Current palliative pharmacotherapy of Alzheimer's disease based on the cholinergic hypothesis led to the development of four cholinesterase inhibitors. These compounds can bring prolongation of the symptom-free period in some patients. This is the first report directly comparing donepezil and rivastigmine plasma and brain levels in in-vivo study. Donepezil and rivastigmine were applied i.m. to rats; the dose was calculated from clinical recommendations. The samples were analysed on an Agilent 1260 Series LC with UV/VIS detector. An analytical column (Waters Spherisorb S5 W (250 mm × 4.6 i.d.; 5 μm particle size)) with guard column (Waters Spherisorb S5 W (30 mm × 4.6 mm i.d.)) was used. The mobile phase contained acetonitrile and 50 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate (17:83; v/v); pH 3.1. The LLOQ in rat plasma was 0.5 ng/mL for donepezil and 0.8 ng/mL for rivastigmine, and the LLOQ in rat brain was 1.0 ng/mL for donepezil and 1.1 ng/mL for rivastigmine. Both compounds showed ability to target the central nervous system, with brain concentrations exceeding those in plasma. Maximum brain concentration after i.m. administration was reached in the 36 (8.34 ± 0.34 ng/mL) and 17 minute (6.18 ± 0.40 ng/mL), respectively for donepezil and rivastigmine. The differences in brain profile can be most easily expressed by plasma/brain AUCtotal ratios: donepezil ratio in the brain was nine-times higher than in plasma and rivastigmine ratio was less than two-times higher than in plasma.

• Keywords
• Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, Alzheimer’s disease, Donepezil, HPLC, Rivastigmine,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

BACKGROUND: Intoxication by nerve agents could be prevented by using small acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (eg, pyridostigmine) for potentially exposed personnel. However, the serious side effects of currently used drugs led to research of novel potent molecules for prophylaxis of organophosphorus intoxication. METHODS: The molecular design, molecular docking, chemical synthesis, in vitro methods (enzyme inhibition, cytotoxicity, and nicotinic receptors modulation), and in vivo methods (acute toxicity and prophylactic effect) were used to study bispyridinium, bisquinolinium, bisisoquinolinium, and pyridinium-quinolinium/isoquinolinium molecules presented in this study. RESULTS: The studied molecules showed non-competitive inhibitory ability towards human acetylcholinesterase in vitro that was further confirmed by molecular modelling studies. Several compounds were selected for further studies. First, their cytotoxicity, nicotinic receptors modulation, and acute toxicity (lethal dose for 50% of laboratory animals [LD50]; mice and rats) were tested to evaluate their safety with promising results. Furthermore, their blood levels were measured to select the appropriate time for prophylactic administration. Finally, the protective ratio of selected compounds against soman-induced toxicity was determined when selected compounds were found similarly potent or only slightly better to standard pyridostigmine. CONCLUSION: The presented small bisquaternary molecules did not show overall benefit in prophylaxis of soman-induced in vivo toxicity.

• Keywords
• AChE inhibitors, nerve agents, pre-treatment, prophylaxis, soman, toxicity,
• MeSH
• Acetylcholinesterase metabolism   MeSH
• Cell Line MeSH
• Cholinesterase Inhibitors chemistry   pharmacology   MeSH
• HeLa Cells MeSH
• Small Molecule Libraries chemistry   pharmacology   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Models, Molecular MeSH
• Molecular Structure MeSH
• Nerve Agents adverse effects   MeSH
• Soman adverse effects   MeSH
• Cell Survival drug effects   MeSH
• Dose-Response Relationship, Drug MeSH
• Structure-Activity Relationship MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Names of Substances
• Acetylcholinesterase MeSH
• Cholinesterase Inhibitors MeSH
• Small Molecule Libraries MeSH
• Nerve Agents MeSH
• Soman MeSH