Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

DRAPA trial--closed-suction drains versus closed gravity drains in pancreatic surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

F. Čečka, M. Loveček, B. Jon, P. Skalický, Z. Šubrt, A. Ferko,

. 2015 ; 16 (-) : 207. [pub] 20150507

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16010228

BACKGROUND: The morbidity of pancreatic resection remains high, with pancreatic fistula being the most common cause. The important question is whether any postoperative treatment adjustment may prevent the development of clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistulae. Recent studies have shown that intraabdominal drains and manipulation using them are of great importance. Although authors of a few retrospective reports have described good results of pancreatic resection without the use of intraabdominal drains, a recent prospective randomized trial showed that routine elimination of drains in pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with poor outcome. An important issue arises as to which type of drain is most suitable for pancreatic resection. Two types of surgical drains exist: open drains and closed drains. Open drains are considered obsolete nowadays because of frequent retrograde infection. Closed drains include two types: passive gravity drains and closed-suction drains. Closed-suction drains are more effective, as they remove fluid from the abdominal cavity under light pressure. However, some surgeons believe that closed-suction drains represent a potential hazard to patients and that negative pressure might increase the risk of pancreatic fistulae. Nobody has yet specifically dealt with the question of which kind of drainage is most appropriate in pancreatic surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: The aim of the DRAins in PAncreatic surgery (DRAPA) trial is to compare the closed-suction drain versus the closed passive gravity drain in pancreatic resection. DRAPA is a dual-centre, prospective, randomized controlled trial. The primary endpoint is the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula; the secondary endpoint is postoperative morbidity with follow-up of 3 months. DISCUSSION: No study to date has compared different types of drains in pancreatic surgery. This study is designed to answer the question whether any particular type of drain might lower the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula or other complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01988519. Registered 13 November 2013.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16010228
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160412100221.0
007      
ta
008      
160408s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s13063-015-0706-1 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s13063-015-0706-1 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)25947117
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Čečka, Filip $u Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. filip.cecka@seznam.cz.
245    10
$a DRAPA trial--closed-suction drains versus closed gravity drains in pancreatic surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial / $c F. Čečka, M. Loveček, B. Jon, P. Skalický, Z. Šubrt, A. Ferko,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The morbidity of pancreatic resection remains high, with pancreatic fistula being the most common cause. The important question is whether any postoperative treatment adjustment may prevent the development of clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistulae. Recent studies have shown that intraabdominal drains and manipulation using them are of great importance. Although authors of a few retrospective reports have described good results of pancreatic resection without the use of intraabdominal drains, a recent prospective randomized trial showed that routine elimination of drains in pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with poor outcome. An important issue arises as to which type of drain is most suitable for pancreatic resection. Two types of surgical drains exist: open drains and closed drains. Open drains are considered obsolete nowadays because of frequent retrograde infection. Closed drains include two types: passive gravity drains and closed-suction drains. Closed-suction drains are more effective, as they remove fluid from the abdominal cavity under light pressure. However, some surgeons believe that closed-suction drains represent a potential hazard to patients and that negative pressure might increase the risk of pancreatic fistulae. Nobody has yet specifically dealt with the question of which kind of drainage is most appropriate in pancreatic surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: The aim of the DRAins in PAncreatic surgery (DRAPA) trial is to compare the closed-suction drain versus the closed passive gravity drain in pancreatic resection. DRAPA is a dual-centre, prospective, randomized controlled trial. The primary endpoint is the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula; the secondary endpoint is postoperative morbidity with follow-up of 3 months. DISCUSSION: No study to date has compared different types of drains in pancreatic surgery. This study is designed to answer the question whether any particular type of drain might lower the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula or other complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01988519. Registered 13 November 2013.
650    _2
$a klinické protokoly $7 D002985
650    _2
$a drenáž $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D004322
650    _2
$a design vybavení $7 D004867
650    _2
$a gravitace $7 D006112
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a pankreatektomie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D010180
650    _2
$a pankreatická píštěl $x etiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D010185
650    12
$a pankreatoduodenektomie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D016577
650    _2
$a tlak $7 D011312
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a výzkumný projekt $7 D012107
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a odsávání $7 D013396
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Loveček, Martin $u First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, IP Pavlova 6, 779 00, Olomouc, Czech Republic. mlovecek@seznam.cz.
700    1_
$a Jon, Bohumil $u Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. jon@fnhk.cz.
700    1_
$a Skalický, Pavel $u First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Olomouc, IP Pavlova 6, 779 00, Olomouc, Czech Republic. pavel.skalicky@fnol.cz.
700    1_
$a Šubrt, Zdeněk $u Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. subrt@email.cz. Department of Field Surgery, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence, Třebešská 1575, 500 02, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. subrt@email.cz.
700    1_
$a Ferko, Alexander $u Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, 500 05, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. alexander.ferko@fnhk.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00163187 $t Trials $x 1745-6215 $g Roč. 16, č. - (2015), s. 207
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25947117 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160408 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160412100304 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1113657 $s 934596
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 16 $c - $d 207 $e 20150507 $i 1745-6215 $m Trials $n Trials $x MED00163187
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160408

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...