodotin (2·5 mg/kg once on day 1 of each 21-day cycle) or intravenous daratumumab (16 mg/kg once a week in cycles 1-3, every 3 weeks in cycles 4-8, and every 4 weeks in cycle 9 and beyond). Patients in both treatment groups also received subcutaneous bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of 21-day cycles) and oral or intravenous dexamethasone (20 mg on the day of and day after bortezomib administration) for the first 8 cycles. Treatment continued until progressive disease, unacceptable toxic effects, withdrawal of consent, or death (whichever occurred first). Patient-reported outcomes were secondary and exploratory objectives. Secondary patient-reported outcome endpoints were change from baseline in HRQOL, as measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-MY20, and maximum postbaseline score for each item attribute on the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Exploratory patient-reported outcome endpoints included changes from baseline in symptoms and related effects as measured by Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), change from baseline in FACT-GP5 score, and change from baseline in the EQ-5D VAS. EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-MY20, and FACT-GP5 scores were analysed in the intention-to-treat population, and PRO-CTCAE and OSDI vision-related functioning scores were analysed in the safety population (patients who received at least one dose of treatment). Results were summarised using descriptive statistics. Least-squares mean changes from baseline were estimated using a restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed model. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04246047, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between May 7, 2020, and June 28, 2021, 494 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population of the DREAMM-7 study (median follow-up 28·2 months, IQR 14·6-31·4) and were randomly assigned to either belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (n=243) or daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (n=251). 222 (45%) of 494 patients were female and 272 (55%) were male. The mean age in the total study population was 64·0 years (SD 9·80). Most patients were White (409 [83%] of 494), Asian (61 [12%]), or Black or African American (20 [4%]). Patients in both groups had stable mean EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY20 scores over time. At each timepoint, most patients reported stable or improved scores in the global health status/quality of life (64 [56%] of 115 patients to 85 [75%] of 114 patients in the belantamab mafodotin group and 105 [51%] of 207 patients to 156 [65%] of 240 patients in the daratumumab group), role functioning (103 [53%] of 196 patients to 77 [68%] of 114 patients in the belantamab mafodotin group and 99 [50%] of 197 patients to 92 [69%] of 134 patients in the daratumumab group), and physical functioning domains (132 [66%] of 201 patients to 101 [77%] of 131 patients in the belantamab mafodotin group and 115 [58%] of 197 patients to 102 [76%] of 134 patients in the daratumumab group) of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and of the disease symptom domain scores of the EORTC QLQ-MY20 (79 [72%] of 109 patients to 95 [83%] of 115 patients in the belantamab mafodotin group and 126 [66%] of 190 patients to 164 [74%] of 221 patients in the daratumumab group). Most patients in the belantamab mafodotin group (155 [77%] of 202 to 79 [96%] of 82) and the daratumumab group (155 [86%] of 181 to 60 [100%] of 60) reported being "not at all," "a little," or "somewhat" bothered by treatment side-effects at each visit, as determined by the FACT-GP5. INTERPRETATION: HRQOL was generally maintained or improved over time with belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone treatment. Our findings, in conjunction with previously reported clinical benefits, support the use of belantamab mafodotin as a potential new standard of care in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. FUNDING: GSK. TRANSLATIONS: For the Polish and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

• MeSH
• bortezomib * terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• dexamethason * terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem * MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• kvalita života MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mnohočetný myelom * farmakoterapie   mortalita   patologie   MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• belantamab mafodotin MeSH Prohlížeč
• bortezomib * MeSH
• daratumumab MeSH Prohlížeč
• dexamethason * MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky MeSH

PURPOSE: To report the results of the multicenter, open-label IRAKLIA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05405166) of isatuximab subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV), plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), to our knowledge, the first phase III MM trial using an on-body injector (OBI). METHODS: Patients with ≥1 prior line of therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to Isa OBI (1,400 mg) or IV (10 mg/kg) once weekly in cycle (C)1 and then every 2 weeks, plus pomalidomide (4 mg once daily, day [D]1-21) and dexamethasone (40 mg once weekly [age ≥75: 20 mg]) and treated until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient request. Coprimary end points were overall response rate (ORR; noninferiority margin, 0.839) and Isa Ctrough (C6D1 predose; noninferiority margin, 0.8). Noninferiority of OBI versus IV was demonstrated if both coprimary end points achieved noninferiority. RESULTS: IRAKLIA randomly assigned 531 patients (OBI, n=263; IV, n=268). After 12-month median follow-up, the ORR was 71.1% (OBI) and 70.5% (IV; relative risk, 1.008 [95% CI, 0.903 to 1.126]; lower CI exceeded noninferiority margin). The mean (standard deviation) C6D1 Ctrough was 499 (259) μg/mL (OBI) and 340 (169) μg/mL (IV). The Ctrough geometric mean ratio (90% CI) was 1.532 (1.316 to 1.784); lower CI exceeded noninferiority margin. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse event incidences were 81.7% (OBI) and 76.1% (IV); infusion reaction incidences were 1.5% and 25.0%. Injection site reactions occurred in 0.4% of OBI injections (all grade 1-2); 99.9% of injections completed without interruption. CONCLUSION: IRAKLIA demonstrated efficacy and pharmacokinetic noninferiority between Isa OBI and IV. No unexpected safety signal was observed, with excellent local tolerability of Isa OBI. Efficacy and safety were comparable with Isa IV in ICARIA-MM, except the lower OBI infusion reaction rate. These results support potential use of the OBI, designed to improve practice efficiency.

• MeSH
• dexamethason aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• injekce subkutánní MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• lokální recidiva nádoru farmakoterapie   MeSH
• mnohočetný myelom * farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * škodlivé účinky   aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• thalidomid * analogy a deriváty   aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• dexamethason MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * MeSH
• isatuximab MeSH Prohlížeč
• pomalidomide MeSH Prohlížeč
• thalidomid * MeSH

AIMS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal Dexamethasone implant (DEX-I) therapy in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) refractory to intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective and cross-sectional study included 37 eyes of 37 patients who received 3 loading doses of IVB injections for DME with no response and underwent DEX-I implant. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements and central foveal thickness (CFT) measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were recorded and compared before DEX-I, at the first week, first, second, third and sixth months. Duration of DME, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, DME types and lens status (phakic, pseudophakic) were also recorded. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 61.14 ±8.69 years (59.5% male, 40.5% female). 35.1% of the patients had cystoid macular edema, 64.9% had diffuse macular edema and 73 % were phakic and 27% were pseudophakic. BCVA, CFT and IOP values before DEX-I injection were 0.78 ±0.16 LogMAR, 493.73 ±107.6 µm and 13.05 ±2.59 mmHg, respectively. At 6 months after DEX-I, BCVA, CFT and IOP values were 0.64 ±0.11 LogMAR, 397.35 ±59.72 µm and 16.3 ±2.51 mmHg, respectively. In all follow-ups, there was a significant improvement in BCVA, a significant decrease in CFT and a significant increase in IOP compared to pre-injection. Ocular hypertension was observed in 0.8 % of patients and progression of cataract progression in 1% of patients after treatment. CONCLUSION: DEX-I therapy is an effective and safe treatment option for DME refractory to IVB treatment.

• Klíčová slova
• Dexamethasone implant, bevacizumab, cataract, diabetic macular edema, intraocular pressure,
• MeSH
• dexamethason * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• diabetická retinopatie * farmakoterapie   komplikace   MeSH
• glukokortikoidy * aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• implantované léky MeSH
• injekce intravitreální MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• makulární edém * farmakoterapie   etiologie   MeSH
• optická koherentní tomografie MeSH
• průřezové studie MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• zraková ostrost MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Názvy látek
• dexamethason * MeSH
• glukokortikoidy * MeSH
• implantované léky MeSH

A 70-year-old woman was examined with a 10-day history of photopsia and floaters in her left eye. Her best-corrected visual acuity was 20/25 in both eyes, with a normal intraocular pressure and some nuclear sclerosis. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography revealed a separated posterior vitreous, with a rolled internal limiting membrane flap and inner retinal dimples in the left eye. Optical coherence tomography angiography demonstrated reduced vessel density in both the superficial and deep capillary plexuses of the left fundus. Sixteen months earlier, she had received a single intravitreal Dexamethasone implant injection, due to inferotemporal branch retinal vein occlusion-related macular edema. A diagnosis of internal limiting membrane tear following an uneventful posterior vitreous detachment was reached and no treatment was recommended.

• Klíčová slova
• Dexamethasone implant, inner retinal dimples, internal limiting membrane tear, intravitreal injection, macular edema, optical coherence tomography, posterior vitreous detachment, retinal vein occlusion,
• MeSH
• dexamethason * aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• glukokortikoidy * aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• implantované léky MeSH
• injekce intravitreální MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• makulární edém * farmakoterapie   komplikace   etiologie   MeSH
• okluze retinální žíly * komplikace   farmakoterapie   MeSH
• optická koherentní tomografie MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• kazuistiky MeSH
• Názvy látek
• dexamethason * MeSH
• glukokortikoidy * MeSH
• implantované léky MeSH

Frontline daratumumab-based triplet and quadruplet standard-of-care regimens have demonstrated improved survival outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). For patients with transplant-ineligible NDMM, triplet therapy with either daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) or bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) is the current standard of care. This phase 3 trial evaluated subcutaneous daratumumab plus VRd (D-VRd) in patients with transplant-ineligible NDMM or for whom transplant was not planned as the initial therapy (transplant deferred). Some 395 patients with transplant-ineligible or transplant-deferred NDMM were randomly assigned to eight cycles of D-VRd or VRd followed by D-Rd or Rd until progression. The primary endpoint was overall minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity rate at 10-5 by next-generation sequencing. Major secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) or better (≥CR) rate, progression-free survival and sustained MRD-negativity rate at 10-5. At a median follow-up of 58.7 months, the MRD-negativity rate was 60.9% with D-VRd versus 39.4% with VRd (odds ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.58-3.55; P < 0.0001). Rates of ≥CR (81.2% versus 61.6%; P < 0.0001) and sustained MRD negativity (≥12 months; 48.7% versus 26.3%; P < 0.0001) were significantly higher with D-VRd versus VRd. Risk of progression or death was 43% lower for D-VRd versus VRd (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.41-0.79; P = 0.0005). Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profiles for daratumumab and VRd. Combining daratumumab with VRd produced deeper and more durable MRD responses versus VRd alone. The present study supports D-VRd quadruplet therapy as a new standard of care for transplant-ineligible or transplant-deferred NDMM. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03652064 .

• MeSH
• bortezomib * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dexamethason * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• doba přežití bez progrese choroby MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• lenalidomid * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mnohočetný myelom * farmakoterapie   diagnóza   mortalita   patologie   MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• reziduální nádor MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• bortezomib * MeSH
• daratumumab MeSH Prohlížeč
• dexamethason * MeSH
• lenalidomid * MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky * MeSH

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of Ozurdex® (DEX) implant in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in real-world clinical practice, and to determine the correlation between known OCT biomarkers and the effect of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 42 eyes of 33 patients (16 women, 17 men) treated with DEX at the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc for DME indication between 2020 and 2023. Follow-up examinations were conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months after the first DEX application. The main assessed parameters were: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), central retinal thickness (CRT), OCT biomarkers. The results were subsequently statistically evaluated. RESULTS: At the first follow-up after DEX application, there was an average decrease in CRT of 186 ±146µm and a gain of 3 ±7 letters. Positive morphological and functional responses were observed in 39 eyes (92.9%) and 23 eyes (54.8%) respectively. The disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) biomarker was initially present in 41 eyes (97.6%), with reduction or disappearance observed in 13 eyes (31%) post-application. Eyes with ellipsoid zone disruption (EZ disruption) had an average initial BCVA of 49.6 letters, compared to 57.8 letters in the group without this biomarker. The mean gain in BCVA was +8.7 letters in treatment-naive eyes and +2.1 letters in previously treated eyes. Chronic DME was less frequent in treatment-naive (n = 1, 14.3%) compared to previously treated eyes (n = 28, 84.8%). All these results were statistically significant (p < 0.05). An increase in IOP post-DEX application occurred in 9 patients (21.4%). CONCLUSION: Our results confirm DEX as a safe and effective treatment option for DME. Treatment-naive patients achieved better functional outcomes. We confirmed ellipsoid zone disruption (EZ disruption) as a negative biomarker. Additionally, we demonstrated the capacity of DEX to reduce disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL).

• Klíčová slova
• OCT biomarkers, Ozurdex, dexamethasone, diabetic macular edema,
• MeSH
• dexamethason * aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• diabetická retinopatie * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• glukokortikoidy aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• implantované léky * MeSH
• injekce intravitreální * MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• makulární edém * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• optická koherentní tomografie MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• zraková ostrost MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Názvy látek
• dexamethason * MeSH
• glukokortikoidy MeSH
• implantované léky * MeSH

BACKGROUND: Dexamethasone 6 mg in patients with severe COVID-19 has been shown to decrease mortality and morbidity. The effects of higher doses of corticosteroid, that would further increase anti-inflammatory effects, are uncertain. The objective of our study was to assess the effect of 20 mg dexamethasone vs. 6 mg dexamethasone intravenously in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and COVID-19. METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial conducted in nine hospitals in the Czech Republic, we randomized adult patients with ARDS and COVID-19 requiring high-flow oxygen, noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation to receive either intravenous high-dose dexamethasone (20 mg/day on days 1-5, 10 mg/day on days 6-10) or standard-dose dexamethasone (6 mg/d, days 1-10). The primary outcome was 28-day ventilator-free days. The five secondary outcomes were 60-day mortality, C-reactive protein dynamics, 14-day WHO (World Health Organization) Clinical Progression Scale score, adverse events and 90-day Barthel index. The long-term outcomes were 180- and 360-day mortality and the Barthel index. The planned sample size was 300, with interim analysis after enrollment of 150 patients. RESULTS: The trial was stopped due to a lack of recruitment, and the follow-up was completed in February 2023. Among 234 randomized patients of 300 planned patients, the primary outcome was available for 224 patients (110 high-dose and 114 standard-dose dexamethasone; median [interquartile range (IQR)] age, 59.0 [48.5-66.0] years; 130 [58.0%] were receiving noninvasive or invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline). The mean number of 28-day ventilator-free days was 8.9 (± 11.5) days for high-dose dexamethasone and 8.0 (± 10.7) days for standard-dose dexamethasone, with an absolute difference of + 0.81 days (95% CI - 2.12-3.73 days). None of the prespecified secondary outcomes, including adverse events, differed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite not reaching its prespecified enrollment, there was no signal to either benefit or harm high-dose dexamethasone over standard-dose dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19 and moderate-to-severe ARDS. Trial registration Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04663555. Registered 10 December 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04663555?term=NCT04663555&rank=1 and EudraCT: 2020-005887-70.

• Klíčová slova
• ARDS, COVID-19, Dexamethasone, Long-term outcomes, Randomized clinical trial, Ventilator-free days,
• MeSH
• COVID-19 * mortalita   komplikace   MeSH
• dexamethason * aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• farmakoterapie COVID-19 * MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• SARS-CoV-2 MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• syndrom dechové tísně * farmakoterapie   mortalita   MeSH
• umělé dýchání * MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• Geografické názvy
• Česká republika epidemiologie   MeSH
• Názvy látek
• dexamethason * MeSH

PURPOSE: The use of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), a conjugated anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody, is becoming a promising frontline treatment for older patients with ALL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: EWALL-INO is an open-label prospective multicenter phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03249870). Patients age 55 years and older with newly diagnosed CD22+ Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) B-cell precursor (BCP) ALL were eligible. After a prephase, a first induction consisting of vincristine, dexamethasone, and three injections of InO (0.8 mg/m2 day 1, 0.5 mg/m2 day 8/day 15) was followed by a second induction combining cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone, and two injections of InO (0.5 mg/m2 day 1/day 8). Responders received up to six cycles of chemotherapy consolidation and 18-month chemotherapy maintenance. Allotransplant was allowed after three consolidations. The primary end point was 1-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Between December 2017 and March 2022, 131 patients (median age 68 years) were included. Three patients died during induction 1 (n = 130), two from multiple organ failure and one from hemorrhage, and none during induction 2 (n = 120). After induction 2, 90% of the patients achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) and 80% had measurable residual disease (MRD2) <10-4. Among responders (n = 119), 47 relapsed and 14 died in CR/CRp. One-year OS, relapse-free survival (RFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) rates were 73.2%, 66%, and 25%, respectively. High-risk cytogenetics and lower CD22 expression (<70%) were associated with worse OS, while both high-risk cytogenetics and MRD2 ≥10-4 were associated with lower RFS and higher CIR. The 10 allotransplanted patients had very favorable outcomes (90% 2-year OS/RFS and no relapse). Only one nonfatal sinusoidal obstructive syndrome was documented during the study. CONCLUSION: Our results support InO's use in first-line regimens for older patients with CD22+ Ph- BCP-ALL.

• MeSH
• antigeny CD22 * MeSH
• cyklofosfamid aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dexamethason aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• filadelfský chromozom MeSH
• inotuzumab ozogamicin * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• pre-B-buněčná leukemie * farmakoterapie   mortalita   genetika   MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• vinkristin aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze II MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• antigeny CD22 * MeSH
• CD22 protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
• cyklofosfamid MeSH
• dexamethason MeSH
• inotuzumab ozogamicin * MeSH
• vinkristin MeSH

We performed retrospective analysis of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients previously exposed to daratumumab treated with ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (IRd) regimen in real clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate efficacy of IRd in these patients and select a subset of patients that would benefit from this treatment the most. In total, we analyzed 43 daratumumab-exposed RRMM patients treated in our center. Minimal response or better was achieved by 53.5% of patients from the cohort. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.56 months (95% CI: 2.56, 8.03) and median overall survival (OS) was 28.92 months (95% CI: 5.4, NR). Duration of response (DOR) was evaluable in 28 patients and reached a median of 21.3 months (95% CI: 6.85, NR). Next, we evaluated hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PFS. There was improved OS in patients that were not-triple refractory or worse (HR = 0.39, 95%Cl (0.14; 1.10), p = .07) and in patients, that had less than three previous lines of treatment (LOT) (HR = 0.13, 95%Cl (0.03; 0.6) p = .003). Similar to OS, there was improved PFS in patients, that were not triple-refractory or worse (HR = 0.52, 95%Cl (0.25; 1.10), p = .08). We concluded, that the best survival benefit for RRMM patients pretreated with daratumumab to IRd regimen was observed in patients that were not triple-refractory and had less than three previous lines of treatment (LOT). The DOR in these patients was 21.3 months (95% CI: 6.85, NR).

• Klíčová slova
• daratumumab, ixazomib, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma,
• MeSH
• chemorezistence * MeSH
• dexamethason * aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• glycin * analogy a deriváty   aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lenalidomid * aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mnohočetný myelom * farmakoterapie   mortalita   MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky * terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• opakovaná terapie MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• recidiva MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• sloučeniny boru * aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Názvy látek
• daratumumab MeSH Prohlížeč
• dexamethason * MeSH
• glycin * MeSH
• ixazomib MeSH Prohlížeč
• lenalidomid * MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky * MeSH
• sloučeniny boru * MeSH